Poul Nielsen wrote:
> Dear Andrew
>
> I hope that I am interpreting the EBNF notation correctly (although
> the expression seems to be BNF, not EBNF - although W3C seems to use
> the BNF notation). Doesn't
> identifier ::= ('_')* ( letter ) ( letter | '_' | digit )*
> indicate that any number o
Oops, I take that back. My expression doesn't reflect the requirement
that an identifier must contain at least one letter.
identifier ::= ('_')* ( letter ) ( letter | '_' | digit )*
seems to be correct.
On 2007 Nov 22, at 09:52, Poul Nielsen wrote:
> Dear Andrew
>
> I hope that I am interpretin
Dear Andrew
I hope that I am interpreting the EBNF notation correctly (although
the expression seems to be BNF, not EBNF - although W3C seems to use
the BNF notation). Doesn't
identifier ::= ('_')* ( letter ) ( letter | '_' | digit )*
indicate that any number of '_' symbols may form the beginn
llML.
> Subject: [cellml-discussion] Question on community's preferred way to
> resolve CellML 1.1 identifier contradiction
>
> Hi all,
>
> I have been working on writing up a purely normative, unambiguous draft
> of the CellML specification to facilitate discussions of
Hi all,
I have been working on writing up a purely normative, unambiguous draft
of the CellML specification to facilitate discussions of how to improve
CellML in the future. As part of this, I have been rewriting most of the
text of the specification to follow good practices for normative
spec
