I search from google on how to restrict user from
sending mail and I did trial and errors for three days
already but to no success. What I want to do is to
restrict some user in sending mail while some
unrestricted user will send mail to internet and
intranet. I am able to restrict outside address
On Friday 07 September 2007, umair shakil wrote:
> Dear All,
>
> Salam!!!
>
> Well i am using CentOS release 4.3 (Final). From the start i installed the
> CentOs plus kernal;
>
> CentOS (2.6.9-42.0.8.plus.c4smp)
That is an updated centos-4.4 kernel
> I was facing the problem, that is system powe
Karanbir Singh wrote:
Hi,
CentOS seems to be doing really well in the hosting business these
days, and even for people who would normally have used Windows or OSX
on the hosting previously, are now looking at using CentOS. And I
thought it would be nice to have a section on the wiki about exa
Dear All,
Salam!!!
Well i am using CentOS release 4.3 (Final). From the start i installed the
CentOs plus kernal;
CentOS (2.6.9-42.0.8.plus.c4smp)
I was facing the problem, that is system poweroffs, as this was happening
randomly, but always found
this problem in the night or even early mornin
If your bios has onboard logging don't forget to check it.
Geoff
Sent from my BlackBerry wireless handheld.
-Original Message-
From: Steven Vishoot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2007 12:08:12
To:CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Random Reboots
--- Bazooka Joe <[EMAI
I'm wondering if anybody has any experience running bacula with a Sony
LIB-81 tape library preferably on CentOS?
A bit more specifically I'm looking at either a LIB-81/A4 or a LIB-81/A5
and switching to bacula because we are starting to need something more
robust than simple tar/dump for backups.
Set up a cron task. I have an auto reboot set up every 6 hours in case I goof
up ssh by sending the cpu usage through the roof (beats paying the colo people
to reboot a system repeatedly).
Geoff
Sent from my BlackBerry wireless handheld.
-Original Message-
From: Scott Ehrlich <[EMAIL
I have RHEL5 Server originally configured and installed by me with Firewall
enabled, but passing through NFS, Samba, and SSH. I then disabled SELinux.
As you all likely recall, I had configured a test environment to get samba and
nfs/nis up and running. I got it going, and recently brought i
On 9/6/07, Bart Schaefer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I notice that the same versions of kmod-xfs and xfsprogs etc. are in
> both the extras and centosplus repositories for centos5.
>
> Is there any particular reason to use the centosplus kernel if what
> I'm primarily interested in is XFS filesyst
I notice that the same versions of kmod-xfs and xfsprogs etc. are in
both the extras and centosplus repositories for centos5.
Is there any particular reason to use the centosplus kernel if what
I'm primarily interested in is XFS filesystem support?
I presume that if I am using the plus kernel, th
In older version of centos there was cpuspeed -d running that controlled
current speed.
In centos 5 it is set for on demand and cpuspeed is not running.
I can startup cpuspeed and send it a signal SIGUSR1 to go full speed.
This works.
However, What is the correct or prefered method to contro
Hey All,
I'm trying to upgrade to perl 5.8.8 via CentOSPlus, but am having no
luck. Here is what I have done.
# yum list | grep perl
. . .
perl.i3863:5.8.5-12.1 installed
. . .
Created /etc/yum.repos.d/CentOS-Base.repo with:
#additional packages that
--- Bazooka Joe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> agree w/ Miark - i spent a month thinking my
> rebooting issue was
> software when it turned out to be a failing battery
> backup unit.
>
> On 9/5/07, Miark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > my other question where can i look (logs, files,
> > > Direct
On Thu, 2007-09-06 at 07:33 -0400, Michael Velez wrote:
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Juan C. Valido
> > Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2007 5:33 AM
> > To: centos@centos.org
> > Subject: [CentOS] Places > Connect to Ser
On Thu, 2007-09-06 at 11:14 -0700, Akemi Yagi wrote:
> On 9/6/07, Juan C. Valido <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Thu, 2007-09-06 at 02:44 -0700, Akemi Yagi wrote:
> > > On 9/6/07, Juan C. Valido <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > This is not too Important but Places > Connect to Server > Windows
Can someone explain the changes in the system PAM setup for Centos5 vs.
earlier verions? I have servers configured to use SMB authentication
against a Windows domain controller so I don't have to deal with
separate passwords. That still works the same for users that actually
have local accou
Peter Kjellstrom napsal(a):
> We see it too. My assumption is that it has to do with slow mirror sync
> somehow. It seems a bunch of mirrors typically sit on a old or new version
> that does not work with the local data (previously pulled from another
> mirror). My typical fix is to ignore it (e
On 9/6/07, Juan C. Valido <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-09-06 at 02:44 -0700, Akemi Yagi wrote:
> > On 9/6/07, Juan C. Valido <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > This is not too Important but Places > Connect to Server > Windows Share
> > > Doesn't work for me also Places > Network Servers
Ray Leventhal schrieb am 06.09.2007 17:08:
> Karanbir Singh wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> CentOS seems to be doing really well in the hosting business these
>> days, and even for people who would normally have used Windows or OSX
>> on the hosting previously, are now looking at using CentOS. And I
>> though
Karanbir Singh wrote:
> Hi,
>
> CentOS seems to be doing really well in the hosting business these
> days, and even for people who would normally have used Windows or OSX
> on the hosting previously, are now looking at using CentOS. And I
> thought it would be nice to have a section on the wiki abo
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of D.Terweij |
NTG-Support
>
> From: "Karanbir Singh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > CentOS seems to be doing really well in the hosting
> business these days,
> > and even for people who would normally have used Windows or
> OSX on the
>
CentOS is doing well in the webhosting business for the same reason
"the upstream provider" is doing well in the enterprise data center.
Webhosting companies have recognized the low TCO CentOS brings to the
table, as well as it's binary compatibility with RHEL and the benefits
that come
semi linux wrote:
Here is the relevant section of the kickstart: (does prompt for pw):
lang en_US
keyboard us
timezone America/Los_Angeles --utc
rootpw textpw
# rootpw --iscrypted ***
reboot
logging --level=debug
graphical
# text
install
autostep --autoscreenshot
driverdisk -
On 9/6/07, D.Terweij | NTG-Support <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: "Karanbir Singh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > CentOS seems to be doing really well in the hosting business these days,
> > and even for people who would normally have used Windows or OSX on the
> > hosting previously, are now looking
From: "Karanbir Singh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CentOS seems to be doing really well in the hosting business these days,
and even for people who would normally have used Windows or OSX on the
hosting previously, are now looking at using CentOS. And I thought it
would be nice to have a section on the
For me it doesn't have to do with cost. It has to do with I've used
RedHat Linux since 1995, then RHEL, then CentOS. And all this time
I've used some form of RedHat or derivative on all my servers. I
prefer to stick with what I know.
Also, you'll notice that the majority of pre-packed Control P
On Thursday 06 September 2007, Phil Schaffner wrote:
> http://www.linuxforums.org/forum/peripherals-hardware/35963-cpu-naming-sche
>mes-x86-386-486-586-amd-64-ia64-em64t.html
A small update, Intel now refers to EM64T as Intel-64. This obviously to add
to the confusion and possible mixup with Inte
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Karanbir Singh
>
> Hi,
>
> CentOS seems to be doing really well in the hosting business
> these days, and
> even for people who would normally have used Windows or OSX
> on the hosting
> previously, are now looking at using CentO
On Thu, 2007-09-06 at 10:15 -0300, Centos wrote:
> Hello
>
> I am downloading Centos, but I don't know What is the difference between
> Centos 5 and Centos 5.0
None, currently. 5 is a link pointing to the latest 5.x release, and
until 5.1 hits the streets, "max[x] = 0".
> also as far as I reme
Hello
I am downloading Centos, but I don't know What is the difference between
Centos 5 and Centos 5.0
also as far as I remember any rpm or file ending with 64 designed for
AMD 64 bit,
can I install CentOS-5.0-x86_64-bin-DVD.iso on Intel 64 bit as well ?
Thanks
Hi,
CentOS seems to be doing really well in the hosting business these days, and
even for people who would normally have used Windows or OSX on the hosting
previously, are now looking at using CentOS. And I thought it would be nice to
have a section on the wiki about exactly why that is.
Not
agree w/ Miark - i spent a month thinking my rebooting issue was
software when it turned out to be a failing battery backup unit.
On 9/5/07, Miark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > my other question where can i look (logs, files,
> > Directories) or something to install to see what is
> > causing the
On Thu, 2007-09-06 at 02:44 -0700, Akemi Yagi wrote:
> On 9/6/07, Juan C. Valido <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > This is not too Important but Places > Connect to Server > Windows Share
> > Doesn't work for me also Places > Network Servers > Windows Network
> > doesn't work for me either. Samba, Map
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Juan C. Valido
> Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2007 5:33 AM
> To: centos@centos.org
> Subject: [CentOS] Places > Connect to Server > Windows Share
> Doesn't workfor me
>
> This is not too Importan
On 9/6/07, Juan C. Valido <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is not too Important but Places > Connect to Server > Windows Share
> Doesn't work for me also Places > Network Servers > Windows Network
> doesn't work for me either. Samba, Mapping Windows Shares and Print
> Sharing work fine. Just curio
This is not too Important but Places > Connect to Server > Windows Share
Doesn't work for me also Places > Network Servers > Windows Network
doesn't work for me either. Samba, Mapping Windows Shares and Print
Sharing work fine. Just curious, Thanks
___
C
36 matches
Mail list logo
