Just updated the subject page
http://wiki.centos.org/FAQ/General/RebuildReleaseProcess
based on Karanbir's comment on centos-devel:
http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/2010-May/005545.html
Is there better material available to replace the erroneous content, or
should the page be
Hi,
On 05/21/2010 03:41 PM, Phil Schaffner wrote:
Just updated the subject page
http://wiki.centos.org/FAQ/General/RebuildReleaseProcess
There is nothing wrong with the process mentioned on that page - its
just not the one being used in CentOS anymore. So adapting the title and
the
On 05/21/2010 04:46 PM, Alan Bartlett wrote:
So, assuming you have overruled both Johnny and Russ, will you please
make the one being used in CentOS known to the rest of the world.
Think about it for a second, you don't feel that process's are changable
? Would you like to point me to where it
On Fri, 21 May 2010, Alan Bartlett wrote:
error. I was lead to believe, after the Lance Davis affair of last
summer, that there would be no more secrecy or any unilateral
decisions made by one person.
... you know, it is gratuitious cruft and attempts at
'triangulation' like this that really
Karanbir Singh wrote on 05/21/2010 12:54 PM:
Hi,
On 05/21/2010 05:30 PM, Phil Schaffner wrote:
OK, thanks - but begs the question - What is the current process?
I published this a while back :
http://www.karan.org/stuff/c5-release-plan.jpeg ; which if you look at -
reflects the same
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory CESA-2010:0427
postgresql security update for CentOS 3 i386:
https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2010-0427.html
The following updated file has been uploaded and is currently syncing to
the mirrors:
i386:
updates/i386/RPMS/rh-postgresql-7.3.21-3.i386.rpm
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory CESA-2010:0423
krb5 security update for CentOS 3 x86_64:
https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2010-0423.html
The following updated file has been uploaded and is currently syncing to
the mirrors:
x86_64:
updates/x86_64/RPMS/krb5-devel-1.2.7-72.x86_64.rpm
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory CESA-2010:0428
postgresql security update for CentOS 4 i386:
https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2010-0428.html
The following updated file has been uploaded and is currently syncing to
the mirrors:
i386:
updates/i386/RPMS/postgresql-7.4.29-1.el4_8.1.i386.rpm
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory CESA-2010:0428
postgresql security update for CentOS 4 x86_64:
https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2010-0428.html
The following updated file has been uploaded and is currently syncing to
the mirrors:
x86_64:
Había un editor de PHP (pero que servía para todo), que hacía eso
exactamente. No recuerdo ahora el nombre. Voy ver si lo encuentro y lo
pongo.
Saludos.
El 21 de mayo de 2010 04:09, killerfs kille...@star.com.pe escribió:
hola listeros,
no se si alguno ha tenido experiencia con algun soft
El 21/05/10 4:09, killerfs escribió:
hola listeros,
no se si alguno ha tenido experiencia con algun soft (editor de texto)
que pueda conectarse via ftp a un servidor y poder editarlo y al momento
de guardarlo que lo suba automaticamente, alguna vez vi esa utilidad en
el dreamweaver, se podia
Sres,
Hemos ejecutado el comando fsck y a borrado una serie de archivos de mysql, al
parecer estos archivos se encuentran en el directorio /lost+found ya que al
ejecutar file * muestra lo siguiente:
#114466: ASCII text
#114470: MySQL table definition file Version 9
#114471: MySQL MISAM
From: Whit Blauvelt w...@transpect.com
service smb restart - does NOT get smbd running (although
shows OK)
sh /etc/init.d/smb restart - DOES get smbd running
/etc/init.d/smb restart - does NOT get smbd running (although shows
OK)
bash /etc/init.d/smb restart - DOES get smbd running
What's
On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 9:30 PM, Whit Blauvelt w...@transpect.com wrote:
On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 06:17:10PM -0700, Benjamin Franz wrote:
Have you looked in /var/log/messages for errors from smbd? I don't
remember seeing that anywhere in your T/S list.
Yup. I've grepped all the logs. Nothing
On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 07:02:06PM -0400, Thomas Dukes wrote:
I am trying to add 127.0.0.1 to my resolv.conf. I added it through the
system-config-network but if I reboot, its gone. I do not have the caching
nameserver package installed. My ISP's nameservers are there. It must have
something
Hi all,
I changed a bad disk (automaticly disabled from software raid1 and system
for I/O error) in one of our servers and now have problem with adding new
one to system without reboot. Does anybody have an experience with this? Or
is it possible? :) We're using hotswap AXX6DRV3G for 6 SATA disks
Keith Keller wrote, On 05/21/2010 12:13 AM:
On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 07:02:06PM -0400, Thomas Dukes wrote:
I am trying to add 127.0.0.1 to my resolv.conf. I added it through the
system-config-network but if I reboot, its gone. I do not have the caching
nameserver package installed. My ISP's
On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 07:02:06PM -0400, Thomas Dukes wrote:
I am trying to add 127.0.0.1 to my resolv.conf. I added it through the
system-config-network but if I reboot, its gone. I do not have the
caching nameserver package installed. My ISP's nameservers are there. It
must have something
Jakub wrote:
I changed a bad disk (automaticly disabled from software raid1 and system
for I/O error) in one of our servers and now have problem with adding new
one to system without reboot. Does anybody have an experience with this?
Or is it possible? :) We're using hotswap AXX6DRV3G for 6
On May 20, 2010, at 9:21 AM, Whit Blauvelt w...@transpect.com wrote:
Hi,
We've got a fresh CentOS 5.4 box, and the only glitch so far is that
/etc/init.d/smb doesn't start smbd. It claims it does - shows [ok]
- but
only nmbd ends up running. Even setting a higher debugging level in
the
At Fri, 21 May 2010 15:38:44 +0200 CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org
wrote:
Hi all,
I changed a bad disk (automaticly disabled from software raid1 and system
for I/O error) in one of our servers and now have problem with adding new
one to system without reboot. Does anybody have
On 5/21/2010 8:38 AM, Jakub Jedelský wrote:
Hi all,
I changed a bad disk (automaticly disabled from software raid1 and
system for I/O error) in one of our servers and now have problem with
adding new one to system without reboot. Does anybody have an experience
with this? Or is it possible?
m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Ok, there's been discussion, including, I think, on the wiki web page,
that syslinux is not correct. At any rate, after enough experimentation, I
have a working install on a USB key. The procedure is:
Using fdisk, partition your key: one partition, VFAT (type b, and
On 5/20/2010 6:43 PM, Hans-Ulrich Flueck wrote:
Hello TIA
If you do not have a local/LAN DNS server neither a caching DNS
configuration on your machine, I can't see a reason to add localhost to the
list of your DNS servers...
The usual reason is that you want caching and you may have added a
On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 10:04:36AM -0400, Ross Walker wrote:
By any chance did someone add smbd to xinetd?
If so then xinetd has the port open and the smbd process will not bind.
Nope. Not sure that would explain why a slight difference in how it's
invoked, through the same init.d script,
On 5/13/2010 1:42 PM, Eero Volotinen wrote:
2010/5/13 Les Mikeselllesmikes...@gmail.com:
Has anything changed in updates that would affect md raid1 resync speed?
I regularly swap a 750G drive and resync to keep an offsite copy and
haven't paid enough attention to known when things changed
On 05/21/2010 09:41 AM m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 07:02:06PM -0400, Thomas Dukes wrote:
I am trying to add 127.0.0.1 to my resolv.conf. I added it through the
system-config-network but if I reboot, its gone. I do not have the
caching nameserver package installed. My ISP's
Not sure what you're supposed to echo, there. I learned,
where I'm working now, to use scsi-rescan-bus, which seems to work.
Using CentOS 5.5, x86_64.
Thanks for your ideas and replies ... and excuse my english
please :)
There's nothing to excuse - it's better than some folks who
m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Ok, there's been discussion, including, I think, on the wiki web page,
that syslinux is not correct. At any rate, after enough experimentation,
I have a working install on a USB key. The procedure is:
Using fdisk, partition your key: one partition, VFAT (type b, and
m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Ok, there's been discussion, including, I think, on the wiki web page,
that syslinux is not correct. At any rate, after enough experimentation,
I have a working install on a USB key. The procedure is:
Using fdisk, partition your key: one
On 5/21/2010 9:44 AM, Whit Blauvelt wrote:
On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 10:04:36AM -0400, Ross Walker wrote:
By any chance did someone add smbd to xinetd?
If so then xinetd has the port open and the smbd process will not bind.
Nope. Not sure that would explain why a slight difference in how it's
Boweie wrote:
m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Bowie wrote:
m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Ok, there's been discussion, including, I think, on the wiki web page,
that syslinux is not correct. At any rate, after enough
experimentation,
I have a working install on a USB key. The procedure is:
Using fdisk,
m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Boweie wrote:
m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Bowie wrote:
m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Ok, there's been discussion, including, I think, on the wiki web page,
that syslinux is not correct. At any rate, after enough
experimentation,
I have a working
On May 21, 2010, at 10:44 AM, Whit Blauvelt w...@transpect.com wrote:
On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 10:04:36AM -0400, Ross Walker wrote:
By any chance did someone add smbd to xinetd?
If so then xinetd has the port open and the smbd process will not
bind.
Nope. Not sure that would explain why
On May 21, 2010, at 11:24 AM, Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 5/21/2010 9:44 AM, Whit Blauvelt wrote:
On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 10:04:36AM -0400, Ross Walker wrote:
By any chance did someone add smbd to xinetd?
If so then xinetd has the port open and the smbd process will not
On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 10:24:00AM -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
The only difference here 'should' be that explicitly running 'sh' will
invoke your own shell aliases and search PATH to execute sh, where if
you omit it you'll get the #!/bin/sh interpreter specified in the script
itself. Is
On 5/21/2010 10:56 AM, Whit Blauvelt wrote:
On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 10:24:00AM -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
The only difference here 'should' be that explicitly running 'sh' will
invoke your own shell aliases and search PATH to execute sh, where if
you omit it you'll get the #!/bin/sh
I've got two pendrives.
I want to install a Debian on them. RAID1.
Ok...
...
After I installed it in RAID1, it works perfectly, ok! :)
When I pull out one of the pendrive [good pendrive], it still boots up,
hurrah :)
But: ...
When I pull out the other pendrive [i plug in the first one i
Jozsi Vadkan wrote on 05/21/2010 12:29 PM:
I've got two pendrives.
I want to install a Debian on them. RAID1.
This is the CentOS list.
...
I already tried:
grub-install /dev/sdc -that's the pendrive name [bios - hard drive
emulation=hard drive, not auto]
or:
# grub
find
Bowie wrote:
m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Bowie wrote:
m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Bowie wrote:
m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Ok, there's been discussion, including, I think, on the wiki web
page, that syslinux is not correct. At any rate, after enough
experimentation, I have a working install on a USB
On 5/21/2010 10:56 AM, Whit Blauvelt wrote:
On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 10:24:00AM -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
The only difference here 'should' be that explicitly running 'sh' will
invoke your own shell aliases and search PATH to execute sh, where if
you omit it you'll get the #!/bin/sh
On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 11:54:26AM -0400, Ross Walker wrote:
# sh -x script start
The problem with debugging it like that is that when started with sh,
there's no bug.
Whit
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 12:52:51PM -0400, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
A suggestion: in the script, add
env /tmp/smb.env
or whatever you want to call it. Then you can compare and contrast with
your environment.
Good idea. I'll try it when the system's back up. Someone's hunting up a
m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Bowie wrote:
m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Bowie wrote:
That doesn't work for me.
# livecd-iso-to-disk /home/bowieb/CentOS-5.5-i386-bin-DVD.iso
/dev/sda1
Verifying image...
/home/bowieb/CentOS-5.5-i386-bin-DVD.iso:
Les Mikesell wrote:
OK, I can get a full-size Seagate 750G to resync at about 40M/s which
easily completes in a workday. But now what I really want to do is use
a laptop size 'WD Scorpio blue' drive which claims to have the same
sector count but will only sync at about a tenth of the
On Fri, 2010-05-21 at 13:00 -0400, Whit Blauvelt wrote:
On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 11:54:26AM -0400, Ross Walker wrote:
# sh -x script start
The problem with debugging it like that is that when started with sh,
there's no bug.
how about adding a set -x as the first line after the
On 5/21/2010 12:13 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
Les Mikesell wrote:
OK, I can get a full-size Seagate 750G to resync at about 40M/s which
easily completes in a workday. But now what I really want to do is use
a laptop size 'WD Scorpio blue' drive which claims to have the same
sector count but
Bowie wrote:
m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Bowie wrote:
m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Bowie wrote:
That doesn't work for me.
snip
Maybe I'm using the wrong script. I have livecd-iso-to-disk from the
livecd-tools-014-8 package. Is liveCD-iso-to-disk a different script?
Odd. I don't understand
Hi;
I have an email form that worked fine until now. For some reason, if I send
an email to an email address at a domain that I control, I can receive the
email TTW no problem. However, if I try and push it to, for example, this
gmail account, I never get it. It's not even in the spam filter. What
Susan Day sent a missive on 2010-05-21:
Hi;
I have an email form that worked fine until now. For some reason, if I
send an email to an email address at a domain that I control, I can
receive the email TTW no problem. However, if I try and push it to,
for example, this gmail account, I
Susan,
Susan wrote:
I have an email form that worked fine until now. For some reason, if I
send
an email to an email address at a domain that I control, I can receive the
email TTW no problem. However, if I try and push it to, for example, this
gmail account, I never get it. It's not even
Do you know that it's going out with valid headers, a legal helo address,
and the like? Many mail systems will use these as reasons to reject
connections when they're wrong. In the case of bad helo values, often it
won't get as far as the spam filter, since that's sent through before the
message.
On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 11:13 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
I have an email form that worked fine until now. For some reason, if I
send
an email to an email address at a domain that I control, I can receive the
email TTW no problem. However, if I try and push it to, for example, this
gmail
You might want to run your MTA's ip address through a blacklist checker.
Also, do you use srv records? Has anything here changed?
I've found that when it comes to email, its quite plausible for your system to
break because of an external party, for example, do you use the relay of your
ISP?
Do you know that it's going out with valid headers, a legal helo
address,
and the like? Many mail systems will use these as reasons to reject
connections when they're wrong. In the case of bad helo values, often it
won't get as far as the spam filter, since that's sent through before the
On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 03:39:53AM -0700, John Doe wrote:
What's the return value?
service smb start
echo $?
# service smb start
Starting SMB services: [ OK ]
Starting NMB services:
# echo $?
0
# ps aux | grep mbd
root 2520 0.0 0.0 107732
On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 08:52:31PM -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
What shell does the script specify at the top and what is found following
$PATH?
Here's from the console:
# echo $PATH
On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 07:49:16AM -0400, Kwan Lowe wrote:
My gut tells me it's not hardware but willing to take it :)
Have you tried adding a set -x to the top of the the smb startup
scripts? I didn't see any such output in your replies so far.
Here you go:
# ./smb start
+ '[' -f
Replies to all replies:
Richard asks:
is the domain you control on the same machine as the form
submission site?
Yes.
was this machine recently upgraded to 5.5?
[the 5.5 upgrade included sendmail and as a
result could have had an impact on your sendmail.cf
(depending on what your
On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 02:36:30PM -0400, Whit Blauvelt wrote:
Here's the path seen within the init.d/smb script (from an inserted echo
$PATH file):
/sbin:/usr/sbin:/bin:/usr/bin
And if I set that path in a console session, smbd still works when called
directly:
# export
Susan Day sent a missive on 2010-05-21:
Here are what the logs have to say:
@40004bf6cfc4383bc65c delivery 6217: deferral:
CNAME_lookup_failed_temporarily._(#4.4.3)/ @40004bf6cfc4383c5eb4
status: local 0/10 remote 0/255 @40004bf6d51e34d61d8c starting
delivery 6218: msg
Simon Billis sent a missive on 2010-05-21:
Just to correct something I wrote:
Susan Day sent a missive on 2010-05-21:
Here are what the logs have to say:
@40004bf6cfc4383bc65c delivery 6217: deferral:
CNAME_lookup_failed_temporarily._(#4.4.3)/ @40004bf6cfc4383c5eb4
status:
On May 21, 2010, at 2:47 PM, Whit Blauvelt w...@transpect.com wrote:
+ /bin/bash -c 'ulimit -S -c 0 /dev/null 21 ; smbd -D'
What happens when you manually try to execute the above commands?
-Ross
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 03:12:02PM -0400, Ross Walker wrote:
What happens when you manually try to execute the above commands?
# /bin/bash -c 'ulimit -S -c 0 /dev/null 21 ; smbd -D'
Not sure what that might in theory do, but it works:
# ps aux | grep mbd | grep -v grep
root 7870 0.0
On Wed, 19 May 2010, j.witvl...@mindef.nl wrote:
Hi Jerry,
Just a general remark.
When deploying a firewall, it is advisable to have (atleast for input, better
for all) to have the general policy set to drop, and only allow in what you
expect to be coming in. If you put a -j log line as a
I found, something like that
echo 0 0 0 /sys/class/scsi_host/hostn/scan
but it found only sda disk which is already running..
Just for your light reading on this matter:
http://www.linuxjournal.com/article/7321
Good article outlining that usage...
___
On Fri, 2010-05-21 at 15:01 -0400, Whit Blauvelt wrote:
On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 02:36:30PM -0400, Whit Blauvelt wrote:
Here's the path seen within the init.d/smb script (from an inserted echo
$PATH file):
/sbin:/usr/sbin:/bin:/usr/bin
And if I set that path in a console session,
On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 5:25 AM, Robert Heller hel...@deepsoft.com wrote:
Do you have logs / Google Analytics reports that show that visitors are
actually landing on https://www.domainname.com (other than your
testing)? If not, you can show this to management.
Thanks to everyone else for the
On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 7:45 PM, Barry Brimer li...@brimer.org wrote:
As for the redirection, I would handle it with mod_rewrite as follows:
VirtualHost XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX:443
ServerName domain.tld
RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} !^www\.domain\.tld$ [NC]
RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} !^$
RewriteRule
Les Mikesell wrote:
But it is just a match for the Seagate drives with the default layout
using one partition that fills the disk. If I have to skip some amount
at the start of the partition I think that will make the partition size
not match, making it impossible to add as a raid member.
On 5/21/2010 4:19 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
Les Mikesell wrote:
But it is just a match for the Seagate drives with the default layout
using one partition that fills the disk. If I have to skip some amount
at the start of the partition I think that will make the partition size
not match,
On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 10:29 PM, Jason Pyeron jpye...@pdinc.us wrote:
From: Tom H
Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2010 22:22
# rpm -V samba
S.5T c /etc/rc.d/init.d/smb
S.5T c /etc/samba/smbusers
...T c /etc/sysconfig/samba
I'm not sure but I really think you have the wrong
On 05/21/2010 02:32 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
[..]
Disk /dev/sdh: 750.1 GB, 750156374016 bytes
255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 91201 cylinders
Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes
Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System
/dev/sdh1 1 91201 732572001 fd
On May 21, 2010, at 3:48 PM, Whit Blauvelt w...@transpect.com wrote:
On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 03:12:02PM -0400, Ross Walker wrote:
What happens when you manually try to execute the above commands?
# /bin/bash -c 'ulimit -S -c 0 /dev/null 21 ; smbd -D'
Not sure what that might in theory do,
On 5/21/2010 4:37 PM, Ross Walker wrote:
On May 21, 2010, at 3:48 PM, Whit Blauveltw...@transpect.com wrote:
On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 03:12:02PM -0400, Ross Walker wrote:
What happens when you manually try to execute the above commands?
# /bin/bash -c 'ulimit -S -c 0/dev/null 21 ; smbd -D'
On 5/21/2010 4:37 PM, Benjamin Franz wrote:
On 05/21/2010 02:32 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
[..]
Disk /dev/sdh: 750.1 GB, 750156374016 bytes
255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 91201 cylinders
Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes
Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System
On 21 May 2010 22:04, Ski Dawg cen...@skidawg.org wrote:
On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 7:45 PM, Barry Brimer li...@brimer.org wrote:
As for the redirection, I would handle it with mod_rewrite as follows:
VirtualHost XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX:443
ServerName domain.tld
RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST}
Les Mikesell wrote:
These is a backuppc archive with millions of hardlinks that will take
forever to copy if I have to do a file-oriented copy onto a different
partition size.
have you tried a dump | restore style Ext{3|2}FS replica? that works
by inode and does it pretty efficiently.
On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 09:39:29AM -0400, Todd Denniston wrote:
Unfortunately trying to use dhclient.conf only leads to frustration.
RH/Fedora chose in /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifup-eth to make the dhcp
client only read
/etc/dhclient-eth#.conf and ifup-eth overwrites that file each
On 21 May 2010 22:04, Ski Dawg cen...@skidawg.org wrote:
On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 7:45 PM, Barry Brimer li...@brimer.org wrote:
As for the redirection, I would handle it with mod_rewrite as follows:
VirtualHost XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX:443
ServerName domain.tld
RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST}
On 5/21/2010 5:46 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
Les Mikesell wrote:
These is a backuppc archive with millions of hardlinks that will take
forever to copy if I have to do a file-oriented copy onto a different
partition size.
have you tried a dump | restore style Ext{3|2}FS replica? that works
On 05/21/2010 04:32 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
On 5/21/2010 4:19 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
Les Mikesell wrote:
But it is just a match for the Seagate drives with the default layout
using one partition that fills the disk. If I have to skip some amount
at the start of the partition I think that
On 05/21/2010 07:39 PM, Robert Nichols wrote:
You have another way out. By my calculation, that drive is partitioned
in DOS compatibility mode, which leaves the remainder of the MBR track
unused. Running fdisk in expert mode (x command), you can move the
partition's beginning of data (b
hello
to postfix when a new update in the deposits
postfix in the deposits is outdated
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On 10-05-21 11:53 PM, fakessh wrote:
hello
to postfix when a new update in the deposits
postfix in the deposits is outdated
Can I assume this is a request to update the version of Postfix in
CentOS? If so, then it's not likely to happen. The reasons are:
a) CentOS is a binary-compatible
85 matches
Mail list logo
