Hello, all.
I found that so many unnessary queue files are saved at
/var/spool/clientmqueue/ directory.
I tested two way to delete these files.
1.
# rm -rf /var/spool/clientmqueue/*
2.
# cd /var/spool/clientmqueue/ ; find . | xargs rm -fv
But this makes a few load of the system
Johnny Hughes wrote:
>> I never had jagged fonts with the standard xfce in extras and normal
>> CentOS using the liberation fonts and the standard freetype from centos.
>> I was using the same fonts I used in Gnome.
>>
>> Maybe I am missing something, why did you need to rebuild freetype?
>>
>>
At Fri, 28 Aug 2009 12:11:19 -0400 CentOS mailing list
wrote:
>
> OK, here is the interesting part :-)
>
> I'm new here as of about 4 months ago, and I just asked some coworkers
> why we went with 2.2.10 instead of the 2.2.3 that comes with CentOS
>
> Apparently at the time we'd been having s
At Fri, 28 Aug 2009 11:46:43 -0400 CentOS mailing list
wrote:
>
> Hello,
> I'm running an apache 2.2 webserver on centos 5.3. I'm seeing
> frequent requests for robots.txt and favicon.ico from the logs those files
> should be in the document root area. What are these files, is this someth
on 8-27-2009 3:12 PM Rudi Ahlers spake the following:
> Hi,
>
> I'm looking at using Linux as a NAS / SAN device, and would like some
> input from other's who have done this before?
>
> How would it compare to commercial SAN devices, Thecus N8800SAS
> (http://www.thecus.com/products_over.php?cid=
Rudi Ahlers wrote:
>
> The thing is, how will these kind of option perform in a hosting
> environment where downtime isn't at all an option. We have backup
> generators, UPS, load balanced networks, etc Even the Tyan /
> SuperMicro machines that I'm looking at will have redundant power
> supplies
Joe Pruett wrote:
>> H, OK, I get it.
>>
>> I know I can build the latest Apache on CentOS, and what we currently
>> do is put it into /usr/local - which I guess works.
>>
>> I'd really prefer to have an RPM though.
>>
>> Certainly the CentOS team as a way in which they produce this RPM.
>> Is
Rudi Ahlers wrote:
> But the one piece of of the puzzle that I don't understand, will a
> self-build-Linux NAS device, or even Openfiler / FreeNAS give us that
> kind of uptime.
You say that downtime is not an option, so I can say with
absolute confidence there really is nothing you can build for
On Fri, 28 Aug 2009 08:54:02 -0700
Taproot wrote:
> Robots.txt is a file that allows or denies robots from indexing or
> crawling the site if they behave as they should.
It's a common misconception. Robots.txt does NOT allow or deny...
Robots.txt only SUGGESTs what they should crawl or not. It'
On Fri, 28 Aug 2009, Alan McKay wrote:
> Is there a document that will tell me what patch levels were shipped
> with the different releases of CentOS? In particular 5.2?
Two come to mind that we ship with every binary we alter,
evey package we build:
- one is the SRPM, which contains al
Rudi Ahlers wrote:
>
> Something else I just realized, dedicated NAS devices can rebuild the
> RAID system on the fly, and offer online RAID migration and expansion,
> load balance, and failover - how would one do these with Linux?
Look at the mdadm tools for raid. Rebuilding on the fly is no pr
Does anyone have experience with linux tools to parse the text from
common non-text file formats for searching? I'm trying to use the
kinosearch add-on for twiki which is fine as far as the search goes, but
it takes forever to generate the index. It uses xpdf to extract strings
from pdf's, ant
Joshua Baker-LePain wrote:
> On Fri, 28 Aug 2009 at 8:58am, Akemi Yagi wrote
>
>> On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 8:36 AM, Joshua Baker-LePain
>> wrote:
>>
>>> You do not have to switch to 64bit, and your setup should be fully
>>> supported. Other folks have mentioned XFS, and that's an option.
>>> But
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 9:58 AM, Joshua Baker-LePain wrote:
> On Fri, 28 Aug 2009 at 8:58am, Akemi Yagi wrote
>> Support for xfs has been added to RHEL 5.4 which will be released any day
>> now.
>
> So it has. I recall looking in the beta release notes when they first came
> out and not seeing it
On Fri, 28 Aug 2009 at 8:58am, Akemi Yagi wrote
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 8:36 AM, Joshua Baker-LePain wrote:
You do not have to switch to 64bit, and your setup should be fully
supported. Other folks have mentioned XFS, and that's an option. But if
you want to stay fully compatible with upstre
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 9:53 AM, David Fix wrote:
> And just to add to the discussion...
>
> We use JFS here for large filesystems. :) (We have some 24TB filesystems
> in place here using JFS, with no problems like XFS has when it gets
> corrupted).
Because the distro kernel does not have suppor
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 1:47 PM, Robert Heller wrote:
> At Fri, 28 Aug 2009 08:53:29 +0200 CentOS mailing list
> wrote:
>
>>
>> On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 12:22 AM, Robert Heller wrote:
>> >
>> > I think many dedicated NAS devices, are in fact Linux machines, using an
>> > embedded Linux system.
S
And just to add to the discussion...
We use JFS here for large filesystems. :) (We have some 24TB filesystems in
place here using JFS, with no problems like XFS has when it gets corrupted).
--
David Fix
Senior Systems Administrator
Mr. X Inc.
35 McCaul Street, Ste. #100
Toronto, ON M5T 1V
Alan McKay wrote:
> I just saw in another list email that RHEL 5.4 is due out any day now.
>
> How long does it then take for the cooresponding CentOS release to come out?
>
> I'm in the process of making a new master server image based on 5.3.
> Though I suppose since I'm using Kickstart/Anacond
> H, OK, I get it.
>
> I know I can build the latest Apache on CentOS, and what we currently
> do is put it into /usr/local - which I guess works.
>
> I'd really prefer to have an RPM though.
>
> Certainly the CentOS team as a way in which they produce this RPM.
> Is this method public? And if
I just saw in another list email that RHEL 5.4 is due out any day now.
How long does it then take for the cooresponding CentOS release to come out?
I'm in the process of making a new master server image based on 5.3.
Though I suppose since I'm using Kickstart/Anaconda, it should be
pretty easy to
OK, here is the interesting part :-)
I'm new here as of about 4 months ago, and I just asked some coworkers
why we went with 2.2.10 instead of the 2.2.3 that comes with CentOS
Apparently at the time we'd been having some problems with mod_perl
crashing (and still are in fact - I'm working on it s
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 8:36 AM, Joshua Baker-LePain wrote:
> You do not have to switch to 64bit, and your setup should be fully
> supported. Other folks have mentioned XFS, and that's an option. But if
> you want to stay fully compatible with upstream, then ext3 is your only
> option.
Support
Robots.txt is a file that allows or denies robots from indexing or
crawling the site if they behave as they should. Favicon.ico is an icon
image that shows up in the address bar of a browser generally to the
left of the uri. Neither are completely necessary and both are items you
would create a
favicon.ico:
http://lmgtfy.com/?q=favicon.ico
robots.txt:
http://lmgtfy.com/?q=robots.txt
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 11:46 AM, Dave wrote:
> Hello,
> I'm running an apache 2.2 webserver on centos 5.3. I'm seeing
> frequent requests for robots.txt and favicon.ico from the logs
Hello,
I'm running an apache 2.2 webserver on centos 5.3. I'm seeing
frequent requests for robots.txt and favicon.ico from the logs those files
should be in the document root area. What are these files, is this something
the rpm installs, or do i have to retrieve or generate them?
Thanks.
D
On Fri, 28 Aug 2009 at 1:03pm, Götz Reinicke - IT-Koordinator wrote
fdisk and parted fail to create any information on the device or fail
completely.
You can't use fdisk on a volume that large. parted should work fine.
What was the error you were getting (exactly)? For a volume that large,
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 4:01 AM, wrote:
> Les Mikesell schrieb am 27.08.2009 20:53:14:
>> I'd assume that 'telnet hostname 443' is intended to be a test for
>> an https web service - which should in fact not permit a connection
>> without ssl encryption. The linux version of telnet probably trie
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 10:48 AM, Alan McKay wrote:
> H, OK, I get it.
>
> Certainly the CentOS team as a way in which they produce this RPM.
> Is this method public? And if so, is it easy to obtain, and run
> against the latest Apache source code to produce my own RPM?
The CentOS method is
Hi,
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 10:32, Alan McKay wrote:
> It looks to me like the httpd on CentOS is stuck at 2.2.2 - what's up
> with that? Even after a yum upgrade.
As Jim suggested, please read this:
http://www.redhat.com/security/updates/backporting/
The whole point of using an "Enterprise" di
Alan McKay wrote:
> H, OK, I get it.
>
> I know I can build the latest Apache on CentOS, and what we currently
> do is put it into /usr/local - which I guess works.
>
> I'd really prefer to have an RPM though.
>
> Certainly the CentOS team as a way in which they produce this RPM.
> Is this m
At Fri, 28 Aug 2009 10:48:51 -0400 CentOS mailing list
wrote:
>
> H, OK, I get it.
>
> I know I can build the latest Apache on CentOS, and what we currently
> do is put it into /usr/local - which I guess works.
>
> I'd really prefer to have an RPM though.
>
> Certainly the CentOS team as
I have a very strange situation where the gpg command will fail to
verify whether there is valid PGP data in some files. Decrypting
these files works flawlessly. Here is an example:
[r...@server autoimport]# gpg -vv --verify-files 01UserEnumswValues.txt.asc.txt
gpg: armor: BEGIN PGP MESSAGE
gpg:
H, OK, I get it.
I know I can build the latest Apache on CentOS, and what we currently
do is put it into /usr/local - which I guess works.
I'd really prefer to have an RPM though.
Certainly the CentOS team as a way in which they produce this RPM.
Is this method public? And if so, is it easy
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 10:32 AM, Alan McKay wrote:
> Hey folks,
>
> It looks to me like the httpd on CentOS is stuck at 2.2.2 - what's up
> with that? Even after a yum upgrade.
>
> I need 2.2.10 or greater, and would prefer to get it via yum or at
> very last an RPM if at all possible. But I can
Hey folks,
It looks to me like the httpd on CentOS is stuck at 2.2.2 - what's up
with that? Even after a yum upgrade.
I need 2.2.10 or greater, and would prefer to get it via yum or at
very last an RPM if at all possible. But I cannot even find an RPM
out there. For some reason both EPEL and D
Götz Reinicke - IT-Koordinator wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to set up an iscsi 12.5 TB storage for some data backup.
>
> Doing so, I had some difficulties to find the right tool, maybe it's
> also a question of the system settings...
>
> The server is a 32Bit CentOS 5.3 with the recent updates. T
On 28/08/2009, at 10:59 PM, Jim Perrin wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 7:03 AM, Götz Reinicke -
> IT-Koordinator wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm trying to set up an iscsi 12.5 TB storage for some data backup.
>>
>> Doing so, I had some difficulties to find the right tool, maybe it's
>> also a question of
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 7:03 AM, Götz Reinicke -
IT-Koordinator wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to set up an iscsi 12.5 TB storage for some data backup.
>
> Doing so, I had some difficulties to find the right tool, maybe it's
> also a question of the system settings...
>
> The server is a 32Bit CentOS
At Fri, 28 Aug 2009 11:17:58 +0100 CentOS mailing list
wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> I received this request from a user and could not find the solution. I
> would like to know if someone already solved this:
> "At the command prompt I used to be able to type the first letter of a
> line command and the
At Fri, 28 Aug 2009 08:53:29 +0200 CentOS mailing list
wrote:
>
> On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 12:22 AM, Robert Heller wrote:
> >
> > I think many dedicated NAS devices, are in fact Linux machines, using an
> > embedded Linux system.
> >
> >>
> >
> > --
> > Robert Heller       -- 978-544
On Fri, 2009-08-28 at 04:11 -0700, chloe K wrote:
> Hi
>
> I already stop the named and killall bind process.
> how can I clear the files under named/chroot/proc/ folder as those
> files are restricted me for tar backup?
>
> /var/named/chroot/proc/sys/net/ipv6/conf/lo/accept_ra_defrtr
Exclud
Alexander Dalloz wrote:
>> Hi,
>> There has been update to mysql within the centosplus repository on 26th
>> August. Please be aware, that you might need to upgrade tables after the
>> server upgrade.
>>
>> 1) run CHECK TABLE
>> 2) if the response is 'Table upgrade required. Please do "REPAIR
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 1:03 PM, Götz Reinicke -
IT-Koordinator wrote:
>
> I'm trying to set up an iscsi 12.5 TB storage for some data backup.
>
> Doing so, I had some difficulties to find the right tool, maybe it's
> also a question of the system settings...
>
> The server is a 32Bit CentOS 5.3 wi
RedShift wrote:
> Ryan Pugatch wrote:
>> Yes, I changed the variable in the spec and installed the RPM I built.
>> I am on a 64-bit machine but did not install a 32-bit RPM.
>>
>> Looks like there are two versions.. the original and mine. What should
>> I do?
>>
>> Requested output:
>>
>> [r...@
Hi
I already stop the named and killall bind process.
how can I clear the files under named/chroot/proc/ folder as those files are
restricted me for tar backup?
/var/named/chroot/proc/sys/net/ipv6/conf/lo/accept_ra_defrtr
/var/named/chroot/proc/sys/net/ipv6/conf/lo/max_addresses
/var/named/ch
> Hi,
> There has been update to mysql within the centosplus repository on 26th
> August. Please be aware, that you might need to upgrade tables after the
> server upgrade.
>
> 1) run CHECK TABLE
> 2) if the response is 'Table upgrade required. Please do "REPAIR TABLE
> `tablename`" to fix it!
Hi,
I'm trying to set up an iscsi 12.5 TB storage for some data backup.
Doing so, I had some difficulties to find the right tool, maybe it's
also a question of the system settings...
The server is a 32Bit CentOS 5.3 with the recent updates. Ths iscsi
connection can be establised.
fdisk and part
Hi
I received this request from a user and could not find the solution. I
would like to know if someone already solved this:
"At the command prompt I used to be able to type the first letter of a
line command and then by using the up arrow key, scroll through all of
the line commands, that begi
From: Chris Andrews
> I was wondering does anyone know how I can slim down Centos install,
> what I mean by slim down is whenever I install Centos with nothing but
> xen. I have all type stuff that is not needed like bluetooth and etc.
> This is a server, so I know that bluetooth is not need but I
Hi,
There has been update to mysql within the centosplus repository on 26th
August. Please be aware, that you might need to upgrade tables after the
server upgrade.
1) run CHECK TABLE
2) if the response is 'Table upgrade required. Please do "REPAIR TABLE
`tablename`" to fix it!'
3) do run :o)
Ryan Pugatch wrote:
>
> Yes, I changed the variable in the spec and installed the RPM I built.
> I am on a 64-bit machine but did not install a 32-bit RPM.
>
> Looks like there are two versions.. the original and mine. What should
> I do?
>
> Requested output:
>
> [r...@localhost ~]$ rpm -qi
RedShift wrote:
> Ryan Pugatch wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I can't seem to get my fonts to look decent under CentOS. I was able to
>> make them look pretty good under Ubuntu, but for the life of me I can't
>> make them look decent on CentOS.
>>
>> Screenshots:
>> http://img199.imageshack.us/img199/8
Johnny Hughes wrote:
> Ryan Pugatch wrote:
>> Lucian @ lastdot.org wrote:
>>
>>> rpm -ivh http://repo.lastdot.org/tmp/msttcorefonts-2.0-1.noarch.rpm
>>> service xfs restart
>>> Restart your application..
>>> Is it working now?
>>> ___
>>> CentOS mailing l
Ryan Pugatch wrote:
> Lucian @ lastdot.org wrote:
>
>> rpm -ivh http://repo.lastdot.org/tmp/msttcorefonts-2.0-1.noarch.rpm
>> service xfs restart
>> Restart your application..
>> Is it working now?
>> ___
>> CentOS mailing list
>> CentOS@centos.org
>> ht
> Thanks for the links. I have already basically done everything
> there and have the ms fonts. Unfortunately they look pretty bad..
I have not followed the thread carefully, but I've seen in a couple of
screenshots that bitmaps fonts might have been used. Have you tried this?
"ln -s /etc/font
Les Mikesell schrieb am 27.08.2009 20:53:14:
> I'd assume that 'telnet hostname 443' is intended to be a test for
> an https web service - which should in fact not permit a connection
> without ssl encryption. The linux version of telnet probably tries
> to do some options negotiations before
>
> These aren't centos based - or even all linux, but the software-NAS
> players are:
> http://www.openfiler.com/
> http://www.freenas.org/
> http://www.nexenta.com/corp/index.php?option=com_content&task=blogsection&id=4&Itemid=67
>
> Or you can just use a generic disto with separate configuration
58 matches
Mail list logo
