On 11/03/2010 01:31 AM, Timothy Lee wrote:
I need to sync up with Ralph and get the dev instance of the wiki online
again.
Ping?...
I've been on the move for a few days and havent been able to sync up
with Ralph to get the dev wiki instance setup ( not being in the same TZ
makes things a
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory CESA-2010:0817
End Of Life security update for CentOS 3:
https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2010-0817.html
As per the upstream vendors errata support policy, updates for CentOS-3
has ended on October 31th 2010.
It is recommended that any system still running
I've got a three Centos 5.5 KVM severs, but only one of them is presenting
guests with the kvm-clock source.
The two servers I'm not seeing kvm-clock on have Athlon x2 64bit
processors.
The other server with kvm-clock has a Phenom II X6 1090T Processor.
I've checked the system
On Thu, 04 Nov 2010 17:03:33 +1300, Steven Ellis
mail_li...@stevencherie.net wrote:
I've got a three Centos 5.5 KVM severs, but only one of them is
presenting
guests with the kvm-clock source.
The two servers I'm not seeing kvm-clock on have Athlon x2 64bit
processors.
The other
El 02/11/10 11:38, Lucas Smud escribió:
Hola:Qué tal? un gusto; me presento me llamo Lucas Smud, soy de Argentina y
quería pasar a comentarles mi temita:Soy administrador de redes pero quiero
incursionar en el Web Hosting y averiguando llegué a la conclusión de que el
centos es el mejor
Yoinier Hernandez Nieves escribió:
El 02/11/10 11:38, Lucas Smud escribió:
Hola:Qué tal? un gusto; me presento me llamo Lucas Smud, soy de Argentina y
quería pasar a comentarles mi temita:Soy administrador de redes pero quiero
incursionar en el Web Hosting y averiguando llegué a la
Hola compañeros tengo un problema ya que he implementado dos servidores
Openldap con samba, segun esto para que esten replicados, pero mi
problema radica en si hago un cambio en mi master el escalvo no refleja
dicho cambio que se supone debe hacer automaticamente.
les pongo mi configuracion
I updated libX11 and the problem is solved. Maybe the updated firefox and
xulrunner are not compatible with the older version.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On Tue, 2010-11-02 at 16:28 -0400, Tim Dunphy wrote:
I am attempting to setup an LDAP server under CentOS 5.4.
However I am unable to search my ldap directory even tho I am
supplying the proper credentials for the Manager account:
[r...@ldap openldap]# ldapsearch -x -h ldap -D
From: mattias m...@mjw.se
Yes but there is no good webmin module for openvpn?
To create a server
And i only have dynamic ips from my isp
I never used webmin (I prefer to edit conf files) but google says there are
webmin modules for openvpn...
And for the dynamic IP:
2010/11/3 mattias m...@mjw.se:
How to setup a vpn server on centos?
I can't find the pptpd in any repo
Hi Matias,
PopTop is possibly solution that you are looking for:
http://poptop.sourceforge.net/ , but ssl-vpn like openvpn is much
better solution (works correctly with any firewalls)
--
Forgot to add that if you google for... hum... centos pptp,
you will find several howtos...
JD
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Printer: Cannon MF4320d. I gave the command lpr NNInteraction_Poster.pdf,
then typed lpq which shows
MF4320-4350_(UFRII_LT) is ready and printing
RankOwner Job File(s) Total
Size
active Ritika 636 NNInteraction_Poster.pdf549888 bytes
On Tue, 2010-11-02 at 19:42 -0500, Jeffrey Gipson wrote:
Sorry to redirect, but have you considered OpenVPN
+1.
But is the OpenVPN windows client any better than recently? Does it
work correctly with WIndows 7 yet? Last time I tried the Win32 client
was kludgy.
If you are only connecting
On Wed, 2010-11-03 at 13:04 +0200, Eero Volotinen wrote:
2010/11/3 mattias m...@mjw.se:
How to setup a vpn server on centos?
I can't find the pptpd in any repo
PopTop is possibly solution that you are looking for:
http://poptop.sourceforge.net/ , but ssl-vpn like openvpn is much
better
On Wed, 3 Nov 2010, Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
On Wed, 2010-11-03 at 13:04 +0200, Eero Volotinen wrote:
2010/11/3 mattias m...@mjw.se:
How to setup a vpn server on centos?
I can't find the pptpd in any repo
PopTop is possibly solution that you are looking for:
http://poptop.sourceforge.net/
On Wed, 2010-11-03 at 12:49 +, John Hodrien wrote:
On Wed, 3 Nov 2010, Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
On Wed, 2010-11-03 at 13:04 +0200, Eero Volotinen wrote:
2010/11/3 mattias m...@mjw.se:
How to setup a vpn server on centos?
I can't find the pptpd in any repo
PopTop is possibly
On 11/3/10 7:48 AM, Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
On Wed, 2010-11-03 at 12:49 +, John Hodrien wrote:
On Wed, 3 Nov 2010, Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
On Wed, 2010-11-03 at 13:04 +0200, Eero Volotinen wrote:
2010/11/3 mattiasm...@mjw.se:
How to setup a vpn server on centos?
I can't find the
On Nov 3, 2010, at 9:07 AM, Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com wrote:
On 11/3/10 7:48 AM, Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
On Wed, 2010-11-03 at 12:49 +, John Hodrien wrote:
On Wed, 3 Nov 2010, Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
On Wed, 2010-11-03 at 13:04 +0200, Eero Volotinen wrote:
2010/11/3
Ross Walker wrote:
On Nov 3, 2010, at 9:07 AM, Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com wrote:
On 11/3/10 7:48 AM, Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
On Wed, 2010-11-03 at 12:49 +, John Hodrien wrote:
On Wed, 3 Nov 2010, Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
On Wed, 2010-11-03 at 13:04 +0200, Eero Volotinen
Here, unpolished, is a script I used to use to
determine what changes I had made to an rpm-based
system. It requires a least light editing
(line 45, 49, and 52 at a minimum)
to run on CentOS; probably won't hurt anything.
#! /bin/bash
# Charles Polisher 2003-10-05
#
# Summarize the key facts
On Sun, 31 Oct 2010, Keith Roberts wrote:
To: CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org
From: Keith Roberts ke...@karsites.net
Subject: Re: [CentOS] PATA Hard Drive woes
On Sun, 31 Oct 2010, William Warren wrote:
To: CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org
From: William Warren
Mattias wrote:
Yes but there is no good webmin module for openvpn?
Not to pour water on your tool, but Google for webmin exploit.
This software appears regularly on security lists I read,
but not in a good way.
--
Charles Polisher
___
CentOS mailing
On Wed, 2010-11-03 at 07:34 -0700, cpol...@surewest.net wrote:
Mattias wrote:
Yes but there is no good webmin module for openvpn?
Not to pour water on your tool, but Google for webmin exploit.
This software appears regularly on security lists I read,
but not in a good way.
+1 I'd never put
On Wed, Nov 03, 2010 at 10:52:34AM -0400, Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
On Wed, 2010-11-03 at 07:34 -0700, cpol...@surewest.net wrote:
Mattias wrote:
Yes but there is no good webmin module for openvpn?
Not to pour water on your tool, but Google for webmin exploit.
This software appears
On Wed, 3 Nov 2010, Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
On Tue, 2010-11-02 at 19:42 -0500, Jeffrey Gipson wrote:
Sorry to redirect, but have you considered OpenVPN
+1.
But is the OpenVPN windows client any better than recently? Does it
work correctly with WIndows 7 yet? Last time I tried the
Dear all,
actually I installed CentOS 5.4 x86_64 on 11 new Dell R710 servers. It is
required to use 5.4 to be covered by the NetApp Interoperability Matrix
for use of Snapdrive.
All systems spit out the error message
mpt2sas0: failure at
On Wed, 3 Nov 2010, Ross Walker wrote:
As always it's better to use internally generated certificates that
are password protected then either passwords or certificates alone.
Having said that these password protected certificates are a PITA to
distribute to users and to support remotely.
Keith Roberts wrote, On 11/03/2010 10:32 AM:
On Sun, 31 Oct 2010, Keith Roberts wrote:
SNIP
There were about 79 Seek errors in the SMART logs of the
HDD.
SNIP
vivard did not show any errors when doing a full disk erase.
So I ran an Advanced r/w scan again with Hitachi DFT, and
the
/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url :
http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/attachments/20101103/3642f4bc/attachment-0001.bin
--
___
CentOS-announce mailing list
centos-annou...@centos.org
http
On Wed, 3 Nov 2010, Todd Denniston wrote:
To: CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org
From: Todd Denniston todd.dennis...@tsb.cranrdte.navy.mil
Subject: Re: [CentOS] PATA Hard Drive woes
Keith Roberts wrote, On 11/03/2010 10:32 AM:
On Sun, 31 Oct 2010, Keith Roberts wrote:
SNIP
There were
On Wed, Nov 03, 2010, Ray Van Dolson wrote:
On Wed, Nov 03, 2010 at 10:52:34AM -0400, Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
On Wed, 2010-11-03 at 07:34 -0700, cpol...@surewest.net wrote:
Mattias wrote:
Yes but there is no good webmin module for openvpn?
Not to pour water on your tool, but Google for
On Wed, 3 Nov 2010, centos-announce-requ...@centos.org wrote:
Today's Topics:
1. CESA-2010:0817 Low CentOS 3 i386/x86_64 CentOS-3 - End Of
Life (Tru Huynh)
Let's hoist one, lads, for CentOS 3 and the fine team that kept it
running...
Thank you to everyone who helped make this
On 11/3/2010 8:32 AM, Keith Roberts wrote:
So to prepare the disk for returning under warranty, I used
another HDD utility to clean the disk again
...
So I ran an Advanced r/w scan again with Hitachi DFT, and
the result was OK.
A complete disk wipe brings bad sectors to the drive's
Warren Young wrote:
On 11/3/2010 8:32 AM, Keith Roberts wrote:
So to prepare the disk for returning under warranty, I used
another HDD utility to clean the disk again
...
So I ran an Advanced r/w scan again with Hitachi DFT, and
the result was OK.
A complete disk wipe brings bad sectors
On 11/3/2010 11:27 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Yeah, but I have problems with smartmon:
More likely, problems with SMART. S.M.A.R.T. is D.U.M.B. :)
It's better than nothing, but sometimes not by a whole lot.
one server that's got two bad sectors, which SMART reports. I've followed
the
Warren Young wrote:
On 11/3/2010 11:27 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Yeah, but I have problems with smartmon:
More likely, problems with SMART. S.M.A.R.T. is D.U.M.B. :)
It's better than nothing, but sometimes not by a whole lot.
one server that's got two bad sectors, which SMART reports.
m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Warren Young wrote:
On 11/3/2010 11:27 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Yeah, but I have problems with smartmon:
More likely, problems with SMART. S.M.A.R.T. is D.U.M.B. :)
It's better than nothing, but sometimes not by a whole lot.
one server that's got two bad
On 11/3/2010 1:04 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Warren Young wrote:
On 11/3/2010 11:27 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Yeah, but I have problems with smartmon:
More likely, problems with SMART. S.M.A.R.T. is D.U.M.B. :)
It's better than nothing, but sometimes not by a whole lot.
one server
On 11/03/10 19:04, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Warren Young wrote:
On 11/3/2010 11:27 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Yeah, but I have problems with smartmon:
More likely, problems with SMART. S.M.A.R.T. is D.U.M.B. :)
It's better than nothing, but sometimes not by a whole lot.
one server that's
On 11/3/2010 12:22 PM, Nicolas Thierry-Mieg wrote:
Maybe try fsck -cc for a non-destructive read-write test.
Good call. That's resilvering.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On 11/03/10 17:01, Keith Roberts wrote:
There were no sectors remapped, which is odd as there were
bad sectors originally on the drive. I ran MemTest86+ out of
curiousity, and there are 5120 Errors, some at 0.4MB 0.5
MB.
You should fix that first.
The BIOS has been playing up, not
RedShift wrote:
On 11/03/10 19:04, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Warren Young wrote:
On 11/3/2010 11:27 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Yeah, but I have problems with smartmon:
More likely, problems with SMART. S.M.A.R.T. is D.U.M.B. :)
It's better than nothing, but sometimes not by a whole lot.
Warren Young wrote:
On 11/3/2010 12:22 PM, Nicolas Thierry-Mieg wrote:
Maybe try fsck -cc for a non-destructive read-write test.
Good call. That's resilvering.
Hmmm... maybe I'll try that first thing in the morning. I don't have to
worry about users, since, as I said, it's an online backup
On 11/03/10 19:57, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
SMART reports the number of sectors that have been reallocated. That
means, the drive was writing to a sector, found out it was unreliable and
decided to remap that sector. It is not abnormal for drives to develop _a
few_ bad sectors over the years.
RedShift wrote:
On 11/03/10 19:57, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
SMART reports the number of sectors that have been reallocated. That
means, the drive was writing to a sector, found out it was unreliable
and decided to remap that sector. It is not abnormal for drives to
develop
_a few_ bad sectors
On Wed, 3 Nov 2010, RedShift wrote:
To: CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org
From: RedShift redsh...@pandora.be
Subject: Re: [CentOS] was, PATA Hard Drive woes, is SMART
On 11/03/10 19:04, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Warren Young wrote:
On 11/3/2010 11:27 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Yeah,
On Wed, 3 Nov 2010, RedShift wrote:
To: CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org
From: RedShift redsh...@pandora.be
Subject: Re: [CentOS] PATA Hard Drive woes
On 11/03/10 17:01, Keith Roberts wrote:
There were no sectors remapped, which is odd as there were
bad sectors originally on the
On Wednesday, November 03, 2010 02:51:02 pm RedShift wrote:
On 11/03/10 17:01, Keith Roberts wrote:
Could a bad controller or bad RAM cause Hard Drive sector
errors?
Neither bad RAM or a bad controllor can physically damage a hard drive. A bad
controller will not cause reallocated
On Wednesday, November 03, 2010 02:25:17 pm Les Mikesell wrote:
I think the point of SMART is to be aware of the physical conditions
regardless of the logical remapping. At some point you run out of
places to relocate.
I had a 1.5TB SATA drive pop up an error in Fedora 13 the other day;
I have run one full test and got no errors on the memory
module. Is it worth keeping it running overnight, just to
see if temperature changes will afect the test?
Regards,
Keith
--
In theory, theory and practice are the same;
in practice they are not.
This email was sent from my laptop with
It wouldn't harm you to do this?
Jack
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf
Of Keith Roberts
Sent: Wednesday, November 03, 2010 9:48 PM
To: centos
Subject: [CentOS] Memtest86+ running time
I have run one full test and got no
On 11/3/2010 4:47 PM, Keith Roberts wrote:
I have run one full test and got no errors on the memory
module. Is it worth keeping it running overnight, just to
see if temperature changes will afect the test?
Yes, I've seen a machine where it ran over a weekend before catching an
error (which
On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 2:47 PM, Keith Roberts ke...@karsites.net wrote:
I have run one full test and got no errors on the memory
module. Is it worth keeping it running overnight, just to
see if temperature changes will afect the test?
I had a system that started crashing randomly. I ran
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf
Of Keith Roberts
Sent: Wednesday, November 03, 2010 9:48 PM
To: centos
Subject: [CentOS] Memtest86+ running time
I have run one full test and got no errors on the memory module. Is it
On Wed, 3 Nov 2010, Lamar Owen wrote:
To: CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org
From: Lamar Owen lo...@pari.edu
Subject: Re: [CentOS] PATA Hard Drive woes
On Wednesday, November 03, 2010 02:51:02 pm RedShift wrote:
On 11/03/10 17:01, Keith Roberts wrote:
Could a bad controller or bad RAM
On Wed, 3 Nov 2010, Warren Young wrote:
To: CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org
From: Warren Young war...@etr-usa.com
Subject: Re: [CentOS] PATA Hard Drive woes
On 11/3/2010 8:32 AM, Keith Roberts wrote:
So to prepare the disk for returning under warranty, I used
another HDD utility to
On 11/03/10 3:13 PM, Keith Roberts wrote:
I'm running the server from an APC UPS Back-UPS 650, so
there should not be any glitches in the power supply, should
there?
thats a simple standby kind of UPS, acts like a 'surge protector' when
the AC is on, and only switches to the battery powered
On 11/03/2010 03:13 PM, Keith Roberts wrote:
On Wed, 3 Nov 2010, Lamar Owen wrote:
Might want to check the power supply as well. Bad/flakey
power can indeed case damage to the drive surface; been
there, done that, have two Maxtor 250GB drives with
scribbled servo data to prove it.
OK.
I'm
On 11/3/2010 9:04 AM, Ross Walker wrote:
Errr, what issues does openvpn have?
I'm no fan of any type of VPN as I think it's a way of extending your trusted
LAN to an untrusted endpoint compromising internal trust levels, but if you
are going to implement a VPN the type is of very little
On 03/11/10 22:03, Akemi Yagi wrote:
On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 2:47 PM, Keith Roberts ke...@karsites.net wrote:
I have run one full test and got no errors on the memory
module. Is it worth keeping it running overnight, just to
see if temperature changes will afect the test?
I had a system that
On Nov 3, 2010, at 10:15 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Ross Walker wrote:
snip
I would suggest only providing VPN access to administrators and for users
providing a combination of SSL gateway to web-mail and some type of
terminal service that either authenticates with a separate domain or is
Does anyone know if this is going to be fixed in CentOS ?
// test case code below
// expected behaviour is all good and a return code of zero.
// this works on 2.6.35-1
// does not work on 2.6.18-194.17.4.el5 from Centos 5.5
// think this bug was fixed in git commit
On 11/03/10 3:46 PM, Ross Walker wrote:
I just think VPNs' time has come and gone.
VPN's have another use entirely, which is linking LAN segments over the
internet to create a private WAN.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
On 11/3/2010 4:18 PM, Keith Roberts wrote:
I might shell out some dosh for a copy if it can
non-destructably repair bad sectors.
Try fsck -cc first. (Or badblocks -n) These do part of what SR does
already, so if they work, that's all you need. Step up only when you
need something that
On 11/3/2010 6:01 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
On 11/03/10 3:46 PM, Ross Walker wrote:
I just think VPNs' time has come and gone.
VPN's have another use entirely, which is linking LAN segments over the
internet to create a private WAN.
But perhaps a better alternative is to give up on the idea
On Nov 3, 2010, at 7:01 PM, John R Pierce pie...@hogranch.com wrote:
On 11/03/10 3:46 PM, Ross Walker wrote:
I just think VPNs' time has come and gone.
VPN's have another use entirely, which is linking LAN segments over the
internet to create a private WAN.
Yes, of course, those will
On 03/11/10 22:59, Philip Manuel wrote:
Does anyone know if this is going to be fixed in CentOS ?
Only if it gets fixed in RHEL.
Did you file a bug? If so, where is it?
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
At Wed, 3 Nov 2010 22:13:03 + (GMT) CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org
wrote:
On Wed, 3 Nov 2010, Lamar Owen wrote:
To: CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org
From: Lamar Owen lo...@pari.edu
Subject: Re: [CentOS] PATA Hard Drive woes
On Wednesday, November 03, 2010 02:51:02
On Nov 3, 2010, at 7:25 PM, Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com wrote:
On 11/3/2010 6:01 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
On 11/03/10 3:46 PM, Ross Walker wrote:
I just think VPNs' time has come and gone.
VPN's have another use entirely, which is linking LAN segments over the
internet to create a
Jake Shipton wrote:
On 03/11/10 22:03, Akemi Yagi wrote:
On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 2:47 PM, Keith Roberts ke...@karsites.net wrote:
I have run one full test and got no errors on the memory
module. Is it worth keeping it running overnight, just to
see if temperature changes will afect the test?
On 11/04/2010 10:36 AM, Ned Slider wrote:
On 03/11/10 22:59, Philip Manuel wrote:
Does anyone know if this is going to be fixed in CentOS ?
Only if it gets fixed in RHEL.
Did you file a bug? If so, where is it?
No I'll file a bug now, was wondering if others had seen this issue
Phil.
I have a CentOS 4 server that acts as a gateway for a small LAN. The
lower half of the 192.168.144 address space is the LAN on eth1, the
upper half is the WAN on eth0, and the default route is to
192.168.144.254 which is my DSL router; this has been working fine for
years.
However, it's
On 11/3/10 6:35 PM, Ross Walker wrote:
On 11/03/10 3:46 PM, Ross Walker wrote:
I just think VPNs' time has come and gone.
VPN's have another use entirely, which is linking LAN segments over the
internet to create a private WAN.
Yes, of course, those will remain and I use those across
On 4/11/10 10:35 AM, Ross Walker wrote:
On Nov 3, 2010, at 7:01 PM, John R Pierce pie...@hogranch.com wrote:
On 11/03/10 3:46 PM, Ross Walker wrote:
I just think VPNs' time has come and gone.
VPN's have another use entirely, which is linking LAN segments over the
internet to create a
On 11/3/10 8:00 PM, Bart Schaefer wrote:
I have a CentOS 4 server that acts as a gateway for a small LAN. The
lower half of the 192.168.144 address space is the LAN on eth1, the
upper half is the WAN on eth0, and the default route is to
192.168.144.254 which is my DSL router; this has been
Bob McConnell wrote:
Jake Shipton wrote:
Akemi Yagi wrote:
Keith Roberts wrote:
I have run one full test and got no errors on the memory
module. Is it worth keeping it running overnight, just to
see if temperature changes will afect the test?
I had a system that started crashing
77 matches
Mail list logo
