RE: [CentOS-es] sarg

2008-10-14 Thread Nino Bravo
Hola seria si mi ip del servidor es 192.168.1.1 y si en el httpd le puse que alias sea reporte entonces: http://192.168.1.1/reporte Saludos Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 12:39:29 -0500 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: centos-es@centos.org Subject: [CentOS-es] sarg olas disculpen acabo de

Re: [CentOS-es] Selinux targeted source en Centos 5.2

2008-10-14 Thread Martin Spinassi
On Mon, 2008-10-13 at 00:32 -0400, Hardy Beltran Monasterios wrote: El jue, 02-10-2008 a las 13:00 -0300, Martin Spinassi escribió: Muy buenas lista! Hace algunas semana comencé a utilizar CentOS para un servidor, y la verdad es que fué una gran decisión. Los contacto para ver si

Re: [CentOS-es] sarg

2008-10-14 Thread Wilder Deza
Si bacan.. ya lo puse pero na sale como que si no encontrara. Lo primero que hice fue compilar el tar del sarr, seguido modifique el sarg.conf que por cierto encontre varios y en varios lugares pero ese alias que me dices no lo he visto??? * * Saludos, *Wilder Deza* *GAMMA CARGO SAC***

[CentOS-es] RE: Resumen de CentOS-es, Vol 22 , Envío 19

2008-10-14 Thread Alejandro Garrido
Muchas gracias francisco por responder, el eclipse no lo baje todavía, pero el netbeans baje una versión, pero era para Windows, ahora que me decis que hay para Linux voy a buscar de nuevo. Un saludo Alejandro Garrido -Mensaje original- Message: 1 Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 09:05:04 -0300

Re: [CentOS] Regd: SeLinux Configuration

2008-10-14 Thread Ian Blackwell
Balaji wrote: * Can any one help me or guide me to 1. Enable the selinux setenforce 1 Use getenforce to determine the current status of selinux. Look in /etc/selinux/config for details of policy being used - e.g. targeted. 2. Selinux Customize my own policy man setsebool man getsebool

Re: [CentOS] Regd: SeLinux Configuration

2008-10-14 Thread Balaji
Dear All, I have executed the following command and i have changed the /etc/selinux/config file and reboot the PC also setenforce 1 i have getting the following message only setenforce: SELinux is disabled Regards -S.Balaji Ian Blackwell wrote: Balaji wrote: * Can any one

Re: [CentOS] Regd: SeLinux Configuration

2008-10-14 Thread Ian Blackwell
Balaji wrote: Dear All, I have executed the following command and i have changed the /etc/selinux/config file and reboot the PC also setenforce 1 i have getting the following message only setenforce: SELinux is disabled Please post your /etc/selinux/config file. Thanks, Ian

[CentOS] Squid proxy High Availability

2008-10-14 Thread lingu
Hi all, I am running squid integrated with squidguard.dansguardian,clamav running on single standalone centos 5 server.Also running webmin for managing squid.This Squid is serving for 4000 clients. Since it is serving more users i don't want to take risk by running single server,if there is

Re: [CentOS] Squid Number of hits

2008-10-14 Thread Mogens Kjaer
lingu wrote: Dear all, I am running squid on centos 5.Is there is any tool to calculate number of ip's hit the server for month wise. Even any command to find out the number of hits is also ok. When I ran a squid cache I used the scripts on: http://www.squid-cache.org/Scripts/NLANR/ to

Re: [CentOS] Sendmail and pmtu discovery

2008-10-14 Thread Ralph Angenendt
Sean Carolan wrote: We have an issue with some customers who refuse to accept ICMP traffic to their mail servers. It seems that they have put Mordac, preventer of information services in charge of their firewall policy (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_minor_characters_in_Dilbert#Mordac).

Re: [CentOS] Squid proxy High Availability

2008-10-14 Thread nate
lingu wrote: Help me in designing the setup of high availability squid I think your better off using a load balancer instead of a cluster. For one, GFS requires shared storage(typically SAN), and two load balancing is much simpler than clustering. LVS is a free linux-based load balancer, so

[CentOS] Squid Number of hits

2008-10-14 Thread lingu
Dear all, I am running squid on centos 5.Is there is any tool to calculate number of ip's hit the server for month wise. Even any command to find out the number of hits is also ok. Regards, Lingu ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org

Re: [CentOS] Mass installs of desktop systems on identical machines

2008-10-14 Thread Kai Schaetzl
Sorin Srbu wrote on Tue, 14 Oct 2008 15:24:59 +0200: Any particular reason why not, if I may ask? Because other distributions have better support for brand-new consumer hardware. Especially, if you consider the lifetime cycle of CentOS which spans to 2014. Look at this not from the viewpoint

Re: [CentOS] Mass installs of desktop systems on identical machines

2008-10-14 Thread Jens Larsson
Any particular reason why not, if I may ask? Because other distributions have better support for brand-new consumer hardware. Especially, if you consider the lifetime cycle of CentOS which spans to 2014. Look at this not from the viewpoint of your mom, but from the computershop that

Re: [CentOS] Sendmail and pmtu discovery

2008-10-14 Thread David Dyer-Bennet
On Tue, October 14, 2008 09:31, Kai Schaetzl wrote: Sean Carolan wrote on Tue, 14 Oct 2008 08:13:34 -0500: My mail logs are showing that customers who specifically disallow ICMP traffic have many Connection Reset entries in our logs: Could somebody explain why ICMP might play a role in mail

Re: [CentOS] Sendmail and pmtu discovery

2008-10-14 Thread Paul Bijnens
On 2008-10-14 16:31, Kai Schaetzl wrote: Sean Carolan wrote on Tue, 14 Oct 2008 08:13:34 -0500: My mail logs are showing that customers who specifically disallow ICMP traffic have many Connection Reset entries in our logs: Could somebody explain why ICMP might play a role in mail delivery?

Re: [CentOS] Squid Number of hits

2008-10-14 Thread John Horne
On Tue, 2008-10-14 at 16:54 +0530, lingu wrote: Dear all, I am running squid on centos 5.Is there is any tool to calculate number of ip's hit the server for month wise. Even any command to find out the number of hits is also ok. Calamaris can give you a summary:

Re: [CentOS] Sendmail and pmtu discovery

2008-10-14 Thread Kai Schaetzl
Ralph Angenendt wrote on Tue, 14 Oct 2008 17:24:08 +0200: If you don't know the smallest MTU on the path to the mail server, you might not be able to send packets over that path, especially if DF is set. But if it's not set? Shouldn't most devices have it not set? Kai -- Kai Schätzl,

[CentOS] Sendmail and pmtu discovery

2008-10-14 Thread Sean Carolan
We have an issue with some customers who refuse to accept ICMP traffic to their mail servers. It seems that they have put Mordac, preventer of information services in charge of their firewall policy (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_minor_characters_in_Dilbert#Mordac). My mail logs are

Re: [CentOS] Mass installs of desktop systems on identical machines

2008-10-14 Thread Kai Schaetzl
Sorin Srbu wrote on Tue, 14 Oct 2008 18:26:51 +0200: Did you maybe have some special hardware in mind? No. I just wanted to point out that for such a task another distribution *might* be better suited, that's all. Kai -- Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany Get your web at Conactive Internet

[CentOS] Re: Mass installs of desktop systems on identical machines

2008-10-14 Thread Scott Silva
on 10-14-2008 9:26 AM Sorin Srbu spake the following: Kai Schaetzl scribbled on Tuesday, October 14, 2008 4:31 PM: Any particular reason why not, if I may ask? Because other distributions have better support for brand-new consumer hardware. Especially, if you consider the lifetime cycle of

RE: [CentOS] Mass installs of desktop systems on identical machines

2008-10-14 Thread Sorin Srbu
Niki Kovacs scribbled on Tuesday, October 14, 2008 1:44 PM: How would it *technically* be possible to replicate these installs as easily as possible? G4u (Ghost for unix) is your solution. It's free. Have a ftp-and dhcp server available on your network. Install one machine with your

Re: [CentOS] Sendmail and pmtu discovery

2008-10-14 Thread Les Mikesell
Kai Schaetzl wrote: Ralph Angenendt wrote on Tue, 14 Oct 2008 17:24:08 +0200: If you don't know the smallest MTU on the path to the mail server, you might not be able to send packets over that path, especially if DF is set. But if it's not set? Shouldn't most devices have it not set?

Re: [CentOS] Sendmail and pmtu discovery

2008-10-14 Thread nate
Kai Schaetzl wrote: Sean Carolan wrote on Tue, 14 Oct 2008 08:13:34 -0500: My mail logs are showing that customers who specifically disallow ICMP traffic have many Connection Reset entries in our logs: Could somebody explain why ICMP might play a role in mail delivery? It doesn't really. If

Re: [CentOS] Sendmail and pmtu discovery

2008-10-14 Thread David Dyer-Bennet
On Tue, October 14, 2008 12:31, Kai Schaetzl wrote: Ralph Angenendt wrote on Tue, 14 Oct 2008 17:24:08 +0200: If you don't know the smallest MTU on the path to the mail server, you might not be able to send packets over that path, especially if DF is set. But if it's not set? Shouldn't

Re: [CentOS] yum priorities question

2008-10-14 Thread Mufit Eribol
Filipe Brandenburger wrote: Hi, The package names are different, so probably geoip (from RPMforge) obsoletes GeoIP from CentOS. In that case, for priorities to work and exclude the one that obsoletes the other, you have to set this option in the [main] section of

Re: [CentOS] yum priorities question

2008-10-14 Thread Ralph Angenendt
Mufit Eribol wrote: Installed package: GeoIP.i386 1.4.4-1.el5.centos Repo: CentOS Extras Priority for CentOS Extras repo: 1 yum update wants to replace the above package with the following: Package: geoip.i386 1.4.5-1.el5.rf Repo: rpmforge Priority for rpmforge: 15 Why does yum try to

Re: [CentOS] yum priorities question

2008-10-14 Thread Filipe Brandenburger
Hi, On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 13:47, Mufit Eribol [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: check_obsoletes=1 Yes Filipe, that's it! This option works nice. Thank you for the hint. No problem! :-) By the way, in a previous thread (rpmforge, perl-dbd-mysql, yum, priorities, centos, and you) it was suggested

Re: [CentOS] Re: Sendmail and pmtu discovery

2008-10-14 Thread Ralph Angenendt
Scott Silva wrote: on 10-14-2008 6:24 AM Ralph Angenendt spake the following: So you basically broke your internet connection because of stupid customers? No, there isn't anything you can do on your side - especially if you don't know how large their MTU is set (which you cannot

Re: [CentOS] Sendmail and pmtu discovery

2008-10-14 Thread Ralph Angenendt
Kai Schaetzl wrote: Ralph Angenendt wrote on Tue, 14 Oct 2008 17:24:08 +0200: If you don't know the smallest MTU on the path to the mail server, you might not be able to send packets over that path, especially if DF is set. But if it's not set? Shouldn't most devices have it not set?

Re: [CentOS] Re: tg3 ethernet card drops connection under heavy load

2008-10-14 Thread Sean Carolan
There was nothing out of the ordinary in /var/log/messages. The logging just stops after the network card drops offline. dmesg also shows nothing out of the ordinary when the driver is loaded. The network card works fine until it is under heavy load. Since you are running CentOS 3 I am

Re: [CentOS] Mass installs of desktop systems on identical machines

2008-10-14 Thread Kai Schaetzl
Niki Kovacs wrote on Tue, 14 Oct 2008 13:44:19 +0200: How would it *technically* be possible to replicate these installs as easily as possible? Kickstart. I wouldn't be so sure that CentOS would be the best choice for a brand-new consumer desktop, though. You might want to use Fedora which

Re: [CentOS] Re: Sendmail and pmtu discovery

2008-10-14 Thread Les Mikesell
Ralph Angenendt wrote: As said, they deliberately broke their internet connection, so there isn't much you can do except setting your MTU to an extremely low value and hope that there's nothing in between which has an even lower MTU. It doesn't have to be extremely low, it just has to be low

Re: [CentOS] Mass installs of desktop systems on identical machines

2008-10-14 Thread Les Mikesell
Niki Kovacs wrote: How would it *technically* be possible to replicate these installs as easily as possible? The hardware is always the same, so I wonder: I have a vague idea about disk images (to be more precise: I know disk images well as far as burning CDs on the commandline is concerned,

Re: [CentOS] Squid proxy High Availability

2008-10-14 Thread Barry Brimer
So i am planned to go for one more Centos5 server with cluster.Can any one suggest me how to design it either i have to go for common storage for storing all global files or i need to synchronize both the server periodically by running instance on local disk of both the servers. You could

Re: [CentOS] Re: Sendmail and pmtu discovery

2008-10-14 Thread Sean Carolan
Thanks for the information. If I understand this correctly, the client would have to convince the owner of each and every router hop along the way to disable PMTU discovery if he insists on dropping all ICMP packets? And Scott hit the nail on the head with this comment: Sometimes you can't be

Re: [CentOS] Re: Sendmail and pmtu discovery

2008-10-14 Thread Ralph Angenendt
Les Mikesell wrote: Ralph Angenendt wrote: As said, they deliberately broke their internet connection, so there isn't much you can do except setting your MTU to an extremely low value and hope that there's nothing in between which has an even lower MTU. It doesn't have to be extremely low,

Re: [CentOS] Sendmail and pmtu discovery

2008-10-14 Thread Kai Schaetzl
Sean Carolan wrote on Tue, 14 Oct 2008 08:13:34 -0500: My mail logs are showing that customers who specifically disallow ICMP traffic have many Connection Reset entries in our logs: Could somebody explain why ICMP might play a role in mail delivery? Kai -- Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany Get

Re: [CentOS] Weird problem in PHP 5.1.6/possible bug

2008-10-14 Thread Patrick
Kai Schaetzl wrote: As you might have seen I actually found a workaround. Your findings on CentOS 4 suggest that it is a specific problem on the CentOS/RHEL 5 platform. The PHP 5 coming with CentOS 5 is set to a locale of C and doesn't match the locale of the system! I guess I file a bug now.

Re: [CentOS] yum priorities question

2008-10-14 Thread Mufit Eribol
Ralph Angenendt wrote: Strange, because it works here: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Documentation]# yum -v update | grep -i geoip -- geoip-devel-1.4.0-1.el5.rf.x86_64 from rpmforge excluded (priority) -- geoip-1.4.0-1.el5.rf.x86_64 from rpmforge excluded (priority) -- geoip-1.4.4-1.el5.rf.x86_64 from

Re: [CentOS] [OT] What is the best network monitoring tool?

2008-10-14 Thread Tim Berger
On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 7:01 PM, Alejandro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi all, Currently I have a big question. What is the best OPEN SOURCE solution for monitoring multiple Host and Services, for example for using in a WebHosting Provider with 50 hosts or more. I've had good luck with mon.

[CentOS] CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 44, Issue 10

2008-10-14 Thread centos-announce-request
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to [EMAIL PROTECTED] You can

Re: [CentOS] Sendmail and pmtu discovery

2008-10-14 Thread mouss
Sean Carolan a écrit : We have an issue with some customers who refuse to accept ICMP traffic to their mail servers. It seems that they have put Mordac, preventer of information services in charge of their firewall policy

[CentOS] App Question.

2008-10-14 Thread bruce
Hi list!! Got a question, and I can't find a good answer for, so I figured i'd post here. I'm working on a project that involves a number of smaller apps to be developed, and run. In order to build this overall application, I'm trying to find a web based app that I can use to manage the entire

Re: [CentOS] Sendmail and pmtu discovery

2008-10-14 Thread Ralph Angenendt
Kai Schaetzl wrote: Sean Carolan wrote on Tue, 14 Oct 2008 08:13:34 -0500: My mail logs are showing that customers who specifically disallow ICMP traffic have many Connection Reset entries in our logs: Could somebody explain why ICMP might play a role in mail delivery? If you don't know

RE: [CentOS] Mass installs of desktop systems on identical machines

2008-10-14 Thread Sorin Srbu
Kai Schaetzl scribbled on Tuesday, October 14, 2008 2:21 PM: I wouldn't be so sure that CentOS would be the best choice for a brand-new consumer desktop, though. Any particular reason why not, if I may ask? It works fine for my computer-ignorant 50+ mom. /S smime.p7s Description: S/MIME

Re: [CentOS] Sendmail and pmtu discovery

2008-10-14 Thread mouss
Kai Schaetzl a écrit : Ralph Angenendt wrote on Tue, 14 Oct 2008 17:24:08 +0200: If you don't know the smallest MTU on the path to the mail server, you might not be able to send packets over that path, especially if DF is set. But if it's not set? Shouldn't most devices have it not set?

Re: [CentOS] looking for good web based DNS script to check nameservers

2008-10-14 Thread Brent L. Bates
FYI. I tried the Web site Robert Spangler posted: http://www.checkdns.net/quickcheckdomainf.aspx We failed some of their tests because THEIR DNS isn't set up properly. -- Brent L. Bates (UNIX Sys. Admin.) M.S. 912 Phone:(757) 865-1400,

Re: [CentOS] /var/amavis

2008-10-14 Thread Jussi Hirvi
Jussi Hirvi wrote: Hello all, My /etc/group is not quite in order (a long story), and now I need to correct privileges right here and there. I would ask someone who has amavisd-new to show me the corresponding listing as this: [EMAIL PROTECTED] amavis]# ls -l /var/amavis total 20

[CentOS] Re: Sendmail and pmtu discovery

2008-10-14 Thread Scott Silva
on 10-14-2008 6:24 AM Ralph Angenendt spake the following: Sean Carolan wrote: We have an issue with some customers who refuse to accept ICMP traffic to their mail servers. It seems that they have put Mordac, preventer of information services in charge of their firewall policy

[CentOS] Mass installs of desktop systems on identical machines

2008-10-14 Thread Niki Kovacs
Hi, I'm running a small Linux consulting business here in a group of small villages in the South of France (http://www.microlinux.fr). I'm using CentOS for everything, servers as well as desktops. The desktop installs are usually highly customized. My approach is to list the client's needs,

[CentOS] OT: is parted reliable?

2008-10-14 Thread Sergio Belkin
Hi, I've read on LPI Linux Certification (Ed O'Reilly) in a nutshell the following thing: parted, unfortunately, has been known to corrupt partition tables and ruin filesystem. What do you think about it? Greets! -- -- Open Kairos http://www.openkairos.com Watch More TV

RE: [CentOS] Squid Number of hits

2008-10-14 Thread Sorin Srbu
lingu scribbled on Tuesday, October 14, 2008 1:24 PM: I am running squid on centos 5.Is there is any tool to calculate number of ip's hit the server for month wise. Even any command to find out the number of hits is also ok.

Re: [CentOS] Samba Hosts Allow/Deny

2008-10-14 Thread Craig White
On Tue, 2008-10-14 at 09:08 -0600, Joseph L. Casale wrote: I am running CentOS 5.2 w/ Samba 3.0.28 and have a basic user level setup and am trying to use hosts allow and deny but it does not have an effect? I have specified them in the share level of the config. I have tried:

Re: [CentOS] OT: is parted reliable?

2008-10-14 Thread Karanbir Singh
Sergio Belkin wrote: Hi, I've read on LPI Linux Certification (Ed O'Reilly) in a nutshell the following thing: parted, unfortunately, has been known to corrupt partition tables and ruin filesystem. Sounds like a question for the parted list, not here. Plenty of stuff in CentOS uses parted,

Re: [CentOS] App Question.

2008-10-14 Thread Karanbir Singh
bruce wrote: Got a question, and I can't find a good answer for, so I figured i'd post here. I'm working on a project that involves a number of smaller apps to be developed, and run. In order to build this overall application, I'm trying to find a web based app that I can use to manage the

[CentOS] yum priorities question

2008-10-14 Thread Mufit Eribol
Hello, I have a question about working principles of yum. Here are the details: Installed package: GeoIP.i386 1.4.4-1.el5.centos Repo: CentOS Extras Priority for CentOS Extras repo: 1 yum update wants to replace the above package with the following: Package: geoip.i386 1.4.5-1.el5.rf Repo:

RE: [CentOS] App Question.

2008-10-14 Thread bruce
Karanbir in this case, i disagree. we're looking for a tool, that may very well exist with the very admins/engineers who use centos/rhel/etc... the whole purpose of the email lists is to share information that's directly related to the topic as well as to information that's 2-3 degrees tangental

Re: [CentOS] Re: Sendmail and pmtu discovery

2008-10-14 Thread Chris Boyd
On Oct 14, 2008, at 1:59 PM, Sean Carolan wrote: If you've ever dealt with with one of these paranoid Mordac-type security managers you know exactly what I'm talking about. In our case the path of least resistance was to disable pmtu discovery, and tell the customer that we've done all we

[CentOS] Centos 5x ipv6 sendmail smtps

2008-10-14 Thread Tony Wicks
Hi all, I'm working my way through v6ing our network. I have a mail server with the default dovecot/sendmail configuration working happily for pop3, pop3s, imap, imaps, smtp, and smtps on v4. I have managed to get all but smtps working on v6. Following is the relevant sendmail.mc -

Re: [CentOS] OT: is parted reliable?

2008-10-14 Thread David Mackintosh
On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 11:13:18PM +0100, Karanbir Singh wrote: And Just to remind everyone that no, this is still not a general conversation about stuff list. How off-topic is it to ask precisely what is on-topic for this list if questions and discussions of the included components belong

[CentOS] Extract text from Microsoft PowerPoint files

2008-10-14 Thread Yanagisawa, Koji
Hello CentOS people, I'm wondering if there are command tools like antiword and docx2txt for Microsoft PowerPoint files (.ppt and .pptx). The idea is to extract text from PowerPoint files. Sorry this isn't exactly about CentOS, but I'd really like it if Yum has something. I tried xlhtml,

Re: [CentOS] Extract text from Microsoft PowerPoint files

2008-10-14 Thread fred smith
On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 10:13:55PM -0400, Yanagisawa, Koji wrote: Hello CentOS people, I'm wondering if there are command tools like antiword and docx2txt for Microsoft PowerPoint files (.ppt and .pptx). The idea is to extract text from PowerPoint files. Sorry this isn't exactly about

Re: [CentOS] USB external HDD error messages

2008-10-14 Thread Guest
On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 9:38 AM, nate [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Guest wrote: Sorry to double up on your answer like this, but is there any chance that the i/o errors are due to a bad usb cable, or usb card in the main computer? I didn't mention before that the external hdd that the seagate is

[CentOS] formatting large volume

2008-10-14 Thread Craig White
I just got a new server with a Dell MD-1000 SAS unit and 6-750 gigabyte drives which are now initializing in RAID 10 which will give me just about 2 terabytes. I vaguely recall reading that fdisk wasn't suitable for partitioning and wonder if I shouldn't be using partd instead. I am also

RE: [CentOS] formatting large volume

2008-10-14 Thread Joseph L. Casale
I vaguely recall reading that fdisk wasn't suitable for partitioning and wonder if I shouldn't be using partd instead. I am also wondering if I should use lvm or just mkfs to create the filesystem. Anyone have suggestions before I blunder in? fdisk can't do GPT which is what you need for

Re: [CentOS] creating a user from an RPM package

2008-10-14 Thread nate
Spiro Harvey wrote: Alternatively, if you could point me to a package or a spec file that does this, I'd be much obliged. From the postifx srpm.. %define postfix_uid89 %define postfix_user postfix %define postfix_gid89 %define postfix_group postfix %define postdrop_group postdrop

Re: [CentOS] creating a user from an RPM package

2008-10-14 Thread Ian Forde
On Wed, 2008-10-15 at 16:22 +1300, Spiro Harvey wrote: What wizardry do you guys use in the SPEC file when creating/deleting a user from an RPM package? I was going to create a macro like: %define user(login,uid,gid,name,homedir,shell) \ echo $1:x:$2:$3:$4:$5:$6 /etc/passwd;

[CentOS] Sendmail rbl - Need to bypass rbl for one local address

2008-10-14 Thread Linux Guru
Hi, Hope any one can help me. I am running centos 5.2 with sendmail and rbl feature.  I need to recieve all emails come to my sales account regardless of rbl . I looked on web and gave up. All I found was if I added To:sales@ ok in my sendmail.mc , sales account will bypass rbl and get all

Re: [CentOS] creating a user from an RPM package

2008-10-14 Thread Spiro Harvey
nate [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From the postifx srpm.. thanks. and to you Ian; looks like useradd is the standard way. :) clamav uses it too. -- Spiro Harvey Knossos Networks Ltd 021-295-1923www.knossos.net.nz

Re: [CentOS] OT: is parted reliable?

2008-10-14 Thread John Newbigin
Until CentOS 4.7, parted would create DOS partitions 2Tb. DOS partitions can not be 2Tb. This could ...corrupt partition tables and ruin filesystem. The latest version from CentOS 4.7 fixes this (and other) bugs. John. Sergio Belkin wrote: Hi, I've read on LPI Linux Certification (Ed

Re: [CentOS] Re: Mass installs of desktop systems on identical machines

2008-10-14 Thread Niki Kovacs
Thanks very much everybody for your numerous comments. I guess I got much more than I expected. Cheers, Niki ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos