> Yeah, the inconvenient parts could probably be done in vbscript or
> something on a windows box, pushing the results into the db through
> odbc, but I thought this would be a common enough problem that
> cross-platform tools would be available. I am using some java stuff on
> the reporting side
I'm running into a memory problem when trying to switch some web servers
that are running centos4.8/x86_64 to centos5.5/x86_64. The new servers
running centos5.5 are using a decent amount more memory than the
centos4.8 servers.
Here's an example from top:
--- centos 5.5 ---
$ uname -a
Linux ws51
Nataraj wrote:
>
> I've seen this kind of thing happen when the autodetection stuff
> misbehaves. I'm not sure why it does this or how to prevent it. Anyway,
> to recover, I would use something like:
>
> mdadm --stop /dev/md125
> mdadm --stop /dev/md126
>
> If for some reason the above commands f
fred smith wrote:helppain/backups/disks/
> hi all!
>
> back in Aug several of you assisted me in solving a problem where one
> of my drives had dropped out of (or been kicked out of) the raid1 array.
>
> something vaguely similar appears to have happened just a few mins ago,
> upon rebooting after
On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 7:59 PM, fred smith
wrote:
>
> back in Aug several of you assisted me in solving a problem where one
> of my drives had dropped out of (or been kicked out of) the raid1 array.
>
> something vaguely similar appears to have happened just a few mins ago,
> upon rebooting after
fred smith wrote:
hi all!
back in Aug several of you assisted me in solving a problem where one
of my drives had dropped out of (or been kicked out of) the raid1 array.
something vaguely similar appears to have happened just a few mins ago,
upon rebooting after a small update. I received four e
"uname -a" shows:
Linux localhost.localdomain 2.6.18-194.17.1.el5 #1 SMP Wed Sep 29
12:50:31 EDT 2010 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
hi all!
back in Aug several of you assisted me in solving a problem where one
of my drives had dropped out of (or been kicked out of) the raid1 array.
something vaguely similar appears to have happened just a few mins ago,
upon rebooting after a small update. I received four emails like this,
one
Still seeing the glitch every 5-20 secs after remounting with "commit=6000".
On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 4:00 PM, Ross Walker wrote:
>
> You could also reduce the dirty interval in sysctl so it flushes sooner
> therefore flushes less data each time.
OK. It's worth a shot. Any idea what the defau
On Oct 19, 2010, at 5:33 PM, Aleksey Tsalolikhin
wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 12:48 PM, Toby Bluhm
> wrote:
>> Ext3 filesystem? Maybe altering the commit option at mount time would help:
>>
>> http://www.mjmwired.net/kernel/Documentation/filesystems/ext3.txt#49
>
> Good one, Tony! We'll
On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 11:40 AM, Aleksey Tsalolikhin
wrote:
>
> I'll ask Red Hat for php-pgsql that uses postgresql84-libs; and try to
> build httpd from source myself in the meantime.
I've opened a bug report / enhancement request with Red Hat:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=644678
Abwesenheitsnotiz:
Vielen Dank für Ihre Nachricht. Ich bin ab dem 22.10. wieder im Büro erreichbar.
In dringenden Fällen wenden Sie sich bitte an Herrn Ostermann,
Email .
Vielen Dank!
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/
On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 12:48 PM, Toby Bluhm
wrote:
> Ext3 filesystem? Maybe altering the commit option at mount time would help:
>
> http://www.mjmwired.net/kernel/Documentation/filesystems/ext3.txt#49
Good one, Tony! We'll try that. Thanks!!
Aleksey
_
On 20/10/10 5:42 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> Ian Murray wrote:
>>
>>
>>> No the example above shows a telnet to port 25 connecting - which I can
>>> reproduce too - but there is no 220 response as there should be from a
>>
>> I am late to the thread (and I haven't a clue what we are talking abo
On 10/19/2010 3:34 PM, Aleksey Tsalolikhin wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 9:08 PM, JohnS wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, 2010-10-18 at 18:25 -0700, Aleksey Tsalolikhin wrote:
>>> Hi. A friend of mine was doing real-time video decoding on
>>> Fedora Core 13 and he had a performance glitch (1/2 a second
>>>
On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 9:08 PM, JohnS wrote:
>
> On Mon, 2010-10-18 at 18:25 -0700, Aleksey Tsalolikhin wrote:
>> Hi. A friend of mine was doing real-time video decoding on
>> Fedora Core 13 and he had a performance glitch (1/2 a second
>> freeze) every 5-10 seconds. "top" showed flush-253:0
>>
> -Original Message-
> From: Todd Denniston [mailto:todd.dennis...@tsb.cranrdte.navy.mil]
> Sent: Monday, October 18, 2010 10:43 AM
> To: CentOS mailing list
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] dhcpd rpm
>
> Ausmus, Matt wrote, On 10/18/2010 01:11 PM:
> > Howdy,
> >
> >
>
> >
> > We’ve found the pr
>
> [herr...@stones herrold]$ telnet 178.63.65.136 25
> Trying 178.63.65.136...
> Connected to 178.63.65.136.
> Escape character is '^]'.
> 220 mercury.localdomain ESMTP Postfix
> quit
> 221 2.0.0 Bye
> Connection closed by foreign host.
> [herr...@stones herrold]$
>
> Something between you
Ian Murray wrote:
>
>
>> No the example above shows a telnet to port 25 connecting - which I can
>> reproduce too - but there is no 220 response as there should be from a
>
> I am late to the thread (and I haven't a clue what we are talking about in
> fact), but I get a 220 when I telnet into tha
Just to follow up on this. Devrim of Postgres said he does not maintain
php-pgsql, Red Hat does. He also added:
2010/10/18 Devrim GÜNDÜZ :
>
> I don't see any way to upgrade libpq for Apache easily, except
> rebuilding Apache from SRPM by yourself, and using postgresql84-libs as
> BuildRequires
> No the example above shows a telnet to port 25 connecting - which I can
> reproduce too - but there is no 220 response as there should be from a
I am late to the thread (and I haven't a clue what we are talking about in
fact), but I get a 220 when I telnet into that IP address...
Escape
Peter Crighton wrote:
> On Mon, 18 Oct 2010 12:47:16 -0400, you wrote:
>>Peter Crighton wrote:
>>> On Sat, 16 Oct 2010 18:27:15 +0100, you wrote:
On 16/10/10 18:07, Peter Crighton wrote:
> I'm trying to install the Adaptec Storage Manager for the 21610SA
> SATA RAID controller on Centos
On Mon, 18 Oct 2010 12:47:16 -0400, you wrote:
>Peter Crighton wrote:
>> On Sat, 16 Oct 2010 18:27:15 +0100, you wrote:
>>
>>>On 16/10/10 18:07, Peter Crighton wrote:
I'm trying to install the Adaptec Storage Manager for the 21610SA SATA
RAID controller on Centos 5.5.
rpm repor
On 10/19/2010 11:17 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On 10/19/2010 9:34 AM, Todd Denniston wrote:
>>
>>> I'm getting tired of converting spreadsheets that someone else updates
>>> to csv so my perl scripts can push the data into a mysql database. Is
>>> there a better way? I haven't had much luck with
>
John Hinton wrote:
> Either way, this thread is really sounding a lot like we are just
> getting antsy for CentOS 6! ;) I'm chomping at the bit for like 2 years
> now. Fortunately I selected a titanium bit because if I ever manage to
> chew through it, I must migrate to Fedora. :) Patience grassh
Hi folks
I have a CentOS box with 2 network cards. One is eth0 and the other is wlan0
(Linksys WUSB54GC USB wifi card)
I use wlan0 to stay linked with other workstations in an small network and eth0
just in case I need to get wired to solve some problem. eth0 is always unpluged
while things ar
Am 15.10.10 22:59, schrieb Pasi Kärkkäinen:
> On Sat, Oct 09, 2010 at 02:15:30PM +0200, Dirk H. Schulz wrote:
>>Hi folks,
>>
>> I would like to test Xen3.3 on CentOS 5.5 on an older machine which is
>> not 64bit capable.
>>
>> Since this is just a "first impression" test I do not want to fuzz
I am very happy with RedHat Cluster Suite and GFS2 on a shared SAN
storage (i.e. scsi block device), since RedHat Cluster Suite not only
handles the file systems but also looks to the availability of the xen
vms (live migration, restart, etc.).
Dirk
Am 14.10.10 13:25, schrieb Rudi Ahlers:
>
On 10/19/2010 11:24 AM, JohnS wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-10-19 at 14:21 +0100, Karanbir Singh wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 10/19/2010 02:09 PM, Jerry Franz wrote:
>>> That is what it does. It *licenses* distribution between people. You
>>> can't say "it's under GPL - but you can't redistribute it because I'
On 10/19/2010 04:24 PM, JohnS wrote:
>> Also worth keeping in mind is that the RC to partners does not prevent
>> one of those partners from publishing the sources if they want for code
>> where licensing and their agreement with Red Hat permits them to. I am
>> not in a position to comment on that
On Tue, 2010-10-19 at 14:21 +0100, Karanbir Singh wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 10/19/2010 02:09 PM, Jerry Franz wrote:
> > That is what it does. It *licenses* distribution between people. You
> > can't say "it's under GPL - but you can't redistribute it because I've
>
> Ok, so that is the point I am tryi
On 10/19/2010 9:34 AM, Todd Denniston wrote:
>
>> I'm getting tired of converting spreadsheets that someone else updates
>> to csv so my perl scripts can push the data into a mysql database. Is
>> there a better way? I haven't had much luck with
>> perl-Spreadsheet-ParseExcel (and find it odd tha
Les Mikesell wrote, On 10/18/2010 06:13 PM:
> I'm getting tired of converting spreadsheets that someone else updates
> to csv so my perl scripts can push the data into a mysql database. Is
> there a better way? I haven't had much luck with
> perl-Spreadsheet-ParseExcel (and find it odd that yu
exim quota uses 32 bit integer: maximum mail store quota must be less
than 2GB.
Is there an repository with exim compiled with
Size of off_t: 8 instead
Size of off_t: 4
Comments in discussion groups say, the version compiled with "Size of
off_t: 8" accepts lager quota.
Helmut
Hi,
On 10/19/2010 02:09 PM, Jerry Franz wrote:
> That is what it does. It *licenses* distribution between people. You
> can't say "it's under GPL - but you can't redistribute it because I've
Ok, so that is the point I am trying to make here. RHEL6 isnt released
as a product. They have an in-dev
On 10/19/2010 06:10 AM, mehdi wrote:
> how open yum.conf in mode read write
1. You need to do it as the 'root' user. Log in as 'root' and then you
will be able to edit it.
2. Please don't hijack unrelated threads. To start a new topic, post a
completely new message with a usefully relevant su
how open yum.conf in mode read write
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On 10/19/2010 05:37 AM, Karanbir Singh wrote:
>
>> Only on v3 license code. Most code is still under v2.
> and what license is the distro shipped as ?
>
That is a very good question. The *support and subscriptions* are under
RH's own license. The *code* in the packages are under the licenses of
On 10/19/10 7:31 AM, Jerry Franz wrote:
> On 10/19/2010 05:03 AM, Karanbir Singh wrote:
>> On 10/19/2010 12:52 PM, Jerry Franz wrote:
>>> Once you publish/distribute GPL licensed code to *anyone*, your
>>> obligation to provide source kicks in for *everyone*. In practice, few
>>> people hammer at a
On 10/19/2010 01:31 PM, Jerry Franz wrote:
>> I am not a lawyer, but you blurb seems to indicate that the issue is
>> applicable to people with the object code, which would make my last
>> point valid.
>>
>
> Only on v3 license code. Most code is still under v2.
and what license is the distro ship
On 10/19/10 6:52 AM, Jerry Franz wrote:
>On 10/19/2010 04:16 AM, Karanbir Singh wrote:
>> hi Guys,
>>
>> On 10/19/2010 12:00 PM, Benjamin Franz wrote:
>>> I'm pretty sure Deyan is referring to their GPL obligations to make the
>>> source code available for most of it.
>> .. this has nothing to
On 10/19/2010 05:03 AM, Karanbir Singh wrote:
On 10/19/2010 12:52 PM, Jerry Franz wrote:
Once you publish/distribute GPL licensed code to *anyone*, your
obligation to provide source kicks in for *everyone*. In practice, few
people hammer at a company "in process" over it. But you *can*.
I am n
On 10/19/2010 12:52 PM, Jerry Franz wrote:
> Once you publish/distribute GPL licensed code to *anyone*, your
> obligation to provide source kicks in for *everyone*. In practice, few
> people hammer at a company "in process" over it. But you *can*.
I am not a lawyer, but you blurb seems to indicate
On 10/19/2010 04:16 AM, Karanbir Singh wrote:
> hi Guys,
>
> On 10/19/2010 12:00 PM, Benjamin Franz wrote:
>> I'm pretty sure Deyan is referring to their GPL obligations to make the
>> source code available for most of it.
> .. this has nothing to do with it...
>
Yes, it does.
http://www.softwa
On 10/19/2010 04:10 AM, Nicolas Thierry-Mieg wrote:
Benjamin Franz wrote:
Yes, to partners :)
I'm pretty sure Deyan is referring to their GPL obligations to make the
source code available for most of it.
GPL doesn't say you have to distribute source code to the whole world,
only to people y
hi Guys,
On 10/19/2010 12:00 PM, Benjamin Franz wrote:
> I'm pretty sure Deyan is referring to their GPL obligations to make the
> source code available for most of it.
.. this has nothing to do with it...
> Given their heavy historical commitment to GPL, I have no doubt it will
> show up very s
Benjamin Franz wrote:
>On 10/19/2010 12:47 AM, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
>> On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 06:44:34PM +0300, Deyan Stoykov wrote:
>>>
>>> Available to partners? Aren't RH obliged to release the source as usual?
>>>
>> Yes, to partners :)
>
> I'm pretty sure Deyan is referring to their GPL
On 10/19/2010 12:47 AM, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 06:44:34PM +0300, Deyan Stoykov wrote:
>>
>> Available to partners? Aren't RH obliged to release the source as usual?
>>
> Yes, to partners :)
I'm pretty sure Deyan is referring to their GPL obligations to make the
source
On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 06:44:34PM +0300, Deyan Stoykov wrote:
> Timo Schoeler wrote:
> >
> > There's progress...
> >
> > http://press.redhat.com/2010/10/18/red-hat-enterprise-linux-6-release-candidate-available-to-partners/
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > Timo
>
> Available to partners? Aren't RH obl
49 matches
Mail list logo
