Bart Schaefer napsal(a):
> This is way off-peak time for us (middle of Sunday night PDT) so I
> suspect looking at this right now is not very useful, but:
Well, it's really way-off now. I dare to say it's conntrack anyway. If
there are client behind NAT using P2P... then 1 client can have
thousand
On 9/9/07, David Hrbác( <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> how many connections are on the router (/proc/net/ip_conntrack) ?
This is way off-peak time for us (middle of Sunday night PDT) so I
suspect looking at this right now is not very useful, but:
# cat /proc/net/ip_conntrack | wc -l
15140
# cat /
Bart Schaefer napsal(a):
> I can't find any recent statistics for Linux NAT performance, but the
> older stuff I can find (e.g. 50k packets/sec for a P3-450Mhz) seems to
> indicate that the gateway should easily be up to the task of handling
> the NAT traffic. Am I wrong about this? Is there any
You has said that box makes only routing functions, so... it's not a
CentOS related item, but maybe you should to consider to purchase and
learn to manage a pfSense appliance[1]. It's simply wonderful.
http://www.pfsense.com/
--
Thanks,
Jordi Espasa Clofent
I am using jaxtr, and if you also sign up, we can talk for free on the phone at
any time.
-milind
P.S. Here is the link to sign up:
http://www.jaxtr.com/user/ticket?n=T1s7331ncxgm2p&type=joininvite
---
Delivered by jaxtr, Inc., 855 Oak Grove Avenue, Suite 100, Menlo Park,
California 94025.
On 9/9/07, Barry Brimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Maybe it is time for some kernel networking tuning.
>
> Add the following lines to /etc/sysctl.conf
Thanks, will try. Question: Why does ip_local_port_range matter?
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@cen
LAN-to-gateway traffic (e.g., a test FTP of a large file from the
gateway to a machine on one of the LANs) begins to degrade as the
LAN-to-internet traffic increases. That's not surprising, but it
degrades disproportionately, i.e. when the FTP begins to show
intermittent stalls, the total traffic
On Sun, 2007-09-09 at 11:49 -0700, Dan Dansereau wrote:
> The G77 Is missing – and when I ask it to install – it states that is
> already installed.
Why do you think it's missing?
--
Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PLEASE don't CC me; I'm already subscribed
signature.asc
Descriptio
Expensive yet stable
www.realnetworks.com
free basic trial server and 30 day large server software trials
after playing with the free trial client, we paid the $199.95 plus tax for
the client to get linux and "other" feature support with it.
Haven't played with the linux side of the client muc
Stewart Walker wrote:
>
> We have been exploring the possibilities using Centos5 for
> video. Video and Audio Streaming sounds like great fun.
>
> Subject is pretty new to us here and well there was nothing
> else to do but take the dive.
>
> After much time beating our heads against the wall
On Fri, 2007-09-07 at 14:11 -0700, Scott Silva wrote:
> Centos spake the following on 9/7/2007 1:38 PM:
> > I have another question.
> > if I mount a filesystem on root partition,
> > is inodes on mounted file system is going to be added to root inodes ?
If you mean you mount the FS over /, you lo
On Fri, 2007-09-07 at 23:13 +0800, Kuang-Chun Cheng wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have CentOS 5.0 which use an old hard disk. And recently I found
> there are some bad sector on it ... I try to backup my data to other
> CentOS 5.0 box
>
> What I did is. I remove the old HD (with bad sector) and inst
Thanks for the help.
On 9/9/07, William L. Maltby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Sat, 2007-09-08 at 16:34 +1000, Steven Haigh wrote:
> > On 08/09/2007, at 4:30 PM, chuck wrote:
> > > I am using CENTOS 5 and I am stuck where I have to repair my boot
> > > loader and all of the files are read onl
On Sat, 2007-09-08 at 16:34 +1000, Steven Haigh wrote:
> On 08/09/2007, at 4:30 PM, chuck wrote:
> > I am using CENTOS 5 and I am stuck where I have to repair my boot
> > loader and all of the files are read only so I cannot fix them.
> >
> > How do I get around this?
> >
>
> mount -o remount,rw
We have been exploring the possibilities using Centos5 for video. Video and
Audio Streaming sounds like great fun.
Subject is pretty new to us here and well there was nothing else to do but take
the dive.
After much time beating our heads against the wall and covering the planet
google'ing a
> Date: Sat, 8 Sep 2007 12:33:52 -0500 (CDT)
> From: Barry Brimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] imap webmail client needed
> To: CentOS mailing list
> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
>> Hi list,
>>
>> I´m searching a webmail imap client
Bart Schaefer wrote:
>
> On 9/9/07, Barry Brimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > What is the speed of the link between you and the ISP?
>
> 100Mb/s.
>
> > Do they have other customer sites that are set up the same
> way as yours
> > that get significantly better performance?
>
> They don't h
How do I force the package manager to re-install a package?
Such as Development - > Development Tools -> G77
Or the entire Development tools package?
The G77 Is missing - and when I ask it to install - it states that is
already installed.
Thanks
Dan A. Dansereau
_
On 9/9/07, Barry Brimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What is the speed of the link between you and the ISP?
100Mb/s.
> Do they have other customer sites that are set up the same way as yours
> that get significantly better performance?
They don't have any other sites set up this way to compare.
On 9/8/07, Ross S. W. Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Has the Internet interface reached it's max capacity?
No.
> Or are you saying that LAN-to-LAN traffic maxs out at 10Mbps, it is
> a little vague.
LAN-to-gateway traffic (e.g., a test FTP of a large file from the
gateway to a machine on o
The other side is a high-end Cisco router managed by our ISP. Its
their router statistics that tell us we're peaking at just over 10Mb/s
coming out of the gateway box. That was where we first assumed the
problem must be, so we've been working with them on this problem for
some while now and have
On 9/9/07, Robert - elists <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What switch is it?
LinkSys Etherfast, a couple of years old now (I'd have to go to our
colocation site to look in the cabinet to get the exact model). it's
a plain dumb switch, no management interface.
> Evidentally, there much be a switch
On 06 September 2007, Karanbir Singh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> CentOS seems to be doing really well in the hosting business these
> days, and even for people who would normally have used Windows or OSX
> on the hosting previously, are now looking at using CentOS. And I
> thought it would be n
On 04 September 2007, Phil Schaffner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Message: 1
> Date: Tue, 04 Sep 2007 09:12:34 -0400
> From: Phil Schaffner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> No new partition is needed. VMware virtual disks are created as files
> within the hosts OS. That's not a lot of free space to play wi
On 9/8/07, Melinda Odom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Will php 5.2 be available for centos 5? The version in the mirror is php
> 5.1.6-12.
>
Try
http://remi.collet.free.fr/rpms/
Regards,
--
Laurentiu Coica
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.
I have a vsftp server hosted on custom dyndns site. We have a 4mb ADSL
connection. When I tried to download the files from the ftp server with wan
IP address or the dyndns address it downloads some files and disconnects.
Please find below an extract from the log file (ace ftp client). I would
appr
On 9/9/07, Timothy Kesten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Am Sonntag, 9. September 2007 12:28 schrieb Akemi Yagi:
> > A minor correction; kaffeine is packaged by Dries not dag.
> That's wrong
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ yum list kaffeine
> .
> Available Packages
> kaffeine.i386
>
> We have a single 3GHz P4 box w/2GB RAM running CentOS 3.8, acting as a
> gateway, which serves multiple IP address, having one virtual
> interface for each IP, e.g., eth0:1, eth0:2, etc. These
> interfaces/IPs are on the public internet. Each of these IP addresses
> is the NAT address for a
OS: CentOS 5.0 x86.
Ioannis Vranos wrote:
Q1: Is it possible different users to have different language interfaces
(menus etc) on the same machine under X.Org (GNOME or KDE)?
Q2: Is it possible to have more than one X.Org sessions running on the
same machine, so as different users to log in a
Q1: Is it possible different users to have different language interfaces
(menus etc) on the same machine under X.Org (GNOME or KDE)?
Q2: Is it possible to have more than one X.Org sessions running on the
same machine, so as different users to log in at the same time, and
switch between users X
Am Sonntag, 9. September 2007 12:28 schrieb Akemi Yagi:
> A minor correction; kaffeine is packaged by Dries not dag.
That's wrong
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ yum list kaffeine
.
.
.
.
Available Packages
kaffeine.i3860.7.1-1.2.el5.rf dag
Therefore bug-report to Dag ;-
Am Sonntag, 9. September 2007 11:40 schrieb Akemi Yagi:
> Looks like a known bug and a newer version of kaffeine has corrected
> the problem. Deleting the offending file does not help because it is
> registered in the rpm database. Fedora Core 6 has kaffeine 0.8.4
> which does not have this probl
On 9/9/07, Akemi Yagi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Looks like a known bug and a newer version of kaffeine has corrected
> the problem. Deleting the offending file does not help because it is
> registered in the rpm database. Fedora Core 6 has kaffeine 0.8.4
> which does not have this problem.
On 9/9/07, Timothy Kesten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Folks,
>
> I've tried to install kaffeine on CentOS 5 but I get following error
>
> Transaction Check Error:
> file /usr/share/mimelnk/application/x-mplayer2.desktop from install of
> kaffeine-0.7.1-1.2.el5.rf conflicts with file from pack
Hi Folks,
I've tried to install kaffeine on CentOS 5 but I get following error
Transaction Check Error:
file /usr/share/mimelnk/application/x-mplayer2.desktop from install of
kaffeine-0.7.1-1.2.el5.rf conflicts with file from package
kdelibs-3.5.4-11.el5.centos
Any hints to solve this proble
35 matches
Mail list logo
