Re: [CentOS-es] Ver aplicación tomcat en subdominio

2011-02-09 Thread Roberto Felipe Muñoz Soto
El 8 de febrero de 2011 12:13, Julio Cesar jce...@geotech.cu escribió:  On Tue, 8 Feb 2011 03:43:57 -0300, César Morales sopo...@mki.cl  wrote: Tengo un servidor con apache/tomcat corriendo en el puerto 80/8080 respectivamente, tengo una aplicación corriendo en tomcat en una dirección del

[CentOS] Printer-Problems

2011-02-09 Thread Timothy Kesten
Hi Folks, fresh CentOS 5.5 x86_64. One USB-printer connected (HP Business Inkjet 1200) Printing from localhost:631 (Testpage) works. But no from any application. From OO only the message: printer-problem - no more. Second printer is from far (Cupsd) in the network. Works well. But what's about

Re: [CentOS] Printer-Problems

2011-02-09 Thread Keith Roberts
On Wed, 9 Feb 2011, Timothy Kesten wrote: To: centos@centos.org From: Timothy Kesten centos-...@gmx.de Subject: [CentOS] Printer-Problems Hi Folks, fresh CentOS 5.5 x86_64. One USB-printer connected (HP Business Inkjet 1200) Printing from localhost:631 (Testpage) works. But no from

Re: [CentOS] Printer-Problems

2011-02-09 Thread Timothy Kesten
Am Mittwoch, 9. Februar 2011, 10:45:05 schrieb Keith Roberts: Which printer is set as default? The local USB-printer What types of apps are you tring to print from - JAVA? Yes - java but also kmail - get error message: client-error-not-authorized Timothy

Re: [CentOS] Printer-Problems - addendum

2011-02-09 Thread Timothy Kesten
The whole error message from kmail was: A print error occured. error message received from system: cupsdoprint -P 'HP_Business_Inkjet_1200' -j 'file:///' -H 'server:631' -U 'admin' -o 'copies=1 multiple-document-handling=seperate_documents-collated- copies orientation-request=3'

Re: [CentOS] Printer-Problems

2011-02-09 Thread Keith Roberts
On Wed, 9 Feb 2011, Timothy Kesten wrote: To: CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org From: Timothy Kesten centos-...@gmx.de Subject: Re: [CentOS] Printer-Problems Am Mittwoch, 9. Februar 2011, 10:45:05 schrieb Keith Roberts: Which printer is set as default? The local USB-printer What

Re: [CentOS] Printer-Problems - addendum

2011-02-09 Thread Keith Roberts
On Wed, 9 Feb 2011, Timothy Kesten wrote: To: CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org From: Timothy Kesten centos-...@gmx.de Subject: Re: [CentOS] Printer-Problems - addendum The whole error message from kmail was: A print error occured. error message received from system: cupsdoprint -P

Re: [CentOS] Printer-Problems - addendum

2011-02-09 Thread Timothy Kesten
Am Mittwoch, 9. Februar 2011, 11:27:04 schrieb Keith Roberts: What desktop are you running - KDE? jepp - KDE Timothy ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Printer-Problems - steps forward

2011-02-09 Thread Timothy Kesten
My computer is server-new I have a second computer in my network called server. There is cupsd running. On server-new I have in /etc/cups/client.conf a line ServerName server So I can use the printer on server. Next I have added the local printer. But cupsdoprint use -H server:631 (see

Re: [CentOS] Printer-Problems - steps forward

2011-02-09 Thread Timothy Kesten
My computer is server-new Here is the local printer I have a second computer in my network called server. There is running cupsd and I can use this printer from server-new (/etc/cups/client.conf - ServerName server). Added the local printer - doesn't work. cupsdoprint use server as host

Re: [CentOS] ipsec with ipv4 and ipv6 not working

2011-02-09 Thread Steve Clark
On 02/08/2011 05:54 PM, Drew wrote: I have posted to the ipsec-devel list and haven't gotten any responses. Also I have spent 2 days googling with no results about the above setup. Is it even possible to tunnel ipv4 packet thru an ipv6 ipsec tunnel? AFAIK, No. IPv4 IPv6 are different

[CentOS] rsync permission denied , without changing apache user and group setting

2011-02-09 Thread Agnello George
Hi i got two server webserver1 and webserver2 i want to rsync some data form webserver1 to webserver2 using a user called syncuser ( syncuser is added to the group apache : adduser -G apache syncuser ) here is my command : [root@web1 projects]# rsync -avzh /var/www/projects/beta-website1

Re: [CentOS] rsync permission denied , without changing apache user and group setting

2011-02-09 Thread Johnny Hughes
On 02/09/2011 05:53 AM, Agnello George wrote: Hi i got two server webserver1 and webserver2 i want to rsync some data form webserver1 to webserver2 using a user called syncuser ( syncuser is added to the group apache : adduser -G apache syncuser ) here is my command : [root@web1

Re: [CentOS] iSCSI disk preperation

2011-02-09 Thread Ross Walker
On Feb 8, 2011, at 4:28 PM, Jason Brown jason.br...@millbrookprinting.com wrote: In our configuration, we are going to have our iSCSI targets and initiators all connected to the same layer 3 switch and isolate the iSCSI traffic on separate networks. Would it be beneficial to also set up

[CentOS] VPN inside VPN?

2011-02-09 Thread Fajar Priyanto
Hi all, Just wondering if VPN inside VPN is possible? I've created PPTP VPN in the office. Then from home, first I need to use company's official ATT VPN. Then after connected, I fire up the PPTP VPN client. Got connected, but cannot ping the PPTP gateway, and half minute later the PPTP got

Re: [CentOS] iptables nat table rules

2011-02-09 Thread Robert Spangler
On Tuesday 08 February 2011 16:43, Carlos S wrote: Thanks for the help. You are welcome. Robert, you pointed out the mistakes correctly. Not sure why I used iptables-save command at first place... Most likely because in ever other distro and web page that is the way to do it. It's just

Re: [CentOS] VPN inside VPN?

2011-02-09 Thread nux
Fajar Priyanto writes: Hi all, Just wondering if VPN inside VPN is possible? I've created PPTP VPN in the office. Then from home, first I need to use company's official ATT VPN. Then after connected, I fire up the PPTP VPN client. Got connected, but cannot ping the PPTP gateway, and half

[CentOS] High Availability and Storage Cluster

2011-02-09 Thread Denis Zaharov
Dear mailing list members, There was a branch about clusters, but I have a certain task. There are two servers with CentOS 5.5 installed. The servers are working with Zabbix (monitoring system for traffic, using a MySQL), wiki and RT (all are using Apache). If one server will have became not

Re: [CentOS] VPN inside VPN?

2011-02-09 Thread Giles Coochey
On 09/02/2011 15:46, n...@nux.ro wrote: Fajar Priyanto writes: Hi all, Just wondering if VPN inside VPN is possible? I've created PPTP VPN in the office. Then from home, first I need to use company's official ATT VPN. Then after connected, I fire up the PPTP VPN client. Got connected, but

Re: [CentOS] High Availability and Storage Cluster

2011-02-09 Thread Johnny Hughes
On 02/09/2011 07:50 AM, Denis Zaharov wrote: Dear mailing list members, There was a branch about clusters, but I have a certain task. There are two servers with CentOS 5.5 installed. The servers are working with Zabbix (monitoring system for traffic, using a MySQL), wiki and RT (all are

Re: [CentOS] High Availability and Storage Cluster

2011-02-09 Thread m . roth
Denis Zaharov wrote: Dear mailing list members, There was a branch about clusters, but I have a certain task. There are two servers with CentOS 5.5 installed. The servers are working with Zabbix (monitoring system for traffic, using a MySQL), wiki and RT (all are using Apache). If one

Re: [CentOS] mount the wrong device after system recovery

2011-02-09 Thread Xinhuan Zheng
The mkinitrd command worked out. Thanks a lot for your help. :) - xinhuan -Original Message- From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Robert Heller Sent: Tuesday, February 08, 2011 4:47 PM To: CentOS mailing list Cc: CentOS mailing list Subject: Re:

[CentOS] a possible heads up wrt CERN experiment breaking SL 5.6

2011-02-09 Thread Larry Vaden
This may or may not be of interest to CentOS developers; if it is not or if it is redundant of your efforts to keep atop of what's happening, you have my apologies. Whether it is joint or disjoint wrt to the upstream code is not known at this point, but I have submitted a request for elucidation

Re: [CentOS] VPN inside VPN?

2011-02-09 Thread Cameron Kerr
On 10/02/11 02:52, Giles Coochey wrote: On 09/02/2011 15:46, n...@nux.ro wrote: Fajar Priyanto writes: Hi all, Just wondering if VPN inside VPN is possible? I've created PPTP VPN in the office. Then from home, first I need to use company's official ATT VPN. Then after connected, I fire up

Re: [CentOS] Ken Olsen od DEC, 1927-2011

2011-02-09 Thread Lamar Owen
On Tuesday, February 08, 2011 08:21:38 pm Jay Leafey wrote: Much as I love Linux, I'd still prefer to be running VMS on an x86 desktop box! 1.) Get an OpenVMS hobbyist media kit and license for OpenVMS/VAX. 2.) Install simh from a third-party CentOS repository, or from source. (

Re: [CentOS] VPN inside VPN?

2011-02-09 Thread Nataraj
On 02/09/2011 09:35 AM, Cameron Kerr wrote: On 10/02/11 02:52, Giles Coochey wrote: On 09/02/2011 15:46, n...@nux.ro wrote: Fajar Priyanto writes: Hi all, Just wondering if VPN inside VPN is possible? I've created PPTP VPN in the office. Then from home, first I need to use company's

Re: [CentOS] VPN inside VPN?

2011-02-09 Thread Gordon Messmer
On 02/09/2011 12:01 PM, Nataraj wrote: I would also look at routing. When the second vpn comes up, it may be configured to alter the routing table which would then try to route the first vpn through the second and the second through the first. That sounds mostly right. Many VPNs will take

Re: [CentOS] VPN inside VPN?

2011-02-09 Thread Les Mikesell
On 2/9/2011 2:40 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote: Another problem is that pptp is udp only and cannot be tunneled through a firewall easily like openvpn or ipsec, so if there is any kind of nat going on when you connect through the first vpn, it won't work because you won't get your packets back.

Re: [CentOS] High Availability and Storage Cluster

2011-02-09 Thread Rajagopal Swaminathan
Greetings, On 2/9/11, Denis Zaharov dizaha...@gmail.com wrote: Dear mailing list members, There are two servers with CentOS 5.5 installed. The servers are working with Zabbix (monitoring system for traffic, using a MySQL), wiki and RT (all are using Apache). If one server will have became

Re: [CentOS] ipsec with ipv4 and ipv6 not working

2011-02-09 Thread Michael H. Warfield
On Tue, 2011-02-08 at 14:54 -0800, Drew wrote: I have posted to the ipsec-devel list and haven't gotten any responses. Also I have spent 2 days googling with no results about the above setup. Is it even possible to tunnel ipv4 packet thru an ipv6 ipsec tunnel? AFAIK, No. It's

[CentOS] how will CentOS handle the perftools 1.7 vs. 1.6 issue?

2011-02-09 Thread Larry Vaden
In order to avoid a cross post, the following background quote is from scientific-linux-us...@fnal.gov: quote On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 11:27 AM, Ewan Mac Mahon e...@macmahon.me.uk wrote: I'm a little bit hazy on the details, but there are some slides from the meeting here[1]:

Re: [CentOS] VPN inside VPN?

2011-02-09 Thread Fajar Priyanto
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 5:20 AM, Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com wrote: On 2/9/2011 2:40 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote: Another problem is that pptp is udp only and cannot be tunneled through a firewall easily like openvpn or ipsec, so if there is any kind of nat going on when you connect

[CentOS] PAE kernel source code

2011-02-09 Thread sri
Hi I want to use 2.6.18-194.el5-PAE kernel source code. Unable to find it over web. Appreciate any pointers for that. Thanks, Sri -- -- ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] PAE kernel source code

2011-02-09 Thread Kenneth Wolcott
On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 20:52, sri bskmo...@gmail.com wrote: Hi I want to use 2.6.18-194.el5-PAE kernel source code. Unable to find it over web. Appreciate any pointers for that. Thanks, Sri Hmmm...I place the following into firefox searchbox (google is my search engine):

Re: [CentOS] PAE kernel source code

2011-02-09 Thread JohnS
On Wed, 2011-02-09 at 21:06 -0800, Kenneth Wolcott wrote: Hmmm...I place the following into firefox searchbox (google is my search engine): 2.6.18-194.el5-PAE SRPM I seem to have lots of hits (maybe they're no good): This one looks pretty good and it is the first one on the list: He

Re: [CentOS] how will CentOS handle the perftools 1.7 vs. 1.6 issue?

2011-02-09 Thread Ned Slider
On 10/02/11 02:05, Larry Vaden wrote: In order to avoid a cross post, the following background quote is from scientific-linux-us...@fnal.gov: quote On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 11:27 AM, Ewan Mac Mahone...@macmahon.me.uk wrote: I'm a little bit hazy on the details, but there are some slides from