Akemi Yagi wrote:
Hi all,
I think that every wiki page should have a name(s) of the
author/maintainer of that page like in:
http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/JavaOnCentOS
I strongly disagree. By adding the name of a person on there, you basically say
that this page is $OnePersonsPage and other
Ralph Angenendt wrote:
Made some more space by putting the search label *above* the search box.
And got rid of the ugly Title Text buttons by making them a bit
nicer :)
Here's a diff:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ralph]# diff -u modern-CentOS/modern-CentOS/css/screen.css
screen.css
---
On Thu, Oct 25, 2007 at 01:34:15PM +0200, Ralph Angenendt enlightened us:
Ralph Angenendt wrote:
Alain Reguera Delgado wrote:
On 10/24/07, Ralph Angenendt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If possible on the *right* hand side of the page at the same height the
Navigation Tabs are? Those are
Puedes buscarlo en la siguiente direccion
http://www.centos.org/modules/tinycontent/index.php?id=13
ahí elijes el HTTP o FTP
y te abre una pagina con todas las versiones de centos elije la que mas te
convenga y la arquitectura, ahí vienen todos los ficheros de centos para la
instalación así
Checa esta pagina aver si te sirve
http://aniani.ifa.hawaii.edu/CENTOS/5.0/updates/i386/RPMS/
-Mensaje original-
De: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] En
nombre de Hector Martínez Romo
Enviado el: Jueves, 25 de Octubre de 2007 09:28 a.m.
Para: centos-es@centos.org
Asunto: RE:
Muchas gracias por a pronta respuesta, voy a hachar un vistazo.
Saludos a la Lista.
-Mensaje original-
De: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] En nombre de Jesus Guevara
Valdez
Enviado el: jueves, 25 de octubre de 2007 11:37
Para: centos-es@centos.org
Asunto: RE: [CentOS-es]
O. T. Suarez wrote:
Hola:
Alguien se ha tropezado con la limitacion de poder tener solo 4 domU
activos en CentOS?
utilizo un dom0 en CentOS 5 con domU en CentOS 4 con discos basados en ficheros.
Alguna solucion? sugerencias?
Saludos
Osvaldo
___
la limitacion esta dada por la cantidad de memoria ram que tienes y de
cuanto le asignas a cada host virtual!
Saludos
Dario
El 25/10/07, Ing. Ernesto Pérez Estévez [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió:
O. T. Suarez wrote:
Hola:
Alguien se ha tropezado con la limitacion de poder tener solo 4 domU
Hola:
la limitacion esta dada por la cantidad de memoria ram que tienes y de
cuanto le asignas a cada host virtual!
Tengo RAM suficiente todavia, el dom0 tiene 4gb y cada domU le asigno 128MB.
tengo 12:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# xm list
Name ID Mem(MiB)
hola:
necesito sabre como crear vlans en centos y como hacer para pasarlas todas por
un proxy??
gracias
_
Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today it's FREE!
Les Mikesell wrote:
Christopher Chan wrote:
Heck, I see lots of circles where they wouldn't trust mysql for an
enterprise application so it seems clear that you are not talking about
stability or performance but rather familiarity and the amount of trust
you have in what you know.
Let's
Chris Mauritz wrote:
Christopher Chan wrote:
I don't recall ever having a problem with postgresql.
I guess the latest versions are more crash resilient. But still no
builtin replication.
This has gotten far afield of CentOS, but recent vintages of Postgresql
DO support replication. :)
Ross Cavanagh wrote:
Thanks,
Also, just to clear things up a little, you were saying the one I had
listed was very old, but I think it is the latest kernel as of
yesterday. I had run yum update prior to trying to install drbd. Then
ran the following:
yum install heartbeat drbd kmod-drbd
Hi,
After the previous debacle with PHP and MySQL it has been decided
that we think about an upgrade from CentOS 3 to 5, since that would
solve our problem, if successful. I tried finding information on how
to best attempt this, but thanks to a plethora of contradictory
information my
I am unable to mount an ext3 filesystem on RHEL AS 2.1. This is not the
boot or root filesystem.
When I try to mount the file system, I get the following error:
mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/sdj1,
or too many mounted file systems
When I try to run e2fsck
If you noticed, I added the uname -r output of the current kernel that
is on the system.
uname -r = 2.6.18-8.1.15.el5
however, the yum output only lists 2.6.18-8.el5
Johnny Hughes wrote:
Ross Cavanagh wrote:
Thanks,
Also, just to clear things up a little, you were saying the one I had
David Christopher Zentgraf wrote:
Hi,
After the previous debacle with PHP and MySQL it has been decided that
we think about an upgrade from CentOS 3 to 5, since that would solve
our problem, if successful. I tried finding information on how to best
attempt this, but thanks to a plethora of
Hi List,
I have users chroot'ed on a CentOS 5 server. They should be able to check
their current disk usage with the quota command. Basically, it works -
however, there are some drawbacks I hope someone can help me on:
In order for the user to access the aquota.user file I hard-linked it into
On 10/25/07, Matt Arnilo S. Baluyos (Mailing Lists)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Here's the dump of /etc/xinetd.d/tftp:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] xinetd.d]# cat tftp
# default: off
# description: The tftp server serves files using the trivial file
transfer protocol. The tftp protocol is often used
I have a local yum repository for CentOS4, and from time to time I add
new (custom) kernel RPMS.
However, when I run 'yum update' on an SMP box, yum 'installs' the new
kernel, kernel-devel and kernel-smp packages, but 'updates' the
kernel-smp-devel package.
i.e. I end up with multiple
James Pearson wrote:
I have a local yum repository for CentOS4, and from time to time I add
new (custom) kernel RPMS.
However, when I run 'yum update' on an SMP box, yum 'installs' the new
kernel, kernel-devel and kernel-smp packages, but 'updates' the
kernel-smp-devel package.
i.e. I
James Pearson wrote:
What do I need to do to get the kernel-smp-devel RPMS to 'install' instead
of 'update'?
See yum.conf(5) and search for installonlypkgs.
Cheers,
Ralph
pgp8GohNGwkpS.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
CentOS mailing list
Johnny Hughes wrote:
James Pearson wrote:
I have a local yum repository for CentOS4, and from time to time I add
new (custom) kernel RPMS.
However, when I run 'yum update' on an SMP box, yum 'installs' the new
kernel, kernel-devel and kernel-smp packages, but 'updates' the
kernel-smp-devel
On Wed, 2007-10-24 at 16:40 -0700, James A. Peltier wrote:
James A. Peltier wrote:
Hi All,
I just enabled nscd to see if I can speed up some operations on our
large NFS/NIS environment, however, now that I've enabled nscd I am no
longer able to sudo. Can someone please point me in
On 10/25/07, Ross Cavanagh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you noticed, I added the uname -r output of the current kernel that
is on the system.
uname -r = 2.6.18-8.1.15.el5
however, the yum output only lists 2.6.18-8.el5
The yum output that you listed showed the 2.6.18-8.el5 kernel as being
Not sure if this is the best place to ask this question (and if so, please
point me to a better listserv), but is there anything wrong RFC or best
practice wise with pointing a CNAME record to a DNS server?
(I'm using EveryDNS.net, and I'd like to make my CNAME records ns1-
4.myDomain.com
--On Wednesday, October 24, 2007 2:15 PM -0700 Scott Silva
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Are you using any auth services in dovecot that are starting after it
does like sasl or ldap?
Or maybe a database connection?
Ah, good possibility. Dovecot starts at priority 65, while saslauthd starts
at
On 10/22/07, Steve Berg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is this someting VMware related? CentOS 4 related? Or possibly some
misconfiguration on my part? This box has been working fine for months
(and has been rebooted many times), so I'm not sure what changed
(certainly nothing on the host OS
Kenneth Porter schrieb:
Ah, good possibility. Dovecot starts at priority 65, while saslauthd
starts at 95. Shouldn't this only be a problem once someone attempts a
login? Perhaps it's a Dovecot bug.
My mail related stuff looks and works like this:
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 17 Sep 18 2007
Rogelio wrote:
Not sure if this is the best place to ask this question (and if so, please
point me to a better listserv), but is there anything wrong RFC or best
practice wise with pointing a CNAME record to a DNS server?
Please read the CNAME discussion in RFC 1034. And no: You do
James A. Peltier ha scritto:
Hi All,
I'm trying to find out the best way to mirror the kbsingh repositories
because most of my machines do not have access to the outside world.
What is the best way to do this. I want extras and misc for both el4
and el5 all arches.
I would say mrepo
Michael Rock napsal(a):
all-generic-ide irqpoll
Without irqpoll it just hangs and without
all-generic-ide it get a kernel panic. So I still
need both to recognize the disk and continue booting.
Michael,
I have tested 8.1.14 ICH9 x86_64 version and it's wokring fine. For sure
I'm right now
On Thu, Oct 25, 2007 at 05:32:46PM +0900, David Christopher Zentgraf wrote:
The situation is as follows: Remote box at our host who offers CentOS
3 as the most up-to-date OS, unless you pay them an unholy amount of
money for RHEL or Windows licences. Popping in a CD for an upgrade
does
I have a cron job that calls a shell script - the script invokes dump.
I'd like to do two things:
- Have the script dump the results of the job to a text file. I tried
this with /path/to/dump my switches -v /home/me/dump.log
But that just produced an empty file.
- Have the dump file be
On 10/25/07, Scott Ehrlich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a cron job that calls a shell script - the script invokes dump.
I'd like to do two things:
- Have the script dump the results of the job to a text file. I tried
this with /path/to/dump my switches -v /home/me/dump.log
But that
Scott Ehrlich wrote:
- Have the script dump the results of the job to a text file. I tried
this with /path/to/dump my switches -v /home/me/dump.log
But that just produced an empty file.
Try appending 21 (without the quotes) to that command.
- Have the dump file be date-stamped with the
Found an error or two from my logwatch report from yesterday,
thought I would share this in hopes this is just first time
run of the problem I noticed in the Kernel report section...
Also not sure why there's an issue with automount either
but I guess I could ask on that issue as well.
I am
Lorenzo Quatrini wrote:
James A. Peltier ha scritto:
Hi All,
I'm trying to find out the best way to mirror the kbsingh repositories
because most of my machines do not have access to the outside world.
What is the best way to do this. I want extras and misc for both el4
and el5 all arches.
James A. Peltier ha scritto:
Lorenzo Quatrini wrote:
James A. Peltier ha scritto:
Hi All,
I'm trying to find out the best way to mirror the kbsingh
repositories because most of my machines do not have access to the
outside world.
What is the best way to do this. I want extras and misc
Rogelio wrote:
Not sure if this is the best place to ask this question (and if so,
please point me to a better listserv), but is there anything wrong
RFC or best practice wise with pointing a CNAME record to a DNS server?
Of course not... it is completely off-topic for a CentOS list.
Since you
Hi,
Does anyone have a pointer to correct documantation for generating and
installing a self signed ssl cert for use on httpd on a C-5 machine?
The docs say to use genkey but AFAIK upstream rm'd crypto-utils from the
distro and as such it is not available. I tried generating the cert on a C-4
Thanks
I found the SRPM for mod_fcgid , compiled it and my perl fcgi is working
good.
however it seems mod_fcgid does not come with fcgi C++ libraries.
would you please let me know if you know where can I find fcgilib rpm .
my googling seems not to be very good :)
Thanks again for help
On Thu, 25 Oct 2007, Tom Diehl wrote:
Hi,
Does anyone have a pointer to correct documantation for generating and
installing a self signed ssl cert for use on httpd on a C-5 machine?
Generating:
http://www.madboa.com/geek/openssl/#cert-self
As for installing, you'll want to follow the
On 10/25/07, Tom Diehl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Does anyone have a pointer to correct documantation for generating and
installing a self signed ssl cert for use on httpd on a C-5 machine?
The docs say to use genkey but AFAIK upstream rm'd crypto-utils from the
distro and as such it is
Hi,
I have just updated my system from Centos 4 to 5 using the DVD. When I
try to update using Yum, it gets so far then I get:
Public key for tomcat5-jsp-2.0-api-5.5.23-0jpp.3.0.2.el5.i386.rpm is
not installed
How do I get the key and install it?
Thanks
Rob
On Thu, 2007-10-25 at 19:06 +0100, Robert Slade wrote:
Hi,
I have just updated my system from Centos 4 to 5 using the DVD. When I
try to update using Yum, it gets so far then I get:
Public key for tomcat5-jsp-2.0-api-5.5.23-0jpp.3.0.2.el5.i386.rpm is
not installed
How do I get the key
On Thu, 25 Oct 2007, Brian Mathis wrote:
On 10/25/07, Tom Diehl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Does anyone have a pointer to correct documentation for generating and
installing a self signed ssl cert for use on httpd on a C-5 machine?
The docs say to use genkey but AFAIK upstream rm'd
Hey guys I am running CentOS 5 with httpd 2.2.3
I am trying to configure mod_authnzldap authing against Active Directory and I
have it working about 50% of the
time.
About 50% of the time this works with no issue, the rest of the time it fails.
Sometimes it fails and notes the following in
On Thu, 25 Oct 2007, Tom Diehl wrote:
Ok, So I changed the Makefile from localhost to match the actual
hostname of the machine. I then ran make testcert as suggested
above and answered the questions as appropriate. It then generated
the cert without errors. I then modified ssl.conf to point
Tom Diehl wrote on Thu, 25 Oct 2007 14:54:19 -0400 (EDT):
error 18 at 0 depth lookup:self signed certificate
OK
(roadrunner pts1) #
Am I correct that the above error is normal for a self signed cert?
Seems so, yes. I get the same. I think your cert is okay. Your errors are
all about
On 10/19/07, James Olin Oden [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi All,
For quite some time I've used raid 1 as a means of providing a
rollback mechanism for an upgrade (which I learned from others long
ago). So essentially, before an upgrade you split the mirrors and
upgrade one side or the other.
--On Thursday, October 25, 2007 2:54 PM -0400 Tom Diehl
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
SSL3_GET_CLIENT_CERTIFICATE
Isn't that for when you need the client to prove who he his? Are you
requiring client SSL certs? It looks like the client is failing to provide
a good cert.
Florin Andrei wrote:
Optionally, do a make menuconfig and tweak the kernel options even more.
You may especially want to edit the CONFIG_LOCALVERSION field to reflect
the fact that you're building a custom kernel. I prefer to make that
field COMPANYNAME.x where x is the build number - start
On Thu, 25 Oct 2007, Paul Heinlein wrote:
On Thu, 25 Oct 2007, Tom Diehl wrote:
Ok, So I changed the Makefile from localhost to match the actual hostname
of the machine. I then ran make testcert as suggested above and answered
the questions as appropriate. It then generated the cert without
On Thu, 25 Oct 2007, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
Tom Diehl wrote on Thu, 25 Oct 2007 14:54:19 -0400 (EDT):
error 18 at 0 depth lookup:self signed certificate
OK
(roadrunner pts1) #
Am I correct that the above error is normal for a self signed cert?
Seems so, yes. I get the same. I think your cert
On Thu, 25 Oct 2007, Kenneth Porter wrote:
--On Thursday, October 25, 2007 2:54 PM -0400 Tom Diehl [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
SSL3_GET_CLIENT_CERTIFICATE
Isn't that for when you need the client to prove who he his? Are you
requiring client SSL certs? It looks like the client is failing to
On 10/25/07, Alain Spineux [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/25/07, Matt Arnilo S. Baluyos (Mailing Lists)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here's the dump of /etc/xinetd.d/tftp:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] xinetd.d]# cat tftp
# default: off
# description: The tftp server serves files using the trivial
Does anyone here on the list, that lives in the U.S. have a spare
wireless pci card that they know will work with Cent OS 5. If you have
one, and would consider selling it, contact me at
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and lets see what we can work out.
Thanks
Jim
Evans F. Mitchell KD4EFM / AFA2TH / WQFK-894 kirjoitti viestissään
(lähetysaika torstai, 25. lokakuuta 2007 18:51):
Found an error or two from my logwatch report from yesterday,
thought I would share this in hopes this is just first time
run of the problem I noticed in the Kernel report
59 matches
Mail list logo
