Re: [cellml-discussion] ABI CellML Meeting Minutes, 10th August, 2011

2011-08-12 Thread Alan Garny
Hi,

Having just read the minutes of this week's CellML meeting, I would like to
clarify the situation with regards to the TeLICeMS grammar...

I wrote the initial OpenCell's COR view more than a year ago. From there,
Andrew (I wasn't involved in that decision) decided to implement the
TeLICeMS service based on my code. So, yes, unless Andrew drastically
changed the grammar I used for the then OpenCell's COR view, it should be
very similar to the one used in TeLICeMs.

However, I have nothing and had nothing to do with the current
minus/negative solution. As it happens, I am against it (see
https://tracker.physiomeproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2990). To me, it goes
against what I was trying to do with OpenCell's COR view, i.e. make it as
simple as possible for a user to edit a CellML file and leave it to the
software to decide how to serialise a model in CellML.

Alan

 -Original Message-
 From: cellml-discussion-boun...@cellml.org [mailto:cellml-discussion-
 boun...@cellml.org] On Behalf Of Dougal Cowan
 Sent: 12 August 2011 03:14
 To: CellML Discussion List
 Subject: [cellml-discussion] ABI CellML Meeting Minutes, 10th August, 2011
 
 I have put the minutes from this week's meeting up at:
 
 http://www.cellml.org/community/meeting/minutes/2011/08.10
 
 Cheers,
 Dougal
 
 ___
 cellml-discussion mailing list
 cellml-discussion@cellml.org
 http://lists.cellml.org/mailman/listinfo/cellml-discussion

___
cellml-discussion mailing list
cellml-discussion@cellml.org
http://lists.cellml.org/mailman/listinfo/cellml-discussion


[cellml-discussion] ABI CellML Meeting Minutes, 10th August, 2011

2011-08-11 Thread Dougal Cowan

I have put the minutes from this week's meeting up at:

http://www.cellml.org/community/meeting/minutes/2011/08.10

Cheers,
Dougal

___
cellml-discussion mailing list
cellml-discussion@cellml.org
http://lists.cellml.org/mailman/listinfo/cellml-discussion