Re: [cellml-discussion] Base normative CellML Specification for further work

2008-01-17 Thread Alan Garny
Dear Andrew, I quite like the structure of your document. Just one thing though: I would like, at this stage, to suggest references to the official CellML specification. Indeed, you are no doubt very familiar with the official CellML specification, but in my case it has been years since I have

Re: [cellml-discussion] Base normative CellML Specification for further work

2008-01-17 Thread Andrew Miller
Randall Britten wrote: 18.3 point 9 defines the hidden set for a *component*. 18.4 point 6 refers to the hidden set of a *variable*. Similar for encapsulated set and sibling set. Might be OK as is, but what do you think? Thanks Randall, this is exactly the type of issue we need to