On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 10:10 PM, Akemi Yagi amy...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/3/28 Ron Blizzard rb4cen...@gmail.com:
I'm a requesting access to a Laptop template so I can enter information
about installing CentOS 5.2 on a Dell Lattude D400.
My user name is RonB on the forums.
Hi Ron,
You
Ron Blizzard wrote:
I've created a FirstNameLastName account in the Wiki.
It's RonBlizzard.
Okay, go ahead ...
Cheers,
Ralph
pgpdkO1zUYPjt.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
CentOS-docs mailing list
CentOS-docs@centos.org
Could you give me permission to edit this page?
http://wiki.centos.org/YoungHoonPark
My account is YoungHoonPark.
Truly,
YoungHoon Park
180도 달라진 야후! 메일 - 여러 개의 메시지를 동시에 확인? 새로운 야후! 메일의 탭으로 가능해집니다.
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2009:0398
https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009-0398.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors:
s390:
updates/s390/RPMS/seamonkey-1.0.9-0.36.el3.centos3.s390.rpm
On Sat, 2009-03-28 at 14:36 -0600, Joseph L. Casale wrote:
I need a little help on this problem, please? I include
my /etc/apcupsd/apcupsd.conf file is attached.
Ok
port 3551 udp/tcp has
been added to the (running) firewall.
Are you attempting to run the agent on a machine *without*
Hi,
I need to implement trouble tracking system,
we have 250 users in one premise 3 desktop support technicians.
I need to implement trouble ticket system, where user will enter their
application / other issues. Mail will be sent to technician available on
duty.
trouble ticket will be provided
Hello,
We make good use of RT by Best Practical, it services an ISP and a NOC.
http://www.bestpractical.com/rt
HTH,
Darrin
2009/3/29 Dhaval Thakar dhaval.tha...@networthdirect.com
Hi,
I need to implement trouble tracking system,
we have 250 users in one premise 3 desktop support
RedShift wrote:
Glenn Matthys
As a follow-up, I found the documentation I wrote how to install CentOS
without any installer:
# First, setup your disks to your liking. You can use whatever you want
here,
... snip ...
(PS: I've also attached the documentation as install_centos.txt, but
Am 29.03.2009 um 08:45 schrieb Dhaval Thakar:
Hi,
I need to implement trouble tracking system,
we have 250 users in one premise 3 desktop support technicians.
I need to implement trouble ticket system, where user will enter their
application / other issues. Mail will be sent to
Darrin Khan wrote:
[...]
We make good use of RT by Best Practical, it services an ISP and a NOC.
http://www.bestpractical.com/rt
[...]
I'd support RT, too. I've made some experiences with Kayako and RT and
while I find Kayako far too complex (especially if you want to customize
it), RT
At Sun, 29 Mar 2009 12:15:16 +0530 CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org
wrote:
Hi,
I need to implement trouble tracking system,
we have 250 users in one premise 3 desktop support technicians.
I need to implement trouble ticket system, where user will enter their
application / other
On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 5:39 PM, Frank Cox thea...@sasktel.net wrote:
I'm looking into costs and feasibility of moving a live feed from a FM radio
station from the station to a point that's past the usable range of their
radio
signal. It's a rural location and Internet service is not
We have had good luck with Mantis:
http://www.mantisbt.org/
KC
On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 2:45 AM, Dhaval Thakar
dhaval.tha...@networthdirect.com wrote:
Hi,
I need to implement trouble tracking system,
we have 250 users in one premise 3 desktop support technicians.
I need to implement
I am having a hell of a time getting adobe flash to work on a recent 5.2
install.
From rpm install:
Running firefox as root -- I have verified there is a symlink in
/usr/lib/mozilla/plugins that points to the actual plugin located in
/usr/lib/flash-plugins
nada.
SoI then copied the plugin
On Sun Mar 29 09:23:38 AM, Chuck wrote:
I am having a hell of a time getting adobe flash to work on a recent 5.2
install.
32-bit or 64-bit?
The adobe flash plugin is 32-bit only and won't work with the 64-bit
local version of Firefox (I could never get it to work anyway).
On my 64-bit 5.2
None of our data center machines are
able to connect so perhaps this is a firewall or NAT issue? Anyway
here is the very un-descriptive error message:
SSL_connect: error::lib(0):func(0):reason(0)
Closing control socket
`ls' at 0 [Delaying before reconnect: 18]
Further
Hello All:
I've configured a few instances of RedHat/CentOS clustering. For basic
services such as web, dns, and LDAP it seems to work well. My basic
configuration just uses the core services and a DRBD volume for the
shared storage.
We have some existing LifeKeeper clustered systems. I don't
mbneto wrote:
Hi,
Since the release of CentOS 5.3 is imminent(?) I'd like to ask a
question regarding why did it took so long to be released and, more
important, suggest some actions in order to reduce this time if I can
assume what caused this delay.
Late?
I just finished cleaning up
I just had a very odd incident with my session locking up, so I
thought I'd describe it to see if it rings any bells with anyone.
Background: I shut down my machine last night for Earth Hour, so the
last thing I did before logging out was exit Firefox3, telling it to
save my open tab state.
On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 9:39 AM, Zube z...@cs.colostate.edu wrote:
On Sun Mar 29 09:23:38 AM, Chuck wrote:
I am having a hell of a time getting adobe flash to work on a recent 5.2
install.
32-bit or 64-bit?
The adobe flash plugin is 32-bit only and won't work with the 64-bit
local
Greetings CentOS list! I do apologize in advance for the OT nature of this
post. Since many of you have great experience with different hardware
platforms, specialized systems, etc I'm hoping someone can help me out. I have
a 1U server for a personal project with only two hard drive bays in
Michael A. Peters wrote:
First I'd like to make sure I am not complaining about this delay
between the RHEL and CentOS releases per se. I did not help in any way
to make it happen faster and usually I don't mind having a three weeks
gap between them. But I've noticed that we had two
2009/3/29 Chuck chuck.car...@gmail.com:
I am having a hell of a time getting adobe flash to work on a recent 5.2
install.
Are you using CentOS 5.2 32 bit or 64 bit? I'm using 32 bit and
have Shockwave Flash installed and working with Firefox v.3.0.6.
Does that work for you? When I test at
2009/3/29 Chuck chuck.car...@gmail.com:
On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 9:39 AM, Zube z...@cs.colostate.edu wrote:
On Sun Mar 29 09:23:38 AM, Chuck wrote:
I am having a hell of a time getting adobe flash to work on a recent 5.2
install.
32-bit or 64-bit?
The adobe flash plugin is 32-bit only and
On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 11:14 AM, Lanny Marcus lmmailingli...@gmail.comwrote:
2009/3/29 Chuck chuck.car...@gmail.com:
I am having a hell of a time getting adobe flash to work on a recent 5.2
install.
Are you using CentOS 5.2 32 bit or 64 bit? I'm using 32 bit and
have Shockwave
On Sunday 29 March 2009 1:45:16 am Dhaval Thakar wrote:
Hi,
I need to implement trouble tracking system,
we have 250 users in one premise 3 desktop support technicians.
I need to implement trouble ticket system, where user will enter their
application / other issues. Mail will be sent to
On Sun, 29 Mar 2009 09:23:38 -0500
Chuck wrote:
I am having a hell of a time getting adobe flash to work on a recent 5.2
install.
Do you have curl.i386 installed? (I've been bitten by this before.)
--
MELVILLE THEATRE ~ Melville Sask ~ http://www.melvilletheatre.com
On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 11:24 AM, Chuck chuck.car...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 11:14 AM, Lanny Marcus
lmmailingli...@gmail.comwrote:
2009/3/29 Chuck chuck.car...@gmail.com:
I am having a hell of a time getting adobe flash to work on a recent 5.2
install.
Are you using
On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 11:37 AM, Frank Cox thea...@sasktel.net wrote:
On Sun, 29 Mar 2009 09:23:38 -0500
Chuck wrote:
I am having a hell of a time getting adobe flash to work on a recent 5.2
install.
Do you have curl.i386 installed? (I've been bitten by this before.)
--
MELVILLE
On 3/29/09, Chuck chuck.car...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 11:24 AM, Chuck chuck.car...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 11:14 AM, Lanny Marcus
lmmailingli...@gmail.comwrote:
2009/3/29 Chuck chuck.car...@gmail.com:
I am having a hell of a time getting adobe flash to work
: Digital signature
Url :
http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/attachments/20090329/4097dea6/attachment-0001.bin
--
___
CentOS-announce mailing list
centos-annou...@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo
On Sun, 29 Mar 2009 11:40:51 -0500
Chuck wrote:
Yes curl is installed.. (I installed everything except virtualization and
storage virt.)
billabong:~ == rpm -q -a | grep -i curl
curl-7.15.5-2.el5
curl-devel-7.15.5-2.el5
curl.i386
--
MELVILLE THEATRE ~ Melville Sask ~
On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 12:09 PM, Frank Cox thea...@sasktel.net wrote:
On Sun, 29 Mar 2009 11:40:51 -0500
Chuck wrote:
Yes curl is installed.. (I installed everything except virtualization and
storage virt.)
billabong:~ == rpm -q -a | grep -i curl
curl-7.15.5-2.el5
On Sun, 29 Mar 2009 12:12:44 -0500
Chuck wrote:
Those are i386 builds of curl. Not sure what tool is printing the info out
like that for you but I have i386 build of curl installed. Those are the
only 2 curl packages that ship with centos 5.2.
You're absolutely sure about that
On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 12:28 PM, Frank Cox thea...@sasktel.net wrote:
On Sun, 29 Mar 2009 12:12:44 -0500
Chuck wrote:
Those are i386 builds of curl. Not sure what tool is printing the info
out
like that for you but I have i386 build of curl installed. Those are the
only 2 curl packages
Guess I'll find out soon enough ...
In order to get qgis to build by RPM in CentOS 5.2 I had to update qt -
but the shared library did not version -
http://forum.qgis.org/viewtopic.php?f=3t=4423
Since the qt shared library did not version with the minor update to qt,
my suspicion (though I
On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 03:07:11PM +0200, Rainer Duffner wrote:
as suggest, RT is a good choice.
But it requires some thinking and planning in advance, and a good
knowledge of PERL-intrinsics on RHEL/CentOS, as it requires around 200
different PERL-module dependencies.
See also the
On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 3:45 AM, Dhaval Thakar
dhaval.tha...@networthdirect.com wrote:
Hi,
I need to implement trouble tracking system,
GLPI may be worth a look
--
Eduardo Grosclaude
Universidad Nacional del Comahue
Neuquen, Argentina
___
CentOS
Les Mikesell wrote:
Michael A. Peters wrote:
Wow, I really must be out of the loop. New versions of RHEL every 4-6
months?
Damn. I left Fedora because their release schedule was too frequent ...
The Fedora releases change behavior wildly with each release. The point
of enterprise
On Sun, 2009-03-29 at 09:23 -0500, Chuck wrote:
I am having a hell of a time getting adobe flash to work on a recent
5.2 install.
From rpm install:
Running firefox as root -- I have verified there is a symlink
in /usr/lib/mozilla/plugins that points to the actual plugin located
in
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org
[mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Eduardo Grosclaude
Sent: Sunday, March 29, 2009 2:54 PM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] need trouble ticket system
On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 3:45 AM, Dhaval Thakar
Hi, i'm using OTRS successful
http://otrs.org/
On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 8:53 PM, Eduardo Grosclaude
eduardo.groscla...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 3:45 AM, Dhaval Thakar
dhaval.tha...@networthdirect.com wrote:
Hi,
I need to implement trouble tracking system,
GLPI may be
Eduardo Grosclaude wrote:
I need to implement trouble tracking system,
GLPI may be worth a look
GLPI is more of an inventory system at heart - so it might make sense if
you tie the issues to underlying devices (and you can couple it with
ocsinventory-ng if you want then inventory to be
Dhaval Thakar wrote:
Hi,
I need to implement trouble tracking system,
we have 250 users in one premise 3 desktop support technicians.
I setup Flyspray once as a trouble ticket system, even though its
nominally a bug tracker, the two functions really aren't that
different.
On 3/29/09, William L. Maltby centos4b...@triad.rr.com wrote:
On Sun, 2009-03-29 at 09:23 -0500, Chuck wrote:
I am having a hell of a time getting adobe flash to work on a recent
5.2 install.
snip
An rpm check of both firefox and the flash plugin return with no
complaints.
snip
I notice you
Robert Nichols wrote:
Les Mikesell wrote:
Michael A. Peters wrote:
Wow, I really must be out of the loop. New versions of RHEL every 4-6
months?
Damn. I left Fedora because their release schedule was too frequent ...
The Fedora releases change behavior wildly with each release. The point
On Sun, 29 Mar 2009 12:15:16 +0530, Dhaval Thakar wrote:
Hi,
I need to implement trouble tracking system, we have 250 users in one
premise 3 desktop support technicians.
I need to implement trouble ticket system, where user will enter their
application / other issues. Mail will be sent
Les:
Honest question, not intended to be smart assed in any
way:
Why have you not moved to SL since they have released the
update before CentOS?
Neil
--
Neil Aggarwal, (832)245-7314, www.JAMMConsulting.com
Eliminate junk email and reclaim your inbox.
Visit http://www.spammilter.com for
On Sun, March 29, 2009 1:52 pm, david.mackint...@xdroop.com wrote:
On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 03:07:11PM +0200, Rainer Duffner wrote:
as suggest, RT is a good choice.
But it requires some thinking and planning in advance, and a good
knowledge of PERL-intrinsics on RHEL/CentOS, as it requires
On Thu, 2009-03-26 at 22:22 +0300, fabian dacunha wrote:
# Generated by authconfig on 2009/03/26 12:50:28
# DO NOT EDIT THIS SECTION (delimited by --start-line--/--end-line--)
# Any modification may be deleted or altered by authconfig in future
workgroup = BALADIA.LOCAL
; password
Neil Aggarwal wrote:
Les:
Honest question, not intended to be smart assed in any
way:
Why have you not moved to SL since they have released the
update before CentOS?
If I liked changing things on a whim, I wouldn't be using enterprise
type distributions in the first place. And since
Ray Van Dolson wrote:
On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 10:25:16PM -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
Neil Aggarwal wrote:
Les:
Honest question, not intended to be smart assed in any
way:
Why have you not moved to SL since they have released the
update before CentOS?
If I liked changing things on a whim,
On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 10:56:56PM -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
Ray Van Dolson wrote:
On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 10:25:16PM -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
Neil Aggarwal wrote:
Les:
Honest question, not intended to be smart assed in any
way:
Why have you not moved to SL since they have
On Sun, 2009-03-29 at 22:56 -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
So what would be the down side to just walking away from everything
RH-related now that Ubuntu has a free alternative with long term
support? I thought perhaps when I mentioned it earlier there would be
a flurry of responses pointing
Ray Van Dolson wrote:
On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 12:46:35PM -0700, Michael A. Peters wrote:
The Firefox 1.5 to 3.0 move in RHEL was at least understandable, there
was good reason for that, but some of the EPEL changes - I think they
leave it to the discretion of the packager but it's annoying.
On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 09:56:07PM -0700, Michael A. Peters wrote:
Ray Van Dolson wrote:
On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 12:46:35PM -0700, Michael A. Peters wrote:
The Firefox 1.5 to 3.0 move in RHEL was at least understandable, there
was good reason for that, but some of the EPEL changes - I
On Sun, 2009-03-29 at 21:24 -0700, Craig White wrote:
On Sun, 2009-03-29 at 22:56 -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
So what would be the down side to just walking away from everything
RH-related now that Ubuntu has a free alternative with long term
support? I thought perhaps when I
So what would be the down side to just walking away from everything
RH-related now that Ubuntu has a free alternative with long term
support? I thought perhaps when I mentioned it earlier there would be
a flurry of responses pointing out functional deficiencies but so far
there have
On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 01:17:03PM +0800, Christopher Chan wrote:
So what would be the down side to just walking away from everything
RH-related now that Ubuntu has a free alternative with long term
support? I thought perhaps when I mentioned it earlier there would be
a flurry of
Functional deficiencies here we come:
1) No equivalent to kickstart:
By that I mean, zero support for automated lvm on raid kind of disk
partitioning in the debian-installer
This is a huge issue with SLES. AutoYaST makes me very angry. :-) I
can generalize my kickstart files
Michael A. Peters wrote:
Christopher Chan wrote:
start/stop' though from Intrepid onwards I believe. There is no root
account by default.
There is a root account, you just can't access it w/o setting it's password.
Oh you can. sudo -i. Now go away.
And as soon as you do set
Centos (who cares about RHEL) needs a bit more extra work to make it
more useful for desktops. I had to build me own kiosktool rpm for example.
Ahh, yes. RH has pretty much said they're not interested in the
desktop market. Until that changes either Fedora or Ubuntu it is. I'd
pick Ubuntu
Ray Van Dolson wrote:
Centos (who cares about RHEL) needs a bit more extra work to make it
more useful for desktops. I had to build me own kiosktool rpm for example.
Ahh, yes. RH has pretty much said they're not interested in the
desktop market. Until that changes either Fedora or
63 matches
Mail list logo
