CentOS Errata and Security Advisory CESA-2010:0113
seamonkey security update for CentOS 4 i386:
https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2010-0113.html
The following updated file has been uploaded and is currently syncing to
the mirrors:
i386:
updates/i386/RPMS/seamonkey-1.0.9-52.el4.centos.i386.rpm
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory CESA-2010:0113
seamonkey security update for CentOS 4 x86_64:
https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2010-0113.html
The following updated file has been uploaded and is currently syncing to
the mirrors:
x86_64:
Hi all,
I need to move ten CentOS/RHEL 5.4 vmware guests from a vmware ESXi 4 host to
a
CentOS 5.4 KVM host (fully patched). But I have two doubts.
First: all these guests have two e1000 network drivers defined as a eth0,eth1
and
modprobe.conf file is the same on all:
alias eth0 e1000
El lun, 15-02-2010 a las 11:15 -0300, Pablo Zuñiga escribió:
El día 15 de febrero de 2010 10:02, Maykel Franco Hernández
may...@maykel.es escribió:
Pero es justo lo que no quería hacer, porque habría que cambiar algo en
las maquinas clientes dentro de mi red?? O no?
Eso se soluciona
Estimado, veo que ha abierto otro hilo con esto, bueno. Sabe, no he visto
nada de la Politica de FORWARD, la tiene activada? eso permite el envio de
correo.
Atte.
El 17 de febrero de 2010 08:14, Maykel Franco Hernández
may...@maykel.esescribió:
Tiene entorno grafico no??
Shorewall es
El lun, 15-02-2010 a las 11:15 -0300, Pablo Zuñiga escribió:
El día 15 de febrero de 2010 10:02, Maykel Franco Hernández
may...@maykel.es escribió:
Pero es justo lo que no quería hacer, porque habría que cambiar algo
en
las maquinas clientes dentro de mi red?? O no?
Eso se soluciona
On 02/18/2010 08:21 AM, Niki Kovacs wrote:
...
03:01.0 RAID bus controller: Adaptec AAC-RAID (rev 01)
03:04.0 SCSI storage controller: Adaptec AIC-7901 U320 (rev 10)
You should still try to open the box and check the cables.
It might be easier to configure the system if you attach the
disks to
I don't bother changing the setting for local disks as it is
usually
pretty quick to scan them. You must have a pretty big and/or
slow
file system for fsck to take 2+ hours.
nate
Mogens Kjaer a écrit :
You should still try to open the box and check the cables.
It might be easier to configure the system if you attach the
disks to the SCSI controller instead of the RAID controller -
if you don't want to run RAID.
I followed your advice (don't get me wrong: I
Dear All,
We are running CentOS4.4 linux in same manner.
We findout the same issue in CentOS Machine also.
We posted this queries to Red Hat Support and We posted same queries
in CentOS group
Their is no difference of using RHEL4 Update 4 and CentOS4.4 Linux?
What thinks
On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 10:12 AM, Henry Ritzlmayr fedora-l...@rc0.atwrote:
I don't bother changing the setting for local disks as it is
usually
pretty quick to scan them. You must have a pretty big and/or
slow
file system for fsck to take 2+
Hi,
I want to setup a central installation server, but haven't done this before,
so I want to find out what would be best practices for this?
The server I have already runs as a central repo, which is updated from one
or our local centos mirrors, and the other CentOS servers (both i386 x64),
as
On 02/18/2010 09:54 AM, Rudi Ahlers wrote:
...
But, how does one get past this? I know we need to reboot from time to time,
but more than often it's (preferably) not sooner than 6 - 10 months, so fsck
will run.
Turn off automatic fsck with tune2fs -i 0 -c 0 and instead
do a manual fsck (reboot
2010/2/18 Rudi Ahlers r...@softdux.com:
Hi,
I want to setup a central installation server, but haven't done this before,
so I want to find out what would be best practices for this?
The server I have already runs as a central repo, which is updated from one
or our local centos mirrors, and
Am 18.02.2010 10:00, schrieb Rudi Ahlers:
Hi,
I want to setup a central installation server, but haven't done this
before, so I want to find out what would be best practices for this?
https://fedorahosted.org/cobbler/
Rainer
___
CentOS
On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 11:15 AM, Eero Volotinen eero.voloti...@iki.fiwrote:
See the kickstart at :
http://www.centos.org/docs/5/html/5.2/Installation_Guide/s1-kickstart2-howuse.html
--
Eero
___
We already use kickstart files, where needed
Maybe one of you has experienced something like this before.
I have a host running CentOS5.3, x86_64 version with the standard
qla2xxx driver. Both ports are recognized and show output in dmesg
but they never find my storage device:
qla2xxx :07:00.1: LIP reset occured (f700).
qla2xxx
2010/2/18 Rudi Ahlers r...@softdux.com:
On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 11:15 AM, Eero Volotinen eero.voloti...@iki.fi
wrote:
See the kickstart at :
http://www.centos.org/docs/5/html/5.2/Installation_Guide/s1-kickstart2-howuse.html
--
Eero
___
On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 11:54 AM, Eero Volotinen eero.voloti...@iki.fiwrote:
kickstart file, if you are familiar with text based configurations?
--
Eero
___
Is kickstart REALLY the only way?
How do I configure the server so that the client
2010/2/18 Rudi Ahlers rudiahl...@gmail.com:
On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 11:54 AM, Eero Volotinen eero.voloti...@iki.fi
wrote:
kickstart file, if you are familiar with text based configurations?
--
Eero
___
Is kickstart REALLY the only way?
How
Rudi Ahlers wrote:
Hi,
I want to setup a central installation server, but haven't done this
before, so I want to find out what would be best practices for this?
The server I have already runs as a central repo, which is updated from
one or our local centos mirrors, and the other CentOS
Is kickstart REALLY the only way?
How do I configure the server so that the client can use network boot,
without a CD?
See documentation at: http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/PXE/PXE_Setup
--
Eero
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
Rudi Ahlers wrote:
kickstart file, if you are familiar with text based configurations?
Is kickstart REALLY the only way?
How do I configure the server so that the client can use network boot,
without a CD?
Hi
You can use PXE. You have to set up a tftp and a DHCP server.
Adam Grossman sent a missive on 2010-02-17:
On Wed, 2010-02-17 at 13:26 -0500, Adam Grossman wrote:
On Wed, 2010-02-17 at 18:17 +, Simon Billis wrote:
Adam Grossman sent a missive on 2010-02-17:
Hello,
i am running CentOS 5.4. i have a requirement where i need to have 1
application
On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 12:16 PM, Marcelo M. Garcia
marcelo.maia.gar...@googlemail.com wrote:
Rudi Ahlers wrote:
kickstart file, if you are familiar with text based configurations?
Is kickstart REALLY the only way?
How do I configure the server so that the client can use
From: Simon Billis si...@houxou.com
To: CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org
Sent: Thu, February 18, 2010 11:25:41 AM
Subject: Re: [CentOS] processor affinity
Adam Grossman sent a missive on 2010-02-17:
On Wed, 2010-02-17 at 13:26 -0500, Adam Grossman wrote:
On Wed, 2010-02-17 at
From: Niki Kovacs cont...@kikinovak.net
Hakan Koseoglu a écrit :
On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 10:26 PM, Niki Kovacs wrote:
boot configuration tools (bios, scsi configurator). So far I haven't
SCSI - Disk
Go to www.hp.com, , click on Support Drivers, on Step 2, for product
type ML 150,
Hi all,
Which ports do I need to have open on an NFS client's firewall to allow it
to connect to a remote NFS servers?
When I disable iptables (using ConfigServerFirewall), it connects fine, but
as soon as I enable it, NFS gives me this error:
r...@saturn:[~]$ mount
John Doe wrote:
From: Simon Billis si...@houxou.com
To: CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org
Sent: Thu, February 18, 2010 11:25:41 AM
Subject: Re: [CentOS] processor affinity
Adam Grossman sent a missive on 2010-02-17:
On Wed, 2010-02-17 at 13:26 -0500, Adam Grossman wrote:
On Wed,
Hi
You need 2 ports open 2049/udp 2049/tcp but you should read this little
howto
http://www.cyberciti.biz/faq/centos-fedora-rhel-iptables-open-nfs-server-ports/
Per
On Thu, 2010-02-18 at 13:00 +0200, Rudi Ahlers wrote:
Hi all,
Which ports do I need to have open on an NFS client's
Hi Rudi,
Rudi Ahlers sent a missive on 2010-02-18:
Hi,
I want to setup a central installation server, but haven't done this
before, so I want to find out what would be best practices for this?
The server I have already runs as a central repo, which is updated
from one or our local
On Thursday 18 February 2010 11:00:53 Rudi Ahlers wrote:
Hi all,
Which ports do I need to have open on an NFS client's firewall to allow it
to connect to a remote NFS servers?
When I disable iptables (using ConfigServerFirewall), it connects fine, but
as soon as I enable it, NFS gives me
John Doe sent a missive on 2010-02-18:
From: Simon Billis si...@houxou.com
To: CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org
Sent: Thu, February 18, 2010 11:25:41 AM
Subject: Re: [CentOS] processor affinity
Adam Grossman sent a missive on 2010-02-17:
On Wed, 2010-02-17 at 13:26 -0500, Adam
On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 1:08 PM, Per Qvindesland p...@norhex.com wrote:
Hi
You need 2 ports open 2049/udp 2049/tcp but you should read this little
howto
http://www.cyberciti.biz/faq/centos-fedora-rhel-iptables-open-nfs-server-ports/
Per
uhm
I have added ports 111 2049 in both
On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 1:11 PM, Tony Molloy tony.mol...@ul.ie wrote:
On Thursday 18 February 2010 11:00:53 Rudi Ahlers wrote:
Hi all,
Which ports do I need to have open on an NFS client's firewall to allow
it
to connect to a remote NFS servers?
When I disable iptables (using
On Thursday 18 February 2010 11:23:43 Rudi Ahlers wrote:
On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 1:11 PM, Tony Molloy tony.mol...@ul.ie wrote:
On Thursday 18 February 2010 11:00:53 Rudi Ahlers wrote:
Hi all,
Which ports do I need to have open on an NFS client's firewall to allow
it
to connect
Hi,
I just finished to write a tutorial on how to install GOsa on RHEL/CentOS 5:
http://www.brucalipto.org/linux/how-to-install-gosa-on-rhelcentos-5
If you see errors on what I wrote please let me know and I will
correct as soon as possible.
Hope someone will find this useful.
Bye
Piero
--
Rudi Ahlers wrote on Thu, 18 Feb 2010 10:54:11 +0200:
The server booted up, ran fsck, then each VM, as it booted up ran fsck as
well - which just slowed down the whole process since there's a 5 minute
delay in starting each VM.
Why would you autostart a VM only every 5 minutes? Or did you
At Thu, 18 Feb 2010 10:07:27 +0100 CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org
wrote:
On 02/18/2010 09:54 AM, Rudi Ahlers wrote:
...
But, how does one get past this? I know we need to reboot from time to time,
but more than often it's (preferably) not sooner than 6 - 10 months, so fsck
will
i've just started looking after a (virtual) centos 5.4 server that's
hosted at rackspace and, unsurprisingly, it was set up with all the
standard defaults. part of the work i'll be doing involves php and,
as i read it, the standard php version with centos 5.4 is php-5.1.
if i *wanted* to
Rudi Ahlers wrote:
Hi,
I want to setup a central installation server, but haven't done this
before, so I want to find out what would be best practices for this?
The server I have already runs as a central repo, which is updated from
one or our local centos mirrors, and the other CentOS
Robert P. J. Day wrote:
i've just started looking after a (virtual) centos 5.4 server that's
hosted at rackspace and, unsurprisingly, it was set up with all the
standard defaults. part of the work i'll be doing involves php and,
as i read it, the standard php version with centos 5.4 is
I use epel (has a lot of different stuff but generally does not have newer
versions of standard packages), rpmforge (sometimes has newer stuff and may
cause some conflicts) remi (up to date ocsinventory-server, php, mysql), and
opennms (Sun JVM 1.5 and opennms). Normally I leave epel enabled
Am 17.02.2010 19:43, schrieb m.r...@5-cent.us:
I'm finally biting the bullet, and replacing the 12-yr-old box that's been
my firewall/router with an appliance. First, does anyone have any idea
whether the WRT160 nl can use tomato? Second, is there any way, or any
reason, I could/would want to
On 2/18/2010 8:49 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
Rudi Ahlers wrote:
Hi,
I want to setup a central installation server, but haven't done this
before, so I want to find out what would be best practices for this?
The server I have already runs as a central repo, which is updated from
one or our
Hi,
I just installed CentOS 5.4 on a 64bit-server. It's the first time I
work with this sort of hardware. Doing rpm -qa | sort | less shows that
most of the packages seem to be installed twice: once for i386
architecture, and then again for x86_64.
Is this normal? Or did I mess up something
On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 7:12 AM, Niki Kovacs cont...@kikinovak.net wrote:
Hi,
I just installed CentOS 5.4 on a 64bit-server. It's the first time I
work with this sort of hardware. Doing rpm -qa | sort | less shows that
most of the packages seem to be installed twice: once for i386
Niki Kovacs wrote:
Hi,
I just installed CentOS 5.4 on a 64bit-server. It's the first time I
work with this sort of hardware. Doing rpm -qa | sort | less shows that
most of the packages seem to be installed twice: once for i386
architecture, and then again for x86_64.
Is this normal?
Niki Kovacs wrote:
Hi,
I just installed CentOS 5.4 on a 64bit-server. It's the first time I
work with this sort of hardware. Doing rpm -qa | sort | less shows that
most of the packages seem to be installed twice: once for i386
architecture, and then again for x86_64.
Is this normal? Or
The 32-bit packages are installed for backward-compatibility with any
32-bit programs you may want to run.
Regarding security, is it less safe to have these *.i386 packages
installed? (esp. on a server)
(according to the principle that less is always more secure)
Go to the HP.com website and download the SmartStart CD for your system.
This has everything you need to configure the raid. The raid on these
machines is a 'hardware' raid running through a proprietary raid card.
It is 'extremely' robust. However, you must use the HP SmartStart disk
(or
On 2/18/2010 8:58 AM, Toby Bluhm wrote:
Generally we would be (re)installing CentOS servers desktops, but I
guess it could be useful for other distro's like Fedora Core / Debian /
FreeBSD? / etc. What would be a good option to go for, or could someone
point me to a good documentation?
On Thu, 18 Feb 2010, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
Rudi Ahlers wrote on Thu, 18 Feb 2010 10:54:11 +0200:
The server booted up, ran fsck, then each VM, as it booted up ran fsck as
well - which just slowed down the whole process since there's a 5 minute
delay in starting each VM.
Why would you
Mathieu Baudier wrote:
The 32-bit packages are installed for backward-compatibility with any
32-bit programs you may want to run.
Regarding security, is it less safe to have these *.i386 packages
installed? (esp. on a server)
(according to the principle that less is always more secure)
Hi
From: John Hinton webmas...@ew3d.com
Go to the HP.com website and download the SmartStart CD for your system.
This has everything you need to configure the raid. The raid on these
machines is a 'hardware' raid running through a proprietary raid card.
It is 'extremely' robust. However, you
On 2/18/2010 10:59 AM, John Doe wrote:
From: John Hintonwebmas...@ew3d.com
Go to the HP.com website and download the SmartStart CD for your system.
This has everything you need to configure the raid. The raid on these
machines is a 'hardware' raid running through a proprietary raid card.
Have you looked at Cobbler and KOAN? Great tools...
On Thu, 18 Feb 2010, Les Mikesell wrote:
On 2/18/2010 8:58 AM, Toby Bluhm wrote:
Generally we would be (re)installing CentOS servers desktops, but I
guess it could be useful for other distro's like Fedora Core / Debian /
FreeBSD? /
On 2/18/2010 9:59 AM, John Doe wrote:
From: John Hintonwebmas...@ew3d.com
Go to the HP.com website and download the SmartStart CD for your system.
This has everything you need to configure the raid. The raid on these
machines is a 'hardware' raid running through a proprietary raid card.
It is
/attachments/20100218/6470cda5/attachment-0001.bin
--
Message: 6
Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2010 01:31:09 +0100
From: Tru Huynh t...@centos.org
Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2010:0113 Critical CentOS 3 x86_64
seamonkey - security update
To: centos-annou...@centos.org
On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 10:12 AM, Henry Ritzlmayr
fedora-l...@rc0.atwrote:
nate wrote:
I don't bother changing the setting for local disks as it is
usually pretty quick to scan them. You must have a pretty big
and/or slow file system for fsck to take 2+ hours.
Balaji wrote:
Dear All,
We are running CentOS4.4 linux in same manner.
You're running CentOS 4.4 on an Itanium system ?!? I didn't think
CentOS built for IA64 Itanic.
Balaji wrote on 02/16/2010 12:32 AM
We are running RHEL4 Update 4 AS IA-64 on a HP rx6600.
We are running
On 02/18/2010 05:24 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
Balaji wrote:
Dear All,
We are running CentOS4.4 linux in same manner.
You're running CentOS 4.4 on an Itanium system ?!? I didn't think
CentOS built for IA64 Itanic.
CentOS-4 has been on IA64
CentOS-5 should be there as well, fairly
--- Original message ---
From: m.r...@5-cent.us
Sent: 18.2.'10, 18:21
On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 10:12 AM, Henry Ritzlmayr
fedora-l...@rc0.atwrote:
nate wrote:
I don't bother changing the setting for local disks as it is
usually pretty quick to scan them. You
Timo wrote:
--- Original message ---
From: m.r...@5-cent.us
Sent: 18.2.'10, 18:21
On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 10:12 AM, Henry Ritzlmayr
fedora-l...@rc0.atwrote:
nate wrote:
I don't bother changing the setting for local disks as it is
usually pretty quick to scan them. You
--- Original message ---
From: m.r...@5-cent.us
To: centos@centos.org
Sent: 18.2.'10, 18:55
Timo wrote:
--- Original message ---
From: m.r...@5-cent.us
Sent: 18.2.'10, 18:21
On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 10:12 AM, Henry Ritzlmayr
fedora-l...@rc0.atwrote:
nate wrote:
Timo wrote:
From: m.r...@5-cent.us
Sent: 18.2.'10, 18:55
Timo wrote:
--- Original message ---
From: m.r...@5-cent.us
Sent: 18.2.'10, 18:21
On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 10:12 AM, Henry Ritzlmayr
fedora-l...@rc0.atwrote:
nate wrote:
snip
a) I'm talking about
work;
..my systems
- Original Message
From: Marcelo M. Garcia marcelo.maia.gar...@googlemail.com
To: CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org
Sent: Thu, February 18, 2010 7:16:45 AM
Subject: Re: [CentOS] best practice: how to setup a central network
installation server?
Rudi Ahlers wrote:
m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
It was dumping large amounts of data into his home directory... which was
NFS mounted from the server I needed to reboot.
That's why I like HA clusters, our NFS cluster runs on top of
CentOS, and if we needed to reboot a node it would have minimal
impact, the other
nate wrote:
m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
It was dumping large amounts of data into his home directory... which
was
NFS mounted from the server I needed to reboot.
That's why I like HA clusters, our NFS cluster runs on top of
CentOS, and if we needed to reboot a node it would have minimal
On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 3:00 AM, Rudi Ahlers r...@softdux.com wrote:
Hi all,
Which ports do I need to have open on an NFS client's firewall to allow it
to connect to a remote NFS servers?
When I disable iptables (using ConfigServerFirewall), it connects fine, but
as soon as I enable it, NFS
Hi,
I was wondering if there was a way to extend (ie: grow) a PV that is part of
a Volume Group? I currently have a partition on my HD that is being used as
a PV for my Volume Group, but would like to make it larger. I have the
space on my drive to extend my partition, but using standard tools
On 19/02/10 10:11, Eric B. wrote:
Hi,
I was wondering if there was a way to extend (ie: grow) a PV that is part of
a Volume Group? I currently have a partition on my HD that is being used as
a PV for my Volume Group, but would like to make it larger. I have the
space on my drive to extend
Les Mikesell wrote on Thu, 18 Feb 2010 08:02:20 -0600:
remi (up to date ocsinventory-server, php, mysql)
The problem with remi's nice (!) and recommended repo is that he just
builds the latest php (5.3.x). That may be possible for 20% of
installations, the other 80% may not work on it. I
a hd in my server failed.
I noticed when I went to SSH in and get a copy of some files in /var/www/html
I tried to tar the files and I was told No, read-only file system.
I restarted and tried running FSCK manually (without -a or -p) and I get inode
errors, short reads, etc.
I tried booting
On Thursday 18 February 2010, Slack-Moehrle mailingli...@mailnewsrss.com
wrote:
Also, what would have caused this all of the sudden? This box has been
running fine for months.
Every hard drive will fail eventually. Some take days. Some take decades.
Most fail somewhere in between those
On 2/18/10 1:31 PM, Kai Schaetzl mailli...@conactive.com wrote:
Les Mikesell wrote on Thu, 18 Feb 2010 08:02:20 -0600:
remi (up to date ocsinventory-server, php, mysql)
The problem with remi's nice (!) and recommended repo is that he just
builds the latest php (5.3.x). That may be
I've been trying to follow samba, centos, ldap, and other
documentation to try and get a CentOS 5 box to permit a user to log
into an existing Windows 200x Active Directory domain without
necessarily having the box as part of the domain.If it has to be
part of the domain, that is fine. The
On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 7:22 PM, Scott Ehrlich srehrl...@gmail.com wrote:
I've been trying to follow samba, centos, ldap, and other
documentation to try and get a CentOS 5 box to permit a user to log
into an existing Windows 200x Active Directory domain without
necessarily having the box as
Clint Dilks wrote:
On 19/02/10 10:11, Eric B. wrote:
Hi,
I was wondering if there was a way to extend (ie: grow) a PV that is part of
a Volume Group? I currently have a partition on my HD that is being used as
a PV for my Volume Group, but would like to make it larger. I have the
I just set up a centos 5.4 server with this a couple of weeks agao, really
straight forward, here is the best guide that I found,
http://www.linuxmail.info/active-directory-integration-samba-centos-5/
http://www.linuxmail.info/active-directory-integration-samba-centos-5/Hope
it helps
On Thu,
Greetings,
On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 5:14 AM, Gary Greene ggre...@minervanetworks.comwrote:
On 2/18/10 1:31 PM, Kai Schaetzl mailli...@conactive.com wrote:
Any opinions on Jason Litka repo?
I happen to have installed PHP 5.2 just yesterday from there
Regards,
Rajagopal
81 matches
Mail list logo
