+1
Regards,
Wilfred
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:cellml-discussion-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Alan Garny
Sent: Wednesday, November 07, 2007 12:46 AM
To: 'CellML Discussion List'
Subject: Re: [cellml-discussion] Representing the next version
of
theCellML Specification
I don't know much (if anything!) about the solutions offered
here, but:
- the current HTML version is nice for viewing from a web
browser, but
if
you have ever tried to print things out you will no doubt have
noticed
that
it doesn't look great anymore. I remember that there used to be
a
'proper'
PDF version of the specifications. I really wish we still had
something
like
that.
- Besides the obvious (i.e. easy to use, easy to maintain, well-
established
technology, etc.), I am not too fussed about the solution we go
for, as
long
as it is suitable for the end user (e.g. looks nice both on and
off the
web
site).
This being all said, and based on Andrew's pros/cons, I would
personally
vote for DocBook.
Alan.
_______________________________________________
cellml-discussion mailing list
cellml-discussion@cellml.org
http://www.cellml.org/mailman/listinfo/cellml-discussion
_______________________________________________
cellml-discussion mailing list
cellml-discussion@cellml.org
http://www.cellml.org/mailman/listinfo/cellml-discussion
