Please enable posting
Subject: Welcome to the CentOS-docs mailing list
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 6 May 2008 14:35:29 +
Welcome to the CentOS-docs@centos.org mailing list!
To post to this list, send your email to:
centos-docs@centos.org
General
Michael Powell wrote:
Please enable posting
I think you just did ...
Cheers,
Ralph
pgpWih1koe7ZY.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
CentOS-docs mailing list
CentOS-docs@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
He instalado un servidor centos 5 en casa y quisiera poder instalar
correctamente la libreria gd 2.0.33.
Ya hice un yum install gd y luego yum info gd sale:
gd.i386 2.0.33-9.4.el5_1.1 installed
pero cuando hago un phpinfo() no me sale la categoria GD
que debo
El Martes, 6 de Mayo de 2008 09:22, victor santana escribió:
He instalado un servidor centos 5 en casa y quisiera poder instalar
correctamente la libreria gd 2.0.33.
Ya hice un yum install gd y luego yum info gd sale:
gd.i386 2.0.33-9.4.el5_1.1 installed
Cherny D. C. Berbesi I. escribi:
El Martes, 6 de Mayo de 2008 09:22, victor santana escribi:
He instalado un servidor centos 5 en casa y quisiera poder instalar
correctamente la libreria gd 2.0.33.
Ya hice un yum install gd y luego yum info gd sale:
gd.i386
El Martes 06 Mayo 2008, Victor Santana - ReparacionONLINE escribió:
Cherny D. C. Berbesi I. escribió:
El Martes, 6 de Mayo de 2008 09:22, victor santana escribió:
He instalado un servidor centos 5 en casa y quisiera poder instalar
correctamente la libreria gd 2.0.33.
Ya hice un yum
Renato Covarrubias Romero escribi:
El Martes 06 Mayo 2008, Victor Santana - ReparacionONLINE escribi:
Cherny D. C. Berbesi I. escribi:
El Martes, 6 de Mayo de 2008 09:22, victor santana escribi:
He instalado un servidor centos 5 en casa y quisiera poder instalar
Hola amigos de la lista
Realize la migracion de varias cuentas de correo, restaure todos los
/var/spool/mail/ el correo funciona con MailScanner y sendmail, funciona
bien, los correos nuevos llegan con poquisimo spam, sin embargo, los spam
que llegaron antes de esta migracion estan bajando
Una consulta amigos, alguien ha hecho correr pop-before-smtp en centos 5,
alguien sabe donde encontrar info, mas alla de la pagina de dovecot y
pop-before-smtp, ojala puedan ayudarme
--
Saludos Cordiales
Luis
___
CentOS-es mailing list
Luis Huacho Lazo escribió:
Hola amigos de la lista
Realize la migracion de varias cuentas de correo, restaure todos los
/var/spool/mail/ el correo funciona con MailScanner y sendmail,
funciona bien, los correos nuevos llegan con poquisimo spam, sin
embargo, los spam que llegaron antes de
Luis Huacho Lazo wrote:
Una consulta amigos, alguien ha hecho correr pop-before-smtp en centos 5,
alguien sabe donde encontrar info, mas alla de la pagina de dovecot y
pop-before-smtp, ojala puedan ayudarme
hola luis
usé pop-before-smtp hace muchos años, no es mala idea, pero creo (es mi
DOVECOT con pop3 e imap
On Tue, May 6, 2008 at 2:54 PM, Reparacion ONLINE-Víctor Santana
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Luis Huacho Lazo escribió:
Hola amigos de la lista
Realize la migracion de varias cuentas de correo, restaure todos los
/var/spool/mail/ el correo funciona con MailScanner
GRacias EPE, lo malo q el server ta caido :-(
2008/5/6 Ing. Ernesto Pérez Estévez [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Luis Huacho Lazo wrote:
Una consulta amigos, alguien ha hecho correr pop-before-smtp en centos
5,
alguien sabe donde encontrar info, mas alla de la pagina de dovecot y
pop-before-smtp,
On Mon, 2008-05-05 at 22:31 -0400, Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu wrote:
Hi All,
I'm toying around with Postfix and MySQL on a CentOS 4 server (no longer
using stock postfix and mysql rpms, obviously). I've read several
How-TOs, and it all looks fairly easy to do.
The one thing that puzzles me is
Craig White wrote on Mon, 05 May 2008 16:38:00 -0700:
that's what I ended up doing...you took the first message in the thread
I see. That message wasn't here when I wrote that.
Kai
--
Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com
Les Mikesell wrote on Mon, 05 May 2008 23:49:11 -0500:
Its actually very useful to access backend hosts on private networks or
to transparently spread the load across several machines.
If you proxy it, not with a Redirect, yes. It seemed he wanted just a
redirect.
Kai
--
Kai Schätzl,
Karanbir Singh wrote:
James Fidell wrote:
Karanbir Singh wrote:
James Fidell wrote:
Is there a PHP 5.2 build for CentOS5.1 anywhere? Unfortunately I
need a
fix for a SOAP bug that is present in the current 5.1.6 release.
Not yet, but we are working on it - there should be something there
James Fidell wrote:
It will definitely be a part of the centosplus repo ( to ensure we get
some upgrade path sanity from centos-4 ), however it might also be
available as a separate repo itself.
What's the status of this now? I don't see it in the centosplus repo
yet.
there are a few things
Hi,
I have a freeradius server that is working well in university. We use
EAP-TTLS and PAP protocols. Users from Windows can use Securew2. Users
from Linux and Mac OS X luckily have native support for EAP-TTLS and
PAP. (if you think is Off Topic, keep reading on). On Ubuntu I can use
the
Hi,
yesterday I upgraded a centos 4.6 box via yum and now it seems that certain
pages, especially swf files stopped working.
Does anyone know if ImageMagick got broken on x64? I don't see any other
package wich could have caused this problem.
kind regards,
Geert
PS Below is the output of my
On Tue, May 06, 2008 at 03:48:01PM +0200, Geert Batsleer wrote:
Hi,
yesterday I upgraded a centos 4.6 box via yum and now it seems that
certain pages, especially swf files stopped working.
Does anyone know if ImageMagick got broken on x64? I don't see any
other package wich could have
James Fidell wrote:
Is there a PHP 5.2 build for CentOS5.1 anywhere? Unfortunately I
need a
fix for a SOAP bug that is present in the current 5.1.6 release.
Tske a look at Jason Litka's site:
http://www.jasonlitka.com/yum-repository/
Archives:
On 03 May 2008, Kai Schaetzl maillists AT conactive.com wrote:
Message: 9
?Date: Sat, 03 May 2008 16:31:50 +0200
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Lanny Marcus wrote on Sat, 3 May 2008 07:28:10 -0500:
Linux compaq1300.HOMELAN 2.6.18-8.el5
Ok. I just asked because you never mentioned you had
Lanny Marcus wrote:
If there is some place I can check in a yum database or RPM database on
her box, to verify the kernel version that's really installed (probably
the original one), please let me know where that is. Thanks much! Lanny
rpm -qa kernel*
And: pup is a frontend to yum is a
On Tue, 2008-05-06 at 16:11 +0200, Ralph Angenendt wrote:
Lanny Marcus wrote:
If there is some place I can check in a yum database or RPM database on
her box, to verify the kernel version that's really installed (probably
the original one), please let me know where that is. Thanks much!
Can someone tell me what, and where the file that contains the port
forwarding info is on a standard install? I had a server fail, I have
mounted the drive and need to get this info back.
Thanks.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
Andrew @ ATM Logic wrote:
Can someone tell me what, and where the file that contains
the port forwarding info is on a standard install? I had a
server fail, I have mounted the drive and need to get this info back.
/etc/sysconfig/iptables and /etc/sysconfig/ip6tables
-Ross
Hi all,
I'm trying to add some milters (particularly spamass-milter and
clamav-milter, which I acquired through rpmforge) to my postfix
configuration on Centos5 with the targeted SELinux policy..
I'm running into difficulty getting postfix to communicate through the
unix domain sockets
On Tue, 2008-05-06 at 09:25 -0500, Lanny Marcus wrote:
On Tue, 2008-05-06 at 16:11 +0200, Ralph Angenendt wrote:
Lanny Marcus wrote:
If there is some place I can check in a yum database or RPM database on
her box, to verify the kernel version that's really installed (probably
the
On Tue, 2008-05-06 at 11:31 +0200, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
Les Mikesell wrote on Mon, 05 May 2008 23:49:11 -0500:
Its actually very useful to access backend hosts on private networks or
to transparently spread the load across several machines.
If you proxy it, not with a Redirect, yes. It
Hi:
I need advice on implementing a storage server. I really do not have
the $ to spend for a Dell iSCSI storage divice and I am thinking
trunning CentOS 5.x with ftp or FreeNAS. Here is what I am looking at
and concerned about.
Situation:
My current storage needs are approximately 1.5 TB
On Tue, 6 May 2008 at 12:11pm, Ed Morrison wrote
Situation:
My current storage needs are approximately 1.5 TB annually. This will
increase to about 3.5 TB annually over the next 5 years (rough est.). This
box will just be a data archive and once it is full it will only be used very
On Tue, May 6, 2008 at 3:11 PM, Ed Morrison [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi:
I need advice on implementing a storage server. I really do not have the $
to spend for a Dell iSCSI storage divice and I am thinking trunning CentOS
5.x with ftp or FreeNAS. Here is what I am looking at and concerned
Actually, I am on rh436 course now. Why not set up centos51 as iscsi
target itself?
On 5/6/08, Matt Shields [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, May 6, 2008 at 3:11 PM, Ed Morrison [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi:
I need advice on implementing a storage server. I really do not have the
$
to
Ed Morrison wrote:
Hi:
I need advice on implementing a storage server. I really do not have
the $ to spend for a Dell iSCSI storage divice and I am thinking
trunning CentOS 5.x with ftp or FreeNAS. Here is what I am looking at
and concerned about.
Situation:
My current storage needs are
Scott Thistle wrote:
Actually, I am on rh436 course now. Why not set up centos51 as iscsi
target itself?
that just pushes the file management issues off to another system, where
you still have to solve them
he wants an archive server, which is more of a NAS device then a SAN.
iSCSI
I can't think of a better word for this than weird.
I went back and reread most of the emails on the original thread, and
both Ross and Bill suggested that something about misc might be off.
So, I created a new mount point called other, pointed fstab at it,
modified my scripts and symlinks that
Ross S. W. Walker wrote:
ext4 is being previewed in Fedora 9 this month, so add one more to
the list.
btrfs looks interesting too, though I expect it will be some time before it
is stable.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Btrfs
--
Jeremy Sanders [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ed Morrison wrote:
I need advice on implementing a storage server. I really do not have
the $ to spend for a Dell iSCSI storage divice and I am thinking
trunning CentOS 5.x with ftp or FreeNAS. Here is what I am looking at
and concerned about.
Situation:
My current storage needs are
John R Pierce wrote:
infrastructure to support lots of SATA drives isn't real cheap
regardless. you really don't want to just bolt a bunch of drives up
inside a jumbo desktop tower and call it a server. 5 years at that
run rate is going to be something like 12TB total storage, which
I just purchased an equallogic SAN with 16 1TB drives for 52k at work.
Love it, scheduled snapshots, thin provisioning, iscsi only but fairly
swift at 16 spindles in a RAID 50.
Jason
www.cyborgworkshop.org
John R Pierce wrote:
Ed Morrison wrote:
Hi:
I need advice on implementing a storage
Ed Morrison wrote:
Hi:
I need advice on implementing a storage server. I really do not have
the $ to spend for a Dell iSCSI storage divice and I am thinking
trunning CentOS 5.x with ftp or FreeNAS. Here is what I am looking at
and concerned about.
Situation:
My current storage
On Tue, May 6, 2008 at 3:11 PM, Ed Morrison [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Situation:
My current storage needs are approximately 1.5 TB annually. This will
increase to about 3.5 TB annually over the next 5 years (rough est.). This
box will just be a data archive and once it is full it will only
I just posted this on my website, oddly enough. While you need to
really understand your storage requirements to make an informed choice
between hardware or software RAID, with quad core CPUs being as cheap as
they are it's hard to not make the argument for software.
This is just hdparm over an
On 5/6/08, Ralph Angenendt ra+centos AT br-online.de wrote:
Lanny Marcus wrote:
If there is some place I can check in a yum database or RPM database on
her box, to verify the kernel version that's really installed (probably
the original one), please let me know where that is. Thanks much!
on 5-6-2008 2:49 PM [EMAIL PROTECTED] spake the
following:
On 5/6/08, Ralph Angenendt ra+centos AT br-online.de wrote:
Lanny Marcus wrote:
If there is some place I can check in a yum database or RPM database on
her box, to verify the kernel version that's really installed (probably
the
On Tue, May 6, 2008 at 2:49 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ rpm -qa kernel*
kernel-headers-2.6.18-53.1.14.el5
kernel-2.6.18-8.el5
kernel-2.6.18-53.1.14.el5
How can I correct this, so the box
will boot the latest kernel? TIA! Lanny
As root, go to the directory
Take these benchmarks with a grain of salt.
We don't know how these hardware controllers were setup and by the numbers
posted, not very well, or they are not very good.
A SATA and a SAS drive will have roughly the same sequential io performance.
Where SAS shines is in random io. So if it's
I used postfixadmin and it has been fine. (CentOS 5)
I suggest redirecting (in the http server) all postfixadmin access to
https for security.
I found the db schema satisfactory for my needs.
The point with postfixadmin is the PHP interface to the database.
You /could/ just create whatever
Ross S. W. Walker wrote:
Take these benchmarks with a grain of salt.
and, more importantly, for the thread at hand, this guy wants an ARCHIVE
server, where performance is quite secondary, reliablity and data
retention are more important.
If he had the budget, I'd be suggesting looking at
The point was, acceptable performance can be had without purchasing a
hardware controller. And for archival purposes on a tight budget $500 bucks
means one controller for 3 more drives.
On Tue, May 6, 2008 at 6:17 PM, John R Pierce [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ross S. W. Walker wrote:
Take
On Tue, 2008-05-06 at 15:41 -0700, Scott Silva wrote:
on 5-6-2008 2:49 PM [EMAIL PROTECTED] spake the
following:
snip
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ rpm -qa kernel*
kernel-headers-2.6.18-53.1.14.el5
kernel-2.6.18-8.el5
kernel-2.6.18-53.1.14.el5
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ uname -a
Linux
On Tue, 2008-05-06 at 15:48 -0700, MHR wrote:
snip
As root, go to the directory where the rpms are located (you can use
'find' for this if you don't alreayd know) and run:
rpm -ivh kernel-headers-2.6.18-53.1.14.el5 kernel-2.6.18-8.el5
kernel-2.6.18-53.1.14.el5
Mark: Syntax for the find
Yes, though slammed hardware RAID a bit. Software RAID has it's place don't
get me wrong, it's just knowing when and where.
Now the problem I have with your approach under the OP's
requirements is the only way to fit that kinda storage over that long a
period is with external enclosures and
On Tue, May 6, 2008 at 6:32 PM, Lanny Marcus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 2008-05-06 at 15:48 -0700, MHR wrote:
snip
As root, go to the directory where the rpms are located (you can use
'find' for this if you don't alreayd know) and run:
rpm -ivh
Ross S. W. Walker wrote:
Yes, though slammed hardware RAID a bit. Software RAID has it's place
don't
get me wrong, it's just knowing when and where.
Now the problem I have with your approach under the OP's
requirements is the only way to fit that kinda storage over that long a
period is with
56 matches
Mail list logo
