[CentOS-es] Saludos, error formateando una memoria USB

2011-02-10 Thread Yoinier Hernandez Nieves
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hola listeros, Tengo un problema con una memoria USB, que anteriormente indicaba que era de 4 GB, pero se reiniciaba en ocasiones, y pensando que podia ser algún problema de estructura del HD, empeze a particionarla con FDisk, luego de esto, solo me

Re: [CentOS-es] Saludos, error formateando una memoria USB

2011-02-10 Thread Rubén González
He tenido varias veces ese problema con algunas memorias usb y, alguna vez me indicaron que mediante un programa las memorias usb pueden ser adulteradas, por lo que indican inicialmente una capacidad de almacenamiento superior a la real, pero, cuando al intentar almacenar un bit más de la

Re: [CentOS] how will CentOS handle the perftools 1.7 vs. 1.6 issue?

2011-02-10 Thread Johnny Hughes
On 02/10/2011 12:37 AM, Ned Slider wrote: On 10/02/11 02:05, Larry Vaden wrote: In order to avoid a cross post, the following background quote is from scientific-linux-us...@fnal.gov: quote On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 11:27 AM, Ewan Mac Mahone...@macmahon.me.uk wrote: I'm a little bit hazy on

Re: [CentOS] how will CentOS handle the perftools 1.7 vs. 1.6 issue?

2011-02-10 Thread Kai Schaetzl
Larry, could you please stop spamming this list with problems you see on the SL list? Thanks. This package isn't even part of CentOS. Kai ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] ipsec with ipv4 and ipv6 not working

2011-02-10 Thread Steve Clark
On 02/09/2011 07:14 PM, Michael H. Warfield wrote: On Tue, 2011-02-08 at 14:54 -0800, Drew wrote: I have posted to the ipsec-devel list and haven't gotten any responses. Also I have spent 2 days googling with no results about the above setup. Is it even possible to tunnel ipv4 packet thru

Re: [CentOS] PAE kernel source code

2011-02-10 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 11:52 PM, sri bskmo...@gmail.com wrote: Hi I want to use 2.6.18-194.el5-PAE kernel source code. Unable to find it over web. Appreciate any pointers for that. Thanks, Sri If you run yum list, you get the list of all available packages, installed or not. You should

[CentOS] Hyper-V template configuration

2011-02-10 Thread Dvorkin, Asya
Hi everyone, I've installed CentOS 5 on Hyper-V and finally got everything working. I would like to setup a template, but google is failing me. Everything I read does not seem very promising when it comes to templates support with MS Hyper-V. I was wondering if maybe someone here has

Re: [CentOS] how will CentOS handle the perftools 1.7 vs. 1.6 issue?

2011-02-10 Thread Ray Van Dolson
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 12:42:48PM +0100, Kai Schaetzl wrote: Larry, could you please stop spamming this list with problems you see on the SL list? Thanks. This package isn't even part of CentOS. Personally, I have no problem with it. Cross-community communication over potentially shared

Re: [CentOS] how will CentOS handle the perftools 1.7 vs. 1.6 issue?

2011-02-10 Thread Lamar Owen
On Thursday, February 10, 2011 06:42:48 am Kai Schaetzl wrote: Larry, could you please stop spamming this list with problems you see on the SL list? Thanks. This package isn't even part of CentOS. While google perftools is not a part of either SL or CentOS, it *is* in EPEL, and CentOS users

Re: [CentOS] High Availability and Storage Cluster

2011-02-10 Thread Ryan Manikowski
On 2/9/2011 7:04 PM, Rajagopal Swaminathan wrote: Greetings, On 2/9/11, Denis Zaharovdizaha...@gmail.com wrote: Dear mailing list members, There are two servers with CentOS 5.5 installed. The servers are working with Zabbix (monitoring system for traffic, using a MySQL), wiki and RT (all

[CentOS] Centos 5.5 + firefox 3.6 and 64bit javaplugin (1.6u23)

2011-02-10 Thread Eero Volotinen
Hi List, Any success running 64bit javaplugin on centos 5.5 firefox 3.6? For me it always complains about wrong elfclass64 ? thanks for any help.. -- Eero ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Centos 5.5 + firefox 3.6 and 64bit javaplugin (1.6u23)

2011-02-10 Thread Lars Hecking
Eero Volotinen writes: Hi List, Any success running 64bit javaplugin on centos 5.5 firefox 3.6? For me it always complains about wrong elfclass64 ? Check out these threads: http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/2010-November/101229.html

Re: [CentOS] Centos 5.5 + firefox 3.6 and 64bit javaplugin (1.6u23)

2011-02-10 Thread Eero Volotinen
2011/2/10 Lars Hecking lheck...@users.sourceforge.net: Eero Volotinen writes: Hi List, Any success running 64bit javaplugin on centos 5.5 firefox 3.6? For me it always complains about wrong elfclass64 ?  Check out these threads:  

Re: [CentOS] how will CentOS handle the perftools 1.7 vs. 1.6 issue?

2011-02-10 Thread Kai Schaetzl
While google perftools is not a part of either SL or CentOS, it *is* in EPEL, and CentOS users can be users of EPEL Then it's on-topic on the EPEL list, not here. e.g. ask there for an updated version of the package. This wasn't the first instance. This guy has recently started a habit of

Re: [CentOS] Centos 5.5 + firefox 3.6 and 64bit javaplugin (1.6u23)

2011-02-10 Thread Mathieu Baudier
Looks like firefox is 32bit version, not 64bit version, but 32bit java 1.6.u23 still fails. Where did you install Java from? The Java browser plugin is not available in teh OpenJDK shipped with CentOS 5.5. You need to install the JRE from Sun. In this page:

Re: [CentOS] how will CentOS handle the perftools 1.7 vs. 1.6 issue?

2011-02-10 Thread Larry Vaden
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 11:31 AM, Kai Schaetzl mailli...@conactive.com wrote: While google perftools is not a part of either SL or CentOS, it *is* in EPEL, and CentOS users can be users of EPEL Then it's on-topic on the EPEL list, not here. e.g. ask there for an updated version of the

Re: [CentOS] how will CentOS handle the perftools 1.7 vs. 1.6 issue?

2011-02-10 Thread Ray Van Dolson
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 11:53:52AM -0600, Larry Vaden wrote: On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 11:31 AM, Kai Schaetzl mailli...@conactive.com wrote: While google perftools is not a part of either SL or CentOS, it *is* in EPEL, and CentOS users can be users of EPEL Then it's on-topic on the EPEL

[CentOS] Some RAID-6 observations ... RHEL-6 vs CentOS-5.5

2011-02-10 Thread Chuck Munro
Hello all, In the process of building a new VM box to replace several individual CentOS servers, I've had the interesting experience of running both CentOS-5.5 and RHEL-6 (eval copy) as I build out the hardware based on a Supermicro motherboard. A couple of observations regarding RAID-6: -

[CentOS] CentOS 5.5 Java Process Death

2011-02-10 Thread Martin Hewitt
Hi all, I'm running CentOS 5.5 Final, Java version 1.6.0_17 OpenJDK Runtime Environment (IcedTea6 1.7.5) (rhel-1.16.b17.el5-x86_64) OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM (build 14.0-b16, mixed mode) installed via Yum. We have a java application, packaged as a jar, running on our servers which, periodically,

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.5 Java Process Death

2011-02-10 Thread m . roth
Martin Hewitt wrote: Hi all, I'm running CentOS 5.5 Final, Java version 1.6.0_17 OpenJDK Runtime Environment (IcedTea6 1.7.5) (rhel-1.16.b17.el5-x86_64) OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM (build 14.0-b16, mixed mode) installed via Yum. We have a java application, packaged as a jar, running on our

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.5 Java Process Death

2011-02-10 Thread Martin Hewitt
Hi Mark, Thanks, I didn't know about the strace command, so that's useful. Fortunately, this is on a dedicated server, so there's a fair amount of free disk. I've also remembered that one server was previously running CentOS 5.4, so I'm rebuilding the mirror server with 5.4 to see if that made a

Re: [CentOS] how will CentOS handle the perftools 1.7 vs. 1.6 issue?

2011-02-10 Thread Keith Keller
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 04:53:09AM -0600, Johnny Hughes wrote: This is correct, CentOS would add an updated package somewhere (our people.centos.org site or the centos-testing repository would be the likely places). We want our release to be the same source code where ever possible ...

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.5 Java Process Death

2011-02-10 Thread m . roth
Hey, Martin, Martin Hewitt wrote: Thanks, I didn't know about the strace command, so that's useful. Fortunately, this is on a dedicated server, so there's a fair amount of free disk. snip If you can do the code changes (and the try/catch is *supposed* to be in there, according to java style),

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.5 Java Process Death

2011-02-10 Thread m . roth
Hey, Martin, Martin Hewitt wrote: Thanks, I didn't know about the strace command, so that's useful. Fortunately, this is on a dedicated server, so there's a fair amount of free disk. snip If you can do the code changes (and the try/catch is *supposed* to be in there, according to java style),

[CentOS] dhcp fail over

2011-02-10 Thread aurfalien
Hi all, Few questions. Does DHCP failover work with statically assigned nodes? Seems like the failover statements only work in shared networks with non bootp clients? I'm assuming Centos 6 will have DHCP v4.2? Currently 5.5 ships with v3.0.5b. And will DHCP v4.X have easier failover

Re: [CentOS] how will CentOS handle the perftools 1.7 vs. 1.6 issue?

2011-02-10 Thread Johnny Hughes
On 02/10/2011 01:33 PM, Keith Keller wrote: On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 04:53:09AM -0600, Johnny Hughes wrote: This is correct, CentOS would add an updated package somewhere (our people.centos.org site or the centos-testing repository would be the likely places). We want our release to be the

Re: [CentOS] dhcp fail over

2011-02-10 Thread Peter Brady
On 10/02/11 11:49 AM, aurfal...@gmail.com wrote: Does DHCP failover work with statically assigned nodes? I have it working. Have a very occasional problem with static addresses on Windoze machines but I suspect that this is a Windoze driver problem than DHCP. Cheers -pete

Re: [CentOS] dhcp fail over

2011-02-10 Thread Paul Heinlein
On Thu, 10 Feb 2011, Peter Brady wrote: On 10/02/11 11:49 AM, aurfal...@gmail.com wrote: Does DHCP failover work with statically assigned nodes? I have it working. Have a very occasional problem with static addresses on Windoze machines but I suspect that this is a Windoze driver problem

Re: [CentOS] how will CentOS handle the perftools 1.7 vs. 1.6 issue?

2011-02-10 Thread Larry Vaden
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 2:06 PM, Johnny Hughes joh...@centos.org wrote: There are any number of 3rd party repos that maintain many newer packages, so getting things into CentOSPlus is not the only option. I would very much appreciate your referral to a repo that has a current BIND.

Re: [CentOS] how will CentOS handle the perftools 1.7 vs. 1.6 issue?

2011-02-10 Thread Ray Van Dolson
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 02:59:48PM -0600, Larry Vaden wrote: On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 2:06 PM, Johnny Hughes joh...@centos.org wrote: There are any number of 3rd party repos that maintain many newer packages, so getting things into CentOSPlus is not the only option. I would very much

Re: [CentOS] Centos 5.5 + firefox 3.6 and 64bit javaplugin (1.6u23)

2011-02-10 Thread Keith Roberts
On Thu, 10 Feb 2011, Eero Volotinen wrote: To: CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org From: Eero Volotinen eero.voloti...@iki.fi Subject: Re: [CentOS] Centos 5.5 + firefox 3.6 and 64bit javaplugin (1.6u23) snip Looks like firefox is 32bit version, not 64bit version, but 32bit java 1.6.u23

[CentOS] Strange Kernel for Centos 5.5

2011-02-10 Thread Always Learning
One of my VPS stopped working. After the data centre replaced a disk normal service resumed, then I notices this: CentOS release 5.5 (Final) Kernel 2.6.35.4 on an x86_64 I always thought Centos 5.x would always be on 2.6.18. Any thoughts?

Re: [CentOS] Strange Kernel for Centos 5.5

2011-02-10 Thread Brunner, Brian T.
-Original Message- From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Always Learning Sent: Thursday, February 10, 2011 4:25 PM To: centos@centos.org Subject: [CentOS] Strange Kernel for Centos 5.5 One of my VPS stopped working. After the data

Re: [CentOS] Strange Kernel for Centos 5.5

2011-02-10 Thread Robert Heller
At Thu, 10 Feb 2011 21:25:24 + CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org wrote: One of my VPS stopped working. After the data centre replaced a disk normal service resumed, then I notices this: CentOS release 5.5 (Final) Kernel

Re: [CentOS] Some RAID-6 observations ... RHEL-6 vs CentOS-5.5

2011-02-10 Thread Christopher Chan
On Friday, February 11, 2011 02:36 AM, Chuck Munro wrote: I'm hoping CentOS-6 doesn't present me with the same problem. Because I'm not a registered RHEL user, I don't have the ability to submit a bug report at RedHat. You don't have to be an RHEL user to file a bug report according to

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.5 Java Process Death

2011-02-10 Thread Martin Hewitt
Hi Mark, I've exhausted the Java avenues for debugging this issue, but, since my last email, the process I pointed strace at has been killed, but I'm afraid the rather raw format of the strace file is lost on me. The last six lines of the ouput file are: clone(child_stack=0x4202a250,

Re: [CentOS] Strange Kernel for Centos 5.5

2011-02-10 Thread Always Learning
Hi Brian T. Robert, Thanks for your input. I did a uname -a on a selection of Centos 5.5 machines and found the servers, netbooks and laptops were all a variety of 2.6.18-194.32.1.el5 and 2.6.19-194.32.1.el5-centos.plus. Only the VPS were different most likely, as Robert suggested, because of

Re: [CentOS] Centos 5.5 + firefox 3.6 and 64bit javaplugin (1.6u23)

2011-02-10 Thread yonatan pingle
Hey there! the newer plugin should work with latest Firefox , just configure the path correctly and you are set ,or use a symlink. check out this fine article http://koolinus.wordpress.com/2009/10/29/enable-java-plugin-on-firefox-with-centos-or-rhel-64bit/ what is your uname -a ? , maybe you

Re: [CentOS] Hyper-V template configuration

2011-02-10 Thread Lucian
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 2:48 PM, Dvorkin, Asya dvork...@umdnj.edu wrote: Hi everyone, I've installed CentOS 5 on Hyper-V and finally got everything working. I would like to setup a template, but google is failing me.  Everything I read does not seem very promising when it comes to templates

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.5 Java Process Death

2011-02-10 Thread Keith Roberts
On Fri, 11 Feb 2011, Martin Hewitt wrote: To: CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org From: Martin Hewitt martin.hew...@gmail.com Subject: Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.5 Java Process Death Hi Mark, I've exhausted the Java avenues for debugging this issue, but, since my last email, the process I