I am currently running 7 raid10 data servers. I can say read speed
increases but I doubt the write speed comparing to non raid setup.
The main advantage of the raid is redundancy but not
the performance. If you want to boost the disk performance, go for
the faster drive with more than
10,000rpm s
John J. Lee wrote:
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 6:43 PM, Jerry Geis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi all,
I was wonder what experiences there are out there with using RAID-X for
performance increases. I do use RAID-1 (2 disks) but am interested in
attemtps to gain higher R/W performance. Do the RAID
Have you tried RAID 10? It combines the security of RAID 1 with the speed of
RAID 0. dmraid supports this RAID type.
I was wonder what experiences there are out there with using RAID-X for
performance increases. I do use RAID-1 (2 disks) but am interested in
attemtps to gain higher R/W performa
If you want to higher R/W performance, you should go for raid0.
raid0 fragments the data into the number of disks and distributes them.
It gains a big performance. One drive fails, however, all data gone.
raid5's benefit is not the speed but the effective space usage with
the least data redundancy
Hi all,
I was wonder what experiences there are out there with using RAID-X for
performance increases. I do use RAID-1 (2 disks) but am interested in
attemtps to gain higher R/W performance. Do the RAID-5's etc give
noticeable
performace increases?
A significant help for me was using ccache fo
On Thu, 10 Apr 2008 23:29:21 +0100
Karanbir Singh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> anyway, we should have php-5.2 available in centos-5 within the
> next couple of weeks
Is the cat out of the bag? Yeeah!!
--
Thanks
http://www.911networks.com
When the network has to work
Linux wrote:
# ps ax
PID TTY STAT TIME COMMAND
2994 ?Ss 0:00 sshd: [EMAIL PROTECTED]/2
4028 pts/2Ss+0:00 -bash
5603 ?Ss 0:00 sshd: [EMAIL PROTECTED]/0
5625 pts/0Ss 0:00 -bash
Two root logins via ssh - are these both you? The first looks e
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 2:43 AM, William L. Maltby
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 2008-04-11 at 02:02 +0300, Linux wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 1:44 AM, Benjamin Karhan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > ] Every 59 minutes (maybe every hour) it reboots without any logs,
> > > ] wit
On Fri, 2008-04-11 at 02:02 +0300, Linux wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 1:44 AM, Benjamin Karhan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > ] Every 59 minutes (maybe every hour) it reboots without any logs,
> > ] without any traces and unfortunately with breaking software raid.
> > ] After reboot dmesg do
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 1:44 AM, Benjamin Karhan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ] Every 59 minutes (maybe every hour) it reboots without any logs,
> ] without any traces and unfortunately with breaking software raid.
> ] After reboot dmesg does not have any strange entries.
> this really only hel
Chris Boyd wrote:
>
> On Apr 10, 2008, at 5:29 PM, Karanbir Singh wrote:
>>> We've been working with a consultant that does a lot of custom Sugar
>>> work, and the Sugar support group is strongly recommending it.
>
> Ah, I was not clear. They are strongly recommending PHP 5.2, not RHEL :-)
you
A little birdy told me that Linux said:
] I have a CentOS 5.0 running as a web server.
]
] # uname -a
] Linux hostnamehidden.net 2.6.18-53.1.14.el5 #1 SMP Wed Mar 5 11:37:38
] EST 2008 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
]
] Every 59 minutes (maybe every hour) it reboots without any logs,
] without
On Apr 10, 2008, at 5:29 PM, Karanbir Singh wrote:
We've been working with a consultant that does a lot of custom Sugar
work, and the Sugar support group is strongly recommending it.
Ah, I was not clear. They are strongly recommending PHP 5.2, not
RHEL :-)
anyway, we should have php-5.2
Chris Boyd wrote:
>
> On Apr 10, 2008, at 2:53 PM, Jim Perrin wrote:
>> Are you certain you need 5.2.x? SugarCRM is a RH partner, and offered
>> a bundled sugarcrm install through rhx.redhat.com
>
> We've been working with a consultant that does a lot of custom Sugar
> work, and the Sugar support
Scott Silva wrote on Thu, 10 Apr 2008 12:28:42 -0700:
> I think you can download the intermediate certs from their webpage.
I had a look at their KB website yesterday and exactly the page that
explains how to get and install the intermediates is gone:
https://knowledge.verisign.com/support/ssl-c
The problem described:
http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=2700
Paul Heinlein wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Apr 2008, Gustavo Gouvea wrote:
>
> > Hi Jonny,
> >
> > Yes, I did the reboot. "getenforce" shows "disabled".
> > The funny is that, issuing the start command it says "OK".
> >
> > Even in the logs:
Thanks Paul,
After using -f -Le, I got an error message, and googleing for it, I found that
I got old net-snmp-libs.
Ive updated the pkg, and its working.
Thanks all.
Paul Heinlein wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Apr 2008, Gustavo Gouvea wrote:
>
> > Hi Jonny,
> >
> > Yes, I did the reboot. "getenforce" s
Hi,
I have a CentOS 5.0 running as a web server.
# uname -a
Linux hostnamehidden.net 2.6.18-53.1.14.el5 #1 SMP Wed Mar 5 11:37:38
EST 2008 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
Every 59 minutes (maybe every hour) it reboots without any logs,
without any traces and unfortunately with breaking software r
Hi, all,
1) it is CentOs 5.1
2) i am sure that LDAP is working according to error and access logs (when i
will type bad user it will fail, when i will type bad password it will
inform me about password mismath)
3) yes it is in correct directory
I am sending whole config file :
LoadModule dav_svn
On Apr 10, 2008, at 2:53 PM, Jim Perrin wrote:
Are you certain you need 5.2.x? SugarCRM is a RH partner, and offered
a bundled sugarcrm install through rhx.redhat.com
We've been working with a consultant that does a lot of custom Sugar
work, and the Sugar support group is strongly recommendi
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 3:48 PM, Chris Boyd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We're looking at SugarCRM 5, but they strongly recommend PHP 5.2.4. Looking
> around I see that a few individuals are maintaining repos for CentOS, but
> I'd prefer to get it from one of the larger repositories.
>
> Anyone o
We're looking at SugarCRM 5, but they strongly recommend PHP 5.2.4.
Looking around I see that a few individuals are maintaining repos for
CentOS, but I'd prefer to get it from one of the larger repositories.
Anyone out there using http://www.jasonlitka.com/yum-repository/ ?
Any idea when PH
on 4-10-2008 2:31 AM Kai Schaetzl spake the following:
Tony Schreiner wrote on Wed, 09 Apr 2008 21:14:25 -0400:
Does that mean
you don't get a dialog saying the site is not verifiable?
Correct. With IE7.
Because I sure
do, with several browsers on different platforms.
Checked now with FF2
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 2:35 PM, David Hláčik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi , i am facing a strange problem.
>
> I have centos , i wan to access svn trought apache using mod auth ldap.
>
> This is what i have configured
>
>AuthLDAPBindDN cn=svn,ou=Operators,o=Organization
> AuthLD
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Gustavo Gouvea wrote:
> Yes, I did the reboot. "getenforce" shows "disabled".
> The funny is that, issuing the start command it says "OK".
Try stopping it, then removing the lock file, then restarting it.
# service snmpd stop
# rm /var/run/snmpd
#
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 1:35 PM, David Hláčik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi , i am facing a strange problem.
>
> I have centos , i wan to access svn trought apache using mod auth ldap.
>
> This is what i have configured
>
>AuthLDAPBindDN cn=svn,ou=Operators,o=Organization
> AuthLD
On Thu, 10 Apr 2008, Gustavo Gouvea wrote:
Hi Jonny,
Yes, I did the reboot. "getenforce" shows "disabled".
The funny is that, issuing the start command it says "OK".
Even in the logs:
Apr 10 12:12:44 localhost snmpd: snmpd startup succeeded
Apr 10 12:12:44 localhost snmpd[6673]: NET-SNMP ver
Hi , i am facing a strange problem.
I have centos , i wan to access svn trought apache using mod auth ldap.
This is what i have configured
AuthLDAPBindDN cn=svn,ou=Operators,o=Organization
AuthLDAPBindPassword Pass1
AuthLDAPURL "ldap://ldap/ou=Users,o=Organization?uid";
Does anyone on the list have recommendations on 12VDC based hardware which
runs a stock Centos 4 (or even 5)?
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
- -
- Jason Pyeron PD Inc. http://www
Filipe Brandenburger schrieb:
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 7:39 AM, Frank Büttner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Perhaps you should do:
wget -r http://www.foo.bar/sample
Hm,
this will download the whole www.foo.bar site:(
Add -np (no parent).
You should also probably add a slash after the directory
Sorry, I goof on the last test. I named your downloaded file .config
instead of .conf. I was getting it mixed up with the selinux config file.
Slow brain today.
Looks like it would have worked with just the --init.
steve
Jim Perrin wrote:
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 11:26 AM, Steve Campbell <[EM
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 7:39 AM, Frank Büttner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Perhaps you should do:
> > wget -r http://www.foo.bar/sample
>
> Hm,
> this will download the whole www.foo.bar site:(
Add -np (no parent).
You should also probably add a slash after the directory in the website:
wge
Jim Perrin wrote:
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 11:26 AM, Steve Campbell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I tried the new config file - the downloaded one - and it still gives me
the errors. I then went through and removed the xattr options on all of them
with no luck still. I have not ran the --chec
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 11:26 AM, Steve Campbell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I tried the new config file - the downloaded one - and it still gives me
> the errors. I then went through and removed the xattr options on all of them
> with no luck still. I have not ran the --check yet.
Did you remo
Jim Perrin wrote:
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 9:24 AM, Steve Campbell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Tony and Jim,
sestatus reports disabled. Thanks for the help on the test, Jim.
Okay, so here's the deal. The default aide.conf checks the selinux
bits. If you need to have selinux off (n
Hi all,
i need to generate certificate files for radius tls. I am using CentOS 5.1
and scripts in /etc/pki/tls/misc for generated own CA key, and for own keys
signed with my CA.
For Radius i need a server certificate with xpextensions support. How can i
generate server certificate with xpextension
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 9:24 AM, Steve Campbell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Tony and Jim,
>
> sestatus reports disabled. Thanks for the help on the test, Jim.
Okay, so here's the deal. The default aide.conf checks the selinux
bits. If you need to have selinux off (not really recommended, but
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
gopinath wrote:
> How to configure Diskless environment in CentOS 5.1. Please help me out
I have a small guide to setting up an NFS server and then dishing out
diskless clients across PXE booting. It's out of date as I've not had
time to update it to
On 4/10/08, Steve Campbell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Thanks Mike,
>
> I'm not sure I can do the reboot today as I have had to put the server into
> a temporary production status.
>
> The thing that is sort of bothering me, though, is that so much trouble
> occurs because of selinux when tryi
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 8:51 AM, Steve Campbell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I'm not sure I can do the reboot today as I have had to put the server into
> a temporary production status.
Well, this is infact selinux related.
Test 1 reports:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# getenforce
Permissive
[EMAIL PR
Jim Perrin wrote:
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 8:51 AM, Steve Campbell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Thanks Mike,
I'm not sure I can do the reboot today as I have had to put the server into
a temporary production status.
The thing that is sort of bothering me, though, is that so much trouble
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 8:51 AM, Steve Campbell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks Mike,
>
> I'm not sure I can do the reboot today as I have had to put the server into
> a temporary production status.
>
> The thing that is sort of bothering me, though, is that so much trouble
> occurs because
On Thursday 10 April 2008 13:51:02 Steve Campbell wrote:
> Michael Simpson wrote:
> > On 4/9/08, Steve Campbell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Jim Perrin wrote:
> >>> On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 3:08 PM, Marc Wiatrowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think those errors are because selinux is off.
Michael Simpson wrote:
On 4/9/08, Steve Campbell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Jim Perrin wrote:
On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 3:08 PM, Marc Wiatrowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I think those errors are because selinux is off.
Hmm, I don't ever really turn selinux off, b
On Thu, 2008-04-10 at 17:30 +0530, gopinath wrote:
> How to configure Diskless environment in CentOS 5.1. Please help me
> out
>
Have a look at The Linux Terminal Server Project.
http://www.ltsp.org/ That's is about the easiest configuration out.
You can use rsync to make the Client OS Layou
gopinath wrote:
How to configure Diskless environment in CentOS 5.1. Please help me out
If you want a thin client setup (diskless machines only run X and log
into the server), the easy way is to install the k12ltsp version that
has a centos base (version 5-EL from the download link here
htt
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 7:39 AM, Frank Büttner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sudev Barar schrieb:
>
>
> > On 10/04/2008, Frank Büttner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > Hello,
> > > how can I get all files from an directory of an web server.
> > > An simple wget http://www.foo.bar/sample/* will
Hi Jonny,
Yes, I did the reboot. "getenforce" shows "disabled".
The funny is that, issuing the start command it says "OK".
Even in the logs:
Apr 10 12:12:44 localhost snmpd: snmpd startup succeeded
Apr 10 12:12:44 localhost snmpd[6673]: NET-SNMP version 5.1.2
But still, there is no process run
Your problem sounds like it has nothing to do with sendmail, but with any
IP traffic. Does the other company have a Web or FTP site at the same IP
address or with in the same class C? If so, when email doesn't work, I bet
neither of these work either. I've seen this happen before. The ISP
On 10/04/2008, gopinath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> How to configure Diskless environment in CentOS 5.1. Please help me out
>
Diskless? Like in no floppy / thumb drives or diskless like in network booting?
--
Regards,
Sudev Barar
Read http://blog.sudev.in for topics ranging from here to there.
How to configure Diskless environment in CentOS 5.1. Please help me out
Regards,
Gopinath M
Signal Networks Pvt. Ltd.
Smile... it increases your face value!
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Sudev Barar schrieb:
On 10/04/2008, Frank Büttner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello,
how can I get all files from an directory of an web server.
An simple wget http://www.foo.bar/sample/* will not work:(
Perhaps you should do:
wget -r http://www.foo.bar/sample
Hm,
this will download the who
Gustavo wrote:
Hello All,
Ive searched the arqchives, but didnt find anything like this.. Maybe im
missing some trick here...
The problem:
I've instaled snmpd and snmp-utils packages with yum.
Im using and old simple .conf file, i've been using on my fedora 1 box,
but when I try to start snmpd,
Joseph L. Casale wrote:
For CentOS5, you could use yum-downloadonly plugin :
Wojtek,
Will this still allow rpm to "--test" the install of a local rpm and pull in
the deps and simulate the install?
Yum (in the default incarnation) requires that you press a "Y" for yes
to proceed with the tra
On 10/04/2008, Frank Büttner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
> how can I get all files from an directory of an web server.
> An simple wget http://www.foo.bar/sample/* will not work:(
Perhaps you should do:
wget -r http://www.foo.bar/sample
--
Regards,
Sudev Barar
Read http://blog.sudev.in
Hello,
how can I get all files from an directory of an web server.
An simple wget http://www.foo.bar/sample/* will not work:(
Thanks for your help.
Frank
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
On 4/9/08, Timothy Selivanow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm try to bond a few interfaces together with the hopes of getting
> increased throughput, and I'm using a cisco Catalyst 2900 as the switch.
> I've tried using mode 0, 5, and 6 with nothing special on the switch,
> and mode 4 with some por
On Wed, Apr 09, 2008 at 01:43:45PM -0600, Joseph L. Casale wrote:
> >For CentOS5, you could use yum-downloadonly plugin :
>
> Wojtek,
> Will this still allow rpm to "--test" the install of a local rpm and pull in
> the deps and simulate the install?
When you have the plugin installed and enabled
On 4/9/08, Jason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Does anyone know of a way to specify a CustomLog file name in apache
> based on the vhost? for example, I have 10 vhosts and instead of giving
> each one a CustomLog directive and specifying a different log file I'd
> like to do something in global tha
On 4/9/08, Steve Campbell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Jim Perrin wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 3:08 PM, Marc Wiatrowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> > > I think those errors are because selinux is off.
> > >
> > >
> >
> > Hmm, I don't ever really turn selinux off, but I had always
Tony Schreiner wrote on Wed, 09 Apr 2008 21:14:25 -0400:
> Does that mean
> you don't get a dialog saying the site is not verifiable?
Correct. With IE7.
> Because I sure
> do, with several browsers on different platforms.
Checked now with FF2 and get a warning. They don't recognize the
inter
Scott Silva wrote:
on 4-9-2008 6:14 PM Tony Schreiner spake the following:
Jay Leafey wrote:
Tony Schreiner wrote:
Kai Schaetzl wrote:
Tony Schreiner wrote on Wed, 9 Apr 2008 15:29:16 -0400:
However, you didn't provide any of the information I asked for.
You are not talking of www.bc.edu, d
62 matches
Mail list logo
