Coming a little late to this discussion, take the example of the three
kernel related HowTos. Each article begins with a Currently
maintained by: AlanBartlett and AkemiYagi line.
Akemi I discussed this some time ago and decided to insert those
lines for two reasons:
(1) to give clear
Dave,
Just to let you know that I have made some minor cosmetic changes to your
KVM article.
Alan.
___
CentOS-docs mailing list
CentOS-docs@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
Works for me.
Dave...
--- On Fri, 4/17/09, Alan Bartlett ajb.st...@googlemail.com wrote:
From: Alan Bartlett ajb.st...@googlemail.com
Subject: Re: [CentOS-docs] Wish to contribute a Winki Article
To: Mail list for wiki articles centos-docs@centos.org
Date: Friday, April 17, 2009, 6:34 AM
Dave,
Made the changes. Please check it over if I made a mistake.
I tried very
hard to address everyone's concerns.
I decided not to delve too deeply into setting up rights for the users.
Yes that part is confusing see below...
I
On Thu, 2009-04-16 at 16:49 -0600, Ed Heron wrote:
I don't see a How To, on this wiki, specifically designed to address the
task of creating a Microsoft Windows XP virtual machine as a Xen guest under
CentOS 5. Many of the concepts are covered in
On Fri, 2009-04-17 at 09:46 -0700, Akemi Yagi wrote:
On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 9:39 AM, JohnS jse...@gmail.com wrote:
Made the changes. Please check it over if I made a mistake.
I tried very
hard to address everyone's concerns.
I decided not to delve too
On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 5:52 PM, JohnS jse...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, 2009-04-16 at 16:49 -0600, Ed Heron wrote:
I don't see a How To, on this wiki, specifically designed to address the
task of creating a Microsoft Windows XP virtual machine as a Xen guest under
CentOS 5. Many of the
Mats Karlsson wrote:
So could we have two alternative text to cover the topic, who can edit
an article?
Currently maintained by: name
Can only be edited by maintainer.
Currently maintained by: CentOS-docs mailing list
Can be edited by anyone on the mailinglist.
s/Can/Should/ at least as
Ed Heron wrote:
I'd seen references to hijacking a thread but hadn't realized what that
meant. I've looked at my sent mail headers and found a References: header
item. Hadn't seen that before. Is that what the list uses to tie threads
together? I was naively thinking it was the subject
On Fri, 2009-04-17 at 13:29 -0400, Phil Schaffner wrote:
Seems obvious to me after all this (and previous) discussion that some
more guidance on the Contribute page would help to clarify what is and
is not considered acceptable. Such a statement could be arrived at
either by consensus
On Fri, 2009-04-17 at 11:53 -0600, Ed Heron wrote:
On Thu, 2009-04-16 at 16:49 -0600, Ed Heron wrote:
I don't see a How To, on this wiki, specifically designed to address the
task of creating a Microsoft Windows XP virtual machine as a Xen guest
under
CentOS 5. Many of the concepts
JohnS wrote:
On Fri, 2009-04-17 at 13:29 -0400, Phil Schaffner wrote:
Seems obvious to me after all this (and previous) discussion that some
more guidance on the Contribute page would help to clarify what is and
is not considered acceptable. Such a statement could be arrived at
either
--- On Fri, 4/17/09, JohnS jse...@gmail.com wrote:
From: JohnS jse...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [CentOS-docs] Wish to contribute a Winki Article
To: Mail list for wiki articles centos-docs@centos.org
Date: Friday, April 17, 2009, 12:39 PM
Made the changes. Please check
On 17/04/2009, Phil Schaffner philip.r.schaff...@nasa.gov wrote:
JohnS wrote:
On Fri, 2009-04-17 at 13:29 -0400, Phil Schaffner wrote:
Seems obvious to me after all this (and previous) discussion that some
more guidance on the Contribute page would help to clarify what is and
is
On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 03:44:51PM -0700, Akemi Yagi wrote:
On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 3:27 PM, JohnS jse...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm afraid it is not working :-(
And that last mail I can't make heads or tales out of it. Could you try
it again please. Or tell us your email client and we
--- On Fri, 4/17/09, JohnS jse...@gmail.com wrote:
From: JohnS jse...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [CentOS-docs] Wish to contribute a Winki Article
To: Mail list for wiki articles centos-docs@centos.org
Date: Friday, April 17, 2009, 6:27 PM
On Fri, 2009-04-17 at 15:12 -0700, Akemi Yagi wrote:
On
On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 8:33 PM, R P Herrold herr...@centos.org wrote:
Alan, Phil, John
Please step away from the keyboard this weekend. Work on a
stamp collection. exercise, talk without a TV or computer on
with members of family or friends.
NO, no, no, Russ, please stop giving bad
2009/4/17 Ramón Cervantes rcervan...@sinergium-sgh.com
Hola,
Os respondo el luens, ya que hasta entonces no puedo hacer esas pruebas.
gracias
*Ramón Cervantes*
Consultor
Móvil 657 86 35 46
rcervan...@sinergium-sgh.com
*www.sinergium-sgh.com*
P* **Antes de
Device 5632 (vbd)
yo diría que tienes un problema con el disco, dónde estás poniendo el disco?
Hector Martínez Romo wrote:
Estimados
He instalado CentOS 5.2 con kernel para virtualizacion,he usado
administrador de maquinas virtuales para crear mis maquinas, todas han
funcionado perfecto,
Hola EPE
exactamente, lo que pasa es que el xen lo tengo en una maquina perteneciente
a un Blade HP y al cerrar la consola desmonto el disco, pero ya lo
solucione.
Muchas gracias por tu respuesta.
El 17 de abril de 2009 13:43, Ing. Ernesto Pérez Estévez
cen...@nuestroserver.com escribió:
Am 17.04.2009 um 05:16 schrieb Mark Pryor:
After trying for 2 hours, I ran into 3 brickwall-issues. Like you
found, there are two base perl modules which require newer versions
than that which comes with 5.3. These modules are
File::Temp and Encode (core)
cpan2rpm can package
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf
Of Kai Schaetzl
Sent: Thursday, April 16, 2009 4:33 PM
To: centos@centos.org
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Dual-boot with WinXP, CentOS already installed
Sorin Srbu wrote on Thu, 16 Apr 2009 14:35:40
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf
Of Guy Boisvert
Sent: Thursday, April 16, 2009 5:04 PM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Dual-boot with WinXP, CentOS already installed
As for Winblows, it always wipes the boot
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf
Of Kai Schaetzl
Sent: Thursday, April 16, 2009 5:16 PM
To: centos@centos.org
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Dual-boot with WinXP, CentOS already installed
Generally speaking, which one is the easiest
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf
Of Kai Schaetzl
Sent: Thursday, April 16, 2009 6:31 PM
To: centos@centos.org
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Dual-boot with WinXP, CentOS already installed
install windows xp then install easyBCD and
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf
Of David G. Miller
Sent: Thursday, April 16, 2009 7:33 PM
To: centos@centos.org
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Dual-boot with WinXP, CentOS already installed
Windows (just like DOS) assigns drive
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf
Of Lanny Marcus
Sent: Thursday, April 16, 2009 8:06 PM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Dual-boot with WinXP, CentOS already installed
There is a
web page on the CentOS Wiki about
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf
Of MHR
Sent: Thursday, April 16, 2009 11:18 PM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] DKMS and new(er) Nvidia-drivers
I've never seen this problem at all - running AMD 64x2 7750, 4Gb
Hi,
I've been setting up a few printer servers with CUPS. Our public
libraries here all run 100% Linux (CentOS 5), so what I do is simply
install the printer on one of the machines (with a static IP) and then
configure CUPS so it can act as a printer server for Linux clients.
It took me some
2009/4/17 Niki Kovacs cont...@kikinovak.net:
Hi,
Hi,
I've been setting up a few printer servers with CUPS. Our public
libraries here all run 100% Linux (CentOS 5), so what I do is simply
install the printer on one of the machines (with a static IP) and then
configure CUPS so it can act as a
Sorin Srbu wrote on Fri, 17 Apr 2009 09:37:53 +0200:
How do you mean broken?
Sorin, why do you think I replied to you? The person using the broken
configuration is David G. Miller.
Kai
--
Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com
Sorin Srbu wrote on Fri, 17 Apr 2009 09:16:33 +0200:
Apparantely Windows can bork up after a while if the system files aren't on
C:.
No, that is a myth. You just cannot put the system drive on an extended
partition, it has to be a primary partition. If that is the first non-Linux
partition
localhost translates into 127.0.0.1 so the daemon listens only to this
locally available address. Adding the LAN address makes the daemon
available for connections from LAN.
Sent from my iPhone
On 17.04.2009, at 12:43, Niki Kovacs cont...@kikinovak.net wrote:
Hi,
I've been setting up a
Kai Schaetzl wrote:
Sorin Srbu wrote on Fri, 17 Apr 2009 09:37:53 +0200:
How do you mean broken?
Sorin, why do you think I replied to you? The person using the broken
configuration is David G. Miller.
odd, David Miller's message appears threaded just fine on my Thundebird
Agile Aspect wrote:
Hi - I'm trying to get wireless running on CentOS 4.7 on a dual core laptop
(latitude-e4500) for an employee.
I'm having trouble with building dkms-ndiswraper-1.54-1.el4.rf -
enclosed are the
errors messages.
The kernel was rebuilt to disable CONFIG_4KSTACKS.
The
Laurent Wandrebeck a écrit :
Can anybody explain this strange behaviour to me?
localhost is a non routable address: 127.0.0.1.
So it won't answer on the public ip address if you don't add it yourself.
Thanks! Got it!
Niki
___
CentOS mailing list
Bill Campbell wrote:
...
That would make me very suspicious that the box had been cracked,
and that a foreign sshd had been substituted for the real one.
rpm -V is your friend.
Also rkhunter and chkrootkit.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
On Fri, 17 Apr 2009 12:18:40 +0200
Rudi Ahlers rudiahl...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanx guys, I see what I'm looking for doesn't really exist. SME
does what I need, but still runs on CentOS 4.7, and it doesn't offer
groupware email out of the box.
What you are looking for doesn't exist in the a
Devin Reade wrote on Thu, 16 Apr 2009 21:19:54 -0600:
The symptoms you describe could be a side effect of being previously hit by
http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=2914 and
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447841.
Thanks for the belated info, anyway. But this doesn't seem to apply
Toby Bluhm wrote on Fri, 17 Apr 2009 07:46:14 -0400:
I didn't know who you were talking about either. It's good to point out
the problem, but maybe next time leave some text clue as to whom you are
referring.
why? The threading makes it quite clear who I replied to. Or is your client
John R Pierce wrote on Fri, 17 Apr 2009 04:34:49 -0700:
odder, I don't see a In-Reply-To: header, so I dunno HOW it appears
threaded just fine.
It's been put in the thread according to the time sequence because the
header you mention is missing. So, it just *appears* to be threaded, but
the
On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 3:30 PM, cen...@911networks.com wrote:
On Fri, 17 Apr 2009 12:18:40 +0200
Rudi Ahlers rudiahl...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanx guys, I see what I'm looking for doesn't really exist. SME
does what I need, but still runs on CentOS 4.7, and it doesn't offer
groupware email out
Toby Bluhm wrote:
Kai Schaetzl wrote:
Toby Bluhm wrote on Fri, 17 Apr 2009 07:46:14 -0400:
I didn't know who you were talking about either. It's good to point out
the problem, but maybe next time leave some text clue as to whom you are
referring.
why? The threading makes it quite clear
On Thu, 2009-04-16 at 09:12 -0400, Ugo Bellavance wrote:
Hi,
I'm running a CentOS 4. server and I sometimes face a weird problem.
It is a weird performance problem, and here is how I discovered it.
This server runs OpenVZ virtual machines, and one of them is an asterisk
server for my
On Thu, 2009-04-16 at 21:14 -0700, Michael A. Peters wrote:
Lanny Marcus wrote:
My belief is that this is not possible, but there are many extremely
knowledgeable people participating on this list and I would like to
know if it is in fact possible. I am running CentOS 5.3 (32 bit) fully
Sorin Srbu wrote:
Isn't reinstalling GAG the same thing as reinstalling grub. What's the
incentive so to speak? Is GAG so much better, or just easier to work with
than grub?
Easier. GAG has its own boot media (diskette or cd). It has a
graphical interface and is very easy.
Guy
Toby Bluhm wrote:
Kai Schaetzl wrote:
Sorin Srbu wrote on Fri, 17 Apr 2009 09:37:53 +0200:
How do you mean broken?
Sorin, why do you think I replied to you? The person using the broken
configuration is David G. Miller.
I didn't know who you were talking about either. It's good to point
On Thu, 2009-04-16 at 14:08 +0200, Sorin Srbu wrote:
Hi all,
I'd like to deploy a solution with dual-booting systems where CentOS 5.3 is
already installed and WinXP will be installed to a separate disk.
I found
From: MHR mhullr...@gmail.com
Install the FireFox extension noscript and be very careful about what
domains you authorize scripting from.
Is there such a thing for Seamonkey, or is this not required? (Or is
this a check with Mozilla question?)
On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 10:18 PM, Spiro Harvey sp...@knossos.net.nz wrote:
Lanny Marcus lmmailingli...@gmail.com wrote:
the forum, which is a highly restricted area. Today when it happened,
what exactly is *it*?
Spiro: When I saw the pop ups, their file waiting for me to click, to
OK it for
On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 11:14 PM, Michael A. Peters mpet...@mac.com wrote:
Lanny Marcus wrote:
snip
My experience is that when browsing on any OS and you come across an
error message stating that your computer is infected and you need to
install such and such software, the web site I was
On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 10:23 AM, JohnS jse...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, 2009-04-16 at 21:14 -0700, Michael A. Peters wrote:
snip
If it makes you feel any safer I will go there and down load it on my
CentOS Desktop! BUT! If your running WINE Then that is another storie I
would NOT.
No WINE
At Fri, 17 Apr 2009 11:28:45 -0400 CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org
wrote:
Sorin Srbu wrote:
Apparantely Windows can bork up after a while if the system files aren't on
C:. I was thinking the Windows installer will see the linux partitions and
try to name them C: and D: etc,
On Fri, 2009-04-17 at 11:13 -0500, Lanny Marcus wrote:
On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 11:14 PM, Michael A. Peters mpet...@mac.com wrote:
Lanny Marcus wrote:
snip
My experience is that when browsing on any OS and you come across an
error message stating that your computer is infected and you need
On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 11:25 AM, William L. Maltby
centos4b...@triad.rr.com wrote:
On Fri, 2009-04-17 at 11:13 -0500, Lanny Marcus wrote:
On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 11:14 PM, Michael A. Peters mpet...@mac.com wrote:
snip
My experience is that when browsing on any OS and you come across an
On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 11:05 AM, Frank Cox thea...@sasktel.net wrote:
I have a copy of AdobeReader_enu-8.1.2-1.i486.rpm here, but I don't know if it
will work on Centos 4. Never tried it.
I found 8.1.3-1 of that in my yum cache and installed it, seems to be
working OK.
Toby Bluhm wrote on Fri, 17 Apr 2009 10:47:26 -0400:
What makes you think mine is broken?
because you didn't know who I replied to.
Kai
--
Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com
___
I've been experiencing delays access data off my file server since I
upgraded to 5.3... either I hosed something, have bad hardware or very
unlikely, found a bug.
When reading or writing data, the stream to the hdd's stops every 5-10
min and %iowait goes through the roof. I checked the logs and
Kai Schaetzl mailli...@conactive.com wrote:
John R Pierce wrote on Fri, 17 Apr 2009 04:34:49 -0700:
odder, I don't see a In-Reply-To: header, so I dunno HOW it appears
threaded just fine.
It's been put in the thread according to the time sequence because the
header you mention is
At Fri, 17 Apr 2009 20:20:16 +0200 CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org
wrote:
Robert Heller wrote on Fri, 17 Apr 2009 12:21:01 -0400:
If MS-Windows can't install itself on the first drive (as seen by the
BIOS eg /dev/hda(1) or /dev/sda(1)), it won't install.
I think it can install
David G. Miller wrote:
What is happening is I get the CentOS mailing list in digest form. That
is, I get one e-mail each day with all of the previous day's posts. If
I notice a topic that I feel I can contribute to, I cut and paste an
appropriate e-mail from the digest and reply to the
On Fri, 2009-04-17 at 14:43 -0400, Robert Heller wrote:
At Fri, 17 Apr 2009 20:20:16 +0200 CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org
wrote:
Robert Heller wrote on Fri, 17 Apr 2009 12:21:01 -0400:
If MS-Windows can't install itself on the first drive (as seen by the
BIOS eg
On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 1:17 PM, Scott Silva ssi...@sgvwater.com wrote:
on 4-17-2009 9:33 AM Lanny Marcus spake the following:
On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 11:25 AM, William L. Maltby
centos4b...@triad.rr.com wrote:
On Fri, 2009-04-17 at 11:13 -0500, Lanny Marcus wrote:
On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at
On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 1:17 PM, Scott Silva ssi...@sgvwater.com wrote:
snip
Noscript will give you an idea of just how many sites run a script of some
kind. You will see a large part of sites just look different when the scripts
don't run, and some don't function at all. Not that it is a bad
On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 2:07 PM, Rob Townley rob.town...@gmail.com wrote:
snip
Remember the NeXT step days (for me, mid 90's) when a single
executable binary file contained both intel and PowerPC/Motorola code.
When clicked, it would execute the intel code on the intel platform
and the
At Fri, 17 Apr 2009 14:07:31 -0500 CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org
wrote:
On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 1:17 PM, Scott Silva ssi...@sgvwater.com wrote:
on 4-17-2009 9:33 AM Lanny Marcus spake the following:
On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 11:25 AM, William L. Maltby
centos4b...@triad.rr.com
On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 2:30 PM, Robert Heller hel...@deepsoft.com wrote:
At Fri, 17 Apr 2009 14:07:31 -0500 CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org
wrote:
On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 1:17 PM, Scott Silva ssi...@sgvwater.com wrote:
on 4-17-2009 9:33 AM Lanny Marcus spake the following:
On Fri,
Anyone else having trouble when installing python-tools?
sudo yum -y install python-tools
Password:
Loaded plugins: fastestmirror, priorities
Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile
adobe-linux
| 951 B 00:00
extras
| 951 B 00:00
base
| 1.1 kB 00:00
updates
| 951 B 00:00
Doesn't look like my reply hit the list for some reason.
--
James A. Peltier
Systems Analyst (FASNet), VIVARIUM Technical Director
Simon Fraser University - Burnaby Campus
Phone : 778-782-6573
Fax : 778-782-3045
E-Mail : jpelt...@sfu.ca
Website : http://www.fas.sfu.ca |
On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 8:57 AM, John Doe jd...@yahoo.com wrote:
http://lmgtfy.com/?q=seamonkey+noscript+pluginl=1 ;P
I am properly chastised - mea culpa
Ccrow Crow Cow Cw C (gulp)
mhr
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
On Apr 17, 2009, at 5:01 PM, James A. Peltier jpelt...@fas.sfu.ca
wrote:
On Thu, 16 Apr 2009, Ross Walker wrote:
I think it's worth while to keep xfs updated for a while until ext4
has made enough of an in-road to say xfs should be depreciated in
favor of ext4.
-Ross
Considering that
On Fri, 17 Apr 2009, Ross Walker wrote:
Time to format isn't really an issue as it is done once before being
put into production. The biggest concern is processing performance and
time to fsck as well as data integrity and recoverability.
Listen, when you're talking a multi TB or PB file
David G. Miller wrote:
Kai Schaetzl mailli...@conactive.com wrote:
What is happening is I get the CentOS mailing list in digest form. That
is, I get one e-mail each day with all of the previous day's posts. If
I notice a topic that I feel I can contribute to, I cut and paste an
On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 1:17 PM, Scott Silva ssi...@sgvwater.com wrote:
snip
Noscript will give you an idea of just how many sites run a script of some
kind. You will see a large part of sites just look different when the scripts
don't run, and some don't function at all. Not that it is a bad
Lanny Marcus wrote:
On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 1:17 PM, Scott Silva ssi...@sgvwater.com wrote:
snip
Noscript will give you an idea of just how many sites run a script of some
kind. You will see a large part of sites just look different when the scripts
don't run, and some don't function at all.
On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 6:44 PM, Robert Nichols
rnicholsnos...@comcast.net wrote:
snip
My problem with NoScript is that there is virtually no site that I visit
that does not require scripting to function properly. The net result is
an almost knee-jerk reaction to click on Allow all this page,
Dear Madam or Sir,
I live in Japan. So I must comply with the nation's law.
When I install software for Linux, is there any easy way to know
whether the the installation and use of the software is legal or not?
Please teach me.
Hiraki
___
CentOS
Hidetsugu Hiraki wrote:
Dear Madam or Sir,
I live in Japan. So I must comply with the nation's law.
When I install software for Linux, is there any easy way to know
whether the the installation and use of the software is legal or not?
Worst case you can always use TurboLinux, been around
Lanny Marcus wrote:
On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 1:17 PM, Scott Silva ssi...@sgvwater.com wrote:
snip
Noscript will give you an idea of just how many sites run a script of some
kind. You will see a large part of sites just look different when the scripts
don't run, and some don't function at all.
79 matches
Mail list logo
