Re: [cellml-discussion] [team-cellml] @cellml.org addresses

2007-06-25 Thread Matt
This seems like it's going in circles. I'm not really sure why anyone would want to contact us personally with something they didn't want to send to the list. Thinking about this more we should probably try: 1) cellml-discussion@cellml.org 2) [EMAIL PROTECTED] - for specific enquiries that you

Re: [cellml-discussion] [team-cellml] @cellml.org addresses

2007-06-25 Thread David Nickerson
Matt wrote: On 6/25/07, David Nickerson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Matt wrote: This seems like it's going in circles. I'm not really sure why anyone would want to contact us personally with something they didn't want to send to the list. Thinking about this more we should probably try: 1)

Re: [cellml-discussion] [team-cellml] @cellml.org addresses

2007-06-25 Thread Matt
On 6/25/07, David Nickerson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Matt wrote: On 6/25/07, David Nickerson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Matt wrote: This seems like it's going in circles. I'm not really sure why anyone would want to contact us personally with something they didn't want to send to the

Re: [cellml-discussion] [team-cellml] @cellml.org addresses

2007-06-25 Thread David Nickerson
Matt wrote: This seems like it's going in circles. I'm not really sure why anyone would want to contact us personally with something they didn't want to send to the list. Thinking about this more we should probably try: 1) cellml-discussion@cellml.org 2) [EMAIL PROTECTED] - for specific

Re: [cellml-discussion] [team-cellml] @cellml.org addresses

2007-06-25 Thread James Lawson
Matt wrote: This seems like it's going in circles. I'm not really sure why anyone would want to contact us personally with something they didn't want to send to the list. Wasn't this originally your suggestion? Thinking about this more we should probably try: 1)