Re: [cellml-discussion] Proposal: BCP for including external code inCellML models

2007-03-15 Thread David Nickerson
> 3) Do you agree with the basic premise of the proposal, that is that > it is better to have a model which is partly expressed in CellML, than > to have a model which is entirely expressed in a more general > programming language? yes. > 4) Do the best practice guidelines for CellML auth

Re: [cellml-discussion] Proposal: BCP for including external code inCellML models

2007-03-15 Thread Andrew Miller
David Nickerson wrote: >> 3) Do you agree with the basic premise of the proposal, that is that >> it is better to have a model which is partly expressed in CellML, than >> to have a model which is entirely expressed in a more general >> programming language? >> > > yes. > > >> 4) Do

Re: [cellml-discussion] Proposal: BCP for including external codeinCellML models

2007-03-15 Thread David Nickerson
> ECMAScript is not practical for use in modelling, because it is an > interpreted, non-typed language, which necessarily means that it cannot > be compiled and will be slower than compiled code. But CellML is an language for the description and exchange of mathematical models. It is not meant