>If it won't "wok", you'l have to "cook" up something. :-) YUK, YUK!
Now that's ironic (you'l):P
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
hce wrote:
Hi,
I've just installed MySQL (mysql.i386 5.0.45-7.el5) and lighty
(lighttpd.i386 1.4.19-1.el5.rf) to the CentOS 5.2, but could not find
mysql and lighttpd scripts in /etc/init.d. Also there is no
/usr/bin/mysql_install_db. Where can I find mysql and lighttpd scripts
for starting the
Hi,
I've just installed MySQL (mysql.i386 5.0.45-7.el5) and lighty
(lighttpd.i386 1.4.19-1.el5.rf) to the CentOS 5.2, but could not find
mysql and lighttpd scripts in /etc/init.d. Also there is no
/usr/bin/mysql_install_db. Where can I find mysql and lighttpd scripts
for starting the processes in
Hi,
--On 5. Juli 2008 09:45:16 -0700 Art Age Software <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Hi,
could you describe in more detail?
What exactly is ignored? The options do not look much different.
As I said, I am trying to set a different primary interface for each
bond: eth0 for bond0, and eth2 for b
On Sun, Jul 6, 2008 at 7:44 PM, John Hanks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have several systems which I recently updated with
>
> yum -y update
>
> to all the latest packages. These systems use yum-priorities and use
> the CentOS (priority 1) EPEL (priority 5) and rpmforge (priority 10)
>
Ray Van Dolson wrote:
Gentee is a programming language, CentOS is a Linux Distribution.
You would hope the question was really about Gentoo, but I have a
suspicion that perhaps it wasn't :-D
Ian
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
_
On Sun, Jul 06, 2008 at 06:52:51PM -0700, ann kok wrote:
> Hi
>
> what is the different between the gentee and centos?
>
Gentee is a programming language, CentOS is a Linux Distribution.
Ray
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.cent
Hi
what is the different between the gentee and centos?
thank you
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On 7/4/08, William L. Maltby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 2008-07-04 at 12:41 +1000, hce wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 4, 2008 at 12:18 AM, William L. Maltby
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, 2008-07-03 at 07:57 -0500, Alex White wrote:
> > >>
> > >
>
> > >>
>
>
> > >
>
Hello,
I have several systems which I recently updated with
yum -y update
to all the latest packages. These systems use yum-priorities and use
the CentOS (priority 1) EPEL (priority 5) and rpmforge (priority 10)
repositories. After the updates, dhcpd stopped working with a SIGPIPE
error which oc
On Sun, 2008-07-06 at 15:57 -0700, Ian Forde wrote:
> 1. Apparently, since I updated from 5.1 to 5.2, dhcpd no longer wants to
> stay running. The config is sound, and I can start it from the
> command-line with the "-d" flag and it serves up leases. But without
> the -d flag, it just silently di
On Sun, Jul 6, 2008 at 4:31 PM, MHR <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 5, 2008 at 11:07 AM, Lanny Marcus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >
> > Mark: A follow on: I searched in the CentOS Bugzilla and also in the
> > Upstream Bugzilla, for "Evolution". There are about 25 things in CentOS
> an
On Sun, 2008-07-06 at 19:39 -0400, S.Tindall wrote:
> Seems like it would be simpler to get an adapter that work with
> the current/native pl2303 driver.
Yeah... but mine works - with some extra work... didn't want to buy this
type of device twice but...
> For the purpose of serial consoles, the
On Mon, 2008-07-07 at 00:54 +0100, Karanbir Singh wrote:
> Ian Forde wrote:
> > I figure that this is the kind of situation that -plus is meant to
> > solve...
>
> open a request at http://bugs.centos.org/ - thats the *only* way to get
> stuff into centos_plus, and if there is a patch or a propo
S.Tindall wrote:
Tripp-Lite U209-000-R:
http://www.tripplite.com/products/product.cfm?productID=2430
Cables-To-Go 26886:
http://www.cablestogo.com/product.asp?cat%5fid=101&sku=26886
Think they cost about US$15 each at provantage.com.
I've been using these with zero issues ( 14 of them conn
Ian Forde wrote:
I figure that this is the kind of situation that -plus is meant to
solve...
open a request at http://bugs.centos.org/ - thats the *only* way to get
stuff into centos_plus, and if there is a patch or a proposed src.rpm
for new pkgs, things go faster.
- KB
--
Karanbir Singh
On Sunday, July 06, 2008 at 6:45 PM, Ian Forde wrote:
I've got a USB to serial adapter that I picked up from Radio
Shack
earlier this year. The updated pl2303 driver is already in the
mainstream kernel as per
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429652 but I'm not
getting
much tractio
On Sun, 2008-07-06 at 19:34 -0400, Marko A. Jennings wrote:
> On Sun, July 6, 2008 6:57 pm, Ian Forde wrote:
> > 1. Apparently, since I updated from 5.1 to 5.2, dhcpd no longer wants to
> > stay running. The config is sound, and I can start it from the
> > command-line with the "-d" flag and it se
On Sun, July 6, 2008 6:57 pm, Ian Forde wrote:
> 1. Apparently, since I updated from 5.1 to 5.2, dhcpd no longer wants to
> stay running. The config is sound, and I can start it from the
> command-line with the "-d" flag and it serves up leases. But without
> the -d flag, it just silently dies...
On Sun, 2008-07-06 at 19:12 -0400, Marko A. Jennings wrote:
> On Sun, July 6, 2008 6:57 pm, Ian Forde wrote:
> > 1. Apparently, since I updated from 5.1 to 5.2, dhcpd no longer wants to
> > stay running. The config is sound, and I can start it from the
> > command-line with the "-d" flag and it se
On Sun, 2008-07-06 at 18:41 -0400, Filipe Brandenburger wrote:
>
> You can actually do that by using "chroot" from a rescue CD. I usually
> want to do that on my systems, when I clone from a machine with
> hardware RAID to a machine on which I will use software RAID. After
> copying the image (u
On Sun, 2008-07-06 at 15:57 -0700, Ray Van Dolson wrote:
> I won't speak on the -plus topic, but as far as upstream is concerned,
> you definitely need to open an RFE SR if you're a paying customer...
> probably won't be super speedy, but better than your bug sitting around
> forever ignored. :)
H
On Sun, July 6, 2008 6:57 pm, Ian Forde wrote:
> 1. Apparently, since I updated from 5.1 to 5.2, dhcpd no longer wants to
> stay running. The config is sound, and I can start it from the
> command-line with the "-d" flag and it serves up leases. But without
> the -d flag, it just silently dies...
On Sun, Jul 06, 2008 at 03:45:39PM -0700, Ian Forde wrote:
> I've got a USB to serial adapter that I picked up from Radio Shack
> earlier this year. The updated pl2303 driver is already in the
> mainstream kernel as per
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429652 but I'm not getting
> muc
1. Apparently, since I updated from 5.1 to 5.2, dhcpd no longer wants to
stay running. The config is sound, and I can start it from the
command-line with the "-d" flag and it serves up leases. But without
the -d flag, it just silently dies...
2. Syslog contains this little snippet:
dhc
I've got a USB to serial adapter that I picked up from Radio Shack
earlier this year. The updated pl2303 driver is already in the
mainstream kernel as per
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429652 but I'm not getting
much traction from Red Hat as far as them updating the kernel. So every
On Sun, Jul 6, 2008 at 3:28 PM, William L. Maltby
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> He is trying to copy an existing install, transport the drive and boot.
> Until he gets a boot that allows the new root to be detected *as* the
> new root, I don't know if that would work.
You can actually do that by us
On Sunday 06 July 2008 22:27:42 Scott Silva wrote:
> It wasn't a personal attack, just a general state of the "average" windows
> user vs an "average" user of some of the linux/unix derivatives.
>
Sorry - just on edge at that moment. I realise it wasn't personal.
> My comment on just increasing t
On Sat, Jul 5, 2008 at 11:07 AM, Lanny Marcus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Mark: A follow on: I searched in the CentOS Bugzilla and also in the
> Upstream Bugzilla, for "Evolution". There are about 25 things in CentOS and
> 119 in Upstream, as of a few minutes ago. I do *not* believe this issue
on 7-6-2008 11:16 AM Anne Wilson spake the following:
On Sunday 06 July 2008 17:26:05 Scott Silva wrote:
That is one of the biggest of my beefs about windows. It allows any
computer noob to shoot themselves in the foot very easily. That can be a
plus or a negative. The biggest negative is that t
On Sun, Jul 6, 2008 at 9:10 AM, Johnny Hughes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> do you have both versions of firefox installed, and do you use both versions
> of firefox ..
Yes and no - I almost never use firefox at all.
> if not, remove the i386 plugin and see if that fixes the
> issue.
>
Did that
Nope...
Johnny Hughes wrote:
Robert Moskowitz wrote:
Johnny Hughes wrote:
Robert Moskowitz wrote:
I have a newly built drive with 5.2 fresh install (that I will be
cloning shortly) in my DECtop and it is failing with X the same way
the upgrade from 5.1 drive did (not too supprising there).
on 7-6-2008 9:10 AM Ray Van Dolson spake the following:
On Sun, Jul 06, 2008 at 09:55:03AM -0600, Joseph L. Casale wrote:
There is a known issue with the new version of yum on RHEL/CentOS 5.2 ...
You need to specify the packages like this:
yum install .x86_64
not
yum install
If you do not
I am not getting my IPv6 address and prefix delegation for my ppp
interface on my new gateway.
ppp is working right. It is getting authenticated and getting the its
IPv4 address. Shorewall is doing the forwarding and the static routes
on the internal interface for IPv4 are working.
But no
On Sun, Jul 6, 2008 at 9:48 AM, B.J. McClure <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> I have a similar issue with only one version of nspluginwrapper
> installed.
># rpm -qa | grep nspluginwrapper
> nspluginwrapper-0.9.91.5-21.el5
> I do appear to have two identical firefox packages installed.
>
On Sun, 2008-07-06 at 11:04 -0400, Filipe Brandenburger wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, Jul 6, 2008 at 6:36 AM, William L. Maltby
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> > If it's a boot drive, remember to rebuild your initrd and modify the
> >> > init file to ignore lvm lock failures with the new VG name. Ot
> Have you considered a file transfer service such as yousendit.com?
> File size might still be an issue I guess as they limit it to 100 MB
> for their free account. There's another thought. Why not create
> yourself a gmail account or other such online account that is as
> forgiving as possible
On Sunday 06 July 2008 19:38:16 Jacques B. wrote:
> Have you considered a file transfer service such as yousendit.com?
> File size might still be an issue I guess as they limit it to 100 MB
> for their free account. There's another thought. Why not create
> yourself a gmail account or other such
On Sun, Jul 6, 2008 at 2:16 PM, Anne Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sunday 06 July 2008 17:26:05 Scott Silva wrote:
>> That is one of the biggest of my beefs about windows. It allows any
>> computer noob to shoot themselves in the foot very easily. That can be a
>> plus or a negative. The b
On Sunday 06 July 2008 17:26:05 Scott Silva wrote:
> That is one of the biggest of my beefs about windows. It allows any
> computer noob to shoot themselves in the foot very easily. That can be a
> plus or a negative. The biggest negative is that there are now millions of
> computers on the interne
Last year to get motherboards with the G33 chipset with SATA working with
Centos I had to either use David Harbic fixes or use Fedora 8 since it had the
later 2.6.25 kernel.
I no longer see David's fixes available and also see in the 5.2 release notes
"update SATA driver and infrastructure". D
On Sun, 2008-07-06 at 11:10 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> Mark Hull-Richter wrote:
> > This was working in 5.1 - I am now getting errors when I try to run a
> > flash video in seamonkey under CetnOS 5.2. Here is the error:
> >
> > For application/x-shockwave-flash found plugin
> > /usr/lib64/mo
Joseph L. Casale wrote:
I would say it is the "Best" one ... it seems there is a problem in this
instance.
Its just not my day :P I used my gmail to sign up to rpmforge, and received the
sub confirmation
instantly, replied to it and received my membership confirmation. Sent an email
regardin
on 7-4-2008 2:38 PM Robert Moskowitz spake the following:
William L. Maltby wrote:
On Fri, 2008-07-04 at 11:41 -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
Yes, dd is actually pretty slow in wall clock time. Where it wins is
in human time since you just type a short command line and go away,
and i
Akemi Yagi wrote:
On Sun, Jul 6, 2008 at 9:10 AM, Ray Van Dolson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sun, Jul 06, 2008 at 09:55:03AM -0600, Joseph L. Casale wrote:
This is on a RHEL5.2 x86_64 system however.
# rpm -qf --queryformat '%{NAME}-%{VERSION}-%{RELEASE}.%{ARCH}\n'
/usr/lib64/perl5/5.8.8/
>I would say it is the "Best" one ... it seems there is a problem in this
>instance.
Its just not my day :P I used my gmail to sign up to rpmforge, and received the
sub confirmation
instantly, replied to it and received my membership confirmation. Sent an email
regarding both packages
I am havi
Joseph L. Casale wrote:
Just to muddy the waters on this a bit more... for me, the rpmforge
perl-Time-HiRes package won't install as it conflicts with my base
installation of perl.
Yea, I just figured that out.
This is on a RHEL5.2 x86_64 system however.
So I assume an x86 install doesn't h
On Sun, Jul 6, 2008 at 9:10 AM, Ray Van Dolson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 06, 2008 at 09:55:03AM -0600, Joseph L. Casale wrote:
> This is on a RHEL5.2 x86_64 system however.
>
> # rpm -qf --queryformat '%{NAME}-%{VERSION}-%{RELEASE}.%{ARCH}\n'
> /usr/lib64/perl5/5.8.8/x86_64-linux-t
on 7-3-2008 11:43 PM Anne Wilson spake the following:
On Thursday 03 July 2008 22:29:55 Jim Perrin wrote:
On Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 5:06 PM, Anne Wilson
wrote:
My daughter needs to send me a large file. It appears that it is getting
through my ISP, but being rejected on my CentOS mail server.
>Just to muddy the waters on this a bit more... for me, the rpmforge
>perl-Time-HiRes package won't install as it conflicts with my base
>installation of perl.
Yea, I just figured that out.
>This is on a RHEL5.2 x86_64 system however.
So I assume an x86 install doesn't have this issue?
># rpm -
Mark Hull-Richter wrote:
This was working in 5.1 - I am now getting errors when I try to run a
flash video in seamonkey under CetnOS 5.2. Here is the error:
For application/x-shockwave-flash found plugin
/usr/lib64/mozilla/plugins/npwrapper.libflashplayer.so
sh: /usr/lib/nspluginwrapper/i386/l
On Sun, Jul 06, 2008 at 09:55:03AM -0600, Joseph L. Casale wrote:
> >There is a known issue with the new version of yum on RHEL/CentOS 5.2 ...
> >
> >You need to specify the packages like this:
> >
> >yum install .x86_64
> >
> >not
> >
> >yum install
> >
> >If you do not specify, then yum can inst
This was working in 5.1 - I am now getting errors when I try to run a
flash video in seamonkey under CetnOS 5.2. Here is the error:
For application/x-shockwave-flash found plugin
/usr/lib64/mozilla/plugins/npwrapper.libflashplayer.so
sh: /usr/lib/nspluginwrapper/i386/linux/npviewer: No such file
>There is a known issue with the new version of yum on RHEL/CentOS 5.2 ...
>
>You need to specify the packages like this:
>
>yum install .x86_64
>
>not
>
>yum install
>
>If you do not specify, then yum can install both (or either) of i386 or
>x86_64 packages to meet that requirement.
I think I fo
Robert Moskowitz wrote:
Johnny Hughes wrote:
Robert Moskowitz wrote:
I have a newly built drive with 5.2 fresh install (that I will be
cloning shortly) in my DECtop and it is failing with X the same way
the upgrade from 5.1 drive did (not too supprising there).
In 5.1 X worked. I could star
Hi,
On Sun, Jul 6, 2008 at 6:36 AM, William L. Maltby
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > If it's a boot drive, remember to rebuild your initrd and modify the
>> > init file to ignore lvm lock failures with the new VG name. Otherwise
>> > you'll be fighting some more battles.
>>
>> Yes, I remember get
Hi,
On Sun, Jul 6, 2008 at 9:12 AM, Nabin Limbu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> For GRE tunneling, how can I specify the
> parameters for tunneling device, so that I ifup-tunnel will automatically
> read and start the interface and I don't have to write the below scripts
> in my start-up file.
Appar
ankush grover wrote:
> I have the below lines added in httpd.conf file
>
> RewriteEngine On
> RewriteCond %{REQUEST_URI} /testdiary
> RewriteRule /testdiary(.)$ /testdiary/
> ProxyPass /testdiary http://testdiary.example.com/
> ProxyPassReverse /testdiary http://testdiary.example.com/
This is w
Hi,
It's been long since I don't write Proxy rules, but IIRC you have to
match /s on the left side and on the right side.
On Sun, Jul 6, 2008 at 6:24 AM, ankush grover <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ProxyPass /testdiaryhttp://testdiary.example.com/
> ProxyPassReverse /testdiary
drew einhorn wrote:
In looking at the possibility of using yum-priorities on a RHEL5 system,
I noticed on thing that is different from my recollection,
I see that the default priority it 99,
but I seem to recall that it used to be 1.
Is my memory faulty, or did it change?
Actually 99 seems to m
David Hláčik wrote:
> Hello, i have moved hard disk from one pc to another (some architecture). I
> have booted, everything working. To my surprise some modules in
> modprobes.conf are still there even if this PC does not have such hardware.
> I have tried remove modprobe.conf, but after reboot, sy
Hello, i have moved hard disk from one pc to another (some architecture). I
have booted, everything working. To my surprise some modules in
modprobes.conf are still there even if this PC does not have such hardware.
I have tried remove modprobe.conf, but after reboot, system by it self does
not gen
William L. Maltby wrote:
> Your blindness is caused by a broken (IMO) search. I also had recently
> searched for this and another thread. AFAICT, the "search" button on the
> mailing lists intro page only checks archived stuff.
I've seen mails archived there before they hit my INBOX. But yes, goog
Hi,
For Ethernet and others, we have a configuration file inside
/etc/sysconfig/newtork-script/ like ifcfg-ethx where we specify ip
address, mask, type etc... For GRE tunneling, how can I specify the
parameters for tunneling device, so that I ifup-tunnel will automatically
read and start the inter
Joseph L. Casale wrote:
Can you identify which one of these packages individually is requiring
the 32-bit perl? In other words, can you install perl-LDAP without it
wanting to pull in the 32-bit perl? Same for all of them...
You can also do an rpm -q -R -p on the .rpm file to see what it
requ
On Sun, 2008-07-06 at 06:36 -0400, William L. Maltby wrote:
>
> Still in the top level working directory ()
>
>find | cpio -oac | gzip --best >
>
Just checked. "find *" is what you want.
Also, there are a couple ignorelocking failures and a mkrootdev. Change
the ignore... that has the V
On Sunday 06 July 2008 11:39:50 William L. Maltby wrote:
> On Sun, 2008-07-06 at 06:52 +0100, Tony Molloy wrote:
> >
> >
> > The problem would be if yum checks it's db to see if it has previously
> > installed /usr/bin/false and find that it hasn't. In that case it won't
> > wok.
>
> If it won't "
On Sun, 2008-07-06 at 06:52 +0100, Tony Molloy wrote:
>
> The problem would be if yum checks it's db to see if it has previously
> installed /usr/bin/false and find that it hasn't. In that case it won't wok.
If it won't "wok", you'l have to "cook" up something. :-) YUK, YUK!
>
--
Bill
___
On Sat, 2008-07-05 at 23:58 -0400, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
> William L. Maltby wrote:
> > On Fri, 2008-07-04 at 17:38 -0400, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
> >
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >> Now actually, I would have perfered renaming the LVM partition and its
> >> internal ext3 partitions. I even
Hi Friends,
I am using Centos 5.2 and using ProxyPass to access applications
running on other servers. Everything is working fine except for one of
the applications I need to auto add forward slash when any user tries
to access that application. For ex
ProxyPass /testdiaryhttp:/
70 matches
Mail list logo
