Buenas:
Tengo qu sacar todas las reglas del Firewall builder y pasarlas a papel.
Como bien sabéis fwbuilder es un poco bastante ladrillo para sacar información,
por lo que si sabeis como importar las reglas a iptables, de las cuáles lo
sacaría todo mas rápido y sencillo os lo agradecería.
Ya
Hola a t...@s,
Tenemos un servidor en Cpanel nos viene devuelto todos los email enviados al
dominio @telefonica.net y dominios que estén alojados en Telefónica.
Hemos hablando con telefónica al 1004 y enviando email al departamento de
nemesys pero no tenemos respuesta, ya llevamos 1 semana
Hola a t...@s,
Tenemos un servidor en Cpanel nos viene devuelto todos los email enviados
al
dominio @telefonica.net y dominios que estén alojados en Telefónica.
Hemos hablando con telefónica al 1004 y enviando email al departamento de
nemesys pero no tenemos respuesta, ya llevamos 1
Buenas:
A un cliente le paso algo parecido, cuando enviaba mails a una empresa
específica no le llegaban.
El por que:
Normalmente los correos disponen de listas negras con las que comprueban si la
ip del correo de origen está en esas listas negras, si está devuelven el mail o
simplemente lo
si tu servidor de correo, usa una ip fija de telefónica el problema está en
la resolución inversa del dominio.
A mi me pasó que tenía un servidor de correo con una ip fija de telefonica.
Al hacer que respondiera a correo.midominio.com resulta que me devolvía la
propia telefónica los correos que
Gracias Maykel, tengo un servidor con IP fija.
Tengo una respuesta de telefónica:
Buenos días:
Centro Némesys, la unidad de Telefónica que recibe y gestiona
reclamaciones sobre abusos en Internet, le informa de que los problemas que
está teniendo son debidos a que la plataforma antiSpam de
Buen día Juan,
Se me ocurre que el archivo */etc/pam.d/login* esta corrupto, sugiero que si
te es posible verifiques ese archivo, es posible que alguna entrada
adicional al mismo este ocasionando el bloqueo.
Saludos.
Carlos R!
El 28 de junio de 2010 18:35, All DigitAll alldigit...@gmail.com
Buen día, hace falta que nos des mas detalles al respecto para poder
ayudarte, describe un poco el hardware.
Saludos.
Carlos R!
El 29 de junio de 2010 03:03, victor santana
reparaciononl...@gmail.comescribió:
Hola a t...@s, tengo un Servidor centos 5.5, lo tengo como: servidor samba
con
Tengo conexión por BT (British Telecom) dedicada, no entiendo exactamente el
motivo, aparte tenemos las medidas de seguridad más actuales.
Gracias por vuestras respuestas.
-Mensaje original-
De: centos-es-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-es-boun...@centos.org] En
nombre de Sergio
Gracias Maykel, tengo un servidor con IP fija.
Tengo una respuesta de telefónica:
Buenos días:
Centro Némesys, la unidad de Telefónica que recibe y gestiona
reclamaciones sobre abusos en Internet, le informa de que los problemas
que
está teniendo son debidos a que la plataforma
Hola,
2010/6/29 Hector Martínez Romo pela...@gmail.com:
Estimados
Cual es vuestra recomendación respecto de que servidor de corro implementar
para una oficina de 50 usuarios?
___
CentOS-es mailing list
CentOS-es@centos.org
solo correo
El 29 de junio de 2010 10:23, Oscar Osta Pueyo
oostap.lis...@gmail.comescribió:
Hola,
2010/6/29 Hector Martínez Romo pela...@gmail.com:
Estimados
Cual es vuestra recomendación respecto de que servidor de corro
implementar
para una oficina de 50 usuarios?
Hola,
2010/6/29 Hector Martínez Romo pela...@gmail.com:
solo correo
El 29 de junio de 2010 10:23, Oscar Osta Pueyo oostap.lis...@gmail.com
escribió:
Hola,
2010/6/29 Hector Martínez Romo pela...@gmail.com:
Estimados
Cual es vuestra recomendación respecto de que servidor de corro
Gracias Maykel por la info, lo miraré.
Me acaban de llamar de telefonica un técnico de nivel más avanzado, me ha
confirmado que tenemos la IP en la lista negra pero no ha podido explicarme
las causas por ahora
. ya os contaré.
Un dato importante que me ha confirmado el técnico de telefonica
Pretendo instalar un servidor de directorio, mas tengo algunas dudas que
agradecería infinitamente me apoyaran a resolver...
¿por qué me debiera inclinar más: openldap o centos directory server?
Esto sería bajo centos 5.5.
La idea es centralizar la autenticación para samba, squid, egroupware y
Hola soy nuevo en esto pero tengo muchas ganas de colaborar
___
CentOS-es mailing list
CentOS-es@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
Una forma de colaborar es usar centos 5.5 y nos cuentas como te fue...
Edgar Rodolfo:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Edgarr789
http://cybernautape.wordpress.com
El 29 de junio de 2010 14:34, Gustavo Llusco gustavoa...@yahoo.esescribió:
Hola soy nuevo en esto pero tengo muchas ganas de
On Tuesday, June 29, 2010 01:23 PM, Emmanuel Noobadmin wrote:
On 6/29/10, Christopher Chanchristopher.c...@bradbury.edu.hk wrote:
The only problem is their HA is commercial only and costs more than
the entire hardware budget I've got for this. Crucially, it relies on
a failover/heartbeat kind
On 06/28/10 7:53 PM, Emmanuel Noobadmin wrote:
The only problem is their HA is commercial only and costs more than
the entire hardware budget I've got for this. Crucially, it relies on
a failover/heartbeat kind of arrangement. According to some sources,
the failover delay of a few seconds will
On 6/29/10, Christopher Chan christopher.c...@bradbury.edu.hk wrote:
raid1/iscsi if you have a single host accessing the data or gluster if
you have more than one host accessing the data...
This is starting to look really complicated with NCP Storage units on
zfs - iscsi to gluster unit ext3
On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 8:55 PM, Eric B. ebe...@hotmail.com wrote:
I've got CentOS 5.3 installed as a Xen client installed. I've recently been
trying to install TrueCrypt on the VM, but am having miserable troubles with
the Fuse kernel module.
To date, I've installed the following packages:
On Monday 28 June 2010 12:58:36 Janez Kosmrlj wrote:
Hi,
we have some old dell optiplex 745 machines which have the Intel 965q
chipset. The problem is, that they freeze as soon as the system tries to
start the X system. It happens even before any log is written. This happens
almost every time
Hi,guys:
I am trying to setup OpenLDAP on CentOS 5.3 i386 for a client of mine.
everytime I try running 'service ldap start',
I get the following in syslog:
r...@xx ~: tailf /var/log/messages
.slaptest: sql_select option missing
slaptest: auxpropfunc error no mechanism available
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf Of Janez Kosmrlj
Sent: maandag 28 juni 2010 13:59
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: [CentOS] centos 5.5 on optiplex 745
Hi,
we have some old dell optiplex 745 machines which have the Intel 965q
chipset. The problem is,
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 10:44 AM, Dicker, Edwin edic...@illumina.comwrote:
This is an issue with the graphics, it gets initialized in the wrong way
( driver ) The installer does not recognize the correct video chip
during install.
If you boot the system in runlevel 3 and then change the
Hi,all:
I'm working on populating an OpenLDAP server (Dapper) for pam
authentication. I'm having trouble import LDIFs for my groups. The
following is and example:
(this imports on CentOS 5.3 i386, openldap version is 2.3.43-3.el5 )
# org.X.admins
dn: cn=admins,dc=X,dc=org
changetype: add
Emmanuel Noobadmin wrote:
On 6/29/10, Christopher Chan christopher.c...@bradbury.edu.hk wrote:
raid1/iscsi if you have a single host accessing the data or gluster if
you have more than one host accessing the data...
This is starting to look really complicated with NCP Storage units on
zfs -
Dear All,
Previously we have used
CentOS4.4 release with Supported Cluster Suite and DRBD 8.0.0
Active/passive (failover)
We have build the DRBD 8.0.0 Source in CentOS4.4 Setup
We have configured the DRBD Resource with default OS installed LVM
(/dev/mapper/vgroot-LogVol00 and
On 6/29/10, Chan Chung Hang Christopher
christopher.c...@bradbury.edu.hk wrote:
gluster don't care about underlying filesystem...it don't support acl
yet for a reason
Could you elaborate on that? Although at the moment I don't appear to
have a need for ACL on the storage, it is always good to
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 07:11:00PM +0800, sync wrote:
dn: cn=admins,dc=X,dc=org
changetype: add
objectClass: groupOfNames
objectClass: top
objectClass: posixGroup
cn: admins
gidNumber: 1001
member: cn=admin,dc=X,dc=org
Shouldn't these members be membeUid and just be the local unix
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
I tried both things. The bios update and the i810 driver and nothing
worked.
After the bios update the vesa driver seems a bit more stable, but still
not 100%.
And with the i810 driver it doesnt work at
sync wrote:
I am trying to setup OpenLDAP on CentOS 5.3 i386 for a client of mine.
everytime I try running 'service ldap start',
I get the following in syslog:
r...@xx ~: tailf /var/log/messages
.slaptest: sql_select option missing
slaptest: auxpropfunc error no mechanism available
Emmanuel Noobadmin wrote:
On 6/29/10, Chan Chung Hang Christopher
christopher.c...@bradbury.edu.hk wrote:
gluster don't care about underlying filesystem...it don't support acl
yet for a reason
Could you elaborate on that? Although at the moment I don't appear to
have a need for ACL on the
On 6/29/10, Chan Chung Hang Christopher
christopher.c...@bradbury.edu.hk wrote:
Define cheap. Like these...er...hmm...creative chums here?
http://blog.backblaze.com/2009/09/01/petabytes-on-a-budget-how-to-build-cheap-cloud-storage/
Or how about 7850USD for a 4U, 36 bay ( loaded with 12 x 1TB
This is a web hosting mailserver, so there are multiple domains being
passed through this email system.
I decided this new system would be Postfix and followed the Centos Wiki
to aid in the installation and setup.
It seems that Amavisd is throwing this error from time to time.
-
Subject:
On Sun, 27 Jun 2010, Athmane Madjoudj wrote:
Refer to https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=552127
You can update spamassassin rules by running as root:
sa-update
I have a simple cron script stuck in /etc/cron.daily that's useful for
getting notice of spamassassin rules updates:
Greetings,
On 6/29/10, Kenneth Gonsalves law...@thenilgiris.com wrote:
On Monday 28 June 2010 21:32:21 Murali M wrote:
The billion dollar question among the computer users in India now!
* Has NRC-FOSS done its job in promoting FOSS in India since 2005 ???
* If not, do we need such
On Tue, 29 Jun 2010, didi wrote:
A nice little insight into CentOS :
http://distrowatch.com/weekly.php?issue=20100628#feature
Nice! Thanks for the link.
(And thanks to KB for his ongoing, Herculean CentOS efforts...)
--
Paul Heinlein heinl...@madboa.com http://www.madboa.com/
+1...from mePLUS the many others for their ongoing, Herculean CentOS
efforts..
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 11:32 AM, Paul Heinlein heinl...@madboa.com wrote:
On Tue, 29 Jun 2010, didi wrote:
A nice little insight into CentOS :
http://distrowatch.com/weekly.php?issue=20100628#feature
On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 3:16 PM, Robert Heller hel...@deepsoft.com wrote:
At Mon, 28 Jun 2010 14:15:20 -1000 CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org
wrote:
So, am I stuck? It seems like my only option is to go ahead and add both
disks, then try to remove one of the disks after completing the
Dave wrote:
On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 3:16 PM, Robert Heller hel...@deepsoft.com
wrote:
At Mon, 28 Jun 2010 14:15:20 -1000 CentOS mailing list
centos@centos.org wrote:
So, am I stuck? It seems like my only option is to go ahead and add
both disks, then try to remove one of the disks after
On Tue, 29 Jun 2010, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
*shrug*
Custom partition, which is what I *always* do, both at work and at home,
since, unlike WinBlow$, I *NEVER* want everything on the same
partition
I've been bitten a few times with the partitioner programs.
My strategy now is to
What's the correct response to a security scan that points out that
apache versions below 2.2.14 have multiple known vulnerabilities? Is
there an official document about what known vulnerabilities have been
fixed in the RHEL/CentOS updates or do you have to wade through the
changelog to try
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 5:11 PM, Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com wrote:
What's the correct response to a security scan that points out that
apache versions below 2.2.14 have multiple known vulnerabilities? Is
there an official document about what known vulnerabilities have been
fixed in
On 6/29/2010 5:11 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
What's the correct response to a security scan that points out that
apache versions below 2.2.14 have multiple known vulnerabilities? Is
there an official document about what known vulnerabilities have been
fixed in the RHEL/CentOS updates or do you
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 5:11 PM, Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com wrote:
What's the correct response to a security scan that points out that
apache versions below 2.2.14 have multiple known vulnerabilities? Is
there an official document about what known vulnerabilities have been
fixed in
I think there was just a thread 'bout this, and I didn't pay attention...
and then I walked into our smallest server room to rebuild a server with
CentOS... and that's what it is. The problem I'm having is this: there are
two 1T SAS drives, raided, via the controller. There's also a 750G SATA
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010, Brian Mathis wrote:
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 5:11 PM, Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com wrote:
What's the correct response to a security scan that points out that
apache versions below 2.2.14 have multiple known vulnerabilities? Is
there an official document about what
# lvm pvs
/dev/hda: open failed: No medium found
Couldn't find device with uuid r5HNPO-l18V-XfJ7-9RXY-AaWC-a4YY-3oL5h7.
PV VG Fmt Attr PSize PFree
/dev/sda2 VolGroup01 lvm2 a- 232.72G 0
/dev/sdb1 VolGroup00 lvm2 a- 232.81G 32.00M
unknown device
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 2:36 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
I think there was just a thread 'bout this, and I didn't pay attention...
and then I walked into our smallest server room to rebuild a server with
CentOS... and that's what it is. The problem I'm having is this: there are
two 1T SAS
On 06/29/2010 02:39 PM, Dave wrote:
# lvm pvs
/dev/hda: open failed: No medium found
Couldn't find device with uuid r5HNPO-l18V-XfJ7-9RXY-AaWC-a4YY-3oL5h7.
PV VG Fmt Attr PSize PFree
/dev/sda2 VolGroup01 lvm2 a- 232.72G 0
/dev/sdb1
On 6/29/2010 4:37 PM, Bill Campbell wrote:
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010, Brian Mathis wrote:
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 5:11 PM, Les Mikeselllesmikes...@gmail.com wrote:
What's the correct response to a security scan that points out that
apache versions below 2.2.14 have multiple known vulnerabilities?
R605 is a power edge server model I think.The Perc6/i is a Dell rebranded raid
controller, it's actually an LSI in disguise. Try downloading the Megaraid
utilities from LSI and using them to see the status of the card.
Also, when you boot the R605, you should be able to get into the Perc's
On 06/29/2010 03:52 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
It's internal, but requires a formal response - or an application
update. The test tool says:
These are the reported vulnerabilities
Apache Server 2.x Prior To 2.2.14 Multiple Vulnerabilities Apache
\'mod_proxy_ftp\' Wildcard Characters
On Tuesday, June 29, 2010 11:25 PM, Emmanuel Noobadmin wrote:
On 6/29/10, Chan Chung Hang Christopher
christopher.c...@bradbury.edu.hk wrote:
Define cheap. Like these...er...hmm...creative chums here?
Kwan Lowe wrote:
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 5:11 PM, Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com wrote:
What's the correct response to a security scan that points out that
apache versions below 2.2.14 have multiple known vulnerabilities? Is
there an official document about what known vulnerabilities have
Situation: two similar servers, both with CentOS 5.4 64-bit. Making
an ext3 filesystem on one takes seconds, on the other minutes.
Partition SizeServer 1 Server 2
1 GB 0.7 sec 0.3 sec
4 GB 2.5 sec 1.2 sec
40 GB15 sec
On Tue, 2010-06-29 at 18:07 -0700, Aleksey Tsalolikhin wrote:
Situation: two similar servers, both with CentOS 5.4 64-bit. Making
an ext3 filesystem on one takes seconds, on the other minutes.
Partition SizeServer 1 Server 2
1 GB 0.7 sec 0.3 sec
4 GB
I ended up going ahead and letting the installer do whatever, then I
removed the logical volume. The howto
(http://tldp.org/HOWTO/LVM-HOWTO/removelv.html) is not so helpful
about helping you figure out what you need to know. Unfortunately I
clobbered my history file don't really know how I did
On 06/29/10 6:17 PM, Craig White wrote:
Similar says, not exactly and the hard drives, controller and RAID
configuration differences would be the first place to look for your
answer.
indeed, first place I'd look would be for things like battery backed
raid controllers with/without
Aleksey Tsalolikhin atsaloli.t...@gmail.com wrote:
(a) account for the difference in the binaries, and
(b) see if something else is different that I can make the same to get
the mkfs.ext3 time down to 15 sec on both systems.
Solving (a) should shed light on (b). Any ideas?
Look into
At Tue, 29 Jun 2010 11:39:35 -1000 CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org
wrote:
# lvm pvs
/dev/hda: open failed: No medium found
Couldn't find device with uuid r5HNPO-l18V-XfJ7-9RXY-AaWC-a4YY-3oL5h7.
PV VG Fmt Attr PSize PFree
/dev/sda2 VolGroup01 lvm2
On Tue, 29 Jun 2010, Les Mikesell wrote:
What's the correct response to a security scan that points out that
apache versions below 2.2.14 have multiple known vulnerabilities? Is
there an official document about what known vulnerabilities have been
fixed in the RHEL/CentOS updates or do you
Robert Heller wrote:
At Tue, 29 Jun 2010 11:39:35 -1000 CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org
wrote:
# lvm pvs
/dev/hda: open failed: No medium found
Couldn't find device with uuid r5HNPO-l18V-XfJ7-9RXY-AaWC-a4YY-3oL5h7.
PV VG Fmt Attr PSize PFree
/dev/sda2
On 6/30/10, Christopher Chan christopher.c...@bradbury.edu.hk wrote:
So cut appropriate corners to fit. Just not like Backblaze. Their's is
decidedly crap hobbled together.
With the kind of budget I have to work with, things are already
looking very rounded already.
I'm just thankful they
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 8:55 PM, John Jasen jja...@realityfailure.org wrote:
Googling the CVE # and the vendor will usually turn up the patched
version or disposition quickly.
An easy way to nail down CVE verifications is via
http://www.redhat.com/security/data/cve/
This url allows you to
D-Link? :-D. I had to get D-Links when money was a bit tighter but now I
have HP Procurve 9210al switches.
/me stomps on Cisco crap.
D-Link had always been decent to me so that's what I usually go for if
available. I've heard people mentioned the HP ProCurves for many years
as really good
Samba can serve files with to Linux clients. It's a Windows
limitation not a Samba one.
Thanks. Well that's a bit sad really...
I don't if it's so much sad as a design choice for NTFS. In
Windows/NTFS one can put spaces in a filename so the is used as a
delimiter of sorts on the command
On Wednesday, June 30, 2010 10:53 AM, Emmanuel Noobadmin wrote:
On 6/30/10, Christopher Chanchristopher.c...@bradbury.edu.hk wrote:
So cut appropriate corners to fit. Just not like Backblaze. Their's is
decidedly crap hobbled together.
With the kind of budget I have to work with, things are
On Wednesday, June 30, 2010 11:43 AM, Drew wrote:
D-Link? :-D. I had to get D-Links when money was a bit tighter but now I
have HP Procurve 9210al switches.
/me stomps on Cisco crap.
D-Link had always been decent to me so that's what I usually go for if
available. I've heard people
Barring that I've had good luck with Linksys over the years. We just
recently installed a 48port gigabit switch in the office that set us
back around $900. Equivalent Procurve was priced at around $3000.
???
For $3000 I can get PoE+, 48 port gigabit + two expansion slots (empty),
vlan,
Drew wrote:
Samba can serve files with to Linux clients. It's a Windows
limitation not a Samba one.
Thanks. Well that's a bit sad really...
I don't if it's so much sad as a design choice for NTFS. In
Windows/NTFS one can put spaces in a filename so the is used as a
delimiter of sorts on
On Wednesday, June 30, 2010 01:14 PM, Drew wrote:
Barring that I've had good luck with Linksys over the years. We just
recently installed a 48port gigabit switch in the office that set us
back around $900. Equivalent Procurve was priced at around $3000.
???
For $3000 I can get PoE+, 48
You must be spoiled by always using GUI tools that present a pick list - no
one
would ever type all that crap every time they want to access a file. And, you
could just as well use underscores instead of spaces and get the same visual
effect AND still permit natural 'break on whitespace'
74 matches
Mail list logo
