[CentOS] Spacewalk from Redhat

Hello, Is anyone using Spacewalk (http://www.redhat.com/spacewalk/) on CentOS 5 or 4? What kind of hardware are you useing it on? Thank you. pgpuVjQkoHYLK.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.or

Re: [CentOS] Moving logical volumes

William L. Maltby schrieb: Since the OP still hasn't clarified his objective, nor provided more detail about original config, I am free to imagine the most permissive situation. Answering your Q, "man vgmerge". Will it do what he wants? No way to tell. But if he has only one lv in the source v

Re: [CentOS] settings up cheap a NAS / SAN server, is it possible?

Les Mikesell wrote: Are you pricing the low end NAS boxes (like Buffalo Linkstation/Terastation, etc.)? It might be hard to beat that if all you want is a file server. Most run Linux of some sort on ARM or PPC processors and may need to be hacked to add NFS or support >2gig files. I h

Re: [CentOS] Minimized Firefox is not visible on panel in CentOS 5.2

hce wrote: Hi, I opened a Firefox on Desktop, but when I clicked Minimize Window button, the Firefox disappeared and there was no icon on the panel, I simply could not find it any more (it did not close), this was the same for the terminal as well . How can I make the Firefox icon visible on pan

Re: [CentOS] Minimized Firefox is not visible on panel in CentOS 5.2

On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 7:28 PM, William L. Maltby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Fri, 2008-06-27 at 12:14 +1000, hce wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I opened a Firefox on Desktop, but when I clicked Minimize Window >> button, the Firefox disappeared and there was no icon on the panel, I >> simply could not

Re: [CentOS] Sendmail with Google Apps SMTP

AnneWilson wrote: > On Sunday 29 June 2008 02:33:13 Neil Cherry wrote: >> AnneWilson wrote: >>> On Saturday 28 June 2008 19:58:58 John R Pierce wrote: Karanbir Singh wrote: > Michael Holmes wrote: >> I use Google Apps for my domain, hosted on a CentOS server. How could >> I setup m

Re: [CentOS] settings up cheap a NAS / SAN server, is it possible?

Am 29.06.2008 um 21:07 schrieb Sorin Srbu: -Original Message- Actually, the calculation is that it needs a GB of RAM for every TB of managed data. How do you reckon this? Ie, what's the basic assumption(s) for the statement? Parity calculations for stripes or what? I don't follow

Re: [CentOS] Yogunluk

On Sat, Jun 28, 2008 at 9:15 PM, Michael A. Peters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > What was really bad - I worked at a company that had the bright idea of > automagically copying the marketing director with all tech support mail so > that he could see the kinds of issues customers were having.

[CentOS] RE: CentOS Digest, Vol 41, Issue 29

> From: Johnny Hughes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > In this case you DO NOT want to integrate these changes [...] > This issue was caused in CentOS-4 (a /etc/passwd.rpmnew file) > due to an > update to the "setup" rpm in March ... and in this case, you can > remove/ignore that file. Thank you for ex

[CentOS] xorg and backlight

Hi all, I have found one problem after upgrading to CentOS 5.2 x86 on my HP Compaq nx7010 laptop. When I close and open lid, backlight is not turned on again. I can see my desktop, but the only thing I can do is press CTRL+ALT+BACKSPACE to restart X11. Then the backlight is restored. xorg.co

Re: [CentOS] Upgrade perl; package conflict

On Sun, 2008-06-29 at 15:41 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote: > Gregory P. Ennis wrote: > >>> Thanks again for your help!!! > >> is it possible that you have extras set at a different priority than > >> base ... you also have the protectbase installed along with priorities > >> (not recommended). > >>

Re: [CentOS] Upgrade perl; package conflict

Gregory P. Ennis wrote: Thanks again for your help!!! is it possible that you have extras set at a different priority than base ... you also have the protectbase installed along with priorities (not recommended). You should have these settings for [extras], [base] and [updates] sections in C

Re: [CentOS] settings up cheap a NAS / SAN server, is it possible?

Les Mikesell wrote: Rudi Ahlers wrote: I mainly want to use it as a backup server for hosting servers, so I'll focus on FTP / SSH / SFTP / iSCSI (if possible), and maybe NFS - I don't want SMB (for security reasons). I'll probably also add Webmin to allow users to browse their backups via

Re: [CentOS] settings up cheap a NAS / SAN server, is it possible?

Rudi Ahlers wrote: I mainly want to use it as a backup server for hosting servers, so I'll focus on FTP / SSH / SFTP / iSCSI (if possible), and maybe NFS - I don't want SMB (for security reasons). I'll probably also add Webmin to allow users to browse their backups via HTTPS, manage folder

Re: [CentOS] settings up cheap a NAS / SAN server, is it possible?

John R Pierce wrote: probably a /little/ expensive but not excessively so, you might check out the Intel 2U 'kit' servers, like http://developer.intel.com/design/servers/platforms/SR1500-2500/index.htm specifically, the SR2500LX configuration, oops, I meant SR2500ALLX :-/ _

Re: [CentOS] settings up cheap a NAS / SAN server, is it possible?

Les Mikesell wrote: Rudi Ahlers wrote: I mainly want to use it as a backup server for hosting servers, so I'll focus on FTP / SSH / SFTP / iSCSI (if possible), and maybe NFS - I don't want SMB (for security reasons). I'll probably also add Webmin to allow users to browse their backups via HT

Re: [CentOS] settings up cheap a NAS / SAN server, is it possible?

Rudi Ahlers wrote: I mainly want to use it as a backup server for hosting servers, so I'll focus on FTP / SSH / SFTP / iSCSI (if possible), and maybe NFS - I don't want SMB (for security reasons). I'll probably also add Webmin to allow users to browse their backups via HTTPS, manage folders,

Re: [CentOS] settings up cheap a NAS / SAN server, is it possible?

Rudi Ahlers wrote: Hi all I want to look at setting up a simple / cheap SAN / NAS server using normal PIV motherboard, 2GB (or even more) RAM, Core 2 Duo CPU (probably a Intel 6700 / 6750 / 6800) & some SATA HDD's (4 or 6x 320GB - 750GB). My budget is limited, so I can't afford a pre-built NA

Re: [CentOS] settings up cheap a NAS / SAN server, is it possible?

Les Mikesell wrote: Rudi Ahlers wrote: I want to look at setting up a simple / cheap SAN / NAS server using normal PIV motherboard, 2GB (or even more) RAM, Core 2 Duo CPU (probably a Intel 6700 / 6750 / 6800) & some SATA HDD's (4 or 6x 320GB - 750GB). My budget is limited, so I can't afford

Re: [CentOS] settings up cheap a NAS / SAN server, is it possible?

Steve Tindall wrote: On Sun, 2008-06-29 at 19:16 +0200, Rudi Ahlers wrote: Unfortunately, the only ECC capable motherboards I can get my hands on will be XEON, which is much more expensive than a normal desktop type motherboard. And the CPU's will cost more. Consider using an Asus s

Re: [CentOS] settings up cheap a NAS / SAN server, is it possible?

Sorin Srbu wrote: -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Steve Thompson Sent: Sunday, June 29, 2008 8:39 PM To: CentOS mailing list Subject: Re: [CentOS] settings up cheap a NAS / SAN server, is it possible? A cheap server: there are

RE: [CentOS] settings up cheap a NAS / SAN server, is it possible?

>-Original Message- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of >Steve Thompson >Sent: Sunday, June 29, 2008 8:39 PM >To: CentOS mailing list >Subject: Re: [CentOS] settings up cheap a NAS / SAN server, is it possible? > > >A cheap server: there are many different values

RE: [CentOS] settings up cheap a NAS / SAN server, is it possible?

>-Original Message- >> Actually, the calculation is that it needs a GB of RAM for every TB of managed data. How do you reckon this? Ie, what's the basic assumption(s) for the statement? Parity calculations for stripes or what? I don't follow. I can't say I've ever heard any such like, so

Re: [CentOS] Upgrade perl; package conflict

> > > > Thanks again for your help!!! > > is it possible that you have extras set at a different priority than > base ... you also have the protectbase installed along with priorities > (not recommended). > > You should have these settings for [extras], [base] and [updates] > sections in Cen

Re: [CentOS] settings up cheap a NAS / SAN server, is it possible?

On Sun, 2008-06-29 at 19:16 +0200, Rudi Ahlers wrote: > Unfortunately, the only ECC capable motherboards I can get my > hands on will be XEON, which is much more expensive than a normal > desktop type motherboard. And the CPU's will cost more. Consider using an Asus socket AM2 motherboard, as

Re: [CentOS] settings up cheap a NAS / SAN server, is it possible?

A cheap server: there are many different values of cheap; it all depends on what you need it for. For my home network, I just picked up a brand new Dell Poweredge PE2900 server (from Dell) with two quad-core 2.33 GHz processors, 24 GB memory and two 250 GB SATA disks for $2800. Price was too

Re: [CentOS] Moving logical volumes

On Sun, 2008-06-29 at 09:13 -0700, John R Pierce wrote: > Frank Büttner wrote: > > Exist there no way to do this without moving the data? > > a different volgroup implies different physical drives... Not necessarily true. But to answer the original question, no, LVM was not designed to swap LVs

Re: [CentOS] Moving logical volumes

On Sun, 2008-06-29 at 09:13 -0700, John R Pierce wrote: > Frank Büttner wrote: > > John R Pierce schrieb: > >> assuming this logical volume containss extfs, dump(8) it on one, > >> restore(8) it on the other. this can be combined with a pipe, > >> like # dump 0 -f - /dev/volgroup/logvol |

Re: [CentOS] Upgrade perl; package conflict

Gregory P. Ennis wrote: It looks like some perl thing is trying to keep the perl at the OLD level. (you have plenty of rf packages, which is rpmforge ... those are NON-CentOS pacakges. I am not saying those are the problem, just pointing out your original statement is in error where you list o

Re: [CentOS] settings up cheap a NAS / SAN server, is it possible?

Rudi Ahlers wrote: I want to look at setting up a simple / cheap SAN / NAS server using normal PIV motherboard, 2GB (or even more) RAM, Core 2 Duo CPU (probably a Intel 6700 / 6750 / 6800) & some SATA HDD's (4 or 6x 320GB - 750GB). My budget is limited, so I can't afford a pre-built NAS devic

Re: [CentOS] settings up cheap a NAS / SAN server, is it possible?

Rainer Duffner wrote: Am 29.06.2008 um 09:08 schrieb Rudi Ahlers: Hi all I want to look at setting up a simple / cheap SAN / NAS server using normal PIV motherboard, 2GB (or even more) RAM, Core 2 Duo CPU (probably a Intel 6700 / 6750 / 6800) & some SATA HDD's (4 or 6x 320GB - 750GB). My b

Re: [CentOS] settings up cheap a NAS / SAN server, is it possible?

John R Pierce wrote: Rudi Ahlers wrote: Hi all I want to look at setting up a simple / cheap SAN / NAS server using normal PIV motherboard, 2GB (or even more) RAM, Core 2 Duo CPU (probably a Intel 6700 / 6750 / 6800) & some SATA HDD's (4 or 6x 320GB - 750GB). My budget is limited, so I can't

Re: [CentOS] Upgrade perl; package conflict

> > It looks like some perl thing is trying to keep the perl at the OLD level. > > (you have plenty of rf packages, which is rpmforge ... those are > NON-CentOS pacakges. I am not saying those are the problem, just > pointing out your original statement is in error where you list only one > N

Re: [CentOS] Upgrade perl; package conflict

Gregory P. Ennis wrote: On Sun, 2008-06-29 at 16:46 +0100, Karanbir Singh wrote: Gregory P. Ennis wrote: I am still having this same problem. The only non-CentOS package I have installed is Astro::Time via cpan. I have looked at the bug report but am not sure what to do next. I have two x86_

Re: [CentOS] Moving logical volumes

Frank Büttner wrote: John R Pierce schrieb: assuming this logical volume containss extfs, dump(8) it on one, restore(8) it on the other. this can be combined with a pipe, like # dump 0 -f - /dev/volgroup/logvol | (cd /dest; restore -rf - ) (this assumes the new logical volume has been c

Re: [CentOS] Upgrade perl; package conflict

On Sun, 2008-06-29 at 16:46 +0100, Karanbir Singh wrote: > Gregory P. Ennis wrote: > > I am still having this same problem. The only non-CentOS package I have > > installed is Astro::Time via cpan. I have looked at the bug report but > > am not sure what to do next. I have two x86_64 units that

Re: [CentOS] Upgrade perl; package conflict

On Sun, 2008-06-29 at 10:45 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote: > Gregory P. Ennis wrote: > > On Fri, 2008-06-27 at 09:24 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >> Removing perl.i386 fixed this... > >> > >> Thanks! > >> > >> - Original Message - > >> From: "Ralph Angenendt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> To:

Re: [CentOS] Upgrade perl; package conflict

Gregory P. Ennis wrote: I am still having this same problem. The only non-CentOS package I have installed is Astro::Time via cpan. I have looked at the bug report but am not sure what to do next. I have two x86_64 units that still have the problem. Make sure the Extras repo is enabled on the

Re: [CentOS] Upgrade perl; package conflict

Gregory P. Ennis wrote: On Fri, 2008-06-27 at 09:24 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Removing perl.i386 fixed this... Thanks! - Original Message - From: "Ralph Angenendt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: centos@centos.org Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2008 8:34:11 PM GMT +01:00 Amsterdam / Berlin / B

Re: [CentOS] Upgrade perl; package conflict

On Fri, 2008-06-27 at 09:24 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Removing perl.i386 fixed this... > > Thanks! > > - Original Message - > From: "Ralph Angenendt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: centos@centos.org > Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2008 8:34:11 PM GMT +01:00 Amsterdam / Berlin / Bern > / Ro

RE: [CentOS] Copy of own messages

>-Original Message- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of >Johnny Hughes >Sent: Sunday, June 29, 2008 3:45 PM >To: CentOS mailing list >Subject: Re: [CentOS] Copy of own messages > >Sorin Srbu wrote: >>> -Original Message- >>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailt

Re: [CentOS] Copy of own messages

Sorin Srbu wrote: -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of AnneWilson Sent: Sunday, June 29, 2008 11:21 AM To: centos@centos.org Subject: [CentOS] Copy of own messages For some reason I'm no longer seeing copies of my own messages. I've checked

RE: [CentOS] Copy of own messages

>-Original Message- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of >Kai Schaetzl >Sent: Sunday, June 29, 2008 2:58 PM >To: centos@centos.org >Subject: Re: [CentOS] Copy of own messages > >Sorin Srbu wrote on Sun, 29 Jun 2008 14:37:37 +0200: > >> I use Gmail too. What is it

Re: [CentOS] system-auth.rpmnew

On Sun, 2008-06-29 at 14:57 +0200, Kai Schaetzl wrote: > The upgrade to 5.2 creates /etc/pam.d/system-auth.rpmnew. I see that > /etc/pam.d/system-auth actually is a symlink to system-auth-ac. > Is it recommended to replace that symlink with the rpmnew file? IMO, it's never OK w/o first examining

[CentOS] system-auth.rpmnew

The upgrade to 5.2 creates /etc/pam.d/system-auth.rpmnew. I see that /etc/pam.d/system-auth actually is a symlink to system-auth-ac. Is it recommended to replace that symlink with the rpmnew file? Kai -- Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conact

Re: [CentOS] Copy of own messages

Sorin Srbu wrote on Sun, 29 Jun 2008 14:37:37 +0200: > I use Gmail too. What is it that Gmail does that might cause this behaviour?? They probably skip duplicate message-ids. Some mail clients allow this to be configurable, maybe there's an option at Gmail as well? Kai -- Kai Schätzl, Berlin,

Re: [CentOS] Moving logical volumes

On Sun, 2008-06-29 at 10:33 +0200, Frank Büttner wrote: > John R Pierce schrieb: > > assuming this logical volume containss extfs, dump(8) it on one, > > restore(8) it on the other. this can be combined with a pipe, like > > # dump 0 -f - /dev/volgroup/logvol | (cd /dest; restore -rf - ) >

RE: [CentOS] Copy of own messages

>-Original Message- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of >Jacques B. >Sent: Sunday, June 29, 2008 11:47 AM >To: CentOS mailing list >Subject: Re: [CentOS] Copy of own messages > >On Sun, Jun 29, 2008 at 5:20 AM, AnneWilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >wrote: >> For some r

RE: [CentOS] Copy of own messages

>-Original Message- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of >AnneWilson >Sent: Sunday, June 29, 2008 11:21 AM >To: centos@centos.org >Subject: [CentOS] Copy of own messages > >For some reason I'm no longer seeing copies of my own messages. I've checked >http://lists

[CentOS] CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 40, Issue 14

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to [EMAIL PROTECTED] You can reac

Re: [CentOS] settings up cheap a NAS / SAN server, is it possible?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Iv'e done a NAS with centos 5.2 here. Specs are: Portwell WADE 8056 board with Intel Core2Duo 2,4GHZ, 4GB (2x 2GB kingston DDR2 667), 4x 500GB Samsung SATA2 HDD's and a very nice Chenbro ES34069 NAS case. The board only supports SoftRaid, so i made a

Re: [CentOS] spam filtering with centos 5.2

John R Pierce wrote: In the past I've used a combination of spamhaus combined RBL's and Spamassassin with Mailscanner as my spam recipe, but this stopped working very well for me well over a year ago. As many of the users of the couple small/personal mail servers I run are NOT technical peopl

Re: [CentOS] settings up cheap a NAS / SAN server, is it possible?

Am 29.06.2008 um 09:08 schrieb Rudi Ahlers: Hi all I want to look at setting up a simple / cheap SAN / NAS server using normal PIV motherboard, 2GB (or even more) RAM, Core 2 Duo CPU (probably a Intel 6700 / 6750 / 6800) & some SATA HDD's (4 or 6x 320GB - 750GB). My budget is limited, so

Re: [CentOS] Copy of own messages

On Sun, Jun 29, 2008 at 5:20 AM, AnneWilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > For some reason I'm no longer seeing copies of my own messages. I've checked > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos and the preferences setting > is still fine. Does anyone know what the problem might be? Thanks

Re: [CentOS] Sendmail with Google Apps SMTP

2008/6/28 Simon Jolle sjolle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On 06/28/2008 02:24 PM, Michael Holmes wrote: > >> I use Google Apps for my domain, hosted on a CentOS server. >> > > What you are exactly hosting on your CentOS server? As far as I know Google > Apps are hosted in Google data centers? > > cheers

[CentOS] Copy of own messages

For some reason I'm no longer seeing copies of my own messages. I've checked http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos and the preferences setting is still fine. Does anyone know what the problem might be? Thanks Anne ___ CentOS mailing list C

Re: [CentOS] download centos 5.2

> fabian dacunha wrote: >> 23:45:37 (124 KB/s) - Connection closed at byte 52617147. Retrying. >> >> --23:45:38-- (try: 2) >> http://centos.bio.lmu.de/5.2/isos/i386/CentOS-5.2-i386-bin-DVD.iso >> Connecting to centos.bio.lmu.de|141.84.43.23|:80... connected. >> HTTP request sent, awaiting response

Re: [CentOS] Moving logical volumes

John R Pierce schrieb: assuming this logical volume containss extfs, dump(8) it on one, restore(8) it on the other. this can be combined with a pipe, like # dump 0 -f - /dev/volgroup/logvol | (cd /dest; restore -rf - ) (this assumes the new logical volume has been created, has a virgin

Re: [CentOS] Sendmail with Google Apps SMTP

AnneWilson wrote on Sun, 29 Jun 2008 08:04:53 +0100: > I use sendmail.postfix, simply setting KMail with the settings listed in > http://mail.google.com/support/bin/answer.py?answer=78799. Doesn't that > supply what you want? He wants to use sendmail with Google as a smarthost, you are not usi

Re: [CentOS] spam filtering with centos 5.2

John R Pierce wrote on Sat, 28 Jun 2008 23:59:38 -0700: > In the past I've used a combination of spamhaus combined RBL's and > Spamassassin with Mailscanner as my spam recipe, but this stopped > working very well for me well over a year ago. How come? I have several MailScanner machines with di

Re: [CentOS] New yum search behavior is awful/useless

Brian wrote on Sat, 28 Jun 2008 15:48:09 -0400 (EDT): > yum provides how does this provide any old functionality of search? Kai -- Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com ___ CentOS mailin

Re: [CentOS] Moving logical volumes

Frank Büttner wrote: Hello, exist there an standard way to move an logical volume from one volume group to another one? assuming this logical volume containss extfs, dump(8) it on one, restore(8) it on the other. this can be combined with a pipe, like # dump 0 -f - /dev/volgroup/lo

[CentOS] Moving logical volumes

Hello, exist there an standard way to move an logical volume from one volume group to another one? Thanks. smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/cento

Re: [CentOS] Clamd not working

On Saturday 28 June 2008 21:30:51 AnneWilson wrote: > On Saturday 28 June 2008 20:38:15 Ralph Angenendt wrote: > > AnneWilson wrote: > > > I seem to have been getting the daily updates. I've not seen the error > > > message before. Perhaps it's just because clamd was not started at > > > bootup (

Re: [CentOS] iptables connlimit

noro wrote: > hi, > > i try use iptables connlimit, > > # iptables -I INPUT -p tcp --dport 80 -m connlimit --connlimit-above 16 > --connlimit-mask 24 -j DROP > iptables: Unknown error 4294967295 > > where is problem ? > thanks > > > # rpm -qa | grep iptables > iptables-1.3.5-4.el5 > > # unam

Re: [CentOS] settings up cheap a NAS / SAN server, is it possible?

Rudi Ahlers wrote: Hi all I want to look at setting up a simple / cheap SAN / NAS server using normal PIV motherboard, 2GB (or even more) RAM, Core 2 Duo CPU (probably a Intel 6700 / 6750 / 6800) & some SATA HDD's (4 or 6x 320GB - 750GB). My budget is limited, so I can't afford a pre-built NA

[CentOS] settings up cheap a NAS / SAN server, is it possible?

Hi all I want to look at setting up a simple / cheap SAN / NAS server using normal PIV motherboard, 2GB (or even more) RAM, Core 2 Duo CPU (probably a Intel 6700 / 6750 / 6800) & some SATA HDD's (4 or 6x 320GB - 750GB). My budget is limited, so I can't afford a pre-built NAS device. Can this

Re: [CentOS] download centos 5.2

fabian dacunha wrote: 23:45:37 (124 KB/s) - Connection closed at byte 52617147. Retrying. --23:45:38-- (try: 2) http://centos.bio.lmu.de/5.2/isos/i386/CentOS-5.2-i386-bin-DVD.iso Connecting to centos.bio.lmu.de|141.84.43.23|:80... connected. HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 206 Partial

Re: [CentOS] Sendmail with Google Apps SMTP

On Sunday 29 June 2008 02:33:13 Neil Cherry wrote: > AnneWilson wrote: > > On Saturday 28 June 2008 19:58:58 John R Pierce wrote: > >> Karanbir Singh wrote: > >>> Michael Holmes wrote: > I use Google Apps for my domain, hosted on a CentOS server. How could > I setup my sendmail.mc

Re: [CentOS] download centos 5.2

fabian dacunha wrote: actually i used wget to download it but im 100% sure there was no file b4 in the same directory with the same name also the md5sum was different as i said b4 for the second file actually here the message for you info wget http://centos.bio.lmu.de/5.2/isos/i386/CentOS-5.2-i

[CentOS] spam filtering with centos 5.2

In the past I've used a combination of spamhaus combined RBL's and Spamassassin with Mailscanner as my spam recipe, but this stopped working very well for me well over a year ago. As many of the users of the couple small/personal mail servers I run are NOT technical people, and use POP to rea