Re: [cellml-discussion] Solicitation of feedback on CellML 1.2

2012-11-04 Thread Jonathan Cooper
Hi all, Just wanted to respond to a couple of points. On 30/10/2012 02:53, Andrew Miller wrote: On 29/10/12 22:36, David Nickerson wrote: In addition, we specifically ask for feedback on the issue of moving to MathML 3.0 (tracker item 67 https://tracker.physiomeproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=67)

Re: [cellml-discussion] Solicitation of feedback on CellML 1.2

2012-11-04 Thread Andrew Miller
On 05/11/12 10:10, Jonathan Cooper wrote: Hi all, Just wanted to respond to a couple of points. On 30/10/2012 02:53, Andrew Miller wrote: On 29/10/12 22:36, David Nickerson wrote: In addition, we specifically ask for feedback on the issue of moving to MathML 3.0 (tracker item 67

Re: [cellml-discussion] Solicitation of feedback on CellML 1.2

2012-10-29 Thread Peter Hunter
Hi Andre, Support for models with parameter uncertainty is pretty urgent in relation to grants but I'm in your hands re optimal strategy for getting there. Cheers, Peter -- Sent using BlackBerry From: David Nickerson [mailto:david.nicker...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday,

Re: [cellml-discussion] Solicitation of feedback on CellML 1.2

2012-10-29 Thread Andrew Miller
On 29/10/12 22:36, David Nickerson wrote: *Dear all, At the 5th International CellML Workshop http://www.cellml.org/community/events/workshop/2011/, we discussed the main list of features that were desirable to have in CellML 1.2. The CellML Editorial Board has been discussing the