So, as it turns out, my issue seems to be running a CentOS 5.4 x86_64 host
and an i386 F11 VM. I used another machine running CentOS 5.4 i386
host and was able to launch, no changes, the F11 i386 VM.
Is there any reason I should see the failure listed below? I've not yet tried
to install
Tait Clarridge wrote:
On Fri, 2009-11-27 at 14:02 +1300, Steven Ellis wrote:
Running Centos 5.4 with KVM on a Dell R610 server and I'd like to
control which of the four ethernet interfaces are used for specific
tasks
My ideal configuration would be
eth0 - Host traffic only, no virtual
- Scot P. Floess sflo...@nc.rr.com wrote:
So, as it turns out, my issue seems to be running a CentOS 5.4 x86_64
host
and an i386 F11 VM. I used another machine running CentOS 5.4 i386
host and was able to launch, no changes, the F11 i386 VM.
Is there any reason I should see the
eL SERV de correo esta en el exterior con el cual accedo a traves del cliente
outlook y al poner mi firewall no salgo pero al kitar la pc del firewall si
salgo.
To: centos-es@centos.org
Date: Sat, 28 Nov 2009 15:13:45 -0600
From: domin...@linuxsc.net
Subject: Re: [CentOS-es] reglas de
Gente xfa necesito su ayuda, miren estoy poniendo un servidor
firewall-proxy(iptables-squid), todo filtrado de paginas y meseenger me funiona
bien el unico problema que tengo es que mis usuarios no pueden enviar ni
recibir correos, el servidor de correo es externo el servicio me lo provee qnet
Revisaste talvez si desde el Firewall puedes conectarte a tu proveedor?
El 29 de noviembre de 2009 11:22, jose soto carrasco
el_ti...@hotmail.comescribió:
Gente xfa necesito su ayuda, miren estoy poniendo un servidor
firewall-proxy(iptables-squid), todo filtrado de paginas y meseenger me
desde mi firewall pongo en consola
telnet mail.ejemplo.com.pe 25
telnet mail.ejemplo.com.pe 110
y responde ok ingreso bien
Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2009 13:26:49 -0500
From: andresgeno...@gmail.com
To: centos-es@centos.org
Subject: Re: [CentOS-es] SERV. CORREO EXTERNO
Revisaste talvez si
Probaste desde caulquiera de las maquinas que queres acceder al servidor
de mail externo hacer telnet mail.ejemplo.com.pe 25 ?
Si se puede meter un poco la cuchara... por que no hacer que tu servidor
tambien sea servidor de correo electronico??? con eso tendrias mucho
menos trafico hacia afuera y
Pues mira te explico acabo de oner el firewall y para hacer la prueba lo
conecte a una pc desde esa pc al kerer hacer el telnet no se puede, ahora las
otras pc que estan fuera del firewall salen por un router de telefonica y el
firewall esta saliendo por una linea con telmex, ahora talves no
Mira porque no utilizas, arno-iptables-firewall es muy facil y muy intuitivo
El 29 de noviembre de 2009 14:03, jose soto carrasco
el_ti...@hotmail.comescribió:
desde mi firewall pongo en consola
telnet mail.ejemplo.com.pe 25
telnet mail.ejemplo.com.pe 110
y responde ok ingreso bien
Y ESO COMO SE ASE..!!! O COMO ES QUE NUNCA HABIA ESCUCHADO DE EL
Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2009 14:55:42 -0500
From: andresgeno...@gmail.com
To: centos-es@centos.org
Subject: Re: [CentOS-es] SERV. CORREO EXTERNO
Mira porque no utilizas, arno-iptables-firewall es muy facil y muy intuitivo
El 29 de
El 29 de noviembre de 2009 08:32, jose soto carrasco
el_ti...@hotmail.comescribió:
eL SERV de correo esta en el exterior con el cual accedo a traves del
cliente outlook y al poner mi firewall no salgo pero al kitar la pc del
firewall si salgo.
Esto ya lo estas tratando en otro hilo de
Exacto puede estar bloqueado el puerto 465 o el 995
El 29 de noviembre de 2009 16:00, Ernesto Celis
celisdelafue...@gmail.comescribió:
l 29 de noviembre de 2009 13:56, jose soto carrasco
el_ti...@hotmail.comescribió:
Y ESO COMO SE ASE..!!! O COMO ES QUE NUNCA HABIA ESCUCHADO DE EL
Por
El 29 de noviembre de 2009 15:09, Andres Genovez
andresgeno...@gmail.comescribió:
Exacto puede estar bloqueado el puerto 465 o el 995
¿Es afirmación o que cosa?
Hasta donde yo se Telmex solo bloquea el puerto 25, es posible también
solicitarles que abran ese (el 25) puerto para ti, si tienes
si algo asi estab pensando pero ahora que me dices eso vi una diferencia al
hacer telnet al 110 y 25 soy de peru en el 110 me sale ok pero en el 25 es como
si entrara pero no da la bienvenida talves sea eso que me dices mañana pienso
llamar a mi proveedor de correo y presentarle mi esquema
Según tu propia descripción del asunto es que entonces estás haciendo
mal el NAT. Chequea bien las reglas para que te serciores...
Esta línea echo 1 /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward te la puedes ahorar
editando:
/etc/sysctl.conf
Y pon a 1 esta línea:
net.ipv4.ip_forward = 0
de manera que quede:
El 29 de noviembre de 2009 18:31, jose soto carrasco
el_ti...@hotmail.comescribió:
si algo asi estab pensando pero ahora que me dices eso vi una diferencia
al hacer telnet al 110 y 25 soy de peru en el 110 me sale ok pero en el 25
es como si entrara pero no da la bienvenida talves sea eso
El 29 de noviembre de 2009 18:31, jose soto carrasco
el_ti...@hotmail.comescribió:
haber que me dice y una cosa tengo ip publica de mi servidor firewall
telmex te da un pull de 5ips ya una de ellasla tengo usada en el firewall
ustedes creen
Por cierto, pull no es lo mismo que pool, aun
On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 2:55 PM, Ross Walker rswwal...@gmail.com wrote:
On Nov 28, 2009, at 3:10 PM, Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com wrote:
Tom H wrote:
Digging around google a bit more I came up with different rules,
and
fingers crossed, they seem to work!
SUBSYSTEM==net,
David McGuffey wrote:
Starting with a fresh load and after I finish hardening the load
following the Center for Internet Security (CIS) guidance, I'm wondering
whether AIDE or OSSEC would be a better intrusion detection system.
I installed AIDE and did a quick test of AIDE and after
On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 7:00 PM, David McGuffey
davidmcguf...@verizon.net wrote:
snip
Maybe I should check to see if Evolution on F11 can export the db into
something that Evolution on 5.4 can import.
Yes. If you are lucky, that will work OK. Possibly you can find some
information on the
On Nov 29, 2009, at 3:27 AM, Rob Townley rob.town...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 2:55 PM, Ross Walker rswwal...@gmail.com
wrote:
There was a kernel update maybe the move from C4 to C5 which caused
grief with Dell hardware, where it reversed the order Broadcom
devices
are
On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 7:55 AM, Rob Kampen rkam...@kampensonline.comwrote:
David McGuffey wrote:
Starting with a fresh load and after I finish hardening the load
following the Center for Internet Security (CIS) guidance, I'm wondering
whether AIDE or OSSEC would be a better intrusion
Rob Townley wrote:
NIC ordering is a problem. Some say it is the multi cpu, some say bad
BIOS, some say MAC address ordering is better, some say PCI bus
enumeration is better. The netdev mailing list has had a long running
discussion on this issue. The CTO of Dell and members of HP along
hi all
hi postfix list
I worked all day to develop my certificates
with certificates free of startssl
I based this document
http://translate.google.fr/translate?js=yprev=_thl=frie=UTF-8u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.grandville.net%2FOpenSSL%2FLigneDeCommandesl=frtl=en
I realized correctly
On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 10:57 AM, Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com wrote:
Rob Townley wrote:
NIC ordering is a problem. Some say it is the multi cpu, some say bad
BIOS, some say MAC address ordering is better, some say PCI bus
enumeration is better. The netdev mailing list has had a long
On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 9:55 AM, Rob Kampen rkam...@kampensonline.com wrote:
David McGuffey wrote:
Starting with a fresh load and after I finish hardening the load
following the Center for Internet Security (CIS) guidance, I'm wondering
whether AIDE or OSSEC would be a better intrusion
fakessh wrote:
how to incorporate the certificates in postfix?
Does this help?
http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/postfix_sasl
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On Sat, 2009-11-28 at 18:57 -0500, David McGuffey wrote:
Starting with a fresh load and after I finish hardening the load
following the Center for Internet Security (CIS) guidance, I'm wondering
whether AIDE or OSSEC would be a better intrusion detection system.
I installed AIDE and did a
Hi all,
I have a CentOS 5.4 server-only installation, i.e. no X installed, and
for some odd reason /etc/resolve.conf gets overwritten by
NetworkManager on a constant basis. I haven't been able to track down
how often, but I think it's on the hour, or something.
This is the conents of the file
On 29/11/09 22:43, Rob Kampen wrote:
Rudi Ahlers wrote:
Hi all,
I have a CentOS 5.4 server-only installation, i.e. no X installed, and
for some odd reason /etc/resolve.conf gets overwritten by
NetworkManager on a constant basis. I haven't been able to track down
how often, but I think it's
On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 11:43 PM, Rob Kampen rkam...@kampensonline.com wrote:
Rudi,
As I recall there was a thread about this a few weeks ago.
Please show your /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-ethX contents.
Thanks
___
Hi Rob,
Here's the
On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 12:13 AM, Tosh toshli...@gmail.com wrote:
Add to /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-ethX
The following 2 lines :
PEERDNS=no
NM_CONTROLLED=no
Line 1 tells the the if commands not to override /etc/resolv.conf
Line 2 tells NetworkManager that it doens't have control
On Sun, 2009-11-29 at 20:31 +, John Horne wrote:
On Sat, 2009-11-28 at 18:57 -0500, David McGuffey wrote:
Starting with a fresh load and after I finish hardening the load
following the Center for Internet Security (CIS) guidance, I'm wondering
whether AIDE or OSSEC would be a better
At Mon, 30 Nov 2009 00:55:28 +0200 CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org
wrote:
On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 12:13 AM, Tosh toshli...@gmail.com wrote:
Add to /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-ethX
The following 2 lines :
PEERDNS=no
NM_CONTROLLED=no
Line 1 tells the the if commands
On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 9:41 PM, Joseph L. Casale
jcas...@activenetwerx.com wrote:
I have a zone that has several hosts update their ip with Dynamic DNS updates.
This morning a client had updated its ip, but bind wasn't returning the new ip
when queried until I restarted the daemon?
Google
On Nov 29, 2009, at 3:52 PM, David McGuffey
davidmcguf...@verizon.net wrote:
On Sun, 2009-11-29 at 20:31 +, John Horne wrote:
On Sat, 2009-11-28 at 18:57 -0500, David McGuffey wrote:
Starting with a fresh load and after I finish hardening the load
following the Center for Internet
You can also use google docs
On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 4:02 PM, MHR mhullr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 5:37 AM, Sorin Srbu sorin.s...@orgfarm.uu.se
wrote:
So basically, CentOS+OOO3.1 vs WinXP+OOO3.1 scores 1 to 0. Good work
CentOS
and OOO teams!
RBFG Thanks for the
On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 6:52 PM, David McGuffey
davidmcguf...@verizon.net wrote:
On Sun, 2009-11-29 at 20:31 +, John Horne wrote:
On Sat, 2009-11-28 at 18:57 -0500, David McGuffey wrote:
Starting with a fresh load and after I finish hardening the load
following the Center for Internet
Hey
On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 10:46 AM, Stephen Nelson-Smith
step...@atalanta-systems.com wrote:
I have a site running drupal. The apache user therefore needs to be
able to write certain files (CSS files for example).
I also have a directory under my web root which is a SAN mount, to
which
On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 10:14 AM, Janez Kosmrlj
postnali...@googlemail.com wrote:
OK I figgured out the client part. But unfortunately this was the easy part.
I still can't figure out, what i'm doing wrong on the server.
I tried installing deltarpm package from epel and the newest createrepo
41 matches
Mail list logo
