Re: [cellml-discussion] CellML Versioning Strategy

2007-09-20 Thread David Nickerson
- At the moment, CellML doesn't explicitly support the rem element (remainder function in MathML), even though CellML does allow its use (at the risk of ending in a situation where a model may work fine in a given CellML tool -- that supports the rem element --, but not in a nother -- that

Re: [cellml-discussion] CellML Versioning Strategy

2007-09-19 Thread Alan Garny
At the break-away session on the versioning strategy for CellML (which followed the Auckland CellML meeting today) we discussed the future of how we would version CellML, including whether we would put all elements for the next version of CellML in a completely different namespace, or only

Re: [cellml-discussion] CellML Versioning Strategy

2007-09-19 Thread Andrew Miller
Matt Halstead wrote: Otherwise, Matt wrote: ... You might want to scan a document to see what versions the model conforms up to, but one of the nice things about pushing these new elements/attributes into new namespaces is that you can still treat a model as say 1.1 even if it contains

Re: [cellml-discussion] CellML Versioning Strategy

2007-09-19 Thread Andrew Miller
Alan Garny wrote: At the break-away session on the versioning strategy for CellML (which followed the Auckland CellML meeting today) we discussed the future of how we would version CellML, including whether we would put all elements for the next version of CellML in a completely different

[cellml-discussion] CellML Versioning Strategy

2007-09-18 Thread Andrew Miller
Hi all, At the break-away session on the versioning strategy for CellML (which followed the Auckland CellML meeting today) we discussed the future of how we would version CellML, including whether we would put all elements for the next version of CellML in a completely different namespace, or

[cellml-discussion] CellML Versioning Strategy

2007-09-18 Thread Matt Halstead
Andrew was opposed to the idea of changing all the namespaces, and suggested changing the namespace of a particular element in only some circumstances: I agree very strongly with this. It would make writing out xpath expressions simpler since you know absolutely what namespace for what elements

Re: [cellml-discussion] CellML Versioning Strategy

2007-09-18 Thread Matt Halstead
On 9/19/07, Andrew Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Matt Halstead wrote: Andrew was opposed to the idea of changing all the namespaces, and suggested changing the namespace of a particular element in only some circumstances: I agree very strongly with this. It would make writing out