Re: [CentOS] Consecutive Jobs

2010-04-06 Thread JohnS
On Wed, 2010-04-07 at 05:17 +, Joseph L. Casale wrote: > >Are you looking for a real job scheduler? If so, it might be overkill, > >but you might want to look into software like Sun Grid Engine, Torque, > >or Condor (there are quite a few other schedulers out there). If those > >aren't what

[CentOS] how to upgrade gtk on centos 4.8

2010-04-06 Thread Tommy Zong
Hello, My centos is 4.8 while I need gtk 2.8 or later. How to upgrade GTK? I'm trying to upgrade manually based on RPMs on 5.X, there are too many decencies when upgrading libX. Is there anybody can give some suggestion to enlighten me? Thanks. - Tommy _

Re: [CentOS] Consecutive Jobs

2010-04-06 Thread Joseph L. Casale
>Are you looking for a real job scheduler? If so, it might be overkill, >but you might want to look into software like Sun Grid Engine, Torque, >or Condor (there are quite a few other schedulers out there). If those >aren't what you're hoping for, perhaps you could give more details about >what y

Re: [CentOS] Consecutive Jobs

2010-04-06 Thread Keith Keller
On Wed, Apr 07, 2010 at 03:57:14AM +, Joseph L. Casale wrote: > Anyone know how to submit jobs to at or anything else that allows jobs > submitted to a queue to be executed consecutively? > > I have a series of servers that submits a job via an ssh background > job but I can only have one exec

[CentOS] Consecutive Jobs

2010-04-06 Thread Joseph L. Casale
Anyone know how to submit jobs to at or anything else that allows jobs submitted to a queue to be executed consecutively? I have a series of servers that submits a job via an ssh background job but I can only have one execute at any given time. Possibly some clever bash work? Thanks! jlc ___

[CentOS] is there easy way to upgrade gtk on centos 4.8?

2010-04-06 Thread Tommy Zong
Hello, I need to use wxPython-src-2.8.10.1 with GraphicContext support which requires gdk_cario_xxx APIs introduced from GTK 2.8. Is there any easy way to upgrade gtk since there are lots of dependences? I ever tried yum but it can not upgrade GTK. Thanks. - Tommy

Re: [CentOS] Kernel BUG

2010-04-06 Thread Gilberto Nunes
Hi I have 16 GB of memory on this hosts Not so much, but I think is enough... Tks Tsuyoshi Nagata escreveu: > (2010/04/05 22:57), Gilberto Nunes wrote: > >> Apr 5 09:19:03 zebra kernel: [] >> >>> keventd_create_kthread+0x0/0xc4 >>> > > Its possible on VM and host

Re: [CentOS] Kernel BUG

2010-04-06 Thread Tsuyoshi Nagata
(2010/04/05 22:57), Gilberto Nunes wrote: > Apr 5 09:19:03 zebra kernel: [] >> keventd_create_kthread+0x0/0xc4 Its possible on VM and host kernel with in-sufficient memory. buy more memory :-)) -Tsuyoshi ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@cen

Re: [CentOS] (OT) OpenOffice.org calc chart strangeness.

2010-04-06 Thread Bill Campbell
On Mon, Apr 05, 2010, JohnS wrote: > >On Sun, 2010-04-04 at 20:16 -0700, Bill Campbell wrote: >> >> My problem is that OO/NeoOffice charts don't seem to take the >> first column of data as the X-Axis, but put everything on the >> Y-Axis which doesn't make sense to me. >> >--- >Look at the top row

Re: [CentOS] socket: write vs send

2010-04-06 Thread Michael D. Berger
On Tue, 06 Apr 2010 15:57:28 -0500, Les Mikesell wrote: [...] I added the handler and its working well now. Thanks, Mike. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] wifi

2010-04-06 Thread Ned Slider
Ned Slider wrote: > > I've not actually used the device, only plugged it in, so you'd need to > configure it from here or just let NetworkManager handle the device. > I just fired the device up to test and it works fine out of the box with NetworkManager connecting to a WPA encrypted WAP. Did

Re: [CentOS] Disc Cloning Question

2010-04-06 Thread Les Mikesell
On 4/6/2010 4:30 PM, Joseph L. Casale wrote: >> If I were doing it, I'd forget lvm on the new drive and just make the md >> devices, mkfs them, mount them somewhere temporarily, copy stuff over >> with 'cp -a', 'tar | tar', 'dump | restor', 'rsync -av', etc., >> edit fstab to mount the new md devic

Re: [CentOS] Disc Cloning Question

2010-04-06 Thread John R Pierce
Joseph L. Casale wrote: >> If I were doing it, I'd forget lvm on the new drive and just make the md >> devices, mkfs them, mount them somewhere temporarily, copy stuff over >> with 'cp -a', 'tar | tar', 'dump | restor', 'rsync -av', etc., >> edit fstab to mount the new md devices for / and /boot,

Re: [CentOS] Disc Cloning Question

2010-04-06 Thread Joseph L. Casale
>If I were doing it, I'd forget lvm on the new drive and just make the md >devices, mkfs them, mount them somewhere temporarily, copy stuff over >with 'cp -a', 'tar | tar', 'dump | restor', 'rsync -av', etc., >edit fstab to mount the new md devices for / and /boot, fix grub and >swap the drives.

[CentOS] Recommendation for RADIUS server & client

2010-04-06 Thread Simeun Furtula
Hello list, I'm planning to make a small network, where users pay monthly for using networks resources. Can you recommend me some free radius server with a nice gui frontend (web will be fine)? It should be compatible with MikroTik. Thanks, Uth0x92

Re: [CentOS] socket: write vs send

2010-04-06 Thread Les Mikesell
On 4/6/2010 3:41 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: >> On Tue, 06 Apr 2010 14:53:45 -0500, Les Mikesell wrote: >> >> [...] >>> They should be equivalent - if the other end closes first, you'll get a >>> SIGPIPE, which by default will kill the process. If you want to keep >>> running you have to handle or

[CentOS] Automated Reply from Dieter Thiel

2010-04-06 Thread Dieter Thiel
Abwesenheitsnotiz: Vielen Dank für Ihre Nachricht. Ich bin ab dem 14.04. wieder im Büro erreichbar. In dringenden Fällen wenden Sie sich bitte an Herrn Ostermann, Email . Vielen Dank! ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/

Re: [CentOS] vsftpd writing files 2 times - once as root

2010-04-06 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 12:58 PM, Dirk H. Schulz wrote: > I have configured my vsftpd with virtual users all of which are mapped > to a system user for file system permissions (let's call him > 'ftpsystemuser'). What is the vsftpd process running as? It is most likely root as it needs to have perm

Re: [CentOS] socket: write vs send

2010-04-06 Thread m . roth
> On Tue, 06 Apr 2010 14:53:45 -0500, Les Mikesell wrote: > > [...] >> They should be equivalent - if the other end closes first, you'll get a >> SIGPIPE, which by default will kill the process. If you want to keep >> running you have to handle or ignore the signal. > > How about if I use MSG_NOSI

Re: [CentOS] socket: write vs send

2010-04-06 Thread Les Mikesell
On 4/6/2010 3:19 PM, Michael D. Berger wrote: > On Tue, 06 Apr 2010 14:53:45 -0500, Les Mikesell wrote: > > [...] > >> >> They should be equivalent - if the other end closes first, you'll get a >> SIGPIPE, which by default will kill the process. If you want to keep >> running you have to handle or

Re: [CentOS] Disc Cloning Question

2010-04-06 Thread Les Mikesell
On 4/6/2010 3:02 PM, Joseph L. Casale wrote: >> Even if there is a way to do a live migration, it's probably faster and >> safer to just build a new raid with or without lvm and copy the stuff >> over. You'll just have to reinstall grub on the new disks to make them >> boot. > > It needn't be live

Re: [CentOS] socket: write vs send

2010-04-06 Thread Michael D. Berger
On Tue, 06 Apr 2010 14:53:45 -0500, Les Mikesell wrote: [...] > > They should be equivalent - if the other end closes first, you'll get a > SIGPIPE, which by default will kill the process. If you want to keep > running you have to handle or ignore the signal. How about if I use MSG_NOSIGNAL in

Re: [CentOS] Disc Cloning Question

2010-04-06 Thread Joseph L. Casale
>Should work:) Crap, forgot about the size difference, I can't online resize ext3 down to occupy less space:/ Bah, I'll just redeploy... ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Disc Cloning Question

2010-04-06 Thread Joseph L. Casale
>Even if there is a way to do a live migration, it's probably faster and >safer to just build a new raid with or without lvm and copy the stuff >over. You'll just have to reinstall grub on the new disks to make them >boot. It needn't be live, I just haven't seen an app like clonezilla that can

Re: [CentOS] socket: write vs send

2010-04-06 Thread Les Mikesell
On 4/6/2010 2:48 PM, Michael D. Berger wrote: > On Tue, 06 Apr 2010 14:37:27 -0500, Les Mikesell wrote: > >> On 4/6/2010 2:16 PM, Michael D. Berger wrote: >>> On CentOS 5.4, >>> Linux 2.6.18-164.6.1.el5 #1 SMP Tue Nov 3 16:18:27 EST 2009 >>> i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux >>> >>> In man 2 send I fin

Re: [CentOS] ssh-agent

2010-04-06 Thread m . roth
> On 4/6/2010 2:34 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: >>> On 4/6/2010 2:04 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: >> And, for the bigger picture, why should it? If I'm logging off, there's no reason for it to keep running. Any sessions that required it are either established, or shut down. >>> >>> Th

Re: [CentOS] socket: write vs send

2010-04-06 Thread Michael D. Berger
On Tue, 06 Apr 2010 14:37:27 -0500, Les Mikesell wrote: > On 4/6/2010 2:16 PM, Michael D. Berger wrote: >> On CentOS 5.4, >> Linux 2.6.18-164.6.1.el5 #1 SMP Tue Nov 3 16:18:27 EST 2009 >> i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux >> >> In man 2 send I find: >> >>The send() call may be used only when t

Re: [CentOS] ssh-agent

2010-04-06 Thread Les Mikesell
On 4/6/2010 2:34 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: >> On 4/6/2010 2:04 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > >>> And, for the bigger picture, why should it? If I'm logging off, there's >>> no reason for it to keep running. Any sessions that required it are >>> either established, or shut down. >> >> That's one

Re: [CentOS] socket: write vs send

2010-04-06 Thread Les Mikesell
On 4/6/2010 2:16 PM, Michael D. Berger wrote: > On CentOS 5.4, > Linux 2.6.18-164.6.1.el5 #1 SMP Tue Nov 3 16:18:27 EST 2009 > i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux > > In man 2 send I find: > >The send() call may be used only when the socket is in a connected >state (so that the intended recip

Re: [CentOS] ssh-agent

2010-04-06 Thread m . roth
> On 4/6/2010 2:04 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: >> And, for the bigger picture, why should it? If I'm logging off, there's >> no reason for it to keep running. Any sessions that required it are >> either established, or shut down. > > That's one of the things it can do. If you don't like it, use s

Re: [CentOS] ssh-agent

2010-04-06 Thread Les Mikesell
On 4/6/2010 2:04 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > > Sorry, you missed the subject of that sentence - I meant, why does it not > stop the one I explicitly started? Are you saying that ssh-agent, with no > commands, implicitly backgrounds itself? Yes, someone pointed out that the manual says exactly th

[CentOS] socket: write vs send

2010-04-06 Thread Michael D. Berger
On CentOS 5.4, Linux 2.6.18-164.6.1.el5 #1 SMP Tue Nov 3 16:18:27 EST 2009 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux In man 2 send I find: The send() call may be used only when the socket is in a connected state (so that the intended recipient is known). The only difference between send() and w

Re: [CentOS] ssh-agent

2010-04-06 Thread Gé Weijers
If you log in on CentOS (or Ubuntu or anything Linux and modern) using a graphical console >>DO NOT START ssh-agent<<. The standard startup scripts run one for you, and when you log out it dies. I assume that's what you want. The 'deamon' version is designed to run the following way in a .p

Re: [CentOS] Disc Cloning Question

2010-04-06 Thread Les Mikesell
On 4/6/2010 1:54 PM, Joseph L. Casale wrote: > I have a server with a stock install scheme with the exception that /boot and > / are on two md raid 1 mirrors over two discs. > > I need to remove those two large discs and replace them with smaller discs. > > Given the lvm over md, and big to small s

Re: [CentOS] ssh-agent

2010-04-06 Thread m . roth
> On 4/6/2010 1:13 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: >>> On 4/6/2010 12:22 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > On 4/6/2010 11:56 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: On 4/6/2010 10:46 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > Todd wrote: >> m.r...@5-cent.us wrote, On 04/06/2010 10:51 AM: >>> Wh

Re: [CentOS] wifi

2010-04-06 Thread Davy Leon
thanks I'll check that link. - Original Message - From: "Robert" To: "CentOS mailing list" Sent: Tuesday, April 06, 2010 1:40 PM Subject: Re: [CentOS] wifi > > > On 04/06/2010 01:56 PM, Davy Leon informed us: >> Hi folks >> I'm trying to use a Netgear WG111-2 USB-wifi adapter on a C

[CentOS] vsftpd writing files 2 times - once as root

2010-04-06 Thread Dirk H. Schulz
I have configured my vsftpd with virtual users all of which are mapped to a system user for file system permissions (let's call him 'ftpsystemuser'). That means, if someone uploads files they are writting using owner and group of the system user: > -rw-r--r-- 1 ftpsystemuser ftpsystemuser 19968

[CentOS] Disc Cloning Question

2010-04-06 Thread Joseph L. Casale
I have a server with a stock install scheme with the exception that /boot and / are on two md raid 1 mirrors over two discs. I need to remove those two large discs and replace them with smaller discs. Given the lvm over md, and big to small scenario, anyone know any automated app that can do this

Re: [CentOS] wifi

2010-04-06 Thread Timothy Kesten
Am Dienstag, 6. April 2010 20:56:42 schrieb Davy Leon: > Hi folks > > I'm trying to use a Netgear WG111-2 USB-wifi adapter on a Centos 5.3 Box. > Someone has done it? It seems not to be supported by the kernel. I've tried it some month ago with no success :-( On sidux (Kernel 2.6.32) it is supp

Re: [CentOS] wifi

2010-04-06 Thread Ned Slider
Davy Leon wrote: > Hi folks > > I'm trying to use a Netgear WG111-2 USB-wifi adapter on a Centos 5.3 Box. > Someone has done it? It seems not to be supported by the kernel. > > Thanks > > David > It should work. However, I'd strongly suggest updating from 5.3 as many improvements to the wir

Re: [CentOS] wifi

2010-04-06 Thread Robert
On 04/06/2010 01:56 PM, Davy Leon informed us: > Hi folks > I'm trying to use a Netgear WG111-2 USB-wifi adapter on a Centos 5.3 > Box. Someone has done it? It seems not to be supported by the kernel. > Thanks You might find something useful at http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=626499 _

Re: [CentOS] ssh-agent

2010-04-06 Thread Les Mikesell
On 4/6/2010 1:13 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: >> On 4/6/2010 12:22 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: On 4/6/2010 11:56 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: >>> On 4/6/2010 10:46 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: Todd wrote: > m.r...@5-cent.us wrote, On 04/06/2010 10:51 AM: >> What I was

Re: [CentOS] ssh-agent

2010-04-06 Thread m . roth
> On 4/6/2010 12:22 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: >>> On 4/6/2010 11:56 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: >> On 4/6/2010 10:46 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: >>> Todd wrote: m.r...@5-cent.us wrote, On 04/06/2010 10:51 AM: > What I was doing: log onto my machine (system run level 5, I

[CentOS] wifi

2010-04-06 Thread Davy Leon
Hi folks I'm trying to use a Netgear WG111-2 USB-wifi adapter on a Centos 5.3 Box. Someone has done it? It seems not to be supported by the kernel. Thanks David___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[CentOS] CentOS press kit

2010-04-06 Thread Geerd-Dietger Hoffmann
Hey Looking at the Fedora ML there is some commotion about a Press Kit [1] they are constructing. I am thinking about doing something like this for CentOS. Now comes my question, what do people think should belong in such a kit. Do you think this is needed? Cheers for your help, Didi [1] https:

Re: [CentOS] ssh-agent

2010-04-06 Thread Les Mikesell
On 4/6/2010 12:22 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: >> On 4/6/2010 11:56 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > On 4/6/2010 10:46 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: >> Todd wrote: >>> m.r...@5-cent.us wrote, On 04/06/2010 10:51 AM: What I was doing: log onto my machine (system run level 5, I log >>>

Re: [CentOS] ssh-agent

2010-04-06 Thread Todd Denniston
m.r...@5-cent.us wrote, On 04/06/2010 01:22 PM: >> On 4/6/2010 11:56 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > On 4/6/2010 10:46 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: >> Todd wrote: >>> m.r...@5-cent.us wrote, On 04/06/2010 10:51 AM: What I was doing: log onto my machine (system run level 5, I log >

Re: [CentOS] ssh-agent

2010-04-06 Thread m . roth
> On 4/6/2010 11:56 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: On 4/6/2010 10:46 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > Todd wrote: >> m.r...@5-cent.us wrote, On 04/06/2010 10:51 AM: >>> What I was doing: log onto my machine (system run level 5, I log >>> out, NOT just lock the screen, every single ni

Re: [CentOS] ssh-agent

2010-04-06 Thread Les Mikesell
On 4/6/2010 11:56 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: >>> On 4/6/2010 10:46 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: Todd wrote: > m.r...@5-cent.us wrote, On 04/06/2010 10:51 AM: >> What I was doing: log onto my machine (system run level 5, I log out, >> NOT just lock the screen, every single night; th

Re: [CentOS] ssh-agent

2010-04-06 Thread Bowie Bailey
m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > Oh, and the man page for ssh-agent reads, as the last line before "Files": > "The agent exits automatically when the command given on the command > line terminates." > Which means, to me, that when the xterm that I started it in is closed, it > should end, unless ther

Re: [CentOS] ssh-agent

2010-04-06 Thread m . roth
>> On 4/6/2010 10:46 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: >>> Todd wrote: m.r...@5-cent.us wrote, On 04/06/2010 10:51 AM: > What I was doing: log onto my machine (system run level 5, I log out, > NOT just lock the screen, every single night; therefore, there should > be no processes running

Re: [CentOS] ssh-agent

2010-04-06 Thread Todd Denniston
m.r...@5-cent.us wrote, On 04/06/2010 11:46 AM: > Todd wrote: >> m.r...@5-cent.us wrote, On 04/06/2010 10:51 AM: >>> What I was doing: log onto my machine (system run level 5, I log out, >>> NOT just lock the screen, every single night; therefore, there should be >>> no processes running owned by m

Re: [CentOS] ssh-agent

2010-04-06 Thread m . roth
> On 4/6/2010 10:46 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: >> Todd wrote: >>> m.r...@5-cent.us wrote, On 04/06/2010 10:51 AM: What I was doing: log onto my machine (system run level 5, I log out, NOT just lock the screen, every single night; therefore, there should be no processes running

Re: [CentOS] ssh-agent

2010-04-06 Thread Les Mikesell
On 4/6/2010 10:46 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > Todd wrote: >> m.r...@5-cent.us wrote, On 04/06/2010 10:51 AM: >>> What I was doing: log onto my machine (system run level 5, I log out, >>> NOT just lock the screen, every single night; therefore, there should be >>> no processes running owned by me)

Re: [CentOS] ssh-agent

2010-04-06 Thread m . roth
Todd wrote: > m.r...@5-cent.us wrote, On 04/06/2010 10:51 AM: >> What I was doing: log onto my machine (system run level 5, I log out, >> NOT just lock the screen, every single night; therefore, there should be >> no processes running owned by me), and in a terminal window, do >>ssh-agent >>

Re: [CentOS] ssh-agent

2010-04-06 Thread Ron Loftin
On Tue, 2010-04-06 at 10:51 -0400, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > Ron wrote: > > On Tue, 2010-04-06 at 09:57 -0400, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > >> Yesterday or Friday, don't remember, I happened to be looking at my > >> processes on my machine, and discovered I had a number of ssh-agents > >> running (al

Re: [CentOS] ssh-agent

2010-04-06 Thread JohnS
On Tue, 2010-04-06 at 08:15 -0700, Bart Schaefer wrote: > On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 7:51 AM, wrote: > > Now, I find that when I log out, ssh-agent IS NOT STOPPED, even though I > > am logged all the way out. When I log out, unless I background something, > > everything running as me should go away.

Re: [CentOS] ssh-agent

2010-04-06 Thread Bart Schaefer
On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 7:51 AM, wrote: > Now, I find that when I log out, ssh-agent IS NOT STOPPED, even though I > am logged all the way out. When I log out, unless I background something, > everything running as me should go away. Everything. ssh-agent is designed to run in the manner of a dae

Re: [CentOS] ssh-agent

2010-04-06 Thread Todd Denniston
m.r...@5-cent.us wrote, On 04/06/2010 10:51 AM: > What I was doing: log onto my machine (system run level 5, I log out, NOT > just lock the screen, every single night; therefore, there should be no > processes running owned by me), and in a terminal window, do >ssh-agent >ssh-add .ssh/priva

Re: [CentOS] Cron and Cluster

2010-04-06 Thread Karanbir Singh
On 04/06/2010 12:10 PM, Joseph L. Casale wrote: > I have an interim solution while I research, do you have any personal > reco's for job scheduling daemons? For what you have in mind, I'd have thought going with either supervisord or torque would be ideal. or as John pointed out, you could go do

Re: [CentOS] ssh-agent

2010-04-06 Thread m . roth
Ron wrote: > On Tue, 2010-04-06 at 09:57 -0400, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: >> Yesterday or Friday, don't remember, I happened to be looking at my >> processes on my machine, and discovered I had a number of ssh-agents >> running (all mine), from different days. I killed all but the current >> day's. >

Re: [CentOS] ssh-agent

2010-04-06 Thread Ron Loftin
On Tue, 2010-04-06 at 09:57 -0400, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > Yesterday or Friday, don't remember, I happened to be looking at my > processes on my machine, and discovered I had a number of ssh-agents > running (all mine), from different days. I killed all but the current > day's. > > Now, I log o

Re: [CentOS] Sending mail from CLI to another SMTP host

2010-04-06 Thread kalinix
On Mon, 2010-04-05 at 23:18 -0700, Agile Aspect wrote: > On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 9:04 PM, Fajar Priyanto wrote: > > Hi all, > > Is it possible to send mail from CLI (bash, python) without any LOCAL > > SMTP installed, using SMTP on another machine. > > Care to give a glimpse of the code? > > Than

[CentOS] ssh-agent

2010-04-06 Thread m . roth
Yesterday or Friday, don't remember, I happened to be looking at my processes on my machine, and discovered I had a number of ssh-agents running (all mine), from different days. I killed all but the current day's. Now, I log out every single night. I checked the next day, and sure enough, the one

Re: [CentOS] compiling FahMON for Centos? [SOLVED]

2010-04-06 Thread Dag Wieers
On Sun, 4 Apr 2010, Steve Huff wrote: > On Apr 3, 2010, at 9:50 PM, fred smith wrote: > >> I had some detritus from a failed installatin of wxgtk hanging around >> in /usr/local that confused heck out of fahmon's configure script. >> removed it, removed the fahmon sources and re-extracted the .tbz

Re: [CentOS] SELinux restorecon does not work

2010-04-06 Thread Jorge Fábregas
On Tuesday 06 April 2010 03:24:49 James Corteciano wrote: > Instead, you can generate a local policy module to allow this access Hello James, This doesn't seem like an incorrect labeling issue. Files under /etc, most of them, will have the etc_t as type. Apparently the current policy doesn't a

Re: [CentOS] Cron and Cluster

2010-04-06 Thread JohnS
On Tue, 2010-04-06 at 11:10 +, Joseph L. Casale wrote: > >I dont quite get clearly what it is that you are looking to achieve > >here, but rather than cron - have you considered a more adept job > >scheduling / orchestrating tool ? there are some very nicely done open > >source ones out the

Re: [CentOS] Cron and Cluster

2010-04-06 Thread Joseph L. Casale
>I dont quite get clearly what it is that you are looking to achieve >here, but rather than cron - have you considered a more adept job >scheduling / orchestrating tool ? there are some very nicely done open >source ones out there. I have a filesystem that mounts only on the active node of an n

Re: [CentOS] KVM web-based interface on CentOS

2010-04-06 Thread Karanbir Singh
On 04/06/2010 10:14 AM, Georghy wrote: >>> I'm configuring a KVM server and I wanna find a Web-based interface to >>> manage my Virtual Machine like on VMware server >>> someone knows one ? openqrm is perhaps one of the most underrated open source projects out there at the moment. It does all of

Re: [CentOS] Cron and Cluster

2010-04-06 Thread Karanbir Singh
On 03/30/2010 11:45 PM, Joseph L. Casale wrote: > I know the cron script can check for node status, but then I have multiple > copies to maintain wheres my existing resources all reference config on the > shard fs (httpd/sql etc) so a change on the active node makes that permanent > on the next nod

Re: [CentOS] KVM web-based interface on CentOS

2010-04-06 Thread Georghy
Athmane Madjoudj a écrit : > On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 10:02 AM, Georghy wrote: > >> Hi everyone, >> I'm configuring a KVM server and I wanna find a Web-based interface to >> manage my Virtual Machine like on VMware server >> someone knows one ? >> >> > > There is > > oVirt http://ovirt.org/

Re: [CentOS] KVM web-based interface on CentOS

2010-04-06 Thread Athmane Madjoudj
On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 10:08 AM, Athmane Madjoudj wrote: > On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 10:02 AM, Georghy wrote: >> Hi everyone, >> I'm configuring a KVM server and I wanna find a Web-based interface to >> manage my Virtual Machine like on VMware server >> someone knows one ? >> > > There is > > oVirt

Re: [CentOS] KVM web-based interface on CentOS

2010-04-06 Thread Athmane Madjoudj
On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 10:02 AM, Georghy wrote: > Hi everyone, > I'm configuring a KVM server and I wanna find a Web-based interface to > manage my Virtual Machine like on VMware server > someone knows one ? > There is oVirt http://ovirt.org/ (i don't thinks that works with CentOS) AND persona

[CentOS] KVM web-based interface on CentOS

2010-04-06 Thread Georghy
Hi everyone, I'm configuring a KVM server and I wanna find a Web-based interface to manage my Virtual Machine like on VMware server someone knows one ? -- Cordialement, / Greetings, Georghy FUSCO ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.

Re: [CentOS] bogus error message from yum update for gmime

2010-04-06 Thread Nicolas Thierry-Mieg
Les Mikesell wrote: > On 3/31/2010 7:18 AM, William Hooper wrote: >> On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 6:30 AM, ken wrote: >>> Available Packages >>> gmime.i386 2.2.25-1.el5 >>>epel >>> gmime-devel.i386 2.2.25-1.el5 >>>epel >> >> The newer versi

[CentOS] SELinux restorecon does not work

2010-04-06 Thread James Corteciano
Hi All, I have this following issue in SELinux. I did what instruction said but the security context has still never changed. Do I need to create local SELinux module? I hope anyone could help me out of this. Thank you. --- # sealert -b