Re: [CentOS] dhcp server

2010-08-08 Thread Richard Gliebe
On 8/9/10 8:49 AM Eero Volotinen wrote: > 2010/8/9 Richard Gliebe : >> On 8/9/10 7:42 AM Barry Brimer wrote: >>> How about firewalling ... does your firewall allow for a DHCP server? >> firewall isn't active inside the LAN. > > firewall can cause problems on windows machines.. maybe you can try >

Re: [CentOS] dhcp server

2010-08-08 Thread Eero Volotinen
2010/8/9 Richard Gliebe : > On 8/9/10 7:42 AM Barry Brimer wrote: >> How about firewalling ... does your firewall allow for a DHCP server? > > firewall isn't active inside the LAN. firewall can cause problems on windows machines.. maybe you can try for example ubuntu livecd and test if dhcp client

Re: [CentOS] dhcp server

2010-08-08 Thread Richard Gliebe
On 8/9/10 7:42 AM Barry Brimer wrote: > How about firewalling ... does your firewall allow for a DHCP server? firewall isn't active inside the LAN. Regards Richard ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] dhcp server

2010-08-08 Thread Richard Gliebe
On 8/9/10 7:25 AM Eero Volotinen wrote: > > it is working on any other os? I'll try it this afternoon, when I'm onside. > > is the dhcp binded to correct interface? Yes. # ifconfig eth0 eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:1A:64:B6:1D:1C inet addr:192.168.100.2 Bcast:192.168.10

Re: [CentOS] (no subject)

2010-08-08 Thread John R Pierce
On 08/08/10 11:08 PM, Giuseppe Corazzin wrote: > Spett.le Cliente, > > dal 9 Agosto 2010 al 29 Agosto 2010UT non sarò in grado di leggere le email > inviate a questo indirizzo. > Per urgenze compilare il form sul nuovo sito della Computer > srlhttp://www.computersrl.com/home/component/jforms/4

Re: [CentOS] (no subject)

2010-08-08 Thread Rajagopal Swaminathan
Greetings, 2010/8/9 Giuseppe Corazzin : > Spett.le Cliente, > > dal 9 Agosto 2010 al 29 Agosto 2010UT non sarò in grado di leggere le email > inviate a questo indirizzo. > Per urgenze  compilare il form sul nuovo sito della Computer srl   > http://www.computersrl.com/home/component/jforms/4/88.ht

[CentOS] (no subject)

2010-08-08 Thread Giuseppe Corazzin
Spett.le Cliente, dal 9 Agosto 2010 al 29 Agosto 2010UT non sarò in grado di leggere le email inviate a questo indirizzo. Per urgenze compilare il form sul nuovo sito della Computer srl http://www.computersrl.com/home/component/jforms/4/88.html o chiamare il numero 0438.450500 Grazie Giusepp

[CentOS] (no subject)

2010-08-08 Thread Giuseppe Corazzin
Spett.le Cliente, dal 9 Agosto 2010 al 29 Agosto 2010UT non sarò in grado di leggere le email inviate a questo indirizzo. Per urgenze compilare il form sul nuovo sito della Computer srl http://www.computersrl.com/home/component/jforms/4/88.html o chiamare il numero 0438.450500 Grazie Giusepp

Re: [CentOS] Moving users from Debian-based distro to CentOS

2010-08-08 Thread John R Pierce
On 08/08/10 10:47 PM, Dotan Cohen wrote: > I have a Debian machine with four users that I plan on migrating to > CentOS. As per Debian habits the UIDs start with 1000. > > Is it enough to reuse the Debian /etc/shadow and /etc/passwd files > over? Or will I need to configure some other things? I h

[CentOS] Moving users from Debian-based distro to CentOS

2010-08-08 Thread Dotan Cohen
I have a Debian machine with four users that I plan on migrating to CentOS. As per Debian habits the UIDs start with 1000. Is it enough to reuse the Debian /etc/shadow and /etc/passwd files over? Or will I need to configure some other things? I had considered just creating four new users starting

Re: [CentOS] dhcp server

2010-08-08 Thread Barry Brimer
> I have to run a dhcp server on CentOS release 5.5 (Final). > > # yum list| grep -i dhcp > dhcp.x86_64 12:3.0.5-23.el5 installed > dhcp-devel.x86_64 12:3.0.5-23.el5 installed > dhcpv6-client.x86_64 1.0.10-18.el5 installed > > after starting the dhcpd daemon, the windows Clients on

Re: [CentOS] dhcp server

2010-08-08 Thread Eero Volotinen
2010/8/9 Richard Gliebe : > Hi all, > > this is my first post on this list, hope someone can help me. > > I have to run a dhcp server on CentOS release 5.5 (Final). > > # yum list| grep -i dhcp > dhcp.x86_64             12:3.0.5-23.el5 installed > dhcp-devel.x86_64       12:3.0.5-23.el5 installed >

[CentOS] dhcp server

2010-08-08 Thread Richard Gliebe
Hi all, this is my first post on this list, hope someone can help me. I have to run a dhcp server on CentOS release 5.5 (Final). # yum list| grep -i dhcp dhcp.x86_64 12:3.0.5-23.el5 installed dhcp-devel.x86_64 12:3.0.5-23.el5 installed dhcpv6-client.x86_641.0.10-18.el5 in

Re: [CentOS] iocharset, codepage issue in CentOS 5.5

2010-08-08 Thread Tsuyoshi Nagata
Hi Alexander (2010/08/07 17:13), Alexander Stepanovitch Pyatkin wrote: > It looks like that the iocharset=cp1251,codepage=866 is not working in Some mount option are changed in centos5 by noticed in blog/wiki. CentOS4(kernel2.6.9 ) mount iocharset=yyy,codepage=xxx CentOS5(kernel2.6.18) mount utf8

Re: [CentOS] what people really mean when they say they're running "5.3"?

2010-08-08 Thread allan
Unless the curriculum covers updates. Peace, Allan James Hogarth wrote: >>> i just don't want to teach off of 5.3, only to find out later that >>> they've been keeping up to date and 5.5 would have been a more >>> appropriate choice. thanks for any tips. >> On a certain level there really isn

Re: [CentOS] OT: Package to truncate .mp3 file

2010-08-08 Thread allan
ditto. I second that motion. Peace, Allan Mark wrote: > On Sun, Aug 8, 2010 at 3:46 PM, wrote: >> Lanny Marcus writes: >> >>> I have a 2.9 MB MP3 file. Would like to use about the first 10%, to >>> embed sound on a web page. The Packages I have in Applications > Sound >>> & Video don't seem to

[CentOS] fail2ban behavior

2010-08-08 Thread Joseph L. Casale
I created a filter and verified it with fail2ban-regex against actual lines in my log and it works. During restarts of fail2ban, only some previous ip's get banned immediately whereas some need a reoccurrence despite the jail's config specification of maxretry and findtime suggesting the entries ma

Re: [CentOS] OT: Package to truncate .mp3 file

2010-08-08 Thread Keith Roberts
On Sun, 8 Aug 2010, John R. Dennison wrote: > To: Lanny Marcus > From: John R. Dennison > Subject: Re: [CentOS] OT: Package to truncate .mp3 file > > On Sun, Aug 08, 2010 at 04:29:41PM -0500, Lanny Marcus wrote: >> I have a 2.9 MB MP3 file. Would like to use about the first 10%, to >> embed so

Re: [CentOS] OT: Package to truncate .mp3 file

2010-08-08 Thread Mark
On Sun, Aug 8, 2010 at 3:46 PM, wrote: > > Lanny Marcus writes: > > > I have a 2.9 MB  MP3 file. Would like to use about the first 10%, to > > embed sound on a web page. The Packages I have in Applications > Sound > > & Video don't seem to be able to  edit the file like that. Is there a > > Packag

Re: [CentOS] OT: Package to truncate .mp3 file

2010-08-08 Thread nux
Lanny Marcus writes: > I have a 2.9 MB MP3 file. Would like to use about the first 10%, to > embed sound on a web page. The Packages I have in Applications > Sound > & Video don't seem to be able to edit the file like that. Is there a > Package I can get from a Yum Repository that will do that?

Re: [CentOS] OT: Package to truncate .mp3 file

2010-08-08 Thread John R. Dennison
On Sun, Aug 08, 2010 at 04:29:41PM -0500, Lanny Marcus wrote: > I have a 2.9 MB MP3 file. Would like to use about the first 10%, to > embed sound on a web page. The Packages I have in Applications > Sound > & Video don't seem to be able to edit the file like that. Is there a > Package I can get f

[CentOS] OT: Package to truncate .mp3 file

2010-08-08 Thread Lanny Marcus
I have a 2.9 MB MP3 file. Would like to use about the first 10%, to embed sound on a web page. The Packages I have in Applications > Sound & Video don't seem to be able to edit the file like that. Is there a Package I can get from a Yum Repository that will do that? Using CentOS 5.5 (32 bit). T

Re: [CentOS] what people really mean when they say they're running "5.3"?

2010-08-08 Thread John R Pierce
On 08/08/10 1:12 PM, James Hogarth wrote: > > I do find this behaviour very odd... if you are not intending to get > support from redhat why not just install CentOS in the beginning so > you can still get updates? Ah well... > > fairly often, its due to some perceived vendor requirements on th

Re: [CentOS] what people really mean when they say they're running "5.3"?

2010-08-08 Thread James Hogarth
I do find this behaviour very odd... if you are not intending to get support from redhat why not just install CentOS in the beginning so you can still get updates? Ah well... Sent from Android Mobile On 8 Aug 2010 18:58, "John R Pierce" wrote: > On 08/08/10 9:11 AM, Robert P. J. Day wrote: >> wh

Re: [CentOS] Encrypted remote backup?

2010-08-08 Thread Rajagopal Swaminathan
Greetings, > On 8/8/10, Michael A. Peters wrote: Better news still, It seems centos rpms are available for x86(32/64 bits) and ppc arch at (hopefully) at an yum repository http://packages.sw.be/rdiff-backup/ Again, I have never touched it... Regards, Rajagopal ___

Re: [CentOS] Encrypted remote backup?

2010-08-08 Thread Rajagopal Swaminathan
Greetings, On 8/8/10, Michael A. Peters wrote: > Can anyone recommend a commercial off site remote backup service with a > client (preferably FOSS) for CentOS 5, preferably that allows encryption > of the data being backed up? > > Small scale, I'm primarily looking to just back up my mail folder

Re: [CentOS] what people really mean when they say they're running"5.3"?

2010-08-08 Thread Jesús Hinojosa
May be. cat /etc/redhat-release is the easy way Greets Enviado desde mi BlackBerry de Claro. -Original Message- From: "John R. Dennison" Sender: centos-boun...@centos.org Date: Sun, 8 Aug 2010 12:56:33 To: Robert Heller Reply-To: CentOS mailing list Cc: CentOS mailing list Subject:

Re: [CentOS] what people really mean when they say they're running "5.3"?

2010-08-08 Thread John R Pierce
On 08/08/10 9:11 AM, Robert P. J. Day wrote: >when i asked the organizer to identify the specific version of RHEL > that was being used at the client site, i was told 5.3 so i can easily > install 5.3 on the classroom machines, but i'm curious about something > and i'll have my contact look i

Re: [CentOS] what people really mean when they say they're running "5.3"?

2010-08-08 Thread John R. Dennison
On Sun, Aug 08, 2010 at 01:29:48PM -0400, Robert Heller wrote: > > Depends. Most people do update as new updates come out. Doing 'yum > update' regularly will update to newer point releases automagically. > Some people (for various reasons) don't regularly update their systems. > > Look in /etc

Re: [CentOS] what people really mean when they say they're running "5.3"?

2010-08-08 Thread John R. Dennison
On Sun, Aug 08, 2010 at 09:18:58AM -0700, Mark wrote: > > Check /etc/redhat-release; also uname -a if you know which kernel to look for. Actually, a combination of "uname -a" for kernel rev and then "rpm -q centos-release" is a more much sane and accurate method to identify

Re: [CentOS] what people really mean when they say they're running "5.3"?

2010-08-08 Thread James Hogarth
>> >>   i just don't want to teach off of 5.3, only to find out later that >> they've been keeping up to date and 5.5 would have been a more >> appropriate choice.  thanks for any tips. > > On a certain level there really isn't much difference from a general > admin POV -- it does not really make s

Re: [CentOS] what people really mean when they say they're running "5.3"?

2010-08-08 Thread Robert Heller
At Sun, 8 Aug 2010 12:11:35 -0400 (EDT) CentOS mailing list wrote: > > > more a terminology usage question than anything else, but in a > couple of weeks, i'll be teaching the first of a few sessions on RHEL > admin and, unsurprisingly, i'll be using centos (as i've done in the > past). > >

Re: [CentOS] Encrypted remote backup?

2010-08-08 Thread nux
Michael A. Peters writes: > Can anyone recommend a commercial off site remote backup service with a > client (preferably FOSS) for CentOS 5, preferably that allows encryption > of the data being backed up? > > Small scale, I'm primarily looking to just back up my mail folder on my > server. >

Re: [CentOS] Encrypted remote backup?

2010-08-08 Thread Timo Schoeler
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 thus Michael A. Peters spake: > Can anyone recommend a commercial off site remote backup service with a > client (preferably FOSS) for CentOS 5, preferably that allows encryption > of the data being backed up? > > Small scale, I'm primarily looking

Re: [CentOS] Encrypted remote backup?

2010-08-08 Thread Tim Nelson
- "Michael A. Peters" wrote: > Can anyone recommend a commercial off site remote backup service with > a > client (preferably FOSS) for CentOS 5, preferably that allows > encryption > of the data being backed up? > > Small scale, I'm primarily looking to just back up my mail folder on > my

[CentOS] Encrypted remote backup?

2010-08-08 Thread Michael A. Peters
Can anyone recommend a commercial off site remote backup service with a client (preferably FOSS) for CentOS 5, preferably that allows encryption of the data being backed up? Small scale, I'm primarily looking to just back up my mail folder on my server. I've been backing it up to local hd via

Re: [CentOS] what people really mean when they say they're running "5.3"?

2010-08-08 Thread Mark
On Sun, Aug 8, 2010 at 9:11 AM, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > : > >  when i asked the organizer to identify the specific version of RHEL > that was being used at the client site, i was told 5.3 so i can easily > install 5.3 on the classroom machines, but i'm curious about something > and i'll have my

[CentOS] what people really mean when they say they're running "5.3"?

2010-08-08 Thread Robert P. J. Day
more a terminology usage question than anything else, but in a couple of weeks, i'll be teaching the first of a few sessions on RHEL admin and, unsurprisingly, i'll be using centos (as i've done in the past). when i asked the organizer to identify the specific version of RHEL that was being u

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.5 : Installing Sources where theyare visibletosystem(VBOXdriver install)

2010-08-08 Thread Mark
On Sun, Aug 8, 2010 at 9:01 AM, MGW-Discussions wrote: > > Do I need to restart the system when the headers and sources are installed? > That is generally a good idea since the kernel, headers and devel rpms are installed all at the same time. Otherwise you won't be running the newly installed ke

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.5 : Installing Sources where theyare visibletosystem(VBOXdriver install)

2010-08-08 Thread MGW-Discussions
JohnS wrote: > rpm -qa | grep kernel > > Look here that is *NOT* what you need! > > I'm listing all of them to make sure you are up to date...of which you > are not... > > yum update kernel kernel-headers kernel-devel > Reboot the Machine to make sure your on the newest kernel. > > > Now for Vi

Re: [CentOS] Stuttering sound

2010-08-08 Thread JohnS
On Sat, 2010-08-07 at 20:39 -0300, Eduardo Grosclaude wrote: > Dear List, > After some googling around without any results, I'm quite puzzled. > Since some past update I can't precise, kernel 2.6.164 works fine, > however 2.6.194 has some sound problem in my somewhat old and beaten > Toshiba lapt

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.5 : Installing Sources where they are visibletosystem(VBOX driver install)

2010-08-08 Thread JohnS
On Sat, 2010-08-07 at 19:06 -0400, MGW-Discussions wrote: > Thanks for the reply. > > How do I verify where the sources should be after the rpm install? > > How do I install only the headers, since that phrase keeps popping up > but like many things on the net, no one ever actually verifies the