saludos,
saben si habrá una aplicacion grafica en centos que sirva para conectarme a un
nas , asi como lo tiene el yast de opensuse pero en centos
gracias.
___
CentOS-es mailing list
CentOS-es@centos.org
NAS es x IP :
mount.cifs //ip -u usurio
eso bastaria asi tengo yo mi NAS
El 16 de febrero de 2011 15:11, el linuxero
linuxerodep...@hotmail.comescribió:
saludos,
saben si habrá una aplicacion grafica en centos que sirva para conectarme a
un nas , asi como lo tiene el yast de opensuse pero
Hola amigos de la lista.
Tengo una duda y no comprendo muy bien.
¿Por qué cuando actualizo mi Centos 5.5 64b también instala versiones
i386 de 32b en algunas librerías y programas? De hecho, en el raíz hay
dos directorios lib: Un es /lib y el otro /lib64
Gracias
Normando
On 15/02/11 02:48, Brian Mathis wrote:
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 4:05 PM, John R. Dennison j...@gerdesas.com wrote:
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 05:00:43PM -0400, robert mena wrote:
Hi,
Despite the mailing list and twitter I did not find any updated info on
either versions regarding the current
On 15/02/11 17:25, Gilbert Sebenste wrote:
Let's see. 7 weeks after a RHEL release, we have:
For RHEL6, lets make that 14 weeks. And RHEL5.6 got released 9 weeks after
RHEL6.
It's amazing how much smoother things would be, in regards to controlling
the anticipation *if* we could find some
Hi List,
We have a CentOS VPS running a web site in a DC far away. The chap that
dev's this site told me he couldn't SFTP in yesterday, his password was
being rejected (I went to his desk to confirm and saw it was telling him the
password was incorrect but neither him nor me had changed it and we
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 12:31 PM, David Sommerseth
d...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
Is it really too much to ask for information on the progress? And
frankly, these references below doesn't shed too much light on the
situation
List,
Please relax. The CentOS team are doing their job.
We
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 7:28 AM, James Bensley jwbens...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi List,
We have a CentOS VPS running a web site in a DC far away. The chap that
dev's this site told me he couldn't SFTP in yesterday, his password was
being rejected (I went to his desk to confirm and saw it was
On 16 Feb 2011 12:34, Nico Kadel-Garcia nka...@gmail.com wrote:
Uh-oh. Has your developer, or you, been editing the /etc/passwd,
/etc/shadow, /etc/group, or /etc/gshadow files manually?
Nope.
And do you
use NIS or LDAP for authentication?
Nope.
And this is a publicly exposed
webserver,
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 7:43 AM, James Bensley jwbens...@gmail.com wrote:
On 16 Feb 2011 12:34, Nico Kadel-Garcia nka...@gmail.com wrote:
Uh-oh. Has your developer, or you, been editing the /etc/passwd,
/etc/shadow, /etc/group, or /etc/gshadow files manually?
Nope.
And do you
use NIS or
On 16/02/11 13:31, Stephen Cox wrote:
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 12:31 PM, David Sommerseth
d...@users.sourceforge.net
mailto:d...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
Is it really too much to ask for information on the progress? And
frankly, these references below doesn't shed too much
On 16/02/11 13:28, James Bensley wrote:
Hi List,
We have a CentOS VPS running a web site in a DC far away. The chap that
dev's this site told me he couldn't SFTP in yesterday, his password was
being rejected (I went to his desk to confirm and saw it was telling him
the password was
Thank you all for your sound advice.
Just to fill you in on why I am such a spoon at sys admin, this system
cost £50K+ and there is no sys admin and it comes with really poor
service support.
So I am learning on the job.
I now have a list of databases and there is not one called Bacula. I
will go
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 7:28 AM, James Bensley jwbens...@gmail.com wrote:
[root@server ~]# su - webdevuser
[webdevuser@server ~]# passwd
Changing password for user webdevuser.
Changing password for webdevuser.
(current) UNIX password:
passwd: Authentication token manipulation error
A lot
On 02/16/2011 04:31 AM, David Sommerseth wrote:
On 15/02/11 17:25, Gilbert Sebenste wrote:
Let's see. 7 weeks after a RHEL release, we have:
For RHEL6, lets make that 14 weeks. And RHEL5.6 got released 9 weeks after
RHEL6.
The FIRST build of a distribution (the .0 of 4.0 or 5.0) takes
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 01:50:55PM +0100, David Sommerseth wrote:
Exactly! Supporters who could most probably do even more, than just to sit
here idle waiting for the next release - if we only knew what the issues
are they are facing.
I find it amusing that all these offers of help
Can anyone with write-back cache working just confirm that they see some
sort of indication of write-back in dmesg?
As I mentioned I talked with Dell and they claim it is working, however
I spoke with VMWare and they said if it isn't indicated in dmesg, then
it isn't working. It would just be
On 2/16/11 7:15 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
If you want timely enterprise open source software, you should:
1. Pay for it from RHEL
2. Learn to build it yourself, then you can ask yourself how long it is
going to take. You still won't know ... but you will know who you yell at.
Or if you
On Wed, 2011-02-16 at 07:18 -0600, John R. Dennison wrote:
From everything I've heard on the
various IRC channels the response to that initial call for
help
was, shall we say, lackluster at best.
I, and I suspect many other Centos users too, do not indulge in IRC. We
have
2011/2/16 Johnny Hughes joh...@centos.org:
Oracle has supposedly released their EL 6 build (last Friday) ... but
they have not released their sources as of this post.
http://oss.oracle.com/el5/ === EL 5 Sources
http://oss.oracle.com/el6/ === 404 Error
No, the sources are here:
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 01:46:19PM +, Always Learning wrote:
I, and I suspect many other Centos users too, do not indulge in IRC. We
have better things to do with our scarce time.
That's nice. You do realize, I hope, that the centos dev team
is on IRC on a near daily
On 2/16/11, Always Learning cen...@g7.u22.net wrote:
In the future, perhaps the 'call' should be shared with the readershi
of this mailing list.
Always,
There is no negotiation, there will only be an announcement on the
list when 5.6 is done.
--
Stephen Cox
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 01:46:19PM +, Always Learning wrote:
I, and I suspect many other Centos users too, do not indulge in IRC. We
have better things to do with our scarce time.
That's nice. You do realize, I hope, that the centos dev team
is on IRC on a near daily basis;
On 16/02/11 14:18, John R. Dennison wrote:
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 01:50:55PM +0100, David Sommerseth wrote:
Exactly! Supporters who could most probably do even more, than just to sit
here idle waiting for the next release - if we only knew what the issues
are they are facing.
I
Thanks to all for your various replies
On 16 February 2011 12:50, Nico Kadel-Garcia nka...@gmail.com wrote:
Check the /etc/shadow and /etc/group for consistent numbers of
entries, and /etc/group and /etc/gshadow.
Do you mean duplicate entries? If so there are none of those.
No, I mean
On 16 February 2011 13:00, ... wrote:
you realize that there are no passwords in /etc/passwd, so if you
delete /etc/shadow and rebuild it using pwconv there will be no
passwords in the new /etc/shadow... depending on the exact state,
you either won't be able to log in, or the machine will be
Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 7:43 AM, James Bensley jwbens...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 16 Feb 2011 12:34, Nico Kadel-Garcia nka...@gmail.com wrote:
snip
Do you have other users who
can still log in or not?
There is only the root and web dev user on this box.
snip
What does
2011/2/16 David Sommerseth d...@users.sourceforge.net:
That Red Hat keeps their work schedule private is not directly comparable
to a CentOS community effort, how I see it.
Red Hat is also a big financial organisation, which CentOS is not. In that
context, Red Hat is much more responsible
On 16 February 2011 14:17, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
What does lastlog | grep -v Never show you?
Hi Mark,
This has shown something (potentially) interesting:
[root@server ~]# lastlog | grep -v Never
Username Port From Latest
root pts/2x.x.x.x Wed Feb 16
On 16/02/11 14:15, Johnny Hughes wrote:
[...snip...]
These phantom RPMS (non released by Red Hat, but in their build tree
for their initial development of the OS) are sometimes very hard to
replicate. They are versions that are no where to be found.
Fair enough. But please misunderstand me
On 16/02/11 15:16, James Bensley wrote:
i'd suggest looking at the log files (/var/log/secure and
.../messages), for indications of why you're having trouble logging
in as the other user. you can also, in a terminal window from a
mere mortal (not root) login, try:
su - user
as
On 02/16/2011 02:22 PM, Morten P.D. Stevens wrote:
The best example is Scientific Linux. There are schedules and an open
development process.
What is the reason for the closed development process in CentOS?
Its funny you say that Morten, since you actually offered to help. Didnt
you ? But
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 6:28 AM, James Bensley jwbens...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi List,
We have a CentOS VPS running a web site in a DC far away. The chap that
dev's this site told me he couldn't SFTP in yesterday, his password was
being rejected (I went to his desk to confirm and saw it was
On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 5:37 PM, James Pearson
jame...@moving-picture.com wrote:
Have a look at mtools (part of CentOS) - you can do something similar as
above as a non-root user:
mformat -C -i floppy.flp -f 360 ::
mcopy -i floppy.flp base_kickstart.ks ::ks.cfg
Well, hey now! That works
Hello,
I'm considering buying a second-hand Thinkpad T60 (with 2 GB RAM), as
a secondary laptop in order to run CentOS 5 on the field.
My main focus is therefore to have something robust, reliable and
above all well compatible with CentOS.
Hibernate / suspend feature are important to me, because
On 16 February 2011 14:34, ... wrote:
yes, that is what doing an su - user as *root* will do, which
doesn't tell you much. instead of doing this from a root login, do
it from a regular account (you don't routinely log in as root i hope
- actually it sounds like you do).
if this works, then
Hi David,
On 02/16/2011 12:50 PM, David Sommerseth wrote:
Exactly! Supporters who could most probably do even more, than just to sit
here idle waiting for the next release - if we only knew what the issues
are they are facing.
So what happened in the early days of when EL6 came out - we
On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 7:11 AM, Johnny Hughes joh...@centos.org wrote:
Because they also have $dayjobs too ... Oracle (with billions of dollars
and unlimited machines and personnel) just released their el6 on Friday.
Is there some reason you can't buy RHEL6?
Johnny et al,
If ya'll are
On 02/15/2011 07:06 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
As I said before, Oracle has not had their stuff released for very long
and while Scientific Linus has released some Alpha/Beta stuff along the
way, they also have not released 5.6 or 6.0 either. This is not easy.
It takes time.
Just for the sake
Keith/guys thanks for the suggestions, here is what I have found. It shows
loaded config file is /etc/php.ini but if I remove that file and restart
apache it still works. I also did as Keith suggested I removed a comment ';'
and I got no errors apache started and it loaded the /etc/php.ini file.
On 16/02/11 15:47, Karanbir Singh wrote:
On 02/16/2011 02:22 PM, Morten P.D. Stevens wrote:
The best example is Scientific Linux. There are schedules and an open
development process.
What is the reason for the closed development process in CentOS?
Its funny you say that Morten, since you
Hi David,
its me again :)
On 02/15/2011 05:11 PM, David Hornford wrote:
When will CentOS 6 be out?
The CentOS team does not have a fixed release schedule following an
upstream release. The release timeframe is based upon the number of bugs
In many cases's its still helpful to have some sort
On 02/16/2011 03:11 PM, David Sommerseth wrote:
If whoever wants to help out in a community project, and then see that when
a task come and then gives a response that this was the wrong timing, due
to other obligations - this is pretty fair response.
Not really. If someone says 'what can i do
On 02/16/2011 03:03 PM, Larry Vaden wrote:
You hear/read quite a few folks saying the equivalent of something
like corporations favor subscriptions over donations.'
Give them a chance to put their money where their mouth is :)
I believe we are working on making that happen, a few things need
On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 1:06 PM, Johnny Hughes joh...@centos.org wrote:
As I said before, Oracle has not had their stuff released for very long
and while Scientific Linus has released some Alpha/Beta stuff along the
way, they also have not released 5.6 or 6.0 either. This is not easy.
It
2011/2/16 Karanbir Singh mail-li...@karan.org:
On 02/16/2011 02:22 PM, Morten P.D. Stevens wrote:
The best example is Scientific Linux. There are schedules and an open
development process.
What is the reason for the closed development process in CentOS?
Its funny you say that Morten, since
Ok, everything is fixed now. I spoke with the VPS providers;
The jailed shell was removed from the webdev user (and the webmaster
user?) and they reset the password. I logged into ssh as the webdev
user to change the password and they told me off for trying and said I
must do it through
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 02:54:14PM +0100, Morten P.D. Stevens wrote:
2011/2/16 Johnny Hughes joh...@centos.org:
No, the sources are here:
http://oss.oracle.com/ol6/
And the RPMs:
http://public-yum.oracle.com/repo/OracleLinux/OL6/0/base/
Note that, according to its FAQ, the repo is
On 02/16/2011 03:20 PM, Morten P.D. Stevens wrote:
Karanbir, this is not quite right. And you know it.
I offered my help for testing. (qa process)
A very large part - if not all - of the qa effort is branding and role
specific within centos. Most of the other things only contribute towards
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 9:25 AM, Scott Robbins scot...@nyc.rr.com wrote:
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 02:54:14PM +0100, Morten P.D. Stevens wrote:
2011/2/16 Johnny Hughes joh...@centos.org:
No, the sources are here:
http://oss.oracle.com/ol6/
And the RPMs:
KB,
On Wednesday, February 16, 2011 09:58:31 am Karanbir Singh wrote:
snip
Now the bit that really cheeses me off is that we cant go through the
same loop again and again everytime someone new comes along and cant be
bothered to see what has happened in the past.
more really well written
On 16/02/11 15:58, Karanbir Singh wrote:
Hi David,
On 02/16/2011 12:50 PM, David Sommerseth wrote:
Exactly! Supporters who could most probably do even more, than just to sit
here idle waiting for the next release - if we only knew what the issues
are they are facing.
So what happened in
On 2/14/2011 1:23 AM, Bruce Ferrell wrote:
Yeah, I'm rebuilding a server with Oracle RAC and I wasn't sure exactly
what version of RedHat was used to build it originally. Centos 5.5
results in the external iscsi volumes being improperly sized. It turns
out Centos 3.5 works. Once, many
Hi,
On 02/16/2011 03:38 PM, David Sommerseth wrote:
However, let this be a discussion after CentOS5.6 and CentOS6 is released.
Rather start a new fresh thread when everyone (especially developers) have
had some rest after the releases.
Right, well volunteered to setup and get this
On 02/16/2011 09:20 AM, Larry Vaden wrote:
On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 1:06 PM, Johnny Hughes joh...@centos.org wrote:
As I said before, Oracle has not had their stuff released for very long
and while Scientific Linus has released some Alpha/Beta stuff along the
way, they also have not released
Mathieu Baudier wrote:
I'm considering buying a second-hand Thinkpad T60 (with 2 GB RAM), as
a secondary laptop in order to run CentOS 5 on the field.
snip
I would be grateful if people having used CentOS on this model could
share their experience (good or bad).
Oddly enough, I asked on
On 02/16/2011 09:03 AM, Larry Vaden wrote:
On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 7:11 AM, Johnny Hughes joh...@centos.org wrote:
Because they also have $dayjobs too ... Oracle (with billions of dollars
and unlimited machines and personnel) just released their el6 on Friday.
Is there some reason you can't
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 8:02 AM, Johnny Hughes joh...@centos.org wrote:
To the best of my knowledge, you are running BETA's or ALPHA's and not
released 5.6 products for SL 5.6 ...
http://www.scientificlinux.org/distributions
Or maybe I am missing something?
Apparently there was some
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 10:15 AM, Johnny Hughes joh...@centos.org wrote:
The CentOS Project can not afford to hire and pay someone a full salary
to do nothing but CentOS full time. If the project could do that, then
they would. But, if they did hire said person, then what would the
OTHER
Hi,
Since I was the one who created this topic (with different purpose) let me
suggest that after the 5.6/6.0 release consider a 'business model' for the
CentOS.
And by business model I mean take some time to:
a) Evaluate _if_ one or more paid staff would ease some of the taks that
must be done
On 2/16/2011 10:15 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
If we could hire 3 or 4 people (and provide any kind of reasonable job
security for their future), that might be an option. Otherwise I think
injecting a limited amount of cash into the process just produces hurt
feelings and degrades, not
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 10:29 AM, Akemi Yagi amy...@gmail.com wrote:
Apparently there was some confusion around the release of SL 5.6
alpha. Troy Dawson cleared it up in his post to the main SL mailing
list:
On Wed, 16 Feb 2011, Paul A wrote:
To: 'CentOS mailing list' centos@centos.org
From: Paul A ra...@meganet.net
Subject: Re: [CentOS] apache 2 and php 5.2
Keith/guys thanks for the suggestions, here is what I have
found. It shows loaded config file is /etc/php.ini but if
I remove that
Am 16.02.2011 01:27, schrieb Soporte Virtual:
2011/2/15 Soporte Virtual sopor...@gmail.com:
Hi list
It's my first message here, but I use CentOS from long time ago (sorry my
language, I'm spanish from Colombia)
I have a Intel board with an Integrated Network Card 82578DC. I've
sucessfully
We have about 50 CentOS servers with software RAID level 1 (mirroring).
Each week, we swap out one of the drives (the one in the second of four
hot-swap bays, only the first two of which contain drives) on each server
and take them offsite for safekeeping.
The problem is, the kernel seemingly
On 02/16/2011 10:50 AM, Larry Vaden wrote:
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 10:29 AM, Akemi Yagi amy...@gmail.com wrote:
Apparently there was some confusion around the release of SL 5.6
alpha. Troy Dawson cleared it up in his post to the main SL mailing
list:
On Wed, 2011-02-16 at 15:52 +0100, Mathieu Baudier wrote:
I'm considering buying a second-hand Thinkpad T60 (with 2 GB RAM), as
a secondary laptop in order to run CentOS 5 on the field.
One thing you might, or happily might not, have difficulties with is the
wifi driver. Most drivers are
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 5:08 PM, Karanbir Singh mail-li...@karan.org wrote:
I just finished pushing through the 5.6 distro tree's into the distro
builders ( so isos get built etc and moved to qa ). Was hoping to have
this done by the weekend but a series of unfortunate incidents ( like
large
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 8:57 AM, Alexander Dalloz ad+li...@uni-x.org wrote:
Just a note about how the ELrepo package works: It sets the original
kernel module (shipping with the CentOS/RHEL) kernel on a blacklist and
forces to load the own module instead. Though both modules have the same
On 02/16/11 6:27 AM, James Bensley wrote:
However he always uses the webdev account which lastlog shows as never
logged in, so when accessing the VPS as the webdev user account are we
somehow actually accessing the VPS as webmaster? Is it possible the
VPS providers performed some crazy voodoo
On Wed, 2011-02-16 at 14:58 +, Karanbir Singh wrote:
Nothing happened, not one person beyond the
usual-people actually did anything.
When you have time please tell all of us, preferably on this list, what
resources you need and how 'ordinary' people can help. Give us a list of
tasks that
On 16/02/2011, at 3:12 PM, Smithies, Russell wrote:
802.3ad info
LACP rate: slow
Active Aggregator Info:
Aggregator ID: 19
Number of ports: 3
Actor Key: 17
Partner Key: 5
Partner Mac Address: 00:1b:90:3d:90:c0
Slave Interface: eth0
MII
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 11:06 AM, Johnny Hughes joh...@centos.org wrote:
WRT the age of RHEL ... that is what enterprise Linux is. Fedora (or
Ubuntu non LTS, or opensuse, or Debian SID, or any number of other
alternatives) exist if you don't want the more stable (ie, older) items.
Again,
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 11:17 AM, Always Learning cen...@g7.u22.net wrote:
Perhaps a mailing list entitle Centos Devoir (home work / jobs to do)
could carry a regular list of jobs that need doing ?
+1
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 11:06 AM, Johnny Hughes joh...@centos.org wrote:
Again, nothing wrong with their approach (I like Troy in any dealings we
have had), however it is not what CentOS does or is going to do. When
we release, we basically loose meaningful access to our machines for a
week
At Wed, 16 Feb 2011 12:00:27 -0500 (EST) CentOS mailing list
centos@centos.org wrote:
We have about 50 CentOS servers with software RAID level 1 (mirroring).
Each week, we swap out one of the drives (the one in the second of four
hot-swap bays, only the first two of which contain drives)
At Wed, 16 Feb 2011 11:02:57 -0500 CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org
wrote:
Mathieu Baudier wrote:
I'm considering buying a second-hand Thinkpad T60 (with 2 GB RAM), as
a secondary laptop in order to run CentOS 5 on the field.
snip
I would be grateful if people having used CentOS
Les Mikesell wrote:
On 2/16/2011 10:15 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
If we could hire 3 or 4 people (and provide any kind of reasonable job
security for their future), that might be an option. Otherwise I think
injecting a limited amount of cash into the process just produces hurt
feelings and
On 2/16/2011 11:06 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
Again, nothing wrong with their approach (I like Troy in any dealings we
have had), however it is not what CentOS does or is going to do. When
we release, we basically loose meaningful access to our machines for a
week as dozens of internal
On 02/16/2011 11:17 AM, Always Learning wrote:
On Wed, 2011-02-16 at 14:58 +, Karanbir Singh wrote:
Nothing happened, not one person beyond the
usual-people actually did anything.
When you have time please tell all of us, preferably on this list, what
resources you need and how
At Wed, 16 Feb 2011 12:00:27 -0500 (EST) CentOS mailing list
centos@centos.org wrote:
We have about 50 CentOS servers with software RAID level 1 (mirroring).
Each week, we swap out one of the drives (the one in the second of four
hot-swap bays, only the first two of which contain drives) on
On 02/16/2011 12:30 PM, Robert Heller wrote:
At Wed, 16 Feb 2011 11:02:57 -0500 CentOS mailing listcentos@centos.org
wrote:
Mathieu Baudier wrote:
I'm considering buying a second-hand Thinkpad T60 (with 2 GB RAM), as
a secondary laptop in order to run CentOS 5 on the field.
snip
I would
The problem is, the kernel seemingly randomly switches between
/dev/sdb and /dev/sdc for these devices.
I use the UUID in fstab rather than '/dev/sda', etc
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
No there is only on php.ini on there located in /etc/php.ini, this is so
weird.
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf
Of Keith Roberts
Sent: Wednesday, February 16, 2011 11:56 AM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] apache
On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 12:10 PM, Karanbir Singh mail-li...@karan.org wrote:
[1]: I say that with a pinch of salt though - EL6 is a tad overdue. A
lot of new projects and services need a codebase newer than whats on
offer in C5.
Karabir,
Should the effort to build community support for an
On 2/16/2011 12:09 PM, compdoc wrote:
The problem is, the kernel seemingly randomly switches between
/dev/sdb and /dev/sdc for these devices.
I use the UUID in fstab rather than '/dev/sda', etc
In this case it would be something you give to mdadm to add a device
back to a set. And you'd
Am 16.02.2011 18:09, schrieb Akemi Yagi:
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 8:57 AM, Alexander Dalloz ad+li...@uni-x.org wrote:
Just curious, any specific reason why to choose the ELrepo module over
the one coming with the CentOS kernel?
I have an RHEL 6 system with an Intel Corporation 82574L Gigabit
partprobe as root should refresh the kernel partition / disk cache
instead of a reboot.
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 7:30 PM, Robert Heller hel...@deepsoft.com wrote:
At Wed, 16 Feb 2011 12:00:27 -0500 (EST) CentOS mailing list
centos@centos.org wrote:
We have about 50 CentOS servers with
On 16/02/11 18:08, Always Learning wrote:
On Wed, 2011-02-16 at 15:52 +0100, Mathieu Baudier wrote:
I'm considering buying a second-hand Thinkpad T60 (with 2 GB RAM), as
a secondary laptop in order to run CentOS 5 on the field.
One thing you might, or happily might not, have difficulties
At Wed, 16 Feb 2011 13:04:00 -0500 CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org
wrote:
On 02/16/2011 12:30 PM, Robert Heller wrote:
At Wed, 16 Feb 2011 11:02:57 -0500 CentOS mailing listcentos@centos.org
wrote:
Mathieu Baudier wrote:
I'm considering buying a second-hand Thinkpad T60
At Wed, 16 Feb 2011 12:38:53 -0500 (EST) CentOS mailing list
centos@centos.org wrote:
At Wed, 16 Feb 2011 12:00:27 -0500 (EST) CentOS mailing list
centos@centos.org wrote:
We have about 50 CentOS servers with software RAID level 1 (mirroring).
Each week, we swap out one of the
On 2/16/2011 12:09 PM, compdoc wrote:
The problem is, the kernel seemingly randomly switches between
/dev/sdb and /dev/sdc for these devices.
I use the UUID in fstab rather than '/dev/sda', etc
In this case it would be something you give to mdadm to add a device
back to a set. And you'd
On Wed, 16 Feb 2011, James Smallacombe wrote:
To: CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org
From: James Smallacombe ja...@sicom.com
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Software RAID Level 1, smartd and changing dev numbers
At Wed, 16 Feb 2011 12:00:27 -0500 (EST) CentOS mailing list
centos@centos.org wrote:
At Wed, 16 Feb 2011 12:38:53 -0500 (EST) CentOS mailing list
centos@centos.org wrote:
At Wed, 16 Feb 2011 12:00:27 -0500 (EST) CentOS mailing list
centos@centos.org wrote:
We have about 50 CentOS servers with software RAID level 1
(mirroring).
Each week, we swap out one of the
Paul A wrote:
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf
Of Keith Roberts
On Wed, 16 Feb 2011, Paul A wrote:
From: Paul A ra...@meganet.net
Keith/guys thanks for the suggestions, here is what I have
found. It shows loaded config file is /etc/php.ini but if
At Wed, 16 Feb 2011 13:43:16 -0500 (EST) CentOS mailing list
centos@centos.org wrote:
On 2/16/2011 12:09 PM, compdoc wrote:
The problem is, the kernel seemingly randomly switches between
/dev/sdb and /dev/sdc for these devices.
I use the UUID in fstab rather than '/dev/sda', etc
On Wed, 16 Feb 2011, Paul A wrote:
To: 'CentOS mailing list' centos@centos.org
From: Paul A ra...@meganet.net
Subject: Re: [CentOS] apache 2 and php 5.2
No there is only on php.ini on there located in
/etc/php.ini, this is so weird.
It is - very odd!
What's your file permissions for
On 2/16/2011 12:41 PM, Robert Heller wrote:
The wireless on the X31 is an Intel Corporation PRO/Wireless LAN 2100
3B Mini PCI Adapter (rev 04). Intel wireless chips are *very well*
supported *out of the box* under CentOS. You do need to download and
install the proper firmware.
Isn't being
On 2/16/2011 11:17 AM, Larry Vaden wrote:
I think I'll continue with the effort to get RedHat to see the wisdom
wrt certain essential elements of the Internet infrastructure (like
BIND).
I thought the RHEL 5.6 release notes said it contains BIND 9.7. What
more do you want?
--
Les
On Tue, 15 Feb 2011, Paul A wrote:
To: 'CentOS mailing list' centos@centos.org
From: Paul A ra...@meganet.net
Subject: [CentOS] apache 2 and php 5.2
Hi originally I installed php 4 on centos 5.5 and then a
few repos including the remi repo to upgrade to php5,
which seems to upgrade/work
1 - 100 of 140 matches
Mail list logo
