[CentOS] Re: NoMachine NX Server

2008-01-30 Thread Timothy Kesten
Am Donnerstag, 31. Januar 2008 05:15 schrieb Sobari Tanuwijaya: > Hi, > Is there anybody ever have an experience install NoMachine NX Server on > centos? Is there anything need to get special attention? NoMachine NX Server and Client works on CentOS 5 "out of the box" on my machines. FreeNX Versi

Re: [CentOS] No route to host

2008-01-30 Thread Les Bell
Bill Campbell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Most likely there was a temporary problem connecting to their server. I was just able to ping mail.pttropical.co.id, their only listed MX server. << Yep. And telnetting to port 25 gives a connection. Looks OK now: telnet mail.pttropical.co.id 25 Try

Re: [CentOS] No route to host

2008-01-30 Thread Bill Campbell
On Thu, Jan 31, 2008, horas simalango wrote: >Thank's for your support, > >So what is the conclusion sir? >Is the problem in my server or in pttropical server? >Could you please explain more clear? Most likely there was a temporary problem connecting to their server. I was just able to ping mail.

Re: [CentOS] NoMachine NX Server

2008-01-30 Thread Alex White
On Thu, 31 Jan 2008 11:15:04 +0700 Sobari Tanuwijaya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> took out a #2 pencil and scribbled: > Hi, > Is there anybody ever have an experience install NoMachine NX > Server on centos? Is there anything need to get special attention? > Thanks in advance > > -- Tanu -- I've seen no

Re: [CentOS] No route to host

2008-01-30 Thread horas simalango
Thank's for your support, So what is the conclusion sir? Is the problem in my server or in pttropical server? Could you please explain more clear? thank you, Regards, Horasima SML. 2008/1/31, Les Bell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > "horas simalango" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> > Please help me

Re: [CentOS] NoMachine NX Server

2008-01-30 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- "Sobari Tanuwijaya" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > Is there anybody ever have an experience install NoMachine NX Server > on > centos? Is there anything need to get special attention? > Thanks in advance > > -- Tanu -- > ___ > CentOS mailing

Re: [CentOS] One approach to dealing with SSH brute force attacks.

2008-01-30 Thread David Mackintosh
On Wed, Jan 30, 2008 at 12:17:22PM -0500, Ed Donahue wrote: > I use this one, works great and easy to setup > http://rfxnetworks.com/bfd.php This is how I deal with them: deny by default unless you know the "secret handshake". http://wiki.xdroop.com/space/Linux/Limited+SSH+Access -- /\oo/\ /

[CentOS] NoMachine NX Server

2008-01-30 Thread Sobari Tanuwijaya
Hi, Is there anybody ever have an experience install NoMachine NX Server on centos? Is there anything need to get special attention? Thanks in advance -- Tanu -- ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

RE: [CentOS] Re: Network routes

2008-01-30 Thread Jason Pyeron
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Scott Silva > Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2008 12:30 > To: centos@centos.org > Subject: [CentOS] Re: Network routes > > on 1/29/2008 5:24 PM Jason Pyeron spake the following: > > > > > >> -

[CentOS] No route to host

2008-01-30 Thread horas simalango
Dear Mr/Mrs/Ms, I have e-mail server using Centos 4.3 So far I can send and receive e-mail using this server, but why to this address: [EMAIL PROTECTED] can not send? Every time I send e-mail to above address my server always respon with this massage: - Transcript of session follows - <[

Re: [CentOS] No route to host

2008-01-30 Thread Les Bell
"horas simalango" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Please help me solve this problem! << The commands you'd use to diagnose this problem are: dig pttropical.co.id SOA (That works fine) dig pttropical.co.id MX (That works, and shows mail.pttropical.co.id as their MX) traceroute mail.pttropical.

[CentOS] No route to host

2008-01-30 Thread horas simalango
Dear Mr/Mrs/Ms, I have e-mail server using Centos 4.1 So far I can send and receive e-mail using this server, but why to this address: [EMAIL PROTECTED] can not send? Every time I send e-mail to above address my server always respon with this massage: - Transcript of session follows - <[

Re: [CentOS] centosplus + priority plugin

2008-01-30 Thread Christopher Chan
Work around below [base] name=CentOS-$releasever - Base #mirrorlist=http://mirrorlist.centos.org/?release=$releasever&arch=$basearch&repo=os baseurl=http://ftp.hostrino.com/pub/centos/$releasever/os/$basearch/ gpgcheck=1 gpgkey=http://mirror.centos.org/centos/RPM-GPG-KEY-centos4 exclude=php*

[CentOS] centosplus + priority plugin

2008-01-30 Thread Christopher Chan
I have a Centos 4 box that has been updated all the way to 4.6 without using the centosplus repository. Now I want to use the centosplus repository for Centos 4 to get the latest LAMP, mod_perl, perl and other perl modules so that I can install rt 3.6.6 and its necessary modules. However, fo

Re: [CentOS] One approach to dealing with SSH brute force attacks.

2008-01-30 Thread Jay Leafey
What I would I like to do is: - allow 22 from specific IPs - allow another port (redirected) from anywhere. this port is then redirected to 22. I do exactly this with a combination of SSH config options and iptables rules. In your /etc/ssh/sshd_config file, find the "Port 22" statement a

[CentOS] adaptec 2100S drivers

2008-01-30 Thread Mark Weaver
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi all, I've got a server that I'm rebuilding and I've been given an Adaptec 2100S single channel scsi card to use. Problem is I can't find drivers for CentOS 4 anywhere. So far I've tried the adaptec drivers on the install CD but when it comes time

NFS problem in the latest kernel (Was: [CentOS] MySQL issues with kernel-2.6.18-53.1.6.el5.x86_64.rpm)

2008-01-30 Thread Akemi Yagi
On Jan 30, 2008 8:25 AM, Johnny Hughes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Joshua Baker-LePain wrote: > > On Wed, 30 Jan 2008 at 10:18am, Johnny Hughes wrote > > > >> Bent Terp wrote: > > > >>> Has something changed with regard to the mount options? We use > >>> (rw,noatime,rsize=8192,wsize=8192,hard,udp,

Re: [CentOS] yum fails with invalid dependency on sqlite

2008-01-30 Thread Yusuf Goolamabbas
> Hi, I am using Centos 4.6 on x86-64. recently when I tried to do a yum -y > check-update this is the output I get > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# yum check-update > Setting up repositories > update100% |=| 951 B00:00 > base 100% |==

Re: [CentOS] One approach to dealing with SSH brute force attacks.

2008-01-30 Thread Les Bell
mouss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> If you consider this security through obscurity, then why not publish the list of your users on a public web page? after all, you should use strong passwords, so why hide usernames? << Usernames are comparatively hard to guess, and chosen from a large space -

Re: [CentOS] One approach to dealing with SSH brute force attacks.

2008-01-30 Thread mouss
James B. Byrne wrote: Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> On: Tue, 29 Jan 2008 07:30:11 -0600, Johnny Hughes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject Was: [CentOS] Unknown rootkit causes compromised servers SOME of the script kiddies check higher ports for SSH *_BUT_* I only see 4% of the brute force attemp

Re: [CentOS] centos 5.0/5.1 nfs kickstart

2008-01-30 Thread Paul Armor
Hi, On Tue, 29 Jan 2008, Adam Miller wrote: According to these docs an MTU can be specified in the kickstart script. It doesn't say much more than that though. http://www.centos.org/docs/5/html/Installation_Guide-en-US/s1-kickstart2-options.html The reason for nfs and an mtu of 4500 is compl

Re: [CentOS] One approach to dealing with SSH brute force attacks.

2008-01-30 Thread Bill Campbell
On Wed, Jan 30, 2008, Brian Mathis wrote: ... > >Log parsing scripts often don't provide the immediacy that rate >limiting does when under attack. You'd have to run the script >constantly parsing logs, since most ssh scans come in bursts. We use swatch for this and othter interesting events (e.g.

Re: [CentOS] Re: rsync and swapping

2008-01-30 Thread Toby Bluhm
Scott Silva wrote: on 1/30/2008 5:24 AM Jerry Geis spake the following: hi all, I use rsync to copy/backup ALL my stuff to another disk. When I run this seems like my machine (4 GIG ram centos 5.1) now begins to swap out more programs. Is there a way to reduce that swapping? I am running with

RE: [CentOS] Re: rsync and swapping

2008-01-30 Thread Christian Volker
Yohoo! >Rsync's main benefit is on backups of changed files. dumping to a new >destination every time makes rsync less efficient than just about every >other >option. >Now if you made the new directory, and hardlinked the old stuff to the new >directory, then rsync would shine. That's what rsn

Re: [CentOS] One approach to dealing with SSH brute force attacks.

2008-01-30 Thread Milton Calnek
Good security is like an onion. The users' think it smells... No, it's layered. Changing the the sshd port from the default does add a layer, a thin layer, but a layer all the same. The rate limiting is a somewhat thicker layer. I personally prefer to block all ssh traffic from the internet

[CentOS] Re: rsync and swapping

2008-01-30 Thread Scott Silva
on 1/30/2008 5:24 AM Jerry Geis spake the following: hi all, I use rsync to copy/backup ALL my stuff to another disk. When I run this seems like my machine (4 GIG ram centos 5.1) now begins to swap out more programs. Is there a way to reduce that swapping? I am running with echo 1 > /proc/sys/v

Re: [CentOS] One approach to dealing with SSH brute force attacks.

2008-01-30 Thread Patrick
Brian Mathis wrote: @James: As for the "security through obscurity" post, you are missing the point. Changing the port number that SSH runs on is not "security through obscurity". Moving an already highly secure service to a different port so scanners don't hit it automatically is a different

Re: [CentOS] rsync and swapping

2008-01-30 Thread MHR
On Jan 30, 2008 11:49 AM, Milton Calnek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > MHR wrote: > > > > # file /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.18-53.1.6.el5 > > /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.18-53.1.6.el5: ELF 64-bit LSB shared object, AMD > > x86-64, version 1, stripped > > > > Doesn't look that way - BUT, it is a self-extracting archiv

Re: [CentOS] rsync and swapping

2008-01-30 Thread MHR
On Jan 30, 2008 10:51 AM, Marko A. Jennings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, January 30, 2008 1:36 pm, MHR wrote: > > > As long as the majority of the files are not plain text - I have had > > really bad results using bzip2 on text files - specifically, massive > > file corruption. I have had

Re: [CentOS] Apache: User and Group

2008-01-30 Thread Kenneth Porter
On Tuesday, January 29, 2008 11:51 AM -0500 Brian Mathis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: There are some cases when you might want apache to be able to write to files, but those are less frequent, so you should only change those specific files to apache ownership, or change the group permissions to a

Re: [CentOS] rsync and swapping

2008-01-30 Thread Milton Calnek
MHR wrote: On Jan 30, 2008 11:03 AM, Milton Calnek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: MHR wrote: On Jan 30, 2008 8:26 AM, William L. Maltby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Wed, 2008-01-30 at 17:14 +0100, Nicolas Thierry-Mieg wrote: Marcelo Roccasalva wrote: On Jan 30, 2008 11:24 AM, Jerry Geis <[EM

Re: [CentOS] Dump on remote filesystems?

2008-01-30 Thread Kenneth Porter
dump works at the device level, dumping the raw block device by interpreting the ext2/3 structures there. If you pass it a directory, it converts it to the device mounted there and dumps the device. restore, on the other hand, operates at the filesystem level. You don't need to be root to dump

Re: [CentOS] rsync and swapping

2008-01-30 Thread MHR
On Jan 30, 2008 11:03 AM, Milton Calnek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > MHR wrote: > > On Jan 30, 2008 8:26 AM, William L. Maltby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> On Wed, 2008-01-30 at 17:14 +0100, Nicolas Thierry-Mieg wrote: > >>> Marcelo Roccasalva wrote: > On Jan 30, 2008 11:24 AM, Jerry Ge

Re: [CentOS] rsync and swapping

2008-01-30 Thread MHR
On Jan 30, 2008 10:46 AM, Brian Mathis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I once knew a guy who bought a really cheap PC with an AMD CPU in it. > Despite the fact that the power supply was underpowered, and > everything else on the machine was just as cheap as possible, he > blamed the AMD chip for all

Re: [CentOS] rsync and swapping

2008-01-30 Thread nate
MHR wrote: > On Jan 30, 2008 8:26 AM, William L. Maltby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > As long as the majority of the files are not plain text - I have had > really bad results using bzip2 on text files - specifically, massive > file corruption. I have had to go back to pre-bzipped archives to > re

Re: [CentOS] rsync and swapping

2008-01-30 Thread Milton Calnek
MHR wrote: On Jan 30, 2008 8:26 AM, William L. Maltby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Wed, 2008-01-30 at 17:14 +0100, Nicolas Thierry-Mieg wrote: Marcelo Roccasalva wrote: On Jan 30, 2008 11:24 AM, Jerry Geis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: hi all, As long as the majority of the files are not p

Re: [CentOS] rsync and swapping

2008-01-30 Thread Les Mikesell
Marcelo Roccasalva wrote: I use rsync to copy/backup ALL my stuff to another disk. When I run this seems like my machine (4 GIG ram centos 5.1) now begins to swap out more programs. Is there a way to reduce that swapping? I am running with echo 1 > /proc/sys/vm/swappiness I simply mount /dev/

Re: [CentOS] rsync and swapping

2008-01-30 Thread Marko A. Jennings
On Wed, January 30, 2008 1:36 pm, MHR wrote: > As long as the majority of the files are not plain text - I have had > really bad results using bzip2 on text files - specifically, massive > file corruption. I have had to go back to pre-bzipped archives to > rebuild these files - not a fun task. W

Re: [CentOS] rsync and swapping

2008-01-30 Thread Brian Mathis
On Wed, Jan 30, 2008 at 1:36 PM, MHR <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > As long as the majority of the files are not plain text - I have had > really bad results using bzip2 on text files - specifically, massive > file corruption. I have had to go back to pre-bzipped archives to > rebuild these file

Re: [CentOS] rsync and swapping

2008-01-30 Thread MHR
On Jan 30, 2008 8:26 AM, William L. Maltby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Wed, 2008-01-30 at 17:14 +0100, Nicolas Thierry-Mieg wrote: > > > > Marcelo Roccasalva wrote: > > > On Jan 30, 2008 11:24 AM, Jerry Geis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> hi all, > > >> > > >> I use rsync to copy/backup AL

Re: [CentOS] One approach to dealing with SSH brute force attacks.

2008-01-30 Thread Brian Mathis
On Wed, Jan 30, 2008 at 12:17 PM, Ed Donahue <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Jan 30, 2008 11:54 AM, James B. Byrne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > On: Tue, 29 Jan 2008 07:30:11 -0600, Johnny Hughes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Subject Was: [CentOS] Unknown rootkit

[CentOS] Re: Network routes

2008-01-30 Thread Scott Silva
on 1/29/2008 5:24 PM Jason Pyeron spake the following: -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Les Mikesell Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2008 18:25 To: CentOS mailing list Subject: Re: [CentOS] Network routes You probably want to remove the d

Re: [CentOS] One approach to dealing with SSH brute force attacks.

2008-01-30 Thread Ed Donahue
I use this one, works great and easy to setup http://rfxnetworks.com/bfd.php On Jan 30, 2008 11:54 AM, James B. Byrne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > On: Tue, 29 Jan 2008 07:30:11 -0600, Johnny Hughes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject Was: [CentOS] Unknown rootkit ca

[CentOS] Re: CentOS plus mysql server

2008-01-30 Thread Scott Silva
on 1/30/2008 4:02 AM Ralph Angenendt spake the following: Scott Silva wrote: It is currently only in CentOS 4 AFAIR. Yes, it is part of the Red Hat Web Stack - which isn't available for version 5 (as that already has a mysql 5 and a php 5 and a more current perl version). Ralph PS: Scott, I

[CentOS] One approach to dealing with SSH brute force attacks.

2008-01-30 Thread James B. Byrne
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> On: Tue, 29 Jan 2008 07:30:11 -0600, Johnny Hughes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject Was: [CentOS] Unknown rootkit causes compromised servers > > SOME of the script kiddies check higher ports for SSH *_BUT_* I only see > 4% of the brute force attempts to login on ports o

Re: [CentOS] yum fails with invalid dependency on sqlite

2008-01-30 Thread Johnny Hughes
Yusuf Goolamabbas wrote: Hi, I am using Centos 4.6 on x86-64. recently when I tried to do a yum -y check-update this is the output I get [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# yum check-update Setting up repositories update100% |=| 951 B00:00 base

Re: [CentOS] MySQL issues with kernel-2.6.18-53.1.6.el5.x86_64.rpm

2008-01-30 Thread William L. Maltby
On Wed, 2008-01-30 at 10:25 -0600, Johnny Hughes wrote: > Joshua Baker-LePain wrote: > > On Wed, 30 Jan 2008 at 10:18am, Johnny Hughes wrote > > > >> Bent Terp wrote: > > > >>> > Has something changed with regard to the mount options? We use > >>> (rw,noatime,rsize=8192,wsize=8192,hard,udp,conte

Re: [CentOS] rsync and swapping

2008-01-30 Thread Milton Calnek
Nicolas Thierry-Mieg wrote: Marcelo Roccasalva wrote: On Jan 30, 2008 11:24 AM, Jerry Geis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: hi all, I use rsync to copy/backup ALL my stuff to another disk. When I run this seems like my machine (4 GIG ram centos 5.1) now begins to swap out more programs. Is ther

Re: [CentOS] Question on http stop responding

2008-01-30 Thread nate
Jerry Geis wrote: > They are scanning my machine to make sure it is OK to be on this network. > One of the faults coming back is "Web server stops responding" to 3 > consecutive HTTP attempts Are you running an http server on that machine they are scanning? If yes, do you need to be running one ?

Re: [CentOS] rsync and swapping

2008-01-30 Thread William L. Maltby
On Wed, 2008-01-30 at 17:14 +0100, Nicolas Thierry-Mieg wrote: > > Marcelo Roccasalva wrote: > > On Jan 30, 2008 11:24 AM, Jerry Geis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> hi all, > >> > >> I use rsync to copy/backup ALL my stuff to another disk. > >> > >> When I run this seems like my machine (4 GIG ra

Re: [CentOS] MySQL issues with kernel-2.6.18-53.1.6.el5.x86_64.rpm

2008-01-30 Thread Johnny Hughes
Joshua Baker-LePain wrote: On Wed, 30 Jan 2008 at 10:18am, Johnny Hughes wrote Bent Terp wrote: Has something changed with regard to the mount options? We use (rw,noatime,rsize=8192,wsize=8192,hard,udp,context="system_u:object_r:httpd_sys_content_t:s0) which has worked fine until now. I

Re: [CentOS] MySQL issues with kernel-2.6.18-53.1.6.el5.x86_64.rpm

2008-01-30 Thread Joshua Baker-LePain
On Wed, 30 Jan 2008 at 10:18am, Johnny Hughes wrote Bent Terp wrote: Has something changed with regard to the mount options? We use (rw,noatime,rsize=8192,wsize=8192,hard,udp,context="system_u:object_r:httpd_sys_content_t:s0) which has worked fine until now. I am trying to duplicate your op

Re: [CentOS] MySQL issues with kernel-2.6.18-53.1.6.el5.x86_64.rpm

2008-01-30 Thread Johnny Hughes
Bent Terp wrote: On 1/24/08, Karanbir Singh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Bent Terp wrote: Hi all! Just a word of warning: after updating a few of our x86_64 based web frontend boxes to the new kernel, we began to get weird MySQL timeouts. The problem went away again when we downgraded to the pre

Re: [CentOS] rsync and swapping

2008-01-30 Thread Nicolas Thierry-Mieg
Marcelo Roccasalva wrote: On Jan 30, 2008 11:24 AM, Jerry Geis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: hi all, I use rsync to copy/backup ALL my stuff to another disk. When I run this seems like my machine (4 GIG ram centos 5.1) now begins to swap out more programs. Is there a way to reduce that swapping

[CentOS] Question on http stop responding

2008-01-30 Thread Jerry Geis
I have a machine centos 5.1 fully up to patch that is on a network that has other machines that takes credit cards. In such an environment I have found that there is something called PCI - Payment Card Industry standards. They are scanning my machine to make sure it is OK to be on this network.

Re: [CentOS] rsync and swapping

2008-01-30 Thread Marcelo Roccasalva
On Jan 30, 2008 11:24 AM, Jerry Geis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > hi all, > > I use rsync to copy/backup ALL my stuff to another disk. > > When I run this seems like my machine (4 GIG ram centos 5.1) > now begins to swap out more programs. Is there a way to reduce > that swapping? I am running with

[CentOS] snort question

2008-01-30 Thread Alex
has anyone gotin snort 2.x working on centos 5.1 thanks in advance for your time ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] rsync and swapping

2008-01-30 Thread Les Mikesell
Jerry Geis wrote: hi all, I use rsync to copy/backup ALL my stuff to another disk. When I run this seems like my machine (4 GIG ram centos 5.1) now begins to swap out more programs. Is there a way to reduce that swapping? I am running with echo 1 > /proc/sys/vm/swappiness I simply mount /dev/s

[CentOS] rsync and swapping

2008-01-30 Thread Jerry Geis
hi all, I use rsync to copy/backup ALL my stuff to another disk. When I run this seems like my machine (4 GIG ram centos 5.1) now begins to swap out more programs. Is there a way to reduce that swapping? I am running with echo 1 > /proc/sys/vm/swappiness I simply mount /dev/sdc1 /mnt/backup; mk

Re: [CentOS] Resizing a fat filesystem on a USB partition

2008-01-30 Thread Dogsbody
AFAIK, there is no way to "resize" any FAT partition. You have to delete both partitions and then create a new one. I thought the CD installer came with a utility to resize FAT partitions (albeit in MS DOS)? And this isn't possible in CentOS it self? :-/ Have you looked at the gparted L

Re: [CentOS] Apache: User and Group

2008-01-30 Thread Niki Kovacs
Jim Perrin a écrit : If apache owns everything in that directory, then it can modify them. This can potentially be undesirable. Depending on what you're doing, you'll have to mix and match permissions as needed. Mostly apache just needs to be able to read stuff, so having root own it with 644 is

Re: [CentOS] Command limiting with SSH keys and password auth ...

2008-01-30 Thread Jim Wildman
On Tue, 29 Jan 2008, Ian wrote: Main problem I have is if you enter no command (simply ssh ) it also kicks you out, I'd like it to ask for a password if no command is given, and then if correct pass you onto a normal shell. I've always used 2 sets of keys, one for the restriction, one without.

Re: [CentOS] RHEL / CentOS Kernel Updates

2008-01-30 Thread Akemi Yagi
On Jan 30, 2008 4:06 AM, Johnny Hughes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > nate wrote: > > Akemi Yagi wrote: > > > >> I hope you are interested in contributing to the CentOS community by > >> sharing your driver: > >> > >> https://projects.centos.org/trac/dasha/ > > > > Looks like that site is for source

Re: [CentOS] Problems to install java plugin in CentOS 5.1 x86_64

2008-01-30 Thread Ralph Angenendt
Sergio Belkin wrote: > Hi! > > I've tried to install java plugin as is in > http://www.howtoforge.com/installation-guide-centos5.1-desktop-p7 but with no > success. > > All steps seems to go well, with no error messages, but Firefox says that > there is no java plugin. Are you using a 64bit v

Re: [CentOS] RHEL / CentOS Kernel Updates

2008-01-30 Thread Johnny Hughes
nate wrote: Akemi Yagi wrote: I hope you are interested in contributing to the CentOS community by sharing your driver: https://projects.centos.org/trac/dasha/ Looks like that site is for source drivers, these drivers come from VMWare, and I'm not sure what their license is, nor do I know ex

Re: [CentOS] Re: CentOS plus mysql server

2008-01-30 Thread Ralph Angenendt
Scott Silva wrote: > It is currently only in CentOS 4 AFAIR. Yes, it is part of the Red Hat Web Stack - which isn't available for version 5 (as that already has a mysql 5 and a php 5 and a more current perl version). Ralph PS: Scott, I do see that you sign your mails. Could you please put your p

Re: [CentOS] How can i share my WAN ip to my LAN?

2008-01-30 Thread Tolun ARDAHANLI
Hi; Thanks... I solved this problem also... thank you Alain... Here is my iptables -L result... ** # iptables -L Chain INPUT (policy ACCEPT) target prot opt source

Re: [CentOS] Bonding two network cards

2008-01-30 Thread Tim Verhoeven
On Jan 30, 2008 3:35 AM, Joseph L. Casale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >Try the wiki: > > > >http://wiki.centos.org/TipsAndTricks/BondingInterfaces > > Is it ok to leave the hwaddress in the eth(n) files to make sure they are > used explicitely as intended in the event other cards are added? In m