David Nickerson wrote:
Hi Tommy,
That looks good - its all starting to make sense to me now.
I'm just wondering how your system would handle a case where two authors
independently encode the same published model. The first author to
upload their encoding would get ownership of the
This is my view of where things should be heading:
The main impetus for this thread is moving the cellml.org site
forward. In this sense I would like to see a description of what it
currently does and what features have been informally slated.
Then I'd like to see a document that re-writes these
Hi Randall,
Two quick points. PCEnv is an Auckland tool and as discussed previously
it should be kept quite distinct from the community sections of
cellml.org - i.e., there shouldn't be a common tracker for PCEnv and the
specifications and cellml.org etc.
Secondly, Matt and I have been
Hi,
There has been some discussion recently about how best to handle local
CellML addresses (which can be used by local groups with an interest in
CellML to arrange meetings and hold other discussions which are purely
local in scope and not of interest to the broader CellML community).
At the
David Nickerson wrote:
Hi Randall,
Two quick points. PCEnv is an Auckland tool and as discussed previously
it should be kept quite distinct from the community sections of
cellml.org - i.e., there shouldn't be a common tracker for PCEnv and the
specifications and cellml.org etc.
I
Andrew Miller wrote:
Hi,
At the Auckland CellML meeting today, we discussed the possibility of
changing to a better tracker and moving some of the mailing list
discussions onto that tracker. Everyone at the meeting agreed with this
idea, so I am now looking for some input from the wider
David Nickerson wrote:
Hi Andrew,
I think this is an excessive response to a very minor problem. I very
easily see this evolving into many separate and distinct local
communities with little interaction.
The intention is that these lists only be used for messages like 'There
is a meeting
David Nickerson wrote:
Andrew Miller wrote:
Hi,
At the Auckland CellML meeting today, we discussed the possibility of
changing to a better tracker and moving some of the mailing list
discussions onto that tracker. Everyone at the meeting agreed with this
idea, so I am now looking for
Andrew Miller wrote:
David Nickerson wrote:
Hi Andrew,
I think this is an excessive response to a very minor problem. I very
easily see this evolving into many separate and distinct local
communities with little interaction.
The intention is that these lists only be used for messages like
Andrew Miller wrote:
Hi,
...
I would recommend Bugzilla (Randall also mentioned JIRA, but it seems to
be a commercial product, and price aside, if we can't review the tracker
source code I'm not sure we should trust it with our data).
Jira provide their source code (surprising as that
David Nickerson wrote:
Andrew Miller wrote:
David Nickerson wrote:
Hi Andrew,
I think this is an excessive response to a very minor problem. I very
easily see this evolving into many separate and distinct local
communities with little interaction.
The intention is that
Andrew Miller wrote:
Hi,
There has been some discussion recently about how best to handle local
CellML addresses (which can be used by local groups with an interest in
CellML to arrange meetings and hold other discussions which are purely
local in scope and not of interest to the broader
12 matches
Mail list logo
