On 28 July 2007, Akemi Yagi wrote:
A nice catch. As you know, typos are a hallmark for some CentOS
developers and an integral part of the CentOS project because they
make this OS stand out. :-)
I laughed, when I read that! I believe they want to make it as perfect
as they possibly can.
On 28 July 2007, simon wrote:
I have recently installed centOS 5 on DELL pentium 2.7ghz (model
optiplex GX270) and have 512 memory
I do not have a CentOS 5 box yet, Below is on a CentOS 4.4 box. A low
end Dell Dimension 2400 (Celeron 2.6 GHz, with 512 MB RAM and integrated
video and sound). I
I have a dual Xeon 3.2GHz XDMCP server serving out about 50 Gnome
desktops to thin clients. I currently am running 32 bit with 4GB of
memory. Performance is fine, normally, and the machine runs with about
3GB in swap. However, if a user app suddenly sucks up the maximum
allowed rss and virtual
Peter Kjellstrom wrote:
On Saturday 28 July 2007, Johnny Hughes wrote:
Alexander Georgiev wrote:
...
Ok, and should I mix disks from different vendors? I have read
somewhere that this augments the reliability of the array, lowering
the probability of 2 disks and more go down
On Sat, 28 Jul 2007, Akemi Yagi wrote:
A nice catch. As you know, typos are a hallmark for some CentOS
developers and an integral part of the CentOS project because they
make this OS stand out. :-)
hey -- I resemble that
-- Russ Herrold
orc_orc on IRC
On 7/29/07, R P Herrold [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 28 Jul 2007, Akemi Yagi wrote:
A nice catch. As you know, typos are a hallmark for some CentOS
developers and an integral part of the CentOS project because they
make this OS stand out. :-)
hey -- I resemble that
-- Russ
Please unsubscribe me from the Centos mailing list.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Robert J. Thompson schrieb:
Please unsubscribe me from the Centos mailing list.
Mail header content:
List-Unsubscribe: http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos,
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Your turn to do it yourself in one of the 2 named fashions.
Alexander
drew einhorn wrote:
Dumb question.
Can't we identify the source of the package by looking at the signature.
Signature, vendor, etc... right. Pretty much why epel (so far) didn't see
the need/value in the complexity/overhead of introducing repotags.
That said, my personal opinion is/was
On 28 July 2007, Dag Wieers wrote:
snip
Let me add that an effort to make sure EPEL is compatible with
RPMforge failed as EPEL wants to become the only repository for RHEL
and there is no interest to consider current RPMforge users.
EPEL refused the repotag, so one cannot easily identify
Hi,
I installed mrtg on centos5 with 14all.cgi script.
I downloaded it from below URL.
http://my14all.sourceforge.net/14all-1.1.txt and copies it as 14all.cgi @
/var/www/cg-bin
I made a few changes to the script. Those changes can be seen in BOLDletteres.
# if MRTG_lib.pm (from mrtg) is not
11 matches
Mail list logo
