Re: [CentOS] Re: Re: Rebuild of kernel 2.6.9-67.0.20.EL failure

2008-06-30 Thread John R Pierce
John wrote: What did I do offend you or others? sending 400K bytes of unsolicited attachments to 1000s of mailboxes is not exactly polite. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[CentOS] Re: Re: Rebuild of kernel 2.6.9-67.0.20.EL failure

2008-06-30 Thread John
Excuse me, What did I do offend you or others? "Paul Heinlein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schreef in bericht news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > On Mon, 30 Jun 2008, John wrote: > >> Maby helpfull logfiles > > Can someone block this guy from the list? > > -- > Paul Heinlein <> [EMAIL PROTECTED] <> > http://www

Re: [CentOS] settings up cheap a NAS / SAN server, is it possible?

2008-06-30 Thread John R Pierce
Rudi Ahlers wrote: ok, so in your setup the OS is totally separate from the data itself? indeed, almost all my servers are setup this way, too. A pair of smaller disks, 36GB or 80GB are mirrored for the OS and software, then populate the rest with large disks in raid10 or raid5 for whateve

Re: [CentOS] settings up cheap a NAS / SAN server, is it possible?

2008-06-30 Thread Rudi Ahlers
Les Mikesell wrote: Rudi Ahlers wrote: David Mackintosh wrote: On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 02:08:33PM -0500, Les Mikesell wrote: Have you updated to Centos 5.2 yet? And if so, did it improve NFS performance? Sorry, these computers are in production now so I can't fiddle with them. Bes

Re: [CentOS] settings up cheap a NAS / SAN server, is it possible?

2008-06-30 Thread Les Mikesell
Rudi Ahlers wrote: David Mackintosh wrote: On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 02:08:33PM -0500, Les Mikesell wrote: Have you updated to Centos 5.2 yet? And if so, did it improve NFS performance? Sorry, these computers are in production now so I can't fiddle with them. Besides, this would be a "

Re: [CentOS] Spacewalk from Redhat

2008-06-30 Thread Tom Lanyon
On 01/07/2008, at 2:19 PM, Amos Shapira wrote: 2008/6/30 Bazy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Hello, Is anyone using Spacewalk (http://www.redhat.com/spacewalk/) on CentOS 5 or 4? What kind of hardware are you useing it on? Do I read it right that it requires Oracle 9?? (http://tinyurl.com/6rff8l) or

Re: [CentOS] settings up cheap a NAS / SAN server, is it possible?

2008-06-30 Thread Rudi Ahlers
nate wrote: Rudi Ahlers wrote: nate wrote: Rudi Ahlers wrote: This raises an interesting question. What do you do in this kind of scenario? How do you upgrade a NAS / SAN with say 5 / 10 TB worth of data? Nate, what EXACTLY does that have todo with the topic? We

Re: [CentOS] settings up cheap a NAS / SAN server, is it possible?

2008-06-30 Thread nate
Rudi Ahlers wrote: > nate wrote: >> Rudi Ahlers wrote: >> >> >>> This raises an interesting question. What do you do in this kind of >>> scenario? How do you upgrade a NAS / SAN with say 5 / 10 TB worth of >>> data? > Nate, what EXACTLY does that have todo with the topic? We're talking > about a s

Re: [CentOS] settings up cheap a NAS / SAN server, is it possible?

2008-06-30 Thread Rudi Ahlers
nate wrote: Rudi Ahlers wrote: This raises an interesting question. What do you do in this kind of scenario? How do you upgrade a NAS / SAN with say 5 / 10 TB worth of data? Lots of the more modern enterprise arrays support online upgrades. Some of them even support re-distributing da

Re: [CentOS] settings up cheap a NAS / SAN server, is it possible?

2008-06-30 Thread nate
Rudi Ahlers wrote: > This raises an interesting question. What do you do in this kind of > scenario? How do you upgrade a NAS / SAN with say 5 / 10 TB worth of data? Lots of the more modern enterprise arrays support online upgrades. Some of them even support re-distributing data across the new sp

Re: [CentOS] Acer 5920 audio chip does not work in CentOS 5.2?

2008-06-30 Thread Alex White
hce wrote: Hi, I've installed CentOS 5.2 to a laptop Acer 5920 for dual boot, the audio works in Window Vista, but does not work in CentOS 5.2. Does CentOS 5.2 support following audio chip or not? Audio device: Intel Corporation 82801H (ICH8 Family) HD Audio Controller (rev 03) Thank you. Kin

Re: [CentOS] settings up cheap a NAS / SAN server, is it possible?

2008-06-30 Thread Rudi Ahlers
David Mackintosh wrote: On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 02:08:33PM -0500, Les Mikesell wrote: Have you updated to Centos 5.2 yet? And if so, did it improve NFS performance? Sorry, these computers are in production now so I can't fiddle with them. Besides, this would be a "long" upgrade -- th

Re: [CentOS] Spacewalk from Redhat

2008-06-30 Thread Amos Shapira
2008/6/30 Bazy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Hello, > > Is anyone using Spacewalk (http://www.redhat.com/spacewalk/) on CentOS 5 or > 4? What kind of hardware are you useing it on? Do I read it right that it requires Oracle 9?? (http://tinyurl.com/6rff8l) or am I missing something? --Amos _

[CentOS] [CentOS4.6]Where can I get these packages (xorg-server xproto fontsproto)?

2008-06-30 Thread huo jinzhe
When I install xf86-video-intel-2.3.2, Package requirements were not met. And " yum list | grep xorg-server " can not find such package. Where can I get these packages (xorg-server xproto fontsproto)? Thanks in advance. The log information is below: ./configure .. checking pkg-config is at

Re: [CentOS] settings up cheap a NAS / SAN server, is it possible?

2008-06-30 Thread David Mackintosh
On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 02:08:33PM -0500, Les Mikesell wrote: > Have you updated to Centos 5.2 yet? And if so, did it improve NFS > performance? Sorry, these computers are in production now so I can't fiddle with them. Besides, this would be a "long" upgrade -- they are both CentOS 4.x systems.

Re: [CentOS] why yum cannot find lighttpd?

2008-06-30 Thread Barry Brimer
I tried to install lighttpd in CentOS 5.2, but yum list lighttpd returned an error of "no matching packages to list". Should it be installed from source tarball? lighttpd is not in the CentOS repositories. It is however a part of the rpmforge repositories. Add the rpmforge repository and then

Re: [CentOS] why yum cannot find lighttpd?

2008-06-30 Thread Stephen Harris
On Tue, Jul 01, 2008 at 11:55:21AM +1000, hce wrote: > I tried to install lighttpd in CentOS 5.2, but yum list lighttpd > returned an error of "no matching packages to list". Should it be You need to configure rpmforge or another repo for this; it's not part of the core OS. Name : lighttpd Arch

Re: [CentOS] why yum cannot find lighttpd?

2008-06-30 Thread Jim Perrin
On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 9:55 PM, hce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > I tried to install lighttpd in CentOS 5.2, but yum list lighttpd > returned an error of "no matching packages to list". Should it be > installed from source tarball? lighttpd is not part of the default operating system, whic

Re: [CentOS] why yum cannot find lighttpd?

2008-06-30 Thread Ray Van Dolson
On Tue, Jul 01, 2008 at 11:55:21AM +1000, hce wrote: > Hi, > > I tried to install lighttpd in CentOS 5.2, but yum list lighttpd > returned an error of "no matching packages to list". Should it be > installed from source tarball? It's not included with the base CentOS (RHEL) distribution. You'll

[CentOS] why yum cannot find lighttpd?

2008-06-30 Thread hce
Hi, I tried to install lighttpd in CentOS 5.2, but yum list lighttpd returned an error of "no matching packages to list". Should it be installed from source tarball? Thank you. Kind Regards, Jim ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.c

Re: [CentOS] nfs cannot see mount points on other machine

2008-06-30 Thread MHR
On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 10:54 AM, Kai Schaetzl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Toby Bluhm wrote on Fri, 27 Jun 2008 12:46:43 -0400: > >> It should only >> be used if you know how it works and what you are doing. > > Isn't that right for everything? > My only comment would be that you are asking for p

Re: Yogunluk: Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.2 kernel [2.6.18-92.1.1.el5] crasheson dual-PIII Compaq ProLiant 3000

2008-06-30 Thread MHR
On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 10:48 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yogunlugumuza gore mesajiniza en yakin zamanda cevap verilecektir. > > Sercan TAPSIN > GSM: > 05358583410 > 05542390959 > 05542390960 > ICQ : 706886 > MSN : [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Yahoo : [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Google : [EMAIL PROTECTED] > M

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.2 kernel [2.6.18-92.1.1.el5] crashes on dual-PIII Compaq ProLiant 3000

2008-06-30 Thread MHR
On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 10:51 AM, Anne Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I have an Athlon 64 X2 4200+, and that hit the powernow-k8 problem too. I > installed your test kernel which has cured it. Thanks > Interesting - I have an Athlon 64 x2 4200+ that had no problems booting the 5.2 kernel

[CentOS] Acer 5920 audio chip does not work in CentOS 5.2?

2008-06-30 Thread hce
Hi, I've installed CentOS 5.2 to a laptop Acer 5920 for dual boot, the audio works in Window Vista, but does not work in CentOS 5.2. Does CentOS 5.2 support following audio chip or not? Audio device: Intel Corporation 82801H (ICH8 Family) HD Audio Controller (rev 03) Thank you. Kind Regards, J

Re: [CentOS] Minimized Firefox is not visible on panel in CentOS 5.2

2008-06-30 Thread hce
On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 11:08 AM, Alex White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > hce wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> I opened a Firefox on Desktop, but when I clicked Minimize Window >> button, the Firefox disappeared and there was no icon on the panel, I >> simply could not find it any more (it did not close), th

Re: [CentOS] Pidgin problem on 5.2

2008-06-30 Thread fred smith
On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 01:11:33PM -0700, Craig White wrote: > On Mon, 2008-06-30 at 16:01 -0400, fred smith wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 03:31:39PM -0400, Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams wrote: > > > On Mon, 2008-06-30 at 12:16 -0400, fred smith wrote: > > > > On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 10:06:28AM -0400

Re: [CentOS] Re: Rebuild of kernel 2.6.9-67.0.20.EL failure

2008-06-30 Thread Paul Heinlein
On Mon, 30 Jun 2008, John wrote: Maby helpfull logfiles Can someone block this guy from the list? -- Paul Heinlein <> [EMAIL PROTECTED] <> http://www.madboa.com/ ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/cent

Re: [CentOS] Problem with Sendmail + Apache

2008-06-30 Thread Kai Schaetzl
Daniel Bruno wrote on Mon, 30 Jun 2008 16:01:06 -0400: > and in > other server works fine with the permissions 770. Probably, on that other server you don't have a web application that wants to access the local client queue directly. Kai -- Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany Get your web at Conacti

Re: [CentOS] Pidgin problem on 5.2

2008-06-30 Thread Craig White
On Mon, 2008-06-30 at 16:01 -0400, fred smith wrote: > On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 03:31:39PM -0400, Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams wrote: > > On Mon, 2008-06-30 at 12:16 -0400, fred smith wrote: > > > On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 10:06:28AM -0400, Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams wrote: > > > > On Mon, 2008-06-30 at 09:33 -

Re: [CentOS] Pidgin problem on 5.2

2008-06-30 Thread fred smith
On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 03:31:39PM -0400, Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams wrote: > On Mon, 2008-06-30 at 12:16 -0400, fred smith wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 10:06:28AM -0400, Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams wrote: > > > On Mon, 2008-06-30 at 09:33 -0400, fred smith wrote: > > > > Suggestions welcome. > > > >

[CentOS] Problem with Sendmail + Apache

2008-06-30 Thread Daniel Bruno
In my /var/log/maillog show this message: NOQUEUE: SYSERR(apache): can not chdir(/var/spool/clientmqueue/): Permission denied Permissions on dir: drwxrwx--- 2 smmsp smmsp 36864 Jun 30 15:23 clientmqueue If i change the permissions to 777 works normaly but is not safe and in other server wor

Re: [CentOS] Pidgin problem on 5.2

2008-06-30 Thread Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams
On Mon, 2008-06-30 at 12:16 -0400, fred smith wrote: > On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 10:06:28AM -0400, Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams wrote: > > On Mon, 2008-06-30 at 09:33 -0400, fred smith wrote: > > > Suggestions welcome. > > > > Add a Notification Area to your panel, or look there if you already have > > on

Re: [CentOS] Pidgin problem on 5.2

2008-06-30 Thread William L. Maltby
On Mon, 2008-06-30 at 14:50 -0400, fred smith wrote: > On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 09:28:39AM -0700, Rodney Myers wrote: > > On Jun 30, 2008, at 9:16 AM, fred smith wrote: > > > > >On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 10:06:28AM -0400, Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams > > >wrote: > > >>On Mon, 2008-06-30 at 09:33 -0400,

Re: [CentOS] 64 bit aware CPU

2008-06-30 Thread Victor Padro
On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 1:51 PM, Tom Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> >> >>> flags: fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic mtrr pge mca cmov >>> pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm pbe cid xtpr >>> >>> >> >> If your CPU has 64-bit mode support the output will incl

Re: [CentOS] Yogunluk

2008-06-30 Thread William L. Maltby
On Mon, 2008-06-30 at 11:42 -0500, Lanny Marcus wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 5:08 AM, William L. Maltby > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Michael: I thought the job of Marketing people (or so they > would like > > to think) is to give

Re: [CentOS] settings up cheap a NAS / SAN server, is it possible?

2008-06-30 Thread Les Mikesell
David Mackintosh wrote: Despite a lot of fidding, configuring, testing and tuning, neither result is very good when it comes to NFS performance. We've gone so far as to run everything as noatime (ie local mount, nfs export, and nfs client mount) hoping for better performance. Have you updated

Re: [CentOS] Lost mail

2008-06-30 Thread nate
Anne Wilson wrote: > I did an update yesterday evening, and didn't spot that it had changed > permissions on my .procmailrc. Consequently no mail came in after that. > I've been out most of today, so just got it fixed, but what will have > happened to the mail for the missing period? Maillog just

Re: [CentOS] 64 bit aware CPU

2008-06-30 Thread Tom Brown
flags: fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm pbe cid xtpr If your CPU has 64-bit mode support the output will include the “lm” flag. OK thanks all - it was a long shot _

Re: [CentOS] Pidgin problem on 5.2

2008-06-30 Thread fred smith
On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 09:28:39AM -0700, Rodney Myers wrote: > On Jun 30, 2008, at 9:16 AM, fred smith wrote: > > >On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 10:06:28AM -0400, Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams > >wrote: > >>On Mon, 2008-06-30 at 09:33 -0400, fred smith wrote: > >>>Suggestions welcome. > >> > >>Add a Notific

Re: [CentOS] 64 bit aware CPU

2008-06-30 Thread Frank Cox
On Mon, 30 Jun 2008 13:26:43 -0500 Victor Padro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> If your CPU has 64-bit mode support the output will include the "lm" flag. > http://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/linux-general-1/proccpuinfo-flag-lm-358563/ Umm.. doesn't this web page merely repeat the answer that

[CentOS] Re: /etc/passwd.rpmnew changes "x" to "*"

2008-06-30 Thread Matt Seitz (matseitz)
[I forgot to changed the "digest" subject the first time I sent this. Resending with the correct subject.] > From: Johnny Hughes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > In this case you DO NOT want to integrate these changes [...] > This issue was caused in CentOS-4 (a /etc/passwd.rpmnew file) > due to an >

[CentOS] Recall: CentOS Digest, Vol 41, Issue 29

2008-06-30 Thread Matt Seitz (matseitz)
Matt Seitz (matseitz) would like to recall the message, "CentOS Digest, Vol 41, Issue 29". ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] 64 bit aware CPU

2008-06-30 Thread Victor Padro
http://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/linux-general-1/proccpuinfo-flag-lm-358563/ On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 1:18 PM, Frank Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, 30 Jun 2008 18:51:33 +0100 > Tom Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > flags: fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic mtrr p

Re: [CentOS] 64 bit aware CPU

2008-06-30 Thread Frank Cox
On Mon, 30 Jun 2008 18:51:33 +0100 Tom Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > flags: fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic mtrr pge mca cmov > pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm pbe cid xtpr If your CPU has 64-bit mode support the output will include the “lm” flag. --

Re: [CentOS] 64 bit aware CPU

2008-06-30 Thread Victor Padro
On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 12:51 PM, Tom Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I dont think it is but would the following CPU be able to take a 64 bit > version of CentOS ? > > processor: 0 > vendor_id: GenuineIntel > cpu family: 15 > model: 2 > model name: Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU

Re: [CentOS] 3ware performance in CentOS

2008-06-30 Thread Florin Andrei
Jim Perrin wrote: Nope. This is just a long-standing performance thing. You can tune ext3 to perform better, but on a 3ware card xfs will win, hands down. Well, after performing more mental ruminations on this subject, restoring the database in case of a crash might be a pain, so I may have

[CentOS] 64 bit aware CPU

2008-06-30 Thread Tom Brown
I dont think it is but would the following CPU be able to take a 64 bit version of CentOS ? processor: 0 vendor_id: GenuineIntel cpu family: 15 model: 2 model name: Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU 2.40GHz stepping: 7 cpu MHz: 2401.247 cache size: 512 KB physical id

Re: [CentOS] Spacewalk from Redhat

2008-06-30 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 12:45 AM, Bazy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello, > > Is anyone using Spacewalk (http://www.redhat.com/spacewalk/) on CentOS 5 or > 4? What kind of hardware are you useing it on? > Spacewalk can work on VM's and real hardware. If you are doing development or small deploym

[CentOS] Lost mail

2008-06-30 Thread Anne Wilson
I did an update yesterday evening, and didn't spot that it had changed permissions on my .procmailrc. Consequently no mail came in after that. I've been out most of today, so just got it fixed, but what will have happened to the mail for the missing period? Maillog just shows that messages h

RE: [CentOS] settings up cheap a NAS / SAN server, is it possible?

2008-06-30 Thread Ross S. W. Walker
David Mackintosh wrote: > On Sun, Jun 29, 2008 at 09:08:15AM +0200, Rudi Ahlers wrote: > > Hi all > > > > I want to look at setting up a simple / cheap SAN / NAS server using > > normal PIV motherboard, 2GB (or even more) RAM, Core 2 Duo CPU (probably > > a Intel 6700 / 6750 / 6800) & some SATA

Re: [CentOS] settings up cheap a NAS / SAN server, is it possible?

2008-06-30 Thread David Mackintosh
On Sun, Jun 29, 2008 at 09:08:15AM +0200, Rudi Ahlers wrote: > Hi all > > I want to look at setting up a simple / cheap SAN / NAS server using > normal PIV motherboard, 2GB (or even more) RAM, Core 2 Duo CPU (probably > a Intel 6700 / 6750 / 6800) & some SATA HDD's (4 or 6x 320GB - 750GB). > My

Re: [CentOS] Sendmail with Google Apps SMTP

2008-06-30 Thread Chris Boyd
On Jun 28, 2008, at 1:58 PM, John R Pierce wrote: complicated by google requirnig TLA authentication and SSL on a nonstandard port for SMTP relaying. Port 587 _is_ the standard port for mail submission to an MTA. http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2476.txt http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc4409.txt http:/

Re: [CentOS] Yogunluk

2008-06-30 Thread Lanny Marcus
On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 5:08 AM, William L. Maltby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Michael: I thought the job of Marketing people (or so they would like > > to think) is to give the Engineering staff a set of specs, a budget > > s/specs/incomplete, inaccurate, rapidly changing, and irrelevant

Re: [CentOS] Pidgin problem on 5.2

2008-06-30 Thread Rodney Myers
On Jun 30, 2008, at 9:16 AM, fred smith wrote: On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 10:06:28AM -0400, Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams wrote: On Mon, 2008-06-30 at 09:33 -0400, fred smith wrote: Suggestions welcome. Add a Notification Area to your panel, or look there if you already have one. OK, done that.

Re: [CentOS] Pidgin problem on 5.2

2008-06-30 Thread fred smith
On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 10:06:28AM -0400, Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams wrote: > On Mon, 2008-06-30 at 09:33 -0400, fred smith wrote: > > Suggestions welcome. > > Add a Notification Area to your panel, or look there if you already have > one. OK, done that. Now what? Nothing happens there when I try to

Re: [CentOS] INIT 5 and system is gone

2008-06-30 Thread Robert Moskowitz
Michel van Deventer wrote: On Mon, 2008-06-30 at 10:33 -0400, Robert Moskowitz wrote: I had been running a system on Centos 5.1 at INIT 3. I did the upgrade to Centos 5.2 with the aid of the powernowk8 patch. Previously I would VNC into the unit when I needed to do admin stuff with a GUI.

Re: [CentOS] kernel-smp for CentOS 5

2008-06-30 Thread James Marcinek
Thanks! - Original Message - From: "Max Hetrick" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "CentOS mailing list" Sent: Monday, June 30, 2008 8:08:34 AM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern Subject: Re: [CentOS] kernel-smp for CentOS 5 -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 James Marcinek wrote: | I rece

Re: [CentOS] INIT 5 and system is gone

2008-06-30 Thread Robert Moskowitz
Michel van Deventer wrote: Hi, On Mon, 2008-06-30 at 10:33 -0400, Robert Moskowitz wrote: I had been running a system on Centos 5.1 at INIT 3. I did the upgrade to Centos 5.2 with the aid of the powernowk8 patch. Previously I would VNC into the unit when I needed to do admin stuff with a

[CentOS] Re: Rebuild of kernel 2.6.9-67.0.20.EL failure

2008-06-30 Thread John
John wrote: > Hello list. > > I'm trying to rebuild the 2.6.9.67.0.20.EL kernel, but it fails even > without > modifications. cut.cut For the curios: > Why to recompile the kernel? > I want to rebuild the kernel because I created a patch to decrease the > kernel timer frequency from 1000 to 100

Re: [CentOS] kickstart and lang

2008-06-30 Thread nate
Sergey Podushkin wrote: > It seems that only > > lang en_US > > will be correct (but undocumented, though). > may be anaconda source can uncover this feature/bug... I have this in my CentOS 4.6 kickstart configs and it doesn't prompt me: lang en_US.UTF-8 langsupport --default en_US.UTF-8 en_US.U

[CentOS] What are these TCP errors telling me?

2008-06-30 Thread Sam Drinkard
Lately, the error messages below have been showing up in the log for the past 3 days. Is something broken, or someone trying to break in or what? I'm completely clueless about this. If you could, since I'm receiving the list in digest form, cc a copy directly to me? Many thanks... Sam **

Re: [CentOS] kickstart and lang

2008-06-30 Thread Sergey Podushkin
Jerry Geis wrote: I have a line like: lang en_US.UTF-8 in my kickstart file. However it stops on that screen to prompt me. Everything else works fine... I am using centos 4.6. Is this line no longer correct? I am sure I got it from a anaconda file to start with. It seems that only lang en_US

Re: [CentOS] INIT 5 and system is gone

2008-06-30 Thread Michel van Deventer
Hi, On Mon, 2008-06-30 at 10:33 -0400, Robert Moskowitz wrote: > I had been running a system on Centos 5.1 at INIT 3. I did the upgrade > to Centos 5.2 with the aid of the powernowk8 patch. > > Previously I would VNC into the unit when I needed to do admin stuff > with a GUI. Well I noticed t

[CentOS] where is ProxyHTMLURLMap for C5 ?

2008-06-30 Thread tblader
Hello, I'm setting up a reverse proxy in Apache (httpd-2.2.3-11.el5_1.centos.3) I have some pages being served which contain hard-coded names of machines behind the proxy, which obviously do not resolve on the client side. I found an Apache config item called ProxyHTMLURLMap* which supposedly wi

Re: [CentOS] INIT 5 and system is gone

2008-06-30 Thread Paul Schoonderwoerd
On Monday 30 June 2008 16:33:32 Robert Moskowitz wrote: > Is there an option that I can edit into the kernel command at boot time > to init in 3? And then what do I try? > > If I have to reload Centos, I have to pull the drive, put it into > another system, install there, etc. Not my idea of a f

[CentOS] kickstart and lang

2008-06-30 Thread Jerry Geis
I have a line like: lang en_US.UTF-8 in my kickstart file. However it stops on that screen to prompt me. Everything else works fine... I am using centos 4.6. Is this line no longer correct? I am sure I got it from a anaconda file to start with. Jerry __

[CentOS] INIT 5 and system is gone

2008-06-30 Thread Robert Moskowitz
I had been running a system on Centos 5.1 at INIT 3. I did the upgrade to Centos 5.2 with the aid of the powernowk8 patch. Previously I would VNC into the unit when I needed to do admin stuff with a GUI. Well I noticed that I was NOT getting GNOME via VNC since the upgrade (worked before jus

Re: [CentOS] Pidgin problem on 5.2

2008-06-30 Thread Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams
On Mon, 2008-06-30 at 09:33 -0400, fred smith wrote: > Suggestions welcome. Add a Notification Area to your panel, or look there if you already have one. -- Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> PLEASE don't CC me; I'm already subscribed signature.asc Description: This is a digitally sig

Re: [CentOS] Pidgin problem on 5.2

2008-06-30 Thread fred smith
On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 09:30:42AM -0400, fred smith wrote: > Having a problem with Pidgin that may have come after the 5.2 upgrade. > I don't use pidgin daily, but the last time I used it (a week or two ago) > it was fine. Now, when clicking the icon nothing visible happens. When I > open an xterm

Re: [CentOS] system-auth.rpmnew

2008-06-30 Thread Kai Schaetzl
Toby Bluhm wrote on Mon, 30 Jun 2008 08:54:29 -0400: > rpm -q --whatprovides /etc/pam.d/system-auth > pam-0.99.6.2-3.27.el5 > > rpm -q --whatprovides /etc/pam.d/system-auth-ac > authconfig-5.3.21-3.el5 So, possible conclusion: they want to make pam self-sufficient, thus replacing the symlink to

[CentOS] Pidgin problem on 5.2

2008-06-30 Thread fred smith
Having a problem with Pidgin that may have come after the 5.2 upgrade. I don't use pidgin daily, but the last time I used it (a week or two ago) it was fine. Now, when clicking the icon nothing visible happens. When I open an xterm and run it from there I get this: $ pidgin libnm_glib_nm_state_cb:

Re: [CentOS] system-auth.rpmnew

2008-06-30 Thread Stephen Harris
On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 08:54:29AM -0400, Toby Bluhm wrote: > ls -als /etc/pam.d/system-auth* > > 4 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 14 May 10 2007 /etc/pam.d/system-auth -> > system-auth-ac > 8 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 848 May 10 2007 /etc/pam.d/system-auth-ac system-auth-ac is the results of running au

Re: [CentOS] system-auth.rpmnew

2008-06-30 Thread Toby Bluhm
Kai Schaetzl wrote: William L. Maltby wrote on Sun, 29 Jun 2008 09:09:17 -0400: IMO, it's never OK w/o first examining the effects. The rpmnew is provided specifically because replacing the previous one may be highly destructive to the aims of that system's users/admins. I've not looked, bu

Re: [CentOS] system-auth.rpmnew

2008-06-30 Thread William L. Maltby
On Mon, 2008-06-30 at 13:14 +0200, Kai Schaetzl wrote: > William L. Maltby wrote on Sun, 29 Jun 2008 09:09:17 -0400: > > > IMO, it's never OK w/o first examining the effects. The rpmnew is > > provided specifically because replacing the previous one may be highly > > destructive to the aims of th

Re: [CentOS] kernel-smp for CentOS 5

2008-06-30 Thread Max Hetrick
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 James Marcinek wrote: | I recently installed CentOS 5 and was trying to locate the kernel-smp packages but without success. Have these packages been removed from the distro or renamed? Does anyone know how many processors the default kernel will hand

Re: [CentOS] kernel-smp for CentOS 5

2008-06-30 Thread Akemi Yagi
On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 5:02 AM, James Marcinek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello All, > > I recently installed CentOS 5 and was trying to locate the kernel-smp > packages but without success. Have these packages been removed from the > distro or renamed? Does anyone know how many processors the

[CentOS] kernel-smp for CentOS 5

2008-06-30 Thread James Marcinek
Hello All, I recently installed CentOS 5 and was trying to locate the kernel-smp packages but without success. Have these packages been removed from the distro or renamed? Does anyone know how many processors the default kernel will handle and if it's optimzed for it? Thanks, james __

Re: [CentOS] Yum repository for bacula for CentOS 5?

2008-06-30 Thread Akemi Yagi
On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 2:49 AM, Kevin Thorpe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Can anyone point me at a yum repository containing a CentOS 5 version of > bacula? Check out the EPEL repository. Please see (near the bottom): http://wiki.centos.org/AdditionalResources/Repositories _

Re: [CentOS] system-auth.rpmnew

2008-06-30 Thread Kai Schaetzl
William L. Maltby wrote on Sun, 29 Jun 2008 09:09:17 -0400: > IMO, it's never OK w/o first examining the effects. The rpmnew is > provided specifically because replacing the previous one may be highly > destructive to the aims of that system's users/admins. > > I've not looked, but I suspect the

Re: [CentOS] Moving logical volumes

2008-06-30 Thread William L. Maltby
On Mon, 2008-06-30 at 08:16 +0200, Frank Büttner wrote: > William L. Maltby schrieb: > > > Yes vgmerge, can do the job. > Thanks. NP. Just as an FYI, at command line, do lvm. Then type help. That gives a nice little "index" to available commands. Then, at command line, a "man " gives more detail

Re: [CentOS] RE: CentOS Digest, Vol 41, Issue 29

2008-06-30 Thread Johnny Hughes
Matt Seitz (matseitz) wrote: From: Johnny Hughes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> In this case you DO NOT want to integrate these changes [...] This issue was caused in CentOS-4 (a /etc/passwd.rpmnew file) due to an update to the "setup" rpm in March ... and in this case, you can remove/ignore that file

Re: [CentOS] Rebuild of kernel 2.6.9-67.0.20.EL failure

2008-06-30 Thread Johnny Hughes
John wrote: Hello list. I'm trying to rebuild the 2.6.9.67.0.20.EL kernel, but it fails even without modifications. How did I try it? Created a (non-root) build environment (not a mock ) Installed the kernel.scr.rpm and did a rpmbuild -ba --target=`uname -m` kernel-2.6.spec 2> prep-err.log | t

Re: [CentOS] Yogunluk

2008-06-30 Thread William L. Maltby
On Sun, 2008-06-29 at 17:06 -0500, Lanny Marcus wrote: > > On Sat, Jun 28, 2008 at 9:15 PM, Michael A. Peters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > Michael: I thought the job of Marketing people (or so they would like > to think) is to give the Engineering staff a set of specs, a budget

[CentOS] Yum repository for bacula for CentOS 5?

2008-06-30 Thread Kevin Thorpe
Can anyone point me at a yum repository containing a CentOS 5 version of bacula? thanks -- Kevin Thorpe ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[CentOS] Rebuild of kernel 2.6.9-67.0.20.EL failure

2008-06-30 Thread John
Hello list. I'm trying to rebuild the 2.6.9.67.0.20.EL kernel, but it fails even without modifications. How did I try it? Created a (non-root) build environment (not a mock ) Installed the kernel.scr.rpm and did a rpmbuild -ba --target=`uname -m` kernel-2.6.spec 2> prep-err.log | tee prep-out.lo

RE: [CentOS] settings up cheap a NAS / SAN server, is it possible?

2008-06-30 Thread Sorin Srbu
>-Original Message- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of >Rainer Duffner >Sent: Monday, June 30, 2008 12:27 AM >To: CentOS mailing list >Subject: Re: [CentOS] settings up cheap a NAS / SAN server, is it possible? > Actually, the calculation is that it needs a

RE: [CentOS] settings up cheap a NAS / SAN server, is it possible?

2008-06-30 Thread Sorin Srbu
>-Original Message- >>> A cheap server: there are many different values of cheap; it all depends >>> on what you need it for. >>> >> >> Yupp, break down the requirements into the following three options: >> >> * Good >> * Fast >> * Cheap >> >> Pick any *two*. You can never ever have all thr