First of all, I was able to use the 5.1 LiveCD to create a bootable USB (8G
Lexar FireFly) - thanks to all for your assistance. Question - has anyone
been able to add NTFS support to an USB install? It would be a nice to have
the ability to access NTFS (and Vista for that matter) disks for
troubl
Ray Leventhal wrote:
Is there a way to 'automatically' recreate users/permissions when moving
from RH8 (yes, I know...way old) to CentOS5.1 or is it just simpler to
recreate the users manually?
Merge your RH8 copies of /etc/passwd and /etc/shadow into the CentOS
ones, preferring the new ver
James A. Peltier wrote:
Does anyone here on the list have CentOS 5.1 running on a PS3? I would
like to look at integrating a couple of PS3 nodes into our cluster for
it's ability to use the Cell processor inside and was wondering if
anyone had any experiences.
I installed recently Yellow D
James A. Peltier wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Does anyone here on the list have CentOS 5.1 running on a PS3? I would
> like to look at integrating a couple of PS3 nodes into our cluster for
> it's ability to use the Cell processor inside and was wondering if
> anyone had any experiences.
I have a 'somet
I have a strange problem when using Centos:
When using a Xen kernel (it does not matter whether a guest is started
or not) networking fails is flakey.
ssl connections fail, ping reports a
wrong data byte #50 .
I am using a Sun quad ethernet card, but when I tried the gigabit
Ethernet on the m
Hi All,
Does anyone here on the list have CentOS 5.1 running on a PS3? I would
like to look at integrating a couple of PS3 nodes into our cluster for
it's ability to use the Cell processor inside and was wondering if
anyone had any experiences.
___
On Mon, 2008-03-24 at 16:19 -0500, Dan Bongert wrote:
> mouss wrote:
> > Dan Bongert wrote:
> >> Hello all:
> >>
> >>
> Though 'ls' was just an example -- just about any program will fail. The 'w'
> command will fail too:
>
> thoth(118) /tmp> w
>16:06:51 up 5:34, 1 user, load average: 0.9
On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 04:18:49PM -0500, Dan Bongert wrote:
>> You can also try running ``strace /bin/ls'' to see what is going on.
> Funnily enough, running strace will work just fine. Though, as I said, just
> about any command will fail -- 'ls' was just for testing purposes.
That's funny. Or
mouss wrote:
Dan Bongert wrote:
Hello all:
I have a couple CentOS 4 servers (all up-to-date) that are having
strange command failures. I first noticed this with a perl script that
uses lots of system calls.
thoth(66) /tmp> uname -a
Linux thoth.ssc.wisc.edu 2.6.9-67.0.7.ELsmp #1 SMP Sat Mar
Bill Campbell wrote:
On Mon, Mar 24, 2008, Dan Bongert wrote:
Hello all:
I have a couple CentOS 4 servers (all up-to-date) that are having strange
command failures. I first noticed this with a perl script that uses lots of
system calls.
Basically, sometimes a command just won't run:
thoth(
> So your first case is ALMOST right. resolv.conf should not point to the
> loopback address, but to the static address of the host. But if you have
> not configured NM for static addressing, well you get what you got.
thanks much for replies ... so to be clear:
qatest1 - 192.168.17.1 (DHCP se
vincenzo romero wrote:
where 192.168.17.db is the name of the zone file.
A good reference for DNS is
http://www.zytrax.com/books/dns/
thank you for the reference and response... I have also checked the
above and reviewed it and attempted to follow the configuration
file samples;
Dan Bongert wrote:
Hello all:
I have a couple CentOS 4 servers (all up-to-date) that are having
strange command failures. I first noticed this with a perl script that
uses lots of system calls.
Basically, sometimes a command just won't run:
thoth(52) /tmp> ls
thoth(53) /tmp> ls
thoth(54)
vincenzo romero wrote:
Hello all,
I'm getting frustrated attempting to understand; I googled and asked
folks and am unable to get a straight answer.
1. How is the /etc/resolv.conf file maintained ?
If you are using DHCP, then the content of resolv.conf SHOULD be at the
mercy of your DHCLIEN
vincenzo romero wrote:
Hello all,
I'm getting frustrated attempting to understand; I googled and asked
folks and am unable to get a straight answer.
1. How is the /etc/resolv.conf file maintained ? I do not seem to
get a consistent result when I save resolv.conf configuration from GUI
or by h
>
> where 192.168.17.db is the name of the zone file.
>
> A good reference for DNS is
> http://www.zytrax.com/books/dns/
thank you for the reference and response... I have also checked the
above and reviewed it and attempted to follow the configuration
file samples; however I noticed in
On Mon, Mar 24, 2008, Dan Bongert wrote:
>Hello all:
>
>I have a couple CentOS 4 servers (all up-to-date) that are having strange
>command failures. I first noticed this with a perl script that uses lots of
>system calls.
>
>Basically, sometimes a command just won't run:
>
>thoth(52) /tmp> ls
>
.
Hello all,
I'm getting frustrated attempting to understand; I googled and asked
folks and am unable to get a straight answer.
1. How is the /etc/resolv.conf file maintained ? I do not seem to
get a consistent result when I save resolv.conf configuration from GUI
or by hand using vim /etc/resolv
Hello all:
I have a couple CentOS 4 servers (all up-to-date) that are having strange
command failures. I first noticed this with a perl script that uses lots of
system calls.
Basically, sometimes a command just won't run:
thoth(52) /tmp> ls
thoth(53) /tmp> ls
thoth(54) /tmp> ls
thoth(55)
On Monday 24 March 2008 18:43:43 Sam Drinkard wrote:
> As Jim just pointed out to me, I was unaware of the mixing.. I'll
> see what else I can muck up while trying to fix this :)
I'm surprised that no-one mentioned the skip-broken plugin. You'd still have
to sort out your clamav problem, but
On Monday 24 March 2008 15:32:14 Ray Leventhal wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> One of our servers (very old) died last week and I'm setting up a new
> CentOS 5.1 box to replace it. Primarily used as a samba fileshare on a
> mostly windows-workstation network.
>
> This system will, ideally, have the OS on a 1
Sam Drinkard wrote:
One is from the kbs repo, and one is from rpmforge. Mostly, you're
mixing similar packages from different repositories. This is a bad
thing, and the reason for the existence of priorities, and
protectbase plugins, as well as include/exclude statements on a per
repository ba
Dennis Gilmore wrote:
On Monday 24 March 2008, Sam Drinkard wrote:
I suppose it's more of a frustration with myself, but can some kind soul
please help me with the procedure to tell yum a package is in fact
installed? Here is the output from the command "yum update".
# yum update
Setting
Jim Perrin wrote:
On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 11:32 AM, Sam Drinkard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I suppose it's more of a frustration with myself, but can some kind soul
please help me with the procedure to tell yum a package is in fact
installed? Here is the output from the command "yum upda
Ray Leventhal wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Is there a way to 'automatically' recreate users/permissions
> when moving
> from RH8 (yes, I know...way old) to CentOS5.1 or is it just
> simpler to
> recreate the users manually?
>
> Total users on this system is < 20.
Check out the 'newusers' command.
Hi all,
Is there a way to 'automatically' recreate users/permissions when moving
from RH8 (yes, I know...way old) to CentOS5.1 or is it just simpler to
recreate the users manually?
Total users on this system is < 20.
Thanks in advance,
-Ray
___
Cen
On Monday 24 March 2008, Sam Drinkard wrote:
> I suppose it's more of a frustration with myself, but can some kind soul
> please help me with the procedure to tell yum a package is in fact
> installed? Here is the output from the command "yum update".
>
> # yum update
> Setting up Update Process
>
On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 11:32 AM, Sam Drinkard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I suppose it's more of a frustration with myself, but can some kind soul
> please help me with the procedure to tell yum a package is in fact
> installed? Here is the output from the command "yum update".
> --> Process
Hi all,
One of our servers (very old) died last week and I'm setting up a new
CentOS 5.1 box to replace it. Primarily used as a samba fileshare on a
mostly windows-workstation network.
This system will, ideally, have the OS on a 146 GB SCSI drive, with user
data on a 300GB SCSI, both attach
I suppose it's more of a frustration with myself, but can some kind soul
please help me with the procedure to tell yum a package is in fact
installed? Here is the output from the command "yum update".
# yum update
Setting up Update Process
Setting up repositories
kbs-CentOS-Extras 100%
On Mon, Mar 24, 2008, Les Mikesell wrote:
>Bill Campbell wrote:
>>On Wed, Feb 27, 2008, Les Mikesell wrote:
...
>>I just started playing with VMware-server-1.0.5-80187 on a 64-bit
>>CentOS 5 system system, and am having some issues with the hotkey
>>switching. Running the vmware-server-console via
31 matches
Mail list logo
