Re: [cellml-discussion] Proof of concept: using git for specification development

2007-11-11 Thread Andrew Miller
Alan Garny wrote: git is also a distributed version control system - the two tools have a fairly similar conceptual model in terms of how they work, with a lot of flow of ideas between the too tools. I have found git slightly faster and a bit more extensible (and with a larger set of commands

Re: [cellml-discussion] Proof of concept: using git for specification development

2007-11-11 Thread Andrew Miller
Alan Garny wrote: Andrew Miller wrote: Alan Garny wrote: There are viewable web interfaces for git - see the gitweb at e.g. http://repo.or.cz/w/cellml-draft- miller.git?a=tree;h=normative;hb=normative How does it work? Using Opera, if I click on blob for abstract.xml, I

Re: [cellml-discussion] Proof of concept: using git for specification development

2007-11-10 Thread Bob Gustafson
Sounds pretty good. Bob G On Sun, 2007-11-11 at 15:16 +1300, Andrew Miller wrote: Bob Gustafson wrote: Besides git, there is Subversion and a new distributed SCM: Mercurial http://www.selenic.com/mercurial/wiki/ Being distributed, it may have advantages for cellml, considering

Re: [cellml-discussion] Proof of concept: using git for specification development

2007-11-09 Thread Bob Gustafson
Besides git, there is Subversion and a new distributed SCM: Mercurial http://www.selenic.com/mercurial/wiki/ Being distributed, it may have advantages for cellml, considering the worldwide spread of cellml participants. Bob G On Thu, 2007-11-08 at 13:44 +1300, Andrew Miller wrote: Hi