Re: [CentOS-virt] open-vm-tools for latest CentOS-4 and CentOS-5 kernel-vms

2008-01-01 Thread Johnny Hughes
John Thomas wrote: Johnny Hughes said the following on 12/31/2007 11:37 AM: snip The open-vm-tools are available here: http://people.centos.org/~hughesjr/open-vm-tools/ The purpose of these RPMS (open-vm-tools) is to replace the VMware-Tools RPMS that come with VMWare. Please remove

Re: [CentOS-virt] open-vm-tools for latest CentOS-4 and CentOS-5 kernel-vms

2008-01-01 Thread Johnny Hughes
Ray Van Dolson wrote: No need to run vmware-config-tools.pl after kernel upgrade This is indeed a huge benefit, as it requires one less reboot and does not require you to do anything via your console or to rebuild anything as a user. You also do not need build tools inside your client VM

Re: [CentOS-virt] open-vm-tools for latest CentOS-4 and CentOS-5 kernel-vms

2008-01-01 Thread Akemi Yagi
On Jan 1, 2008 7:53 AM, Johnny Hughes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ray Van Dolson wrote: Couple questions regarding these kernels... should they be run on the host or on the guest? And I see they are in -testing right now, and also in tru's home directory. Where is the authoritative source

[CentOS-es] Ayuda con sendmail

2008-01-01 Thread Henry Villavicencio
Acabo de instalar sendmail, configure el sendmail.mc y al poner: m4 /etc/mail/sendmail.mc /etc/mail/sendmail.cf me sale el siguiente error # $id: local_procmail.m4,v 8.22 2002/11/17 04:24:19 ca Exp $ # NONE:0: m4: ERROR: end of file in argument list

Re: [CentOS-es] Ayuda con sendmail

2008-01-01 Thread Ugo Bellavance
Henry Villavicencio wrote: Acabo de instalar sendmail, configure el sendmail.mc y al poner: m4 /etc/mail/sendmail.mc /etc/mail/sendmail.cf me sale el siguiente error # $id: local_procmail.m4,v 8.22 2002/11/17 04:24:19 ca Exp $ # NONE:0: m4: ERROR: end of file in argument list

RE: [CentOS-es] Cluster de Balanceo

2008-01-01 Thread Roger Peña
--- Hector Martínez Romo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Estimado Gracias por tu respuesta, sin embargo piranha , por lo menos a mi no me sirve, eso es lo que creo, debido a que yo no cuento con otro servidor para que haga el balanceo entre los dos que tengo, abra alguna otra solución donde

Re: [CentOS] 1680x1050 Monitor

2008-01-01 Thread Carlos Daniel Ruvalcaba Valenzuela
Here is my xorg.conf I hope it could be useful to you. Good luck On Dec 31, 2007 12:28 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, 31 Dec 2007 02:28:58 -0700 Carlos Daniel Ruvalcaba Valenzuela [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have the same monitor actually, here are some tips: Add this modeline to

Re: [CentOS] display resolution

2008-01-01 Thread dny
On Dec 31, 2007 12:25 AM, Bart Schaefer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Were you able to select your monitor from the list or are you choosing some kind of generic monitor? Move your existing xorg.conf out of the way before running system-config-display so that it's forced to start from scratch. It

Re: [CentOS] display resolution

2008-01-01 Thread Johnny Hughes
dny wrote: On Dec 31, 2007 12:25 AM, Bart Schaefer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Were you able to select your monitor from the list or are you choosing some kind of generic monitor? Move your existing xorg.conf out of the way before running system-config-display so that it's forced to start from

Re: [CentOS] Centos 5.1, mythtv, saa7134_dvb?

2008-01-01 Thread Mogens Kjaer
Akemi Yagi wrote: ... I do not know the answer but you can try building the module first - much faster than building the whole kernel anyway. I also suggest filing a request at bugs.centos.org. This will help remind Johnny when he does centosplus for the next release. Alas, the saa7134 in

Re: [CentOS] Centos 5.1, mythtv, saa7134_dvb?

2008-01-01 Thread Akemi Yagi
On Jan 1, 2008 4:44 AM, Mogens Kjaer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Alas, the saa7134 in 2.6.18 is too old for my card :-( The driver in 2.6.18 supports card numbered 1 to 95. My card (medion) has number 96 :-( Putting saa7134 from a 2.6.23 kernel into 2.6.18 doesn't work. Oh, this is

Re: [CentOS] Firewall frustration

2008-01-01 Thread Robert Moskowitz
Mark Weaver wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Mon, 31 Dec 2007 12:21:34 -0500 Robert Moskowitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: William L. Maltby wrote: On Mon, 2007-12-31 at 09:33 -0500, Robert Moskowitz wrote: Peter Farrell wrote: Problem

Re: [CentOS] Firewall frustration

2008-01-01 Thread Scott Ehrlich
On Tue, 1 Jan 2008, Robert Moskowitz wrote: Mark Weaver wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Mon, 31 Dec 2007 12:21:34 -0500 Robert Moskowitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: William L. Maltby wrote: On Mon, 2007-12-31 at 09:33 -0500, Robert Moskowitz wrote: Peter Farrell

Re: [CentOS] Centos 5.1, mythtv, saa7134_dvb?

2008-01-01 Thread Mogens Kjaer
Akemi Yagi wrote: On Jan 1, 2008 4:44 AM, Mogens Kjaer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Alas, the saa7134 in 2.6.18 is too old for my card :-( The driver in 2.6.18 supports card numbered 1 to 95. My card (medion) has number 96 :-( Putting saa7134 from a 2.6.23 kernel into 2.6.18 doesn't work. Oh,

Re: [CentOS] Firewall frustration

2008-01-01 Thread Mark Weaver
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tue, 1 Jan 2008 08:57:22 -0500 Robert Moskowitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Have you ever thought about how rare floppy drives are now? At best you go with a bootable usb, if your notebook supports bootable USB. My Libretto does have a bootable

Re: [CentOS] Centos 5.1, mythtv, saa7134_dvb?

2008-01-01 Thread Johnny Hughes
Mogens Kjaer wrote: Akemi Yagi wrote: On Jan 1, 2008 4:44 AM, Mogens Kjaer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Alas, the saa7134 in 2.6.18 is too old for my card :-( The driver in 2.6.18 supports card numbered 1 to 95. My card (medion) has number 96 :-( Putting saa7134 from a 2.6.23 kernel into

Re: [CentOS] Re: Firewall frustration

2008-01-01 Thread Chris Mauritz
Ugo Bellavance wrote: Mark Weaver wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tue, 1 Jan 2008 08:57:22 -0500 Robert Moskowitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Have you ever thought about how rare floppy drives are now? At best you go with a bootable usb, if your notebook supports

Re: [CentOS] Re: Firewall frustration

2008-01-01 Thread Mark Weaver
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tue, 01 Jan 2008 10:32:14 -0500 Ugo Bellavance [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I guess he wants it to be portable. He seems to be knowing his requirements a lot better than we do. It looks like he wants an easy firewall that would boot for HD

Re: [CentOS] Re: Firewall frustration

2008-01-01 Thread Mark Weaver
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tue, 01 Jan 2008 10:59:17 -0500 Chris Mauritz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Old laptops make pretty good firewalls, I think. They take little space, have a built-in battery backup and built-in keyboard/monitor to use when you are visiting the

Re: [CentOS] Firewall frustration

2008-01-01 Thread Robert Moskowitz
Mark Weaver wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tue, 1 Jan 2008 08:57:22 -0500 Robert Moskowitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Have you ever thought about how rare floppy drives are now? At best you go with a bootable usb, if your notebook supports bootable USB. My Libretto

Re: [CentOS] Re: Firewall frustration

2008-01-01 Thread Johnny Hughes
Chris Mauritz wrote: Ugo Bellavance wrote: Mark Weaver wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tue, 1 Jan 2008 08:57:22 -0500 Robert Moskowitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Have you ever thought about how rare floppy drives are now? At best you go with a bootable usb, if your

Re: [CentOS] Re: Firewall frustration

2008-01-01 Thread Robert Moskowitz
Ugo Bellavance wrote: Mark Weaver wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tue, 1 Jan 2008 08:57:22 -0500 Robert Moskowitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Have you ever thought about how rare floppy drives are now? At best you go with a bootable usb, if your notebook supports bootable

Re: [CentOS] Re: Firewall frustration

2008-01-01 Thread Robert Moskowitz
Chris Mauritz wrote: Ugo Bellavance wrote: Mark Weaver wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tue, 1 Jan 2008 08:57:22 -0500 Robert Moskowitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Have you ever thought about how rare floppy drives are now? At best you go with a bootable usb, if your

Re: [CentOS] Re: Firewall frustration

2008-01-01 Thread Robert Moskowitz
Mark Weaver wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tue, 01 Jan 2008 10:32:14 -0500 Ugo Bellavance [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I guess he wants it to be portable. He seems to be knowing his requirements a lot better than we do. It looks like he wants an easy firewall that

Re: [CentOS] Firewall frustration

2008-01-01 Thread Robert Moskowitz
Firewall is up and running. Used Shorewall with Webmin. Les Bell wrote: Robert Spangler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: While IPTABLES might be CHEAP (price) it is a very good firewall. Learn to set it up from the command line, it isn't that hard. Amen. I've been using CentOS for firewalls

Re: [CentOS] Re: Firewall frustration

2008-01-01 Thread Steven Vishoot
--- Johnny Hughes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Chris Mauritz wrote: Ugo Bellavance wrote: Mark Weaver wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tue, 1 Jan 2008 08:57:22 -0500 Robert Moskowitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Have you ever thought about how rare floppy drives

[CentOS] Re: Firewall frustration

2008-01-01 Thread Ugo Bellavance
Robert Moskowitz wrote: Firewall is up and running. Used Shorewall with Webmin. Les Bell wrote: Robert Spangler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: While IPTABLES might be CHEAP (price) it is a very good firewall. Learn to set it up from the command line, it isn't that hard. Amen. I've been using

Re: [CentOS] Firewall frustration

2008-01-01 Thread Steven Haigh
On 02/01/2008, at 4:11 AM, Robert Moskowitz wrote: I spent much of the past 24 hours trying to find out how to set up iptables for firewall routing WITHOUT NATing. Could not find anything. *boggle* Is it really that hard? ## Clear up whatever is in there at the moment. iptables -F INPUT

Re: [CentOS] drbd on CentOS 5

2008-01-01 Thread Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu
On Fri, 2007-12-07 at 22:40 +0100, Fabian Arrotin wrote: No, you don't need the centosplus kernel to use DRBD ... but actually there is no (not yet) kmod-drbd for the current (and updated) CentOS 5.1 kernel. They'll appear soon Sorry for the late reply: thanks for the answer, Fabian. Much

Re: [CentOS] Firewall frustration

2008-01-01 Thread jarmo
Steven Haigh kirjoitti viestissään (lähetysaika tiistai, 1. tammikuuta 2008 20:23): On 02/01/2008, at 4:11 AM, Robert Moskowitz wrote: I spent much of the past 24 hours trying to find out how to set up iptables for firewall routing WITHOUT NATing. Could not find anything. There you go.

Re: [CentOS] Re: Firewall frustration

2008-01-01 Thread Barry Schiffman
--- Steven Vishoot [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- Johnny Hughes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Chris Mauritz wrote: Ugo Bellavance wrote: Mark Weaver wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tue, 1 Jan 2008 08:57:22 -0500 Robert Moskowitz [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [CentOS] Firewall frustration

2008-01-01 Thread Robert Moskowitz
Thanks I will read this through a bit later. Perhaps I was making more of it than needed, but my attempts were not working. And all I was trying for at first was to allow SSH through. Steven Haigh wrote: On 02/01/2008, at 4:11 AM, Robert Moskowitz wrote: I spent much of the past 24 hours

[CentOS] cron clarification

2008-01-01 Thread Joseph L. Casale
What is the ramifications to simply placing scripts in the /etc/cron.hourly directory as opposed to actually adding jobs via the crontab -e method? Is there any significance to using one method versus the other? Thanks! jlc ___ CentOS mailing list

Re: [CentOS] cron clarification

2008-01-01 Thread Stephen Harris
On Tue, Jan 01, 2008 at 04:08:17PM -0700, Joseph L. Casale wrote: What is the ramifications to simply placing scripts in the /etc/cron.hourly directory as opposed to actually adding jobs via the crontab -e method? Is there any significance to using one method versus the other? If you don't

RE: [CentOS] cron clarification

2008-01-01 Thread Joseph L. Casale
Traditional crontab entries do still work, if you really want to deal with that, but it's harder to automate install/uninstalls. -- rgds Stephen Thanks Stephen and Jim! jlc ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org

Re: [CentOS] Regd: CentOS 4.4 Installtion Screen Shots

2008-01-01 Thread Balaji
Dear All, I want to take a moment to thank everyone who responded to my query. Regards -S.Balaji Craig White wrote: On Mon, 2007-12-31 at 17:55 -0500, Jim Perrin wrote: On Dec 31, 2007 4:55 PM, William L. Maltby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: And I was so trying to not fill in for