Mag Gam a écrit :
Why would you download an illegal version of RHEL? I see no point in that...
Maybe there's also illegal customer support on these filesharing
networks :oD
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/lis
MHR a écrit :
For those of you who have reported here about problems with your
browser windows suddenly going away in Firefox and/or SeaMonkey:
The solution for me was to upgrade to Firefox3beta4. Just doesn't crash
anymore. I know there are no updates for now, but heck, from a pragmatic
point
On Sat, Mar 1, 2008 at 1:48 PM, Karanbir Singh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Primorec wrote:
> > I've checked today here
> >
> > Extras Testing:
> > i386 = http://centos.karan.org/el5/extras/testing/i386/RPMS/
> > x86_64
> > Sources
> >
> > Could not find gnumeric (yet).
> >
> > Am I looking into t
On Fri, 2008-03-21 at 19:38 -0700, Al Sparks wrote:
> I am using Sonic Digital Media Plus v7, on Windows, and I'm trying to
> make a bootable RHEL IA 64 bit CD (mostly so I can include a kickstart
> file).
>
> So what I did is I grabbed the disk one ISO file, copied the contents
> on my hard drive
I am using Sonic Digital Media Plus v7, on Windows, and I'm trying to
make a bootable RHEL IA 64 bit CD (mostly so I can include a kickstart
file).
So what I did is I grabbed the disk one ISO file, copied the contents
on my hard drive in a folder.
Then I clicked on the Data -> Data Disk. I then
MHR wrote:
For those of you who have reported here about problems with your
browser windows suddenly going away in Firefox and/or SeaMonkey:
Please send me all relevant hardware and software configuration
details about your Mozilla installation as well as your version of
CentOS. I am looking int
Why would you download an illegal version of RHEL? I see no point in that...
On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 3:08 PM, Michael Semcheski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 2:17 PM, Simon Jolle sjolle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Centos Users
> >
> > Its _really_ nonsense to rel
For those of you who have reported here about problems with your
browser windows suddenly going away in Firefox and/or SeaMonkey:
Please send me all relevant hardware and software configuration
details about your Mozilla installation as well as your version of
CentOS. I am looking into a theory a
Did something change since (at least) CentOS 5.1, kernel 2.6.18-53.1.4
that would affect the CUPS printing system? I am no longer able to
connect to it and that seems to be impacting my ability to use the
newest unreleased beta version of SeaMonkey. (My standard release
SeaMonkey, 1.1.8, works ju
I am finishing my mail server config and just trying to get the mysql
login working - it fails to connect and thorws the following error
Mar 21 21:58:21 mail0 authdaemond: failed to connect to mysql server
(server=localhost, userid=courier): Can't connect to local MySQL
server through soc
Hi
I am finishing my mail server config and just trying to get the mysql
login working - it fails to connect and thorws the following error
Mar 21 21:58:21 mail0 authdaemond: failed to connect to mysql server
(server=localhost, userid=courier): Can't connect to local MySQL server
through so
vincenzo romero wrote:
Hello all,
I am trying to configure a subdomain DNS server on a Cent OS 5.1 - for
my lab. Brief configuration:
Lab machine ---> 192.168.17.2 (should respond to DNS queries from
hosts in 192.168.16.0/20 network)
1. I would also like to forward any queries outside the ab
On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 2:17 PM, Simon Jolle sjolle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Hi Centos Users
>
> Its _really_ nonsense to release RHEL version on file sharing networks.
> The only reason why RHEL is so popular on torrent trackers is the lack
> of knowledge about Centos :-)
>
> Conclusion: we s
On Wed, Jan 23, 2008 at 7:38 PM, Tim Alberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Greetings, I'm a Fedora user likely going to switch to CentOS in the
> next few days. I'm wondering if anyone has some heads up advice for
> me? I am very familiar with FC6 and before so I anticipate few problems
> I hav
On Wed, 23 Jan 2008 17:38:59 -0800, Tim Alberts wrote:
> Greetings, I'm a Fedora user likely going to switch to CentOS in the
> next few days. I'm wondering if anyone has some heads up advice for me?
> I am very familiar with FC6 and before so I anticipate few problems I
> haven't already seen (
On Fri, 2008-03-21 at 11:27 -0700, Robert - elists wrote:
> So, since this box has been online for like 2 or 3 years, since like centos
> 4.0 or 4.1 load with multiple yum updates, I am guessing a recompile of that
> app should make the difference?
No. You need to find out where the memory is bein
>
>
> I'd be looking at the application that triggered that error.
> Apparently, it tried to 'free()' a memory block that wasn't malloc()'d
> in the first place.
> ___
Thank you John and Ignacio and others,
So, since this box has been online for like
On Fri, 2008-03-21 at 11:11 -0700, Robert - elists wrote:
> *** glibc detected *** free(): invalid pointer: 0xbffa11b8 ***
> ... I am wondering if I
> should be focusing on a certain glib area or in the application providing
> the error in the error logs
Application. This error happens when an ap
Robert - elists wrote:
On a centos 4.6 box
rpm -qa | grep glib
glib-1.2.10-15
glibc-2.3.4-2.39
glibc-headers-2.3.4-2.39
glibc-common-2.3.4-2.39
dbus-glib-0.22-12.EL.9
glibc-kernheaders-2.4-9.1.100.EL
glibc-devel-2.3.4-2.39
glib2-2.4.7-1
I am getting this type of error at times on a mail server
Hi Centos Users
Its _really_ nonsense to release RHEL version on file sharing networks.
The only reason why RHEL is so popular on torrent trackers is the lack
of knowledge about Centos :-)
Conclusion: we should do more marketing :-)
cheers
Simon
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital sign
On a centos 4.6 box
rpm -qa | grep glib
glib-1.2.10-15
glibc-2.3.4-2.39
glibc-headers-2.3.4-2.39
glibc-common-2.3.4-2.39
dbus-glib-0.22-12.EL.9
glibc-kernheaders-2.4-9.1.100.EL
glibc-devel-2.3.4-2.39
glib2-2.4.7-1
I am getting this type of error at times on a mail server
*** glibc detected ***
On Fri, 2008-03-21 at 08:43 -0700, Akemi Yagi wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 8:19 AM, John <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Fri, 2008-03-21 at 08:02 -0700, Akemi Yagi wrote:
> >
> > Yes I read about it, (the error). Any other pointers you can give on it?
> > Auto mount that is. I searched vari
On Fri, 2008-03-21 at 08:45 -0700, John R Pierce wrote:
> John wrote:
> > On Fri, 2008-03-21 at 08:02 -0700, Akemi Yagi wrote:
> >
> >> On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 7:52 AM, John <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
> >>> On Fri, 2008-03-21 at 09:30 -0500, Barry Brimer wrote:
> >>>
> >>> > >
John wrote:
On Fri, 2008-03-21 at 08:02 -0700, Akemi Yagi wrote:
On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 7:52 AM, John <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Fri, 2008-03-21 at 09:30 -0500, Barry Brimer wrote:
> > Anyone see anything wrong with the configuration? I also read the How To
> > on the Wiki
On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 8:19 AM, John <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 2008-03-21 at 08:02 -0700, Akemi Yagi wrote:
>
> Yes I read about it, (the error). Any other pointers you can give on it?
> Auto mount that is. I searched various How Tos on the net and every
> config I use will not work.
On Fri, 2008-03-21 at 09:30 -0500, Barry Brimer wrote:
/etc/fstab:
//machine_name/SAN /mnt/SAN cifs defaults 0 0
[EMAIL PROTECTED] SAN]# mount -a
Password:
mount error 13 = Permission denied
Problem is there is no password to the smb server. Why am I getting a
password prompt when the share ha
On Fri, 2008-03-21 at 08:02 -0700, Akemi Yagi wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 7:52 AM, John <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Fri, 2008-03-21 at 09:30 -0500, Barry Brimer wrote:
>
> > > > Anyone see anything wrong with the configuration? I also read the How
> > To
> > > > on the Wiki and no lu
On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 7:52 AM, John <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 2008-03-21 at 09:30 -0500, Barry Brimer wrote:
> > > Anyone see anything wrong with the configuration? I also read the How To
> > > on the Wiki and no luck on doing the auto.smb.top and auto.smb.sub
> > > configuration?
On Fri, 2008-03-21 at 09:30 -0500, Barry Brimer wrote:
> > /etc/fstab:
> >
> > //machine_name/SAN /mnt/SAN cifs defaults 0 0
> >
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] SAN]# mount -a
> > Password:
> > mount error 13 = Permission denied
> >
> > Problem is there is no password to the smb server. Why am I getting a
>
/etc/fstab:
//machine_name/SAN /mnt/SAN cifs defaults 0 0
[EMAIL PROTECTED] SAN]# mount -a
Password:
mount error 13 = Permission denied
Problem is there is no password to the smb server. Why am I getting a
password prompt when the share has full RW access and all access is
granted on the share?
On Fri, 21 Mar 2008, Ed Morrison wrote:
Nicolas Thierry-Mieg wrote:
the master mirror seems down (apt.sw.be), but you can use one of the
secondary mirrors
Thanks. I appreciate the help.
Also have a look at the new RPMforge website at:
http://rpmrepo.org/RPMforge
for more inform
Hi,
i have problem with madwifi driver (ath_pci) version 0.9.4 ,on
CentOs5.1after hibernate wireless devices are not working - i need to
restart them
(ifconfig down/ up or network restart).
Is there any solution?
i am using acpid script which will hibernate on power off button pressed.
It is just
/etc/fstab:
//machine_name/SAN /mnt/SAN cifs defaults 0 0
[EMAIL PROTECTED] SAN]# mount -a
Password:
mount error 13 = Permission denied
Problem is there is no password to the smb server. Why am I getting a
password prompt when the share has full RW access and all access is
granted on the share?
Nicolas Thierry-Mieg wrote:
the master mirror seems down (apt.sw.be), but you can use one of the
secondary mirrors
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Thanks. I appreciate the help.
_
--
Pasi Pirhonen - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://pasi.pirhonen.eu/
Top-postings silently ignored
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url :
http://lists.centos.org/pipermai
On Thursday 20 March 2008 21:24, Akemi Yagi wrote:
> > I see in the repo there are some printer drivers like foomatic and
> > hpijs. I'm just wondering if there are plans to also include hplip in
> > the future?
>
> hplip is included in CentOS-5 but not in CentOS-4.
Any plans to port to Cent
Hi all
I wanted to expand my motherboard's SATA capabilities, so I got a SUNIX
SATA2100 PCI SATA card, which uses INITIO INI1622 chipsit, as per their
website:
http://www.sunix.com.tw/it/en/Product_Detail.php?class_a_id=0&sid=447
The only drivers available on their website is for Fedora Core
37 matches
Mail list logo
