Riaan Van Niekerk wrote:
username: RiaanVanNiekerk
page detailing official vendor support statements for CentOS,
actual/current, pending or requested. E.g. using as a base content available
on
http://blog.danieldk.org/post/2008/04/09/CentOS-vendor-support
Let me get back to you on Sunday
I have just finished deploying two Dell PowerEdge 1950s with CentOS 5.1 and
Virtuozzo 4. GFS is up and running and Virtuozzo is configured for
shared-storage clustering. Everything works adequately but I am wondering if
anyone else has experienced load issues like I am seeing. I have three
VEs/VMs
James,
- James Thompson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have just finished deploying two Dell PowerEdge 1950s with CentOS
5.1 and Virtuozzo 4. GFS is up and running and Virtuozzo is configured
for shared-storage clustering. Everything works adequately but I am
wondering if anyone else has
I believe both dlm_send and dlm_receive are part of GFS' locking mechanism
where locks are bouncing back and forth between servers. The Zimbra VE is
pretty consistent in its internal load and what struck me was that
Virtuozzo's PIM interface flags the increased load (leading me to believe it
is
On Sat, 2008-05-31 at 16:19 -0400, James Thompson wrote:
With GFS things seem at least noticeably more sluggish which I expect
is normal given the multi-se
James,
I haven't personally used GFS before, but the sysstat package might be
able to help you out. Basically, from what i can see there
Title: Richard Ramrez Ortiz
Buenos das,
Ayer estuvo probando en un servidor HP Proliant un RAID1 con la
controladora que trae integrada(NVIDIA)
La creacin del RAID fue sin problemas a travs de la utilidad de
configuracin en el arranque, por lo que pude instalar el centos con
normalidad. Sin
--- On Sat, 5/31/08, Richard Ramírez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Richard Ramírez [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [CentOS-es] Consulta RAID 1
To: centos-es@centos.org
Received: Saturday, May 31, 2008, 11:32 AM
div id=yiv421073998!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC
-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN
Robert Moskowitz wrote:
Matt Hyclak wrote:
On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 04:37:58PM -0400, Robert Moskowitz enlightened
us:
I just got a 8Gb flash drive and went to copy a bunch of files onto
it. I wanted to perserve everything, so I just took my archiving
rsync command and altered it to go to
I have an existing in-production LAMP server running Centos 5.1. It uses
physical partitions on top of hardware RAID1, having / /home /var and /boot
on separate partitions.
We have a near-identical system I am thinking of bringing in as a
DRBD/Heartbeat companion. One solution may be to use
sbeam wrote:
I have an existing in-production LAMP server running Centos 5.1. It uses
physical partitions on top of hardware RAID1, having / /home /var and /boot
on separate partitions.
We have a near-identical system I am thinking of bringing in as a
DRBD/Heartbeat companion. One solution
sbeam wrote:
I have an existing in-production LAMP server running Centos 5.1. It uses
physical partitions on top of hardware RAID1, having / /home /var and /boot
on separate partitions.
We have a near-identical system I am thinking of bringing in as a
DRBD/Heartbeat companion. One solution
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can
On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 12:33 PM, Craig White [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
where I'm taking the 'id:' field from each record and inserting an
underscore and the id into the 'attributes' label directly above.
Just for fun, this is a one-line sed script that would change that file:
sed -n -e
On Sat, May 31, 2008 at 7:40 AM, sbeam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We have a near-identical system I am thinking of bringing in as a
DRBD/Heartbeat companion. One solution may be to use csync2
[http://oss.linbit.com/csync2/] on /etc and /usr/local (the only areas that
will differ from the stock
On 5/31/2008 3:33 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
Robert Moskowitz wrote:
You can't expect it to maintain ext3 file permissions in a FAT32
partition :D
Not necessarily. If the Linux files do not need to be accessed from the
windows environment, you could create an image file, format the image as
Couldn't agree more. Personally I wanted to see what the fuss was all about. I
certainly got my hands full... 8-)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of MHR
Sent: Friday, May 30, 2008 8:06 PM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Fastest
On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 5:17 PM, MHR [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 4:51 PM, Christopher Chan
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Try adding 'guest ok = yes' to the printer share configuration.
I will - thanks.
I did - no change.
...I think you need to pick a bit more on Windows
On Sat, May 31, 2008 at 1:16 PM, Johnny Hughes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I also normally build all the extras kmods while I build the centosplus
kernel, so they were also not yet done ... however I did go ahead and build
I dont intend to blame anybody but kmod_xfs was a couple of days late
for
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of MHR
Sent: Saturday, May 31, 2008 2:57 PM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] CentOS-Samba question
On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 5:17 PM, MHR [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 4:51 PM,
I want to thank you all for your comments and the knowledge I gained
thereby
Kenneth Burgener wrote:
On 5/31/2008 3:33 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
Robert Moskowitz wrote:
You can't expect it to maintain ext3 file permissions in a FAT32
partition :D
Not necessarily. If the Linux files do
Good day all,
I was wondering if I could pick some admin heads here as I have a HUGE
project I have been tasked with.
I am asking here since I will be basing everything on Centos, and want
it to all play nice together. If anyone feels this is straying off
topic, please just reply off
21 matches
Mail list logo
