CentOS Errata and Security Advisory CESA-2009:1535
pidgin security update for CentOS 3 i386:
https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009-1535.html
The following updated file has been uploaded and is currently syncing to
the mirrors:
i386:
updates/i386/RPMS/pidgin-1.5.1-6.el3.i386.rpm
source:
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory CESA-2009:1535
pidgin security update for CentOS 3 x86_64:
https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009-1535.html
The following updated file has been uploaded and is currently syncing to
the mirrors:
x86_64:
updates/x86_64/RPMS/pidgin-1.5.1-6.el3.x86_64.rpm
Yo justamente hoy hice esto y me funciono bien. No utilice todas esas
reglas en el iptables... Prohibi la entrada de paquetes que no hayan
sido pedidos por mi firewall, bloquee el puerto 80 para mi red, y en vez
del redirect que mostrar lo hice con dnat y me anduvo.
iptables -F
iptables -A
Hola buenos días,
Acabamos de implementar en Cpanel en nuestro servidor, pero estamos
recibiendo un montón de spam, como medida hemos configurado la aplicación
spamassassin pero filtra muy pocos mensajes.
¿Existen algunas reglas o configuración que pueda aplicarle extra para
mejorar el
El jue, 29-10-2009 a las 09:01 +0100, Sergio escribió:
Hola buenos días,
Acabamos de implementar en Cpanel en nuestro servidor, pero estamos
recibiendo un montón de spam, como medida hemos configurado la
aplicación spamassassin pero filtra muy pocos mensajes.
¿Existen algunas
Hola amigos queria saber si se puede hacer una migración de un centos 32
bit a un 64 que esta en otra pc sin tener que sealizar la conf de todos
los servicios otra vez
saludos
___
CentOS-es mailing list
CentOS-es@centos.org
Julio Martinez escribió:
una pequeña duda colega , esto que me acabas de explicar debo hacerlo
antes o despues de actualizar con yum ?
Cuando quieras, no hace ninguna diferencia el cambio de lenguaje es de
efecto inmediato, te explico un poco mejor: una vez que te loggeas
On Thu, 29 Oct 2009 13:42:06 -0300
choique choi...@gmail.com wrote:
Hola amigos queria saber si se puede hacer una migración de un centos
32 bit a un 64 que esta en otra pc sin tener que sealizar la conf de
todos los servicios otra vez
bueno, yo lo que haría sería:
guardar /etc y /home
Alguien que me pueda ayudar???
2009/10/28 samuel correa samuel.cor...@gmail.com
Hola a todos.
Resulta que tengo unos usuarios alojados en mi servidor ldap que necesito
que tengan unos permisos 700 para todo lo que creen (archivos y directorios)
cuando estén logueados, pero no encuentro
¿qué debo hacer para que al promover otro samba como pdc, sea reconocido por
los mismos clientes de wxp 2000 y vista que ya tienen su cuenta de máquina?
¿solamente copiar los archivos en /home y /etc/samba al nuevo server?
___
CentOS-es mailing list
Hola.
Aunque no diste mayores datos.
Yo lo hice asi:
supongo que ya esta instalado samba y el servicio detenido en el nuevo
server o conectado a un cable cruzado a un equipo.
1).- Obtuve el local sid con net getlocalsid del pdc antiguo y lo copie en
un archivo de texto despues con net
La duda era con el primer paso... porque he estado intentando pasarlo sin
éxito sin copiar el getlocalsid
mensaje original-
De: Mario Ganga mario.ga...@gmail.com
Para: centos-es@centos.org
Fecha: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 18:24:40 -0300
La duda era con el primer paso... porque he estado intentando pasarlo sin
éxito sin copiar el getlocalsid.
Mario, muchas Gracias.
mensaje original-
De: Mario Ganga mario.ga...@gmail.com
Para: centos-es@centos.org
Fecha: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 18:24:40 -0300
From: John Doe jd...@yahoo.com
A quick and dirty example (only prints the extra duplicate lines; not the
original duplicate):
awk -F: ' { v[$3]=v[$3]+1; if (v[$3]1) print $0; } ' datafile
Here's the version will the 1st duplicate included:
awk -F: ' { v[$3]=v[$3]+1; if (v[$3] == 1) {
Yes it works, but using fqdn as destination, iptables can take too
long time to resolve the address.
Using nslookup is a better solution, I think.
Vinícius Coque
On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 6:44 PM, Marcus Moeller m...@marcus-moeller.de wrote:
Hi all,
does it work to define iptables rules with a
On 10/29/2009 10:29 AM, Vinicius Coque wrote:
does it work to define iptables rules with a fqdn as destination
instead of an IP address? Or is it useful to resolve the name first
using e.g. nslookup, writing the result to a variable which is then
used within the -d statement?
I guess that
On 10/28/2009 09:04 AM Neil Aggarwal wrote:
Ken:
You can set the machine up to use VNC for the
console.
Then, give the person a normal login which they will
use to login to the machine from the console interface.
Basically, it will be just like they are sitting at
the machine a
On Oct 29, 2009, at 1:35 AM, vijay shanker vijay.s...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks guys,
I have done my changes in the sudoers file.
what i did is ; added a group with same access as root.
how i am able to use sudo. but there is a problem.
my machine is responding very slow for the sudo. It
It's my understanding that CentOS is a carbon copy of Red Hat - with the
exception of the art work. Assuming that this is true, the support matrix
for VMware Server 2.0.1 states Red Hat 5.1. I cannot seem to locate a
CentOS 5.1 x86-64 copy. I can get a copy of 5.3 and 5.4. If I take this
gene.po...@macys.com wrote:
It's my understanding that CentOS is a carbon copy of Red Hat - with the
exception of the art work. Assuming that this is true, the support
matrix for VMware Server 2.0.1 states Red Hat 5.1. I cannot seem to
locate a CentOS 5.1 x86-64 copy. I can get a copy of
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 9:29 AM, gene.po...@macys.com wrote:
It's my understanding that CentOS is a carbon copy of Red Hat - with the
exception of the art work. Assuming that this is true, the support matrix
for VMware Server 2.0.1 states Red Hat 5.1. I cannot seem to locate a
CentOS 5.1
Brian Mathis wrote:
I am running VMware Server 2.0.1 on CentOS 5.2 and 5.3 with no
problems. Search this mailing list for info on 5.4, as I think there
was a small issue that needed to be worked around.
I believe this was the issue:
http://communities.vmware.com/thread/229957
Regards,
Max
Max Hetrick wrote:
gene.po...@macys.com wrote:
It's my understanding that CentOS is a carbon copy of Red Hat - with the
exception of the art work. Assuming that this is true, the support
matrix for VMware Server 2.0.1 states Red Hat 5.1. I cannot seem to
locate a CentOS 5.1 x86-64 copy.
On 10/28/2009 09:10 AM Alfred von Campe wrote:
On Oct 27, 2009, at 19:28, ken wrote:
E.g., create a file with vi with just one German/Greek/French word,
say,
Έντελέχεια (Entylecheia, an ancient Greek word). If the
name of the
file is nonenglish, then, after you do your save in vim,
Les Mikesell wrote:
That's actually pretty strange because the glibc update in 5.4 will break
VMware
Server 2.0.1. Have you rebooted or restarted vmware since the update? if
you
haven't, don't until you look up the fix...
Yeah, I've rebooted my instances. My one instance is my laptop
Hi all,
I downloaded the 5.4 x86_64 DVD ISO this morning
(CentOS-5.4-x86_64-bin-DVD.iso). However, the md5sum and sha1sums both don't
match what's in the md5sum.txt or the release notes
(http://wiki.centos.org/Manuals/ReleaseNotes/CentOS5.4). I downloaded two ISOs
from two different
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 7:01 AM, Max Hetrick maxhetr...@verizon.net wrote:
Les Mikesell wrote:
That's actually pretty strange because the glibc update in 5.4 will break
VMware
Server 2.0.1. Have you rebooted or restarted vmware since the update? if
you
haven't, don't until you look up
On Wednesday 28 October 2009 23:42:30 ken wrote:
On 10/28/2009 08:39 AM Anne Wilson wrote:
The big update caused one of the rare re-starts on my mail server, so I
saw the startup messages that I had forgotten about.
Oct 28 10:50:04 borg2 python: [3424]: warning: python-dbus not installed.
KB is correct--IPTables performs a DNS lookup when it processes the
rule. It doesn't slow down to run a DNS lookup for every packet it
sees.
There are some practical risks to using hostnames, if you're not
expecting them, though. If you lose DNS services during startup, your
boot will hang for a
Ken:
Is it possible to make the ssh connection
connecting to a linux box from a windows machine.
I use cygwin ssh to connect CentOS servers from my windows
laptop.
Neil
--
Neil Aggarwal, (281)846-8957, http://www.JAMMConsulting.com
CentOS 5.4 KVM VPS $55/mo, no setup fee, no
Max Hetrick wrote:
Les Mikesell wrote:
That's actually pretty strange because the glibc update in 5.4 will break
VMware
Server 2.0.1. Have you rebooted or restarted vmware since the update? if
you
haven't, don't until you look up the fix...
Yeah, I've rebooted my instances. My one
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 10:58, Ryan Lynch ryan.b.ly...@gmail.com wrote:
KB is correct--IPTables performs a DNS lookup when it processes the
rule. It doesn't slow down to run a DNS lookup for every packet it
sees.
There are some practical risks to using hostnames, if you're not
expecting
No Ross,
This is the irony; i am working on the same machine. There is no network in
between
Regards,
Vijay Shanker Dubey
Ph: +91-9818311884
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 6:40 PM, Ross Walker rswwal...@gmail.com wrote:
On Oct 29, 2009, at 1:35 AM, vijay shanker vijay.s...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks
Neil Aggarwal wrote:
Ken:
Is it possible to make the ssh connection
connecting to a linux box from a windows machine.
I use cygwin ssh to connect CentOS servers from my windows
laptop.
Or you could do it with putty. But, if you need more than occasional
remote GUI access you should
vijay shanker vijay.s...@gmail.com schrieb am 29.10.2009 16:24:54:
No Ross,
This is the irony; i am working on the same machine. There is no
network in between
Install strace, then run sudo via strace and look which syscall
is causing the hangs. As always the manpage is your friend.
As a
Les Mikesell wrote:
No, I have it on an x86 box and had to use the workaround here:
http://communities.vmware.com/message/1364852
/lib/libc-2.5.so is actually still available after the upgrade so you
don't have to copy it from another system - it just isn't the target of
the libc.so.6
From: Greenseid, Joseph M (IS) joseph.greens...@ngc.com
I downloaded the 5.4 x86_64 DVD ISO this morning
(CentOS-5.4-x86_64-bin-DVD.iso). However, the md5sum and sha1sums both don't
match what's in the md5sum.txt or the release notes
(http://wiki.centos.org/Manuals/ReleaseNotes/CentOS5.4). I
Hi Everyone,
I started a social networking site and I am getting ready to go live
next week. I have limited fund as I am not funded yet (although
hopefully soon).
I have an extra Mac Pro (I know, how can I possibly call a Mac Pro
dual 2.8 quad core with 16gb RAM extra). So Mac Pro quad
gene.po...@macys.com wrote:
It's my understanding that CentOS is a carbon copy of Red Hat - with
the exception of the art work. Assuming that this is true, the support
matrix for VMware Server 2.0.1 states Red Hat 5.1. I cannot seem to
locate a CentOS 5.1 x86-64 copy. I can get a copy of
If you want speed, use RAID 10.
Neil
--
Neil Aggarwal, (281)846-8957, http://www.JAMMConsulting.com
CentOS 5.4 KVM VPS $55/mo, no setup fee, no contract, dedicated 64bit CPU
1GB dedicated RAM, 40GB RAID storage, 500GB/mo premium BW, Zero downtime
-Original Message-
From:
Neil,
Can you explain how RAID 10 would work with 4 x 1tb drives?
Should I just get 2 x 2tb drives and mirror?
I probably dont need 4 x 1tb drives to start, maybe even 2 x 2tb. I
can't image this growing faster than I can get money to add more
equipment, move to Co-Lo, etc.
On Oct 29, 2009,
However, other than this issue which may be fixed in 2.0.2 (I still
had a problem but haven't spent much time investigating), the
combination works fine.
The upgrade to VMware Server 2.0.2 on 5.4 has not gone well for me. The
XP shutdown command hangs. XP Task Manager then shows nothing
RAID 10 is striping across mirrored drives.
So, if you have 4 x 1TB drives, think of it as two separate
1 TB volumes. The system will write half your data to
volume A and the other half to volume B. The data in volume
A and B do not overlap.
Now, each volume is composed of a mirrored set of
On Thu, 29 Oct 2009, ML wrote:
My question is about initial setup. The 4 x 1TB drives. How to set
this up for I have some protection?
RAID 0+1? (striped + mirrored) I would end up with 2TB useable space.
RAID 5? so what one is a hot spare? 3TB useable space?
What about striping the 4 1TB
The consensus of the list seemed to be that I should change the PEERDNS
variable. It seems not to be working. The machine rebooted yesterday,
/etc/resolv.conf got rewritten again. And yet:
find /etc/sysconfig/ -type f -exec grep -iH 'peerdns=' {} \;
On 10/29/2009 11:29 AM Les Mikesell wrote:
Neil Aggarwal wrote:
Ken:
Is it possible to make the ssh connection
connecting to a linux box from a windows machine.
I use cygwin ssh to connect CentOS servers from my windows
laptop.
Or you could do it with putty. But, if you need more than
Turned out to be a download problem, not a mirror problem.
--Joe
From: centos-boun...@centos.org on behalf of Greenseid, Joseph M (IS)
Sent: Thu 10/29/2009 10:46 AM
To: CentOS Mailing List
Subject: [CentOS] problem with 5.4 x86_64 DVD iso?
Hi all,
I
Curt Mills wrote:
On Thu, 29 Oct 2009, ML wrote:
My question is about initial setup. The 4 x 1TB drives. How to set
this up for I have some protection?
RAID 0+1? (striped + mirrored) I would end up with 2TB useable space.
RAID 5? so what one is a hot spare? 3TB useable space?
What
I can't remember if I asked here - I've got more than one printer, HP,
laser, builtin JetDirect. When I go there in a browser, I see the basic
thing, but I can't get to the networking page. It says that it wants a
password, no user name. It doesn't accept anything. Last week, a co-worker
reset one
On Oct 29, 2009, at 11:11 AM, Neil Aggarwal wrote:
RAID 10 is striping across mirrored drives.
So, if you have 4 x 1TB drives, think of it as two separate
1 TB volumes. The system will write half your data to
volume A and the other half to volume B. The data in volume
A and B do not
I've been running VMWare Server 1.x for some time now, currently on
1.08, and I've been pretty satisfied with it.
I was wondering if any of you fellow VMWare users are seeing any
significant benefit to moving to the 2.0 release.
I'm running CentOS 5.4 with Linux 2.6.18-164.el5 #1 SMP x86_64 on
ML schrieb:
Hi Everyone,
I want to be sure the data is protected, but machine resources and
money are limited.
Why don't you rent a VPS for the time being and rsync the file+data to
your MacPro, where you can use TimeMachine to create further backups?
Rainer
Would 2 x 1TB enterprise drives be enough mirrored?
Are you going to to software RAID1 or hardware?
I find software RAID1 bogs down for intensive database
applications.
NOTE: Host based RAID is the same as software RAID.
You will need an actual external RAID card like one
from Areca.
MHR wrote:
I've been running VMWare Server 1.x for some time now, currently on
1.08, and I've been pretty satisfied with it.
I was wondering if any of you fellow VMWare users are seeing any
significant benefit to moving to the 2.0 release.
I'm running CentOS 5.4 with Linux 2.6.18-164.el5 #1
On Thursday 29 October 2009 18:35:56 m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
I can't remember if I asked here - I've got more than one printer, HP,
laser, builtin JetDirect. When I go there in a browser, I see the basic
thing, but I can't get to the networking page. It says that it wants a
password, no user
On Thu, 29 Oct 2009, nate wrote:
MHR wrote:
I've been running VMWare Server 1.x for some time now, currently on
1.08, and I've been pretty satisfied with it.
I was wondering if any of you fellow VMWare users are seeing any
significant benefit to moving to the 2.0 release.
I'm running
Would 2 x 1TB enterprise drives be enough mirrored?
Are you going to to software RAID1 or hardware?
I find software RAID1 bogs down for intensive database
applications.
If I can find a cheap enough RAID Card that wil fit the Mac Pro, I
would do hardware RAID, but Apple wants $699 for
/etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifup-eth: BOOTPROTO=bootp
So, it's not PEERDNS, not DHCP, not NetworkManager. Why is dhclient-script
even being run?
BOOTPROTO=bootp is triggering it.
In /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifup-eth:
if [ ${BOOTPROTO} = bootp -o ${BOOTPROTO} = dhcp ]; then
If you want performance stick with RAID 10. In general the more drives
(spindles) the faster the array. The Western Digital RE3 500 GB drives
are a good deal. You should be able to get 4 of those in the low
$200s. In RAID 10 this would give you better performance than 2 x 1TB
in RAID 1.
Ryan
On
If I can find a cheap enough RAID Card that wil fit the Mac Pro, I
would do hardware RAID, but Apple wants $699 for theirs...
$699 is pretty steep, but RAID cards are not cheap.
They are worth it for performance though.
If you don't need absolute performance, software RAID will
work.
Give
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 02:07:22PM -0500, Neil Aggarwal wrote:
If I can find a cheap enough RAID Card that wil fit the Mac Pro, I
would do hardware RAID, but Apple wants $699 for theirs...
$699 is pretty steep, but RAID cards are not cheap.
They are worth it for performance though.
If
John R Pierce wrote:
It's my understanding that CentOS is a carbon copy of Red Hat - with
the exception of the art work. Assuming that this is true, the support
matrix for VMware Server 2.0.1 states Red Hat 5.1. I cannot seem to
locate a CentOS 5.1 x86-64 copy. I can get a copy of 5.3
Ryan,
If you want performance stick with RAID 10. In general the more drives
(spindles) the faster the array. The Western Digital RE3 500 GB drives
are a good deal. You should be able to get 4 of those in the low
$200s. In RAID 10 this would give you better performance than 2 x 1TB
in RAID
MHR wrote:
I've been running VMWare Server 1.x for some time now, currently on
1.08, and I've been pretty satisfied with it.
I was wondering if any of you fellow VMWare users are seeing any
significant benefit to moving to the 2.0 release.
I haven't tried doing anything new or different -
m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
I can't remember if I asked here - I've got more than one printer, HP,
laser, builtin JetDirect. When I go there in a browser, I see the basic
thing, but I can't get to the networking page. It says that it wants a
password, no user name. It doesn't accept anything.
Message-ID:
fac47fca0910281232x71fbf92cva80095483d210...@mail.gmail.com
On: Wed, 28 Oct 2009 20:32:14 +0100, Marcus Moeller
m...@marcus-moeller.de wrote:
Hi all,
is there a way to combine iptables parameters like: iptables
-A OUTPUT -p UDP -p TCP -d $IP1 -d $IP2 ?
man iptables
...
Dear James.
is there a way to combine iptables parameters like: iptables
-A OUTPUT -p UDP -p TCP -d $IP1 -d $IP2 ?
I should have better written something like:
-A OUTPUT -p UDP OR -p TCP -d $IP1 OR -d $IP2
as that's what I was looking for. Sorry.
Best Regards
Marcus
Hi all,
I just installed 5.4 on a machine here... All seems running fine,
except I decided to put on the extra repositories - and as usual I
decided to install yum-priorities (as directed here:
http://wiki.centos.org/AdditionalResources/Repositories/RPMForge ) but
it seems like this package is
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 9:00 AM, Meenoo Shivdasani mee...@gmail.com wrote:
BOOTPROTO=bootp is triggering it.
I'm confused. I just rebooted another machine with 'BOOTPROTO=bootp' in
/etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifup-eth, it did not rewrite
/etc/resolv.conf.
Okay, my goof, the one with the
Is software RAID 10 decent performance?
depends on the workload.
committed random writes are greatly accelerated by battery backed write
caches on real raid controllers.this greatly speeds up things like
transactional databases.
if your workload is mostly read, software raid
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 1:00 PM, Boris Epstein borepst...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
I just installed 5.4 on a machine here... All seems running fine,
except I decided to put on the extra repositories - and as usual I
decided to install yum-priorities (as directed here:
From: Barry Brimer [mailto:li...@brimer.org]
Sent: Wednesday, October 28, 2009 11:33 PM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Not able to FTP since 5.4
I do not use ftp much lately, but my bro did and noticed we
cannot ftp
to the server since the upgrade.
Using VSFTP.
Is software RAID 10 decent performance?
Given that you are just starting out,
go with SW raid10. When your usage grows,
plan to move to hardware raid or a hosted solution.
Neil
--
Neil Aggarwal, (281)846-8957, http://www.JAMMConsulting.com
CentOS 5.4 KVM VPS $55/mo, no setup fee, no contract,
$700, eesh. You can get some nice Areca cards for much less than that.
What is the cheapest SATA hardware raid card I can get at newegg.com?
Seems like most turn out not to be true hardware raid that I have
found and will not run on CentOS 4.8 without a great deal of grief.
Matt
Matt:
Everyone I know recommends Areca cards.
Neil
--
Neil Aggarwal, (281)846-8957, http://www.JAMMConsulting.com
CentOS 5.4 KVM VPS $55/mo, no setup fee, no contract, dedicated 64bit CPU
1GB dedicated RAM, 40GB RAID storage, 500GB/mo premium BW, Zero downtime
-Original Message-
On Thu, 29 Oct 2009, Matt wrote:
What is the cheapest SATA hardware raid card I can get at newegg.com?
Seems like most turn out not to be true hardware raid that I have
found and will not run on CentOS 4.8 without a great deal of grief.
Not a direct answer to your question, but be careful of
someone wrote:
m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
I can't remember if I asked here - I've got more than one printer, HP,
laser, builtin JetDirect. When I go there in a browser, I see the basic
thing, but I can't get to the networking page. It says that it wants a
password, no user name. It doesn't
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 4:07 PM, Akemi Yagi amy...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 1:00 PM, Boris Epstein borepst...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
I just installed 5.4 on a machine here... All seems running fine,
except I decided to put on the extra repositories - and as usual I
decided
Curt Mills wrote:
On Thu, 29 Oct 2009, Matt wrote:
What is the cheapest SATA hardware raid card I can get at newegg.com?
Seems like most turn out not to be true hardware raid that I have
found and will not run on CentOS 4.8 without a great deal of grief.
Not a direct answer to
On Wednesday 28 October 2009 16:36, Marcus Moeller wrote:
Dear Ryan.
is there a way to combine iptables parameters like: iptables -A OUTPUT
-p UDP -p TCP -d $IP1 -d $IP2 ?
Each of those parameters is called a match, in IPTables-speak. You
can specify multiple matches in one
Not a direct answer to your question, but be careful of SATA drives.
Seagate does make enterprise SATA drives.
--
Neil Aggarwal, (281)846-8957, http://www.JAMMConsulting.com
CentOS 5.4 KVM VPS $55/mo, no setup fee, no contract, dedicated 64bit CPU
1GB dedicated RAM, 40GB RAID storage, 500GB/mo
On Wednesday 28 October 2009 15:47, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
This is irritating: I've got a server I just upgraded to 5.4, then
rebooted, only to discover that it just *sits* there at the grub boot
menu. I looked at grub.conf, and uncommented hiddenmenu (which should have
been done long
On Fri, 2009-10-30 at 09:57 +1300, Clint Dilks wrote:
Curt Mills wrote:
On Thu, 29 Oct 2009, Matt wrote:
What is the cheapest SATA hardware raid card I can get at newegg.com?
Seems like most turn out not to be true hardware raid that I have
found and will not run on CentOS 4.8
Am 29.10.2009 um 21:50 schrieb Curt Mills:
On Thu, 29 Oct 2009, Matt wrote:
What is the cheapest SATA hardware raid card I can get at newegg.com?
Seems like most turn out not to be true hardware raid that I have
found and will not run on CentOS 4.8 without a great deal of grief.
Not a
On Wednesday 28 October 2009 16:44, Marcus Moeller wrote:
does it work to define iptables rules with a fqdn as destination
instead of an IP address? Or is it useful to resolve the name first
using e.g. nslookup, writing the result to a variable which is then
used within the -d statement?
m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
someone wrote:
m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
I can't remember if I asked here - I've got more than one printer, HP,
laser, builtin JetDirect. When I go there in a browser, I see the basic
thing, but I can't get to the networking page. It says that it wants a
Thanks for your help Bart. I had to download the device-mapper RPMs and
manually upgrade them first. Once I'd done that, the upgrade went fine.
Bart Schaefer wrote:
The mirrors that are being selected for you must not be fully up to
date. I don't know why that would be the case, but from a
Craig White wrote:
there actually are server and consumer grade SATA drives and you should
be very careful about what you are buying.
an important consideration is error handling.cheap consumer SATA
drives tend to delay error reporting as long as they physically can,
doing many retries
Looks like the price has gone up with the economy starting to recover.
I paid $68 per WD RE3 500GB drive on Amazon.com back in June.
I would still recommend going with 4 drives in RAID 10 over 2 in RAID
1 or even 3 drives in RAID 5. You will get almost double the
performance due to being able to
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 17:12, Robert Spangler mli...@zoominternet.net wrote:
On Wednesday 28 October 2009 16:44, Marcus Moeller wrote:
does it work to define iptables rules with a fqdn as destination
instead of an IP address? Or is it useful to resolve the name first
using e.g. nslookup,
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 16:57, Robert Spangler mli...@zoominternet.net wrote:
Even simpler;
iptables -A OUTPUT -d $IP1 -j DROP
iptables -A OUTPUT -d $IP2 -j DROP
This will catch everything doesn't matter if its UDP or TCP or ICMP.
I think you're missing the point of the original question:
Ivan Arteaga wrote:
John R Pierce wrote:
Ivan Arteaga wrote:
Hello,
I have a server running CentOS 4.7 and I want to add a new USB-HD for
backup some data. I made the file system as ext3 with the command:
/
mkfs -t ext3 /dev/sdb1/
After that I did add a new Volume Group
Hello everyone,
I'm doing some tests with ACL's and even though I can create a default ACL
for a directory (that includes rwx for the default owner), when I finally
create a file wihin that directory the execute bit is chopped off:
[...@machine ~]$ mkdir mydir
[...@machine ~]$ setfacl -d -m
Jorge Fábregas wrote:
I don't think umask is involved here. As far as I know umask isn't
involved
when dealing with default ACL's. Anyhow, I'm pretty sure this is by design
(security-wise). Is there any way to override this behaviour?
It's been eons since I played with acls, but I thought
94 matches
Mail list logo
