Re: [CentOS] rpc.idmapd error after upgrade to 5.1

2007-12-08 Thread Johnny Hughes
Olaf Mueller wrote: Hello, after upgrade from CentOS 5 to 5.1 I see the following error in /var/log/messages: 'rpc.idmapd[2330]: main: open(/var/lib/nfs/rpc_pipefs/nfs): No such file or directory' The directory exists with the permissions dr-xr-xr-x 2 root root0 Dec 7 10:21 nfs

Re: [CentOS] Re: Re: Re: are RPMForge and EPEL compatible?

2007-12-08 Thread Johnny Hughes
Les Mikesell wrote: Karanbir Singh wrote: I have repeatedly asked people to take this conversation away from this list. Is there really any point you are trying to make by carrying on ? its not that hard to just post a follow up on another list, both you and rex are on the epel and the

[CentOS] CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 34, Issue 6

2007-12-08 Thread centos-announce-request
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to [EMAIL PROTECTED] You can

Re: [CentOS] tick_divider

2007-12-08 Thread Akemi Yagi
On Dec 8, 2007 2:18 AM, Akemi Yagi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Dec 6, 2007 8:52 AM, Scott McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I just did. Note I made a typo and commented on that in a second post. Does tick_divider work successfully in a 64bit installation? In the changelog of the kernel

Re: [CentOS] remote ssh to machine how display firefox

2007-12-08 Thread Bill Campbell
On Sat, Dec 08, 2007, Les Mikesell wrote: Les Bell wrote: Les Mikesell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What's a 'trusted' forwarding mean as opposed to any other kind? A trusted X11 client will bypass the security controls specified in the X11 Security Extension Specification (see

Re: [CentOS] tick_divider

2007-12-08 Thread Akemi Yagi
Sorry, one more piece of the patch note was missing in my previous e-mail: == ACK less the hz= bits for 5.1.z, per Alan's concern about only certain values in the currently accepted range actually being valid. I'd say fully bake that part

[CentOS] Re: kernel-vm.i686 5.0--5.1 Error: Missing Dependency: kernel-headers is needed by package glibc-headers

2007-12-08 Thread Scott Silva
on 12/7/2007 8:05 PM John Thomas spake the following: Cough, cough, cough (I have a bit of a cold, please excuse me) Oh great, now my MUA has a virus! ;-P You need to cover your keyboard when you cough. -- MailScanner is like deodorant... You hope everybody uses it, and you notice quickly if

Re: [CentOS] Re: are RPMForge and EPEL compatible?

2007-12-08 Thread Lamar Owen
On Friday 07 December 2007, Karanbir Singh wrote: I'd be happy to host the rest of this conversation in [EMAIL PROTECTED] - which might actually have more people watching who play a role in these situations ? There is one point that belongs in the user CentOS list (and not on centos-devel)

[CentOS] perl-File-Temp problem

2007-12-08 Thread FTNX
Where do I find an RPM for perl-File-Temp for Centos 5 that will work? At some point Perl got upgraded, and perl-File-Temp stopped working, killing amavisd-new. I've tried different versions, even from a src.rpm, but they won't install due to a conflict with Perl.

Re: [CentOS] Error in xorg-x11-xinit

2007-12-08 Thread Akemi Yagi
On Dec 8, 2007 5:37 PM, Olaf Mueller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, if login as user I get the following error message in ~/.xsession-errors*: /etc/X11/xinit/Xsession: line 15: unask: command not found Changing 'unask' to 'umask' seems to fix it. This happens under CentOS 5 and 5.1.

Re: [CentOS] perl-File-Temp problem

2007-12-08 Thread Mark Pryor
--- FTNX [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Where do I find an RPM for perl-File-Temp for Centos 5 that will work? At some point Perl got upgraded, and perl-File-Temp stopped working, killing amavisd-new. I've tried different versions, even from a src.rpm, but they won't install due to a

Re: [CentOS] perl-File-Temp problem

2007-12-08 Thread Mark Pryor
--- FTNX [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Saturday 08 December 2007 22:40, Mark Pryor wrote: unless you tried to upgrade it from CPAN, I don't see how you got out-of-sync. No. I had to learn the hard way not to use CPAN. I have two Centos 5 machines that have been updated only with