Re: [cellml-discussion] New draft secondary specification: Uncertainty

2012-05-29 Thread Alan Garny
- boun...@cellml.org] On Behalf Of Andrew Miller Sent: 29 May 2012 01:28 To: cellml-discussion@cellml.org Subject: [cellml-discussion] New draft secondary specification: Uncertainty Hi all, I've just put up a draft secondary specification on how we could represent parameter uncertainty

Re: [cellml-discussion] New draft secondary specification: Uncertainty

2012-05-29 Thread Michael Clerx
Dear all, I'm glad to see uncertainty being taken into acount in cell models. Perhaps it would be worthwhile to add the scenario where no assumptions are made about the uncertainty and a parameter value is simply given by its upper and lower bounds. kind regards, Michael On 05/29/2012

Re: [cellml-discussion] New draft secondary specification: Uncertainty

2012-05-29 Thread Andrew Miller
On 29/05/12 20:17, Michael Clerx wrote: Dear all, I'm glad to see uncertainty being taken into acount in cell models. Perhaps it would be worthwhile to add the scenario where no assumptions are made about the uncertainty and a parameter value is simply given by its upper and lower bounds. I

[cellml-discussion] New draft secondary specification: Uncertainty

2012-05-28 Thread Andrew Miller
Hi all, I've just put up a draft secondary specification on how we could represent parameter uncertainty within the context of my CellML 1.2 draft. The secondary specification can be viewed here: http://www.cellml.org/Members/miller/draft-secondary-spec-uncertainty/ The DocBook it is