Re: [CentOS] conntrack-tools and Session syncing

On Sun, 2008-08-10 at 20:28 +0200, Dirk H. Schulz wrote: > Hi Robert, > > --On 10. August 2008 13:56:22 -0400 Robert Spangler > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > - snip - > > > OK, I don't know this tool you are using to syn the conntracking of all > > the firewalls. Could you post a link to it?

Re: [CentOS] Kerio Mailserver on Centos 5

Hi Dk, we will be testing that from the end of september onwards, but until now we have only run it on MacOS X. --On 12. August 2008 15:54:06 -0700 dnk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I was wondering if any of the mail admins on here have used the kerio mail server on centos, and their thoughts o

[CentOS] What is vibr0 Network interface and what is it used for

Hello, I have see that my machine have an interface that named virbr0. I have no idea what is it and what it using for ? I am not configured any IP address for it but I see it had an IP address and see it listed in firewall config. Can anyone give me an explanation about this or point me to a

Re: [CentOS] NFS issues

No firewall on either end and server responds to ping. client: program vers proto port 102 tcp111 portmapper 102 udp111 portmapper 1000241 udp889 status 1000241 tcp892 status server: program vers proto port 102

Re: [CentOS] NFS issues

On Tue, 2008-08-12 at 20:16 -0700, nate wrote: > Johan Swensson wrote: > > It happend again this night but now I temporarily(?) fixed it with > > mounting -o nolock on the web servers. > > It works but dmesg is still spamming "lockd: server 192.168.20.22 not > > responding, timed out". Atleast my s

Re: [CentOS] NFS issues

Johan Swensson wrote: > It happend again this night but now I temporarily(?) fixed it with > mounting -o nolock on the web servers. > It works but dmesg is still spamming "lockd: server 192.168.20.22 not > responding, timed out". Atleast my sites are up, and the message isn't > critical anymore. >

Re: [CentOS] WUBI like process for CentOS ?

Fajar Priyanto wrote: > In current days of distro like Ubuntu, Opensuse, and Mandriva, being > "suitable" is not enough anymore (I think). Try install Centos on a > notebook, and we will see that the wifi is not recognized. Sure as > sysadmin we can do ndiswrapper, etc. But what will "ordinary" /

Re: [CentOS] WUBI like process for CentOS ?

MHR wrote: > To repeat what has been said before (right here!): CentOS is just like > RHEL, an enterprise Linux distribution, suitable for anything from > laptops to desktops to enterprise-wide networked multi-server > machines. I don't think RHEL would make a good desktop. I think it would make

Re: [CentOS] WUBI like process for CentOS ?

On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 7:51 PM, Fajar Priyanto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > In current days of distro like Ubuntu, Opensuse, and Mandriva, being > "suitable" is not enough anymore (I think). Try install Centos on a > notebook, and we will see that the wifi is not recognized. Sure as > sysadmin w

Re: [CentOS] NFS issues

On Tue, 2008-08-12 at 14:27 +0200, Johan Swensson wrote: > So I'm running nfs to get content to my web servers. Now I've had this > problem 2 times (about 2 weeks since the last occurrence). > I use drbd on the nfs server for redundancy. Now to my problem: > > All my web sites stopped responding s

Re: [CentOS] WUBI like process for CentOS ?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 MHR wrote: > Hmm. I use CentOS as my desktop OS, my laptop OS, my workdesk OS and > my work is also converting over (sometime RSN) to use CentOS as the > base OS for our application. > > To repeat what has been said before (right here!): CentOS is ju

Re: [CentOS] Missing fonts for tightvnc

Filipe Brandenburger wrote: On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 14:53, Robert Moskowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Font directory '/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/misc' not found - ignoring (then the same message for Speedo, Type1, 75dpi, and 100dpi). Then a fatel server error about: could not open default foun

Re: [CentOS] NFS issues

It happend again this night but now I temporarily(?) fixed it with mounting -o nolock on the web servers. It works but dmesg is still spamming "lockd: server 192.168.20.22 not responding, timed out". Atleast my sites are up, and the message isn't critical anymore. But how can I get rid of it?

Re: [CentOS] Sendmail is not putting the full information in the received header anymore

Hi, On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 09:38, Jason Pyeron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Previously, when our server received an email it would slap the rcpt to in the > received headers by adding a for <...> any ideas what has changed? In my (vast) experience with e-mail (most of it with Postfix though) I o

Re: [CentOS] Missing fonts for tightvnc

On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 14:53, Robert Moskowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Font directory '/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/misc' not found - ignoring (then > the same message for Speedo, Type1, 75dpi, and 100dpi). > Then a fatel server error about: could not open default fount 'fixed' >From the path, I

Re: [CentOS] Changing boot drives

On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 21:22, MHR <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > So, what is the best way to put a correct MBR that will boot from > /dev/sda on /dev/sda if /dev/sda is the first boot device? Assuming you use grub to boot: # grub-install /dev/sda HTH, Filipe __

Re: [CentOS] WUBI like process for CentOS ?

On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 6:21 PM, Fajar Priyanto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I think Ubuntu is targeted for desktop use and less savvy users. That's > why they need something like Wubi for easiness. And since Centos is not > a desktop distro (cmiiw), the users tend to be somekind of sysadmin > wh

[CentOS] Changing boot drives

This is probably a dumb question, but I haven't found anything that clearly describes what I need. My system has 2 IDE (PATA) hard drives and 2 SATA hard drives. /dev/hda is the boot drive, but /dev/sda contains my CentOS installation, including /boot, /, /home and swap. I know for a fact that th

Re: [CentOS] WUBI like process for CentOS ?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Karanbir Singh wrote: > Ned Slider wrote: >> I agree - I think that whilst features like this may be appealing to >> the goals of Ubuntu, they do not necessarily match the goals of the >> CentOS project. > > How'd you work that out ? I think Ubuntu i

Re: [CentOS] bind-9.3.4-6.0.2.P1.el5_2 and rrset-order: order 'fixed'not fully implemented

--- On Tue, 8/12/08, Johnny Hughes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > From: Johnny Hughes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: [CentOS] bind-9.3.4-6.0.2.P1.el5_2 and rrset-order: order > 'fixed'not fully implemented > To: "CentOS mailing list" > Date: Tuesday, August 12, 2008, 5:34 PM > Scott McClana

Re: [CentOS] Suggestion on Network Management software with troubleticket system

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Nifty Cluster Mitch wrote: > I suspect you need tracking, ownership, states (new, assigned, working, OMGH, > fixed), attached documents, the ability to generate > reports and also solve the do you remember games when systems are down > (documentatio

Re: [CentOS] Mirroring Hard Drive

Robert wrote: I should have had the common decency to report that I *did* try this howto and *was* successful. There were a couple things that caused some head-scratching. Yes I also made it work this weekend. I ignored all the stuff regarding the creation of /etc/mtab and mdadm.conf ... they a

Re: [CentOS] Missing fonts for tightvnc

Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams wrote: On Tue, 2008-08-12 at 14:53 -0400, Robert Moskowitz wrote: You would think installing via yum would handle dependencies, but perhaps fonts are not managed like dependencies. Well, they can be, but not unless the packager does so. The challenge now is

Re: [CentOS] Please help: The process of am-utils map key lookup

On Tue, Aug 12, 2008, Robinson Tiemuqinke wrote: >Hi, >I am using am-utils(amd binary daemon) to auto mount home directories. the >mounting process seems working fine but I am still not understand how the >amd map key(s) lookup process works. >I've carefully read the am-utils(amd) document at htt

Re: [CentOS] bind-9.3.4-6.0.2.P1.el5_2 and rrset-order: order 'fixed'not fully implemented

Scott McClanahan wrote: According to this page, BIND can be compiled with the "enabled-fixed-rrset" option to support this. How to determine what switches were used to compile the BIND RPM I downloaded with "yum update?" I was recently curious about this too. Is there an easier way than pee

Re: [CentOS] Re: gcc editor for newbie (Emacs or vim or ?)

On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 07:20:22PM -0500, Lanny Marcus wrote: >On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 1:30 PM, Scott Silva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> on 8-11-2008 9:06 AM Lanny Marcus spake the following: > >>> I will look at Eclipse, but one of my goals is to be able to fix >problems >

Re: [CentOS] Suggestion on Network Management software with troubleticket system

> In my current small-ish setting, I use Trac for tickets and documentation. I > keep most configuration files in a Subversion repository (an export of which > serves as the depot for cfengine) -- and Trac makes it easy to link between > wiki pages, tickets, and repository revisions. I second the

Re: [CentOS] Suggestion on Network Management software with troubleticket system

Nifty Cluster Mitch wrote: On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 07:52:45AM +0700, Fajar Priyanto wrote: Subject: [CentOS] Suggestion on Network Management software with -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi all, I'm looking for a network management software. And as the network grows it clearly

Re: [CentOS] Suggestion on Network Management software with troubleticket system

On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 07:52:45AM +0700, Fajar Priyanto wrote: > Subject: [CentOS] Suggestion on Network Management software with > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hi all, > I'm looking for a network management software. And as the network grows > it clearly becomes that manua

[CentOS] Kerio Mailserver on Centos 5

I was wondering if any of the mail admins on here have used the kerio mail server on centos, and their thoughts on it. My initial testing is going very well - but was hoping for some unbiased opinions (as opposed to asking on the kerio forum) on it's use with centos (5 in particular if pos

Re: [CentOS] Missing fonts for tightvnc

On Tue, 2008-08-12 at 14:53 -0400, Robert Moskowitz wrote: > You would think installing via yum would handle dependencies, but > perhaps fonts are not managed like dependencies. Well, they can be, but not unless the packager does so. -- Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> PLEASE don

Re: [CentOS] Re: gcc editor for newbie (Emacs or vim or ?)

Edlin aarrgh my eyes... I don't know who to credit the quote to, but I think it's best described by: "Windows. From the company that brought you edlin." -- Spiro Harvey Knossos Networks Ltd 021-295-1923www.knossos.net.nz

Re: [CentOS] bind-9.3.4-6.0.2.P1.el5_2 and rrset-order: order 'fixed'not fully implemented

> According to this page, BIND can be compiled with the "enabled-fixed-rrset" > option to support this. How to determine what switches were used to compile > the BIND RPM I downloaded with "yum update?" I was recently curious about this too. Is there an easier way than peering into the spec fi

Re: [CentOS] Re: gcc editor for newbie (Emacs or vim or ?)

On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 03:27:28PM -0400, William L. Maltby wrote: > On Tue, 2008-08-12 at 20:45 +0200, Mihai T. Lazarescu wrote: > > An intuitive interface shortens the learning curve. > > An efficient interface becomes a concern after that. vi came > > to serve in an environment where most were

Re: [CentOS] learning centos

On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 05:41:17AM -0700, Akemi Yagi wrote: > On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 5:11 AM, pedro henrique antunes de oliveira > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hello, I'm new to CENTOS and I'd like to learn how to use it from ground up. > > > > Can anyone recommend me books on it? > > > > I alre

Re: [CentOS] mystery process "unit"

sbeam wrote: Maybe enabling selinux but leaving httpd opened up would be appropriate for the time being. Is that possible or advisable? audit2allow wants to allow a lot of things. Try toggling the httpd_disable_trans boolean: setsebool -P httpd_disable_trans on That should disable SELinu

[CentOS] Please help: The process of am-utils map key lookup

Hi, I am using am-utils(amd binary daemon) to auto mount home directories. the mounting process seems working fine but I am still not understand how the amd map key(s) lookup process works. I've carefully read the am-utils(amd) document at http://am-utils.org/docs/am-utils/am-utils_8.html,

[CentOS] Looking for remote console on iPv6 without security layer

I am looking for a remote console program that I can run over IPv6. I do not need it to supply its own security layer, as I will be running it over HIP (http://infrahip.hiit.fi/). I have discovered that VNCSERVER that comes with Centos does not support IPv6. I would have to pay for a copy of

Re: [CentOS] mystery process "unit"

On Tuesday 12 August 2008 15:44, Jancio Wodnik wrote: > Hm. And what about selinux and httpd ? Selinux is securing httpd from > this attacks, right ? Selinux was disabled ? good point, SElinux is set to permissive on this system because we had to get up and running in a hurry and support a lot of

[CentOS] bind-9.3.4-6.0.2.P1.el5_2 and rrset-order: order 'fixed' not fully implemented

Running CentOS 5.2 with the following BIND update rpm, installed with "yum update" - bind-9.3.4-6.0.2.P1.el5_2. Our master DNS has an rrset-order stanza with "order fixed" entries similar to the following: rrset-order { class IN type A name "abc.foobar123.com" order fixe

Re: [CentOS] mystery process "unit"

sbeam pisze: On Tuesday 12 August 2008 09:08, Mr Shunz wrote: maybe you should check with "lsof -p 3041" and see which files/pipes it uses to have a clue. of course! it's a perl w0rm that was uploaded last night, now killed. Now to determine how it got in. I found some output in t

Re: [CentOS] Re: gcc editor for newbie (Emacs or vim or ?)

On Tue, 12 Aug 2008 15:27:28 -0400 "William L. Maltby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Or the stupid > MS editor that used to come on DOS? Edlin was good for automated remote script generation over a serial connection. (We used to do kiosks with today's weather report and the special at the restaur

Re: [CentOS] Re: gcc editor for newbie (Emacs or vim or ?)

On Tue, 2008-08-12 at 20:45 +0200, Mihai T. Lazarescu wrote: > On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 10:48:10AM -0700, Florin Andrei wrote: > > > MHR wrote: > >> > >> Vi is not the world's best editor > > > > Heh, understatement of the century. > > It's an awful editor. I wish I could hire the person who came

Re: [CentOS] Re: gcc editor for newbie (Emacs or vim or ?)

Well, when people start to fail to understand your metaphors (or switch to the uber-literal-minded mode and attack the imperfections in the comparisons you make, instead of debating the original topic), you know it's pointless to continue the discussion. ;-) But the way this "discussion" evolv

Re: [CentOS] Re: gcc editor for newbie (Emacs or vim or ?)

Florin Andrei wrote: Frank Cox wrote: On Tue, 12 Aug 2008 10:48:10 -0700 Florin Andrei <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: It's an awful editor. I wish I could hire the person who came up with the user interface, only to have the satisfaction of having him/her fired five minutes later. With no severan

[CentOS] Missing fonts for tightvnc

You would think installing via yum would handle dependencies, but perhaps fonts are not managed like dependencies. Anyway, I installed tightvnc to test out its IPv6 support. Installed ok (after I erased regular vnc). But when I tried to start it, I got 5 warnings about: Font directory '

Re: [CentOS] Re: gcc editor for newbie (Emacs or vim or ?)

On Tue, 12 Aug 2008 11:25:50 -0700 Florin Andrei <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Frank Cox wrote: > > On Tue, 12 Aug 2008 10:48:10 -0700 > > Florin Andrei <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> It's an awful editor. I wish I could hire the person who came up with > >> the user interface, only to have

Re: [CentOS] Re: gcc editor for newbie (Emacs or vim or ?)

On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 10:48:10AM -0700, Florin Andrei wrote: > MHR wrote: >> >> Vi is not the world's best editor > > Heh, understatement of the century. > It's an awful editor. I wish I could hire the person who came up with > the user interface, only to have the satisfaction of having him/he

Re: [CentOS] Re: gcc editor for newbie (Emacs or vim or ?)

Frank Cox wrote: On Tue, 12 Aug 2008 10:48:10 -0700 Florin Andrei <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: It's an awful editor. I wish I could hire the person who came up with the user interface, only to have the satisfaction of having him/her fired five minutes later. With no severance package. Viewed i

Re: [CentOS] Re: gcc editor for newbie (Emacs or vim or ?)

On Tue, 12 Aug 2008 10:48:10 -0700 Florin Andrei <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It's an awful editor. I wish I could hire the person who came up with > the user interface, only to have the satisfaction of having him/her > fired five minutes later. With no severance package. Viewed in the context

Re: [CentOS] gcc editor for newbie (Emacs or vim or ?)

On Tue, 12 Aug 2008 13:10:25 -0400 Bowie Bailey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > There is a nice vi cheatsheet available here: > > http://downloads.techrepublic.com.com/abstract.aspx?docid=172404 "Access to this feature requires a free TechRepublic membership!" -- MELVILLE THEATRE ~ Melville Sask

Re: [CentOS] mystery process "unit"

On Tuesday 12 August 2008 13:39, Jeff Kinz wrote: > If you don't mind I would like to use it as a real world example for a > class I'm teaching?  I will remove all the identifying information > first of course. Sure go right ahead. Unfortunately I have tons of real world examples... :/ cheers Sa

No IPv6 - Re: [CentOS] vncserver on IPv6

Triggered by your comments below about the log... Rob Lockhart wrote: On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 12:01 PM, Robert Moskowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: On Fri, Aug 8, 2008 at 3:55 PM, Robert Moskowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [CentOS] Re: gcc editor for newbie (Emacs or vim or ?)

MHR wrote: Vi is not the world's best editor Heh, understatement of the century. It's an awful editor. I wish I could hire the person who came up with the user interface, only to have the satisfaction of having him/her fired five minutes later. With no severance package. It's one of the wo

Re: [CentOS] mystery process "unit"

On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 12:28:08PM -0400, sbeam wrote: > On Tuesday 12 August 2008 12:18, Rainer Duffner wrote: > > (I think it requires both register_globals and allow_url_fopen to be on, > > but I'm not sure if you can't get it to work with only allow_url_fopen) > > as I just found out, it c

RE: [CentOS] gcc editor for newbie (Emacs or vim or ?)

Lanny Marcus wrote: > > Thank you! gvim is slick. As you wrote, it has lots of help > and it will be easy to learn how to use vi, by learning on gvim. > Better than holding a cheat sheet or having a book open, trying > to figure out what to do, when learning. There is a nice vi cheatsheet availab

Re: [CentOS] mystery process "unit"

On Tuesday 12 August 2008 12:18, Rainer Duffner wrote: > (I think it requires both register_globals and allow_url_fopen to be on, > but I'm not sure if you can't get it to work with only allow_url_fopen) as I just found out, it can, as long as the PHP developer was even more naive than usual.

Re: [CentOS] Mirroring Hard Drive

Robert wrote: Paul R. Ganci wrote: Matt wrote: why not just put it in the machine and make it a raid1 mirror then, if the first one dies, you just use the second one :D How do you do that? Detailed step by step instructions easily modified for CentOS: http://www.howtoforge.com/s

Re: [CentOS] mystery process "unit"

sbeam schrieb: On Tuesday 12 August 2008 10:16, Rainer Duffner wrote: Anything in /tmp ? Disable register_globals and allow_url_fopen. Set open_basedir for any virtual hosts to the absolute minimum. I have mod_security installed now, but I tested a similar attack, and sadly, it still

Re: [CentOS] mystery process "unit"

On Tuesday 12 August 2008 10:16, Rainer Duffner wrote: > Anything in /tmp ? > > Disable register_globals and allow_url_fopen. > Set open_basedir for any virtual hosts to the absolute minimum. allow_url_fopen was enabled on one of many sites. A developer put in an unsafe php include(). This allowe

Re: [CentOS] vncserver on IPv6

Rob Lockhart wrote: On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 12:01 PM, Robert Moskowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: On Fri, Aug 8, 2008 at 3:55 PM, Robert Moskowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [CentOS] WUBI like process for CentOS ?

Ned Slider wrote: I agree - I think that whilst features like this may be appealing to the goals of Ubuntu, they do not necessarily match the goals of the CentOS project. How'd you work that out ? JMHO, but I would think other stuff like a ServerCD (or rebuilding FastTrack packages) would be

Re: [CentOS] Suggestion on Network Management software with troubleticket system

On Mon, 11 Aug 2008, nate wrote: I'm looking for a network management software. And as the network grows it clearly becomes that manual notes is getting too tedious. Also an integrated troube ticketing systemm would be great. Any reference is really appreciated. For managing my "network" of

Re: [CentOS] WUBI like process for CentOS ?

Ralph Angenendt wrote: Ned Slider wrote: Sven wrote: On 8/12/08, Karanbir Singh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Now the question: is there anyway to get something similar for CentOS ? or is there a process that someone might follow to achieve the same or similar result ? I am just curious. What i

Re: [CentOS] WUBI like process for CentOS ?

Ned Slider wrote: > Sven wrote: >> On 8/12/08, Karanbir Singh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> Now the question: is there anyway to get something similar for CentOS ? or >>> is there a process that someone might follow to achieve the same or similar >>> result ? >> >> I am just curious. What is the

Re: [CentOS] mystery process "unit"

sbeam schrieb: On Tuesday 12 August 2008 09:08, Mr Shunz wrote: maybe you should check with "lsof -p 3041" and see which files/pipes it uses to have a clue. of course! it's a perl w0rm that was uploaded last night, now killed. Now to determine how it got in. I found some output i

Re: [CentOS] mystery process "unit"

On Tuesday 12 August 2008 09:08, Mr Shunz wrote: > maybe you should check with "lsof -p 3041" and see which files/pipes it > uses to have a clue. of course! it's a perl w0rm that was uploaded last night, now killed. Now to determine how it got in. I found some output in the main apache error l

[CentOS] Sendmail is not putting the full information in the received header anymore

Previously, when our server received an email it would slap the rcpt to in the received headers by adding a for <...> any ideas what has changed? Any pointers would be grateful. Headers received today: Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from psmtp.com (exprod8mx220.postini.com [64.18.3.

Re: [CentOS] WUBI like process for CentOS ?

Sven wrote: On 8/12/08, Karanbir Singh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, Hi Karanbir [...] Now the question: is there anyway to get something similar for CentOS ? or is there a process that someone might follow to achieve the same or similar result ? I am just curious. What is the use case

Re: [CentOS] Centos 5.2, Firefox 3, and IPv6

Robert Moskowitz wrote: I am doing some testing and it almost seems as if Firefox 3.0.1 that comes with Centos 5.2 is NOT working with IPv6. my home network is 100% ipv6 and firefox works fine :D ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.

Re: [CentOS] mystery process "unit"

Hi, > Ok, dumb question. On a certain LAMP server I am seeing in 'ps auxf' a process > called "unit" with no arguments or other path info. It has a fairly low pid, > 3041, indicating it might have been started soon after reboot (last week). > but ps says it was started yesterday, can't find it in

[CentOS] mystery process "unit"

Ok, dumb question. On a certain LAMP server I am seeing in 'ps auxf' a process called "unit" with no arguments or other path info. It has a fairly low pid, 3041, indicating it might have been started soon after reboot (last week). but ps says it was started yesterday, I don't see it on any of 3

Re: [CentOS] WUBI like process for CentOS ?

On 8/12/08, Karanbir Singh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi, Hi Karanbir [...] > Now the question: is there anyway to get something similar for CentOS ? or > is there a process that someone might follow to achieve the same or similar > result ? I am just curious. What is the use case for Wub

Re: [CentOS] SCO 7.1 on full virtualization mode

lingu schrieb: Hi, I am trying to install SCO 7.1 on Centos 5.2 in full virtualization mode. That's the strangest thing I've seen in a while, I must admit. But the installation requires booting from a floppy drive provide in the SCO CD. I tried different ways to attach floppy dri

Re: [CentOS] learning centos

On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 5:11 AM, pedro henrique antunes de oliveira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello, I'm new to CENTOS and I'd like to learn how to use it from ground up. > > Can anyone recommend me books on it? > > I already have the documentation from the web site, can I start with it? > > I'v

[CentOS] NFS issues

So I'm running nfs to get content to my web servers. Now I've had this problem 2 times (about 2 weeks since the last occurrence). I use drbd on the nfs server for redundancy. Now to my problem: All my web sites stopped responding so I started by checking dmesg and there I found a bunch of this

Re: [CentOS] vncserver on IPv6

On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 12:01 PM, Robert Moskowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 8, 2008 at 3:55 PM, Robert Moskowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote: >> >>http://www.realvnc.com/products/enterprise/4.1/ipv6.html >> >> >> IPv6 support in VNC Server E4.1.7/P4.1.2

[CentOS] learning centos

Hello, I'm new to CENTOS and I'd like to learn how to use it from ground up. Can anyone recommend me books on it? I already have the documentation from the web site, can I start with it? I've already done very basic stuff on archlinux and slackware. __

[CentOS] CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 42, Issue 3

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to [EMAIL PROTECTED] You can reac

[CentOS] WUBI like process for CentOS ?

Hi, Over the last few days a couple of people have asked about WUBI liks process for CentOS. I've had to look up what WUBI is ( to save you time : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wubi_(Ubuntu) ) . Now the question: is there anyway to get something similar for CentOS ? or is there a process tha

[CentOS] SCO 7.1 on full virtualization mode

Hi, I am trying to install SCO 7.1 on Centos 5.2 in full virtualization mode.But the installation requires booting from a floppy drive provide in the SCO CD. I tried different ways to attach floppy drive to the guest.I even tried providing floppy image as a drive to the guest but guest is

Re: [CentOS] Sendmail with TLS, permission problem - SOLVED

Now I stumble on another problem (not fatal). I think it's only relevant to dual-MTA setups (separate Sendmail daemons for receiving and transmitting mail). I don't find a way to enable STARTTLS (for the receiving sm-daemon) while at the same time running the receiving daemon with the unprivileged

Re: [CentOS] Sendmail with TLS, permission problem

Ralph Angenendt wrote on Tue, 12 Aug 2008 11:21:33 +0200: > IIRC sendmail checks from /etc/mail downwards, so /etc/mail is open too > wide still. Don't think so, these are the default permissions in CentOS 4, can't check on 5 as I moved to postfix on 5. The certs directory needs to be owned by

Re: [CentOS] Re: gcc editor for newbie (Emacs or vim or ?)

--On Monday, August 11, 2008 7:20 PM -0500 Lanny Marcus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Then you shouldn't go wrong, because I have yet to be on a linux box or a bsd box that didn't have some form or emulation of vi installed. vi is everywhere! But, apparently, I need to learn how to use Emacs or

Re: [CentOS] Sendmail with TLS, permission problem - SOLVED

Ian Forde ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) kirjoitteli (12.8.2008 12:44): > and change the ownership on the certs dir to root:root while you're > there... you're okay with 755 perms on /etc/mail, as long as it's > root:root. Basically, stick with the stock permissions and you should > be fine... Damn it, Ian

Re: [CentOS] Sendmail with TLS, permission problem

Here's more info about my Sendmail. It's the current version from the CentOS 5 repositories. [EMAIL PROTECTED] mail]# sendmail -d0.1 Version 8.13.8 Compiled with: DNSMAP HESIOD HES_GETMAILHOST LDAPMAP LOG MAP_REGEX MATCHGECOS MILTER MIME7TO8 MIME8TO7 NAMED_BIND NETINET NETINET6

Re: [CentOS] Sendmail with TLS, permission problem

On Tue, 2008-08-12 at 02:42 -0700, Ian Forde wrote: > On Tue, 2008-08-12 at 12:38 +0300, Jussi Hirvi wrote: > > Ralph Angenendt ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) kirjoitteli (12.8.2008 12:21): > > >> Thanks for quick reply. That didn't help yet. The error message in > > >> maillog > > >> is still the same: "sen

Re: [CentOS] Sendmail with TLS, permission problem

On Tue, 2008-08-12 at 12:38 +0300, Jussi Hirvi wrote: > Ralph Angenendt ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) kirjoitteli (12.8.2008 12:21): > >> Thanks for quick reply. That didn't help yet. The error message in maillog > >> is still the same: "sendmail.pem unsafe: Permission denied". The directory > >> perms are n

Re: [CentOS] Sendmail with TLS, permission problem

On Tue, 2008-08-12 at 11:21 +0200, Ralph Angenendt wrote: > Jussi Hirvi wrote: > > Ralph Angenendt ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) kirjoitteli (12.8.2008 11:24): > > >> dr-xr-xr-x 2 mail mail 4096 Aug 11 14:42 /etc/mail/certs > > > ^^^ > > > > > > Even allowing group to read there and enter there might be t

Re: [CentOS] Sendmail with TLS, permission problem

Ralph Angenendt ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) kirjoitteli (12.8.2008 12:21): >> Thanks for quick reply. That didn't help yet. The error message in maillog >> is still the same: "sendmail.pem unsafe: Permission denied". The directory >> perms are now: >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] mail]# ls -ld / /etc /etc/mail /etc/

Re: [CentOS] Sendmail with TLS, permission problem

Jussi Hirvi wrote: > Ralph Angenendt ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) kirjoitteli (12.8.2008 11:24): > >> dr-xr-xr-x 2 mail mail 4096 Aug 11 14:42 /etc/mail/certs > > ^^^ > > > > Even allowing group to read there and enter there might be too much. > > Thanks for quick reply. That didn't help yet. The error

Re: [CentOS] Sendmail with TLS, permission problem

Ralph Angenendt ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) kirjoitteli (12.8.2008 11:24): > Jussi Hirvi wrote: >> Aug 11 15:25:24 mail sm-mta-rx[12785]: STARTTLS=server: file >> /etc/mail/certs/sendmail.pem unsafe: Permission denied > >> dr-xr-xr-x 2 mail mail 4096 Aug 11 14:42 /etc/mail/certs > ^^^ > > Even allowing

Re: [CentOS] Re: gcc editor for newbie (Emacs or vim or ?)

Lanny Marcus wrote: > On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 1:30 PM, Scott Silva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > on 8-11-2008 9:06 AM Lanny Marcus spake the following: > > >> I will look at Eclipse, but one of my goals is to be able to fix > >> problems on a remote box and that will probably require vi. > > >

Re: [CentOS] Sendmail with TLS, permission problem

Jussi Hirvi wrote: > Aug 11 15:25:24 mail sm-mta-rx[12785]: STARTTLS=server: file > /etc/mail/certs/sendmail.pem unsafe: Permission denied > dr-xr-xr-x 2 mail mail 4096 Aug 11 14:42 /etc/mail/certs ^^^ Even allowing group to read there and enter there might be too much. Ralph pgp6Ds

[CentOS] Sendmail with TLS, permission problem

Hello, list, I have a problem with Sendmail configuration. I'm building (on CentOS 5) a "dual-MTA" setup with amavisd-new (as specified in amavisd-new documentation, file README.sendmail-dual). So far so good. But when I tried to add server SMTP-AUTH and TLS, I get a strange, permission-related