CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2008:0262
https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2008-0262.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors:
s390:
updates/s390/RPMS/gpdf-2.8.2-7.7.2.s390.rpm
s390x:
updates/s390x/RPMS/gpdf-2.8.2-7.7.2.s390x.rpm
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# ls -l /var/named/chroot/var/named
total 68
-rw-r- 1 root root 1920 may 10 15:14 14.168.192.in-addr.arpa.zone
-rw-r- 1 root root 561 may 10 15:24 3.168.192.in-addr.arpa.zone
-rw-r- 1 root root 461 may 10 15:23 94.110.200.in-addr.arpa.zone
drwxrwx--- 2
Hi everyone,
Any chance I can get the card[1] in $subj to work under CentOS 5.1 ?
The only thing I get in dmesg when inserting/removing the card, are
messages from pccard:
--- dmesg ---
pccard: CardBus card inserted into slot 0
pccard: card ejected from slot 0
--- end ---
When inserting, no new
Hi list,
I have the following entries, below, in today's log file (for yesterday,
10th May).
I don't run the automated yum-updated and didn't run a yum update
yesterday, and no packages were installed. Obviously the entries are old.
I was wondering if anyone could offer an explanation?
Hi all,
sometimes I´m checking status of my server with phpSysInfo, always is all
right, but at May 8 I was experienced a big deviation. My machine was
online for 12 days, but net statistics are reseted. I was checked
/proc/net/dev and there are reseted net statistics too. How is this
possible?
On Sun, 2008-05-11 at 08:08 +0200, Patrick wrote:
How do you get yum/http download statistics of files (rpms) that live on
a CentOS5.1 box with Apache? Is it just a matter of installing some
weblog analyzer software or is some other magic needed?
yum just uses bog-standard HTTP/FTP, so an
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url :
http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/attachments/20080511/baf27488/attachment-0001.bin
--
Message: 7
Date: Sun, 11 May 2008 12:07:34 +0300
From: Pasi Pirhonen [EMAIL PROTECTED
On Sun, May 11, 2008 at 2:26 AM, Ned Slider [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi list,
I have the following entries, below, in today's log file (for yesterday,
10th May).
- yum Begin
Packages Installed:
lzo.i386 1.08-4.2.el5.rf
libmad.i386
2008/4/19 Johnny Hughes [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Akemi Yagi wrote:
I normally only release kernels for CentOS Plus with the same numbers and at
the same times as the upstream kernels.
Since I did screw this up, I will release a new version as soon as I can
after the current set of updates are
Filipe Brandenburger wrote:
2008/5/9 Ralph Angenendt [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Can you give us the bug number for that?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445773
It was closed as duplicate of another bug this morning, I don't know
if I would agree with that.
As the resolution is wait
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Alexandru E. Ungur
Sent: Sunday, May 11, 2008 3:59 AM
To: centos@centos.org
Subject: [CentOS] ASUS WL-100W PCMCIA Wireless NIC
Hi everyone,
Any chance I can get the card[1] in $subj to work under CentOS
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Ned Slider
Sent: Sunday, May 11, 2008 5:27 AM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: [CentOS] Today's log - yum entries
Hi list,
I have the following entries, below, in today's log file (for yesterday,
10th
On Sun, 2008-05-11 at 06:54 -0400, Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams wrote:
On Sun, 2008-05-11 at 08:08 +0200, Patrick wrote:
How do you get yum/http download statistics of files (rpms) that live on
a CentOS5.1 box with Apache? Is it just a matter of installing some
weblog analyzer software or is
Since it seems there are no Linux drivers for this card, your only hope
of getting this thing working is NDISwrapper.
Just had a look and it seems you are in luck!
Someone has gotten your card working in CentOS 5.1 (see entry 58):
On Sun, May 11, 2008 at 5:56 AM, happymaster23 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
but its impossible to break my server
These days it's very hard to state that. I would not bet any money on
it. The only way to be really sure the server cannot be hacked is to
disconnect the network cables (and maybe the
John wrote:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Ned Slider
Sent: Sunday, May 11, 2008 5:27 AM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: [CentOS] Today's log - yum entries
Hi list,
I have the following entries, below, in today's log file (for
Hi,
On Sun, May 11, 2008 at 5:26 AM, Ned Slider [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have the following entries, below, in today's log file (for yesterday,
10th May).
I don't run the automated yum-updated and didn't run a yum update
yesterday, and no packages were installed. Obviously the entries
Akemi Yagi wrote:
On Sun, May 11, 2008 at 2:26 AM, Ned Slider [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi list,
I have the following entries, below, in today's log file (for yesterday,
10th May).
- yum Begin
Packages Installed:
lzo.i386 1.08-4.2.el5.rf
Filipe Brandenburger wrote:
Hi,
On Sun, May 11, 2008 at 5:26 AM, Ned Slider [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have the following entries, below, in today's log file (for yesterday,
10th May).
I don't run the automated yum-updated and didn't run a yum update
yesterday, and no packages were
Filipe Brandenburger wrote:
Hi,
On Sun, May 11, 2008 at 5:26 AM, Ned Slider [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have the following entries, below, in today's log file (for yesterday,
10th May).
I don't run the automated yum-updated and didn't run a yum update
yesterday, and no packages were
Hi,
On Sun, May 11, 2008 at 10:24 AM, Robert Nichols
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I fixed that problem for yum by editing /etc/logrotate.d/yum and changing
size 30k to size 10k. For CentOS, a 10 kilobyte log file is enough
to hold several months of yum activity, but small enough that the file
Robert Nichols wrote:
Filipe Brandenburger wrote:
Hi,
On Sun, May 11, 2008 at 5:26 AM, Ned Slider [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have the following entries, below, in today's log file (for
yesterday,
10th May).
I don't run the automated yum-updated and didn't run a yum update
yesterday, and
Thank you for answer,
last number of transefered data that I seen was about three or four
gigabytes - this is too low for roll over or not?
I´m not using phpSysInfo for monitoring transfered data and I do not want to
monitor them. I was only surprised how it happened.
2008/5/11 Jim Perrin
On Sun, May 11, 2008 at 11:34 AM, happymaster23 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thank you for answer,
last number of transefered data that I seen was about three or four
gigabytes - this is too low for roll over or not?
4GB is just about the extent of the 32bit range for the increments
used in
Thank you for answer,
you are right, word impossible I should write with quotation marks ;), but
I think, that if I say that I´m using private key (attacker can discover
this very simply) only from my IP (this is, I think, only information
saying: try rader some much less secured machine) and
Thank you very much!!!,
you are right - after 4 gigabytes counter was reseted.
2008/5/11 Jim Perrin [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Sun, May 11, 2008 at 11:34 AM, happymaster23 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Thank you for answer,
last number of transefered data that I seen was about three or four
sender: D Steward date: Sun, May 11, 2008 at 11:34:08PM +1000 EOQ
Since it seems there are no Linux drivers for this card, your only hope
of getting this thing working is NDISwrapper.
Just had a look and it seems you are in luck!
Someone has gotten your card working in CentOS 5.1 (see entry
I was just about to ask the same, but for packages I just rolled.
Is there a cmd line swith or env var?
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
- -
- Jason Pyeron PD Inc.
28 matches
Mail list logo
