Is there a way to use Nouveau (open source Nvidia) driver in CentOS 5 ?
nv seems to support only the lowest resolutions thru the dvi output (NV44
chip), and I don't like the idea of installing propiertary Nvidia drivers.
This way I came to Nouveau.
I had a look at some Fedora rpms, but they
Timo Neuvonen wrote:
Is there a way to use Nouveau (open source Nvidia) driver in CentOS 5 ?
nv seems to support only the lowest resolutions thru the dvi output (NV44
chip), and I don't like the idea of installing propiertary Nvidia drivers.
This way I came to Nouveau.
I had a look at some
Hi CentOS,br/br/
cypro...@gmail.com has invited you to try Spokeo,
which finds your friends' updates across the Web.
Your friends are already using Spokeo to follow you on Web Results.
Try Spokeo today to find what your friends are doing across 30 different social
networks!
Click
Is there a way to use Nouveau (open source Nvidia) driver in CentOS 5 ?
nv seems to support only the lowest resolutions thru the dvi output
(NV44
chip), and I don't like the idea of installing propiertary Nvidia
drivers.
This way I came to Nouveau.
I had a look at some Fedora rpms, but
Timo Neuvonen wrote:
# rpm -ivh xorg-x11-drv-nouveau-2.1.6-1.fc8.x86_64.rpm
kernel-drm-nouveau = 10 is needed by
xorg-x11-drv-nouveau-2.1.6-1.fc8.x86_6
you can't use RPMs built for a different OS distribution, you'd need to
take the SRPM and rebuild/recompile it.
Aren't the
Hi,
I'm trying to install an old fujitsu siemens econel 50 server.
It uses an Intel chipset with ICH6R sata subsystem known as fakeraid.
I have configured a Raid 1 with two 160GB hds.
FS and Intel both provide a driver called megaide on a driver disk to
use fakeraid and here is the problem:
-
Rainer Traut wrote:
Question:
How can I prevent the ahci driver to load after installation?
Try adding 'blacklist ahci' to /etc/modprobe.d/blacklist
Also check for and comment out any aliases to ahci in /etc/modprobe.conf
___
CentOS mailing list
I've checked my system by aide and i've received information:
changed: /bin
changed: /bin/tar
changed: /bin/mv
changed: /bin/cp
changed: /bin/ls
changed: /bin/vi
i don't remember that I changed those commands, what does it mean? Somebody
broken in? or those commands are changed normally?
--
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org
[mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of John R Pierce
Sent: Sunday, December 28, 2008 5:13 AM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] xorg-x11-drv-nouveau for CentOS?
Timo Neuvonen wrote:
# rpm -ivh
I well installed using clamd filing rpmforge depot
yum --disablerepo=epel -v install clam\*
service clamd start
OK
also
I have always the same error when I restart sendmail
[r...@r13151 ~]# service sendmail restart
Arr�t de sm-client : [ OK ]
Arr�t de
On Sun, Dec 28, 2008 at 9:19 AM, Mariusz settl...@atp-czesci.pl wrote:
I've checked my system by aide and i've received information:
changed: /bin
changed: /bin/tar
changed: /bin/mv
changed: /bin/cp
changed: /bin/ls
changed: /bin/vi
i don't remember that I changed those commands, what
To OP in my previious reply the yum install should be:
yum install nvidia-x11-drv --enablepo=*\rpmforge
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org
[mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Timo Neuvonen
Sent: Saturday, December 27, 2008 8:54 PM
To: centos@centos.org
On Sat, Dec 27, 2008 at 9:53 PM, John R Pierce pie...@hogranch.com wrote:
snip
designs. Also, Dell is fairly notorious for using PSUs that are just
barely adequate for the system as originally configured.
And, I believe, in the Dell Dimensions, we have 4 of them, they use
Proprietary cases,
swilting schrieb:
I well installed using clamd filing rpmforge depot
yum --disablerepo=epel -v install clam\*
service clamd start
OK
also
I have always the same error when I restart sendmail
[r...@r13151 ~]# service sendmail restart
Arr�t de sm-client :
I am planning to use ZFS on my Centos 5.2 systems. The data I am
storing is very large text files where each file can range from 10M to
20G. I am very interested on the compression feature of ZFS, and it
seems no other native Linux FS supports it.
My question are: Is ZFS stable? How does it scale
swilting schrieb:
I wish to add options to sendmail
INPUT_MAIL_FILTER(`spamassassin',
`S=local:/var/run/spamass-milter/spamass-milter.sock, F=T,
T=C:5m;S:4m;R:4m;E:5m')dnl
dnl MAILER(cyrusv2)dnl
INPUT_MAIL_FILTER(`greylist',
`S=local:/var/run/milter-greylist/milter-greylist.sock')
Swilting wrote on Sun, 28 Dec 2008 17:01:35 +0100:
clamav-milter
Let me guess: you didn't start it. (Yes, sendmail won't do this for you.)
I see that you went to comp.mail.sendmail for your earlier SMTP AUTH
question. Do yourself and others a favor and go to: fr.comp.mail.serveurs
Your
On Sun, Dec 28, 2008 at 9:19 AM, Mariusz settl...@atp-czesci.pl wrote:
I've checked my system by aide and i've received information:
changed: /bin
changed: /bin/tar
changed: /bin/mv
changed: /bin/cp
changed: /bin/ls
changed: /bin/vi
i don't remember that I changed those commands, what
On Sun, Dec 28, 2008 at 9:19 AM, Mariusz settl...@atp-czesci.pl wrote:
I've checked my system by aide and i've received information:
changed: /bin
changed: /bin/tar
changed: /bin/mv
changed: /bin/cp
changed: /bin/ls
changed: /bin/vi
i don't remember that I changed those commands, what
Mag Gam wrote:
I am planning to use ZFS on my Centos 5.2 systems. The data I am
storing is very large text files where each file can range from 10M to
20G. I am very interested on the compression feature of ZFS, and it
seems no other native Linux FS supports it.
My question are: Is ZFS
On Sun, Dec 28, 2008 at 8:02 PM, Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com wrote:
Mag Gam wrote:
I am planning to use ZFS on my Centos 5.2 systems. The data I am
storing is very large text files where each file can range from 10M to
20G. I am very interested on the compression feature of ZFS, and it
Am 28.12.2008 um 20:02 schrieb Les Mikesell:
Mag Gam wrote:
I am planning to use ZFS on my Centos 5.2 systems. The data I am
storing is very large text files where each file can range from 10M
to
20G. I am very interested on the compression feature of ZFS, and it
seems no other native
On Dec 28, 2008, at 7:16 PM, Mag Gam wrote:
I am planning to use ZFS on my Centos 5.2 systems. The data I am
storing is very large text files where each file can range from 10M to
20G. I am very interested on the compression feature of ZFS, and it
seems no other native Linux FS supports it.
thanks everyone for your fair and balanced opinions and experiences!
On Sun, Dec 28, 2008 at 2:38 PM, Davide Cittaro
davide.citt...@ifom-ieo-campus.it wrote:
On Dec 28, 2008, at 7:16 PM, Mag Gam wrote:
I am planning to use ZFS on my Centos 5.2 systems. The data I am
storing is very large
Lanny Marcus wrote:
And, I believe, in the Dell Dimensions, we have 4 of them, they use
Proprietary cases, motherboards and PSUs.
not since the 90s, anyways. at one time, Dell dimensions used PSUs with
two wires swapped on the power connector, but they haven't done this in
a long long time.
On Sun, Dec 28, 2008 at 6:19 PM, John R Pierce pie...@hogranch.com wrote:
Lanny Marcus wrote:
And, I believe, in the Dell Dimensions, we have 4 of them, they use
Proprietary cases, motherboards and PSUs.
not since the 90s, anyways. at one time, Dell dimensions used PSUs with
two wires
Scott Silva wrote:
on 12-22-2008 4:19 PM Philip Manuel spake the following:
I'm trying to understand why a normal user is not allowed to unmount
their USB stick? I think it is most likely a udev rule. does anyone know ?
Thanks
Phil.
Is it something simple like a shell or
Mag Gam wrote:
I am planning to use ZFS on my Centos 5.2 systems. The data I am
storing is very large text files where each file can range from 10M to
20G. I am very interested on the compression feature of ZFS, and it
seems no other native Linux FS supports it.
My question are: Is ZFS
On Sun, Dec 28, 2008, Davide Cittaro wrote:
On Dec 28, 2008, at 7:16 PM, Mag Gam wrote:
I am planning to use ZFS on my Centos 5.2 systems. The data I am
storing is very large text files where each file can range from 10M to
20G. I am very interested on the compression feature of ZFS, and it
Bill Campbell wrote:
I would go with Opensolaris.
for a dedicated production storage server, I would go with Solaris 10.
unless there's some specific feature/capability you need thats only in
OpenSolaris.
___
CentOS mailing list
On Dec 29, 2008, at 7:09 AM, John R Pierce wrote:
Bill Campbell wrote:
I would go with Opensolaris.
for a dedicated production storage server, I would go with Solaris 10.
unless there's some specific feature/capability you need thats only in
OpenSolaris.
Totally agree. Solaris 10 is
31 matches
Mail list logo
