Am 08.03.11 00:05, schrieb Ralph Angenendt:
Am 04.03.11 17:06, schrieb Andreas Rogge:
I'm currently porting the public and free parts of Red Hat Documentation
to CentOS.
Being unable to do anything graphics-related, I need someone to provide
the following images:
logo.svg 300x140
Estoy configurando centos 5.5 para autenticación radius.
Me estoy conectando con windows 7. Ya me aparece el diálogo donde ocupo
poner el usuario y contraseña al momento de enlazar con el ap.
radtest fulano 123qwe localhost 1812 testing123 me autoriza correctamente
me topé con el problema
Hola,
2011/3/7 Fernando Rojas de la Torre fernando.ro...@uniondetula.gob.mx:
Estoy configurando centos 5.5 para autenticación radius.
Me estoy conectando con windows 7. Ya me aparece el diálogo donde ocupo
poner el usuario y contraseña al momento de enlazar con el ap.
radtest fulano 123qwe
well i'm already running that kernel version.
i've upgraded to the latest *194*
Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2011 01:46:45 -0600
From: thea...@sasktel.net
To: centos@centos.org
Subject: Re: [CentOS] BUG: soft lockup CPU stuck for 10seconds (Server went
down)
On Mon, 07 Mar 2011 09:31:42 +0200
Dne 7.3.2011 20:56, ann kok napsal(a):
Hi
I used the command ip -6 addr add 2001:DB8:CAFE:::12/64 dev eth0
to add ipv6 address and can see it in ifconfig
but can't ping it
Why?
Thank you
# ping6 2001:db8:cafe:::12
PING 2001:db8:cafe:::12(2001:db8:cafe:::12) 56
Dear All
My centos machine is connected to my MS Windows machine on the net.The
MS Windows machine is connected to Internet via valid IP address
setting and on its secondary ip address setting it can see my centos
machine on the intranet.Can you please let me know how can try for
Internet
Dne 8.3.2011 10:19, hadi motamedi napsal(a):
Dear All
My centos machine is connected to my MS Windows machine on the net.The
MS Windows machine is connected to Internet via valid IP address
setting and on its secondary ip address setting it can see my centos
machine on the intranet.Can you
On 07/03/11 08:31, Roland RoLaNd wrote:
Hello,
Today my server stopped responding.
i went to the console and on the screen there were a continuous loop of the
following info shown on the screen:
BUG: soft lockup - CPU#0 stuck for 10s! [java:13959]
and alot of other information.
ii've
On 3/8/11, Jakub Jedelsky jakub.jedel...@gmail.com wrote:
Dne 8.3.2011 10:19, hadi motamedi napsal(a):
Dear All
My centos machine is connected to my MS Windows machine on the net.The
MS Windows machine is connected to Internet via valid IP address
setting and on its secondary ip address
Keith Keller wrote on Mon, 7 Mar 2011 15:28:55 -0800:
In CentOS, I believe that rc.sysinit will try to set the hostname from
its FQDN (or whatever you have set in /etc/sysconfig/network) without
mucking about with /etc/hosts.
Yes. I didn't say it wouldn't.
Kai
On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 12:09 PM, hadi motamedi motamed...@gmail.com wrote:
On 3/8/11, Jakub Jedelsky jakub.jedel...@gmail.com wrote:
Dne 8.3.2011 10:19, hadi motamedi napsal(a):
Dear All
My centos machine is connected to my MS Windows machine on the net.The
MS Windows machine is connected to
On 3/8/11, Rudi Ahlers r...@softdux.com wrote:
On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 12:09 PM, hadi motamedi motamed...@gmail.com wrote:
On 3/8/11, Jakub Jedelsky jakub.jedel...@gmail.com wrote:
Dne 8.3.2011 10:19, hadi motamedi napsal(a):
Dear All
My centos machine is connected to my MS Windows machine on
Dne 8.3.2011 11:27, hadi motamedi napsal(a):
On 3/8/11, Rudi Ahlers r...@softdux.com wrote:
On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 12:09 PM, hadi motamedi motamed...@gmail.com wrote:
On 3/8/11, Jakub Jedelsky jakub.jedel...@gmail.com wrote:
Dne 8.3.2011 10:19, hadi motamedi napsal(a):
Dear All
My centos
Thank you very much for your reply.I am familiar with internet
connection sharing on MS Windows as I have a third XP client on the
same net connected to the internet.I tried as the following on my
centos:
#route add -net default gw 172.18.209.1
Where this is the secondary ip address of the
your topology is below?
centos xp---internet
then centos access internet via xp ?
2011/3/8 hadi motamedi motamed...@gmail.com
On 3/8/11, Rudi Ahlers r...@softdux.com wrote:
On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 12:09 PM, hadi motamedi motamed...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 3/8/11, Jakub Jedelsky
On 3/8/11, bedo bedo.w...@gmail.com wrote:
your topology is below?
centos xp---internet
then centos access internet via xp ?
2011/3/8 hadi motamedi motamed...@gmail.com
On 3/8/11, Rudi Ahlers r...@softdux.com wrote:
On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 12:09 PM, hadi motamedi
On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 12:10 AM, Robert Nichols
rnicholsnos...@comcast.net wrote:
On 03/07/2011 08:21 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
That said, it can be problematic when you ping $HOSTNAME and get a
valid 127.0.0.1 response, and haven't actually tested your external
port. It also requires
OK, i know ,you need ICS with XP ,you can see below:
http://www.microsoft.com/windowsxp/using/networking/expert/crawford_02july01.mspx
2011/3/8 hadi motamedi motamed...@gmail.com
On 3/8/11, bedo bedo.w...@gmail.com wrote:
your topology is below?
centos xp---internet
then centos
On Mar 7, 2011, at 9:55 AM, John Hodrien j.h.hodr...@leeds.ac.uk wrote:
On Mon, 7 Mar 2011, Ross Walker wrote:
1Gbe can do 115MB/s @ 64K+ IO size, but at 4k IO size (NFS) 55MB/s is about
it.
If you need each node to be able to read 90-100MB/s you would need to setup
a cluster file system
On Mar 7, 2011, at 3:43 PM, Dr. Ed Morbius dredmorb...@gmail.com wrote:
We're looking for tools to be used in monitoring the PERC H800 arrays on
a set of database servers running CentOS 5.5.
We've installed most of the OMSA (Dell monitoring) suite.
Our current alerting is happening
On 3/8/11 8:32 AM, Ross Walker wrote:
Why wouldn't you want safe writes? Is that like saying, and if you care for
your data?
You don't fsync every write on a local disk. Why demand it over NFS where the
server is probably less likely to crash than the writing node? That's like
saying you
On Mar 7, 2011, at 9:41 AM, Tim Dunphy bluethu...@gmail.com wrote:
On my centos boxes whenever I try to install packages I get a mix of
packages from the repos that are both i386 and x86_64 in
archictecture:
Yum doesn't implicitly know if you want the 64 or 32-bit versions so it selects
I just got an inexpensive VPS too have an outside server to play/test
with. I am pinging it every 5 minutes and graphing with MRTG on
another CentOS box. This works fine to all servers but the VPS. The
first ping to the VPS is always crud and following ones are fine.
[root@ns1 scripts]# ping X
My centos machine is connected to my MS Windows machine on the net.
The MS Windows machine is connected to Internet via valid IP address
setting and on its secondary ip address setting it can see my centos
machine on the intranet.
Connecting any windows based computer directly to the internet is
On Mar 8, 2011, at 9:48 AM, Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com wrote:
On 3/8/11 8:32 AM, Ross Walker wrote:
Why wouldn't you want safe writes? Is that like saying, and if you care for
your data?
You don't fsync every write on a local disk. Why demand it over NFS where
the
server is
Hi guys,
I took your advice and performed a yum remove *386 on this box.
Also yes I can easily append x86_64 or i386 (depending on the machine)
each time I go to install an app. But my question remains is there any
way to instruct yum to automatically select the right package
architecture
On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 1:19 AM, hadi motamedi motamed...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear All
Can you please let me know how can try for
Internet connection sharing such that my centos machine can see
internet with minor modifications done?
I believe Steve Barnes has the right answer -- you need to
Hal Davison wrote:
Greetings..
Yes ENSCRIPT is a text to PostScript
conversion service.
As usual, am a bi confused on how to
implement the fit-to-page functionality.
Google resources say it is used then
proceeds to dance around the issue
Using the -ffontname@W/H option can one
But my question remains is there any way to instruct
yum to automatically select the right package architecture
through a setting in one of the config files rather than
having to specify which architecture you are working with
each time.
You can place an exclude statement in /etc/yum.conf
On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 5:23 PM, Bart Schaefer barton.schae...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 1:19 AM, hadi motamedi motamed...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear All
Can you please let me know how can try for
Internet connection sharing such that my centos machine can see
internet with minor
Sounds like the remote router is having to ARP to find the MAC address
of your VPS server. Perhaps its ARP cache is full or it has a relatively
short ARP cache TTL. Cisco routers, by default, have a 4 hour timeout. I
can't imagine a router having 5 minute timeout. You could test this by
running a
Hi
Thank you for your help
I type the ifconfig -a
there is ipv6 address
inet6 fe80::20c:29ff:fe3c:92a1/64 scope link tentative
i also add one
inet6 2001:db8:cafe:::12/64 scope global tentative
but both are not pingable by ping6
Here are commands you suggested me to run
route -n -A
ok that's great! thank you!
On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 10:29 AM, compdoc comp...@hotrodpc.com wrote:
But my question remains is there any way to instruct
yum to automatically select the right package architecture
through a setting in one of the config files rather than
having to specify which
Hello,
Is it possible to downgrade to an old version of a package on epel ? I
am in troubles with the new dokuwiki-0-0.6.20101107.a.el5, and cannot
find dokuwiki-0-0.4.20091225.c.el5.noarch...
Thanks,
--
Philippe
___
CentOS mailing list
On 03/08/2011 10:42 AM, ann kok wrote:
Hi
Thank you for your help
I type the ifconfig -a
there is ipv6 address
inet6 fe80::20c:29ff:fe3c:92a1/64 scope link tentative
i also add one
inet6 2001:db8:cafe:::12/64 scope global tentative
but both are not pingable by ping6
Here are
On 3/8/2011 8:57 AM, Matt wrote:
I just got an inexpensive VPS too have an outside server to play/test
with. I am pinging it every 5 minutes and graphing with MRTG on
another CentOS box. This works fine to all servers but the VPS. The
first ping to the VPS is always crud and following ones
I blame Adaptec for the dominance of IDE. Seriously.
If Adaptec A) hadn't had the lionshare of the SCSI mindset in the PC
business back in the 90s, and B) hadn't made so much overpriced buggy
crap, we'd all be using SCSI today.
Yes and No. I remember playing with it back in the 90's and
On Tue, 8 Mar 2011, Drew wrote:
I blame Adaptec for the dominance of IDE. Seriously.
If Adaptec A) hadn't had the lionshare of the SCSI mindset in the
PC business back in the 90s, and B) hadn't made so much overpriced
buggy crap, we'd all be using SCSI today.
Yes and No. I remember
On 03/08/2011 09:51 AM, Tim Dunphy wrote:
ok that's great! thank you!
On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 10:29 AM, compdoc comp...@hotrodpc.com wrote:
But my question remains is there any way to instruct
yum to automatically select the right package architecture
through a setting in one of the config
On 08/03/11 15:53, Philippe Naudin wrote:
Hello,
Is it possible to downgrade to an old version of a package on epel ? I
am in troubles with the new dokuwiki-0-0.6.20101107.a.el5, and cannot
find dokuwiki-0-0.4.20091225.c.el5.noarch...
Thanks,
You will need to install the
On 08/03/11 16:55, Ned Slider wrote:
On 08/03/11 15:53, Philippe Naudin wrote:
Hello,
Is it possible to downgrade to an old version of a package on epel ? I
am in troubles with the new dokuwiki-0-0.6.20101107.a.el5, and cannot
find dokuwiki-0-0.4.20091225.c.el5.noarch...
Thanks,
You
On Tue, 8 Mar 2011, Ross Walker wrote:
The OP wanted 90MB/s per node and we have no clue whether the application he
is using is capable of driving 1MB block sizes.
I thought he wanted 90MB/s reads per node (and I've demonstrated that's doable
with NFS). The only reason I'm not showing it
Drew wrote:
I blame Adaptec for the dominance of IDE. Â Seriously.
If Adaptec A) hadn't had the lionshare of the SCSI mindset in the PC
business back in the 90s, and B) hadn't made so much overpriced buggy
crap, we'd all be using SCSI today.
Yes and No. I remember playing with it back in
On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 8:54 AM, Johnny Hughes joh...@centos.org wrote:
I would also do this:
yum reinstall \*
The reason being that sometimes the /usr/share/ items (shared between
BOTH packages) get removed when removing multi arch RPMS.
The above lines added to the FAQ:
On 03/07/2011 02:22 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Keith Keller wrote:
On Mon, Mar 07, 2011 at 10:34:24AM -0600, Sean Carolan wrote:
Can anyone point out reasons why it might be a bad idea to put this
sort of line in your /etc/hosts file, eg, pointing the FQDN at the
loopback address?
Hi --
I'm running a server which is usually stable, but every
once in a while it hangs. The server is used as a file
store using NFS and to run VMware machines.
I don't see anything in /var/log/messages or elsewhere
to indicate any problem or offer any clue why the system
was hung.
Any
On Tue, 8 Mar 2011, Ross Walker wrote:
Well on my local disk I don't cache the data of tens or hundreds of clients
and a server can have a memory fault and oops just as easily as any client.
Also I believe it doesn't sync every single write (unless mounted on the
client sync which is only
Johnny Hughes wrote:
On 03/07/2011 02:22 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Keith Keller wrote:
On Mon, Mar 07, 2011 at 10:34:24AM -0600, Sean Carolan wrote:
Can anyone point out reasons why it might be a bad idea to put this
sort of line in your /etc/hosts file, eg, pointing the FQDN at the
On 3/8/2011 11:24 AM, Michael Eager wrote:
Hi --
I'm running a server which is usually stable, but every
once in a while it hangs. The server is used as a file
store using NFS and to run VMware machines.
I don't see anything in /var/log/messages or elsewhere
to indicate any problem or
I'm running a server which is usually stable, but every
once in a while it hangs.
There can be many reasons for that. One thing I'm curious about - try
looking at the reallocated sector count, and current pending sector count
for your drives with smartctl.
On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 12:24 PM, Michael Eager ea...@eagerm.com wrote:
Hi --
I'm running a server which is usually stable, but every
once in a while it hangs. The server is used as a file
store using NFS and to run VMware machines.
I don't see anything in /var/log/messages or elsewhere
to
Hello folks,
I am experiencing a weird problem at bootup with large RAID-6 arrays.
After Googling around (a lot) I find that others are having the same
issues with CentOS/RHEL/Ubuntu/whatever. In my case it's Scientific
Linux-6 which should behave the same way as CentOS-6. I had the same
compdoc wrote:
I'm running a server which is usually stable, but every
once in a while it hangs.
There can be many reasons for that. One thing I'm curious about - try
looking at the reallocated sector count, and current pending sector count
for your drives with smartctl.
Thanks for the
Brian Mathis wrote:
On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 12:24 PM, Michael Eager ea...@eagerm.com wrote:
Hi --
I'm running a server which is usually stable, but every
once in a while it hangs. The server is used as a file
store using NFS and to run VMware machines.
I don't see anything in
Les Mikesell wrote:
On 3/8/2011 11:24 AM, Michael Eager wrote:
Hi --
I'm running a server which is usually stable, but every
once in a while it hangs. The server is used as a file
store using NFS and to run VMware machines.
I don't see anything in /var/log/messages or elsewhere
to
The only indication that I had that there was a problem (other
that attached systems were not accessing files) was that the
fan(s) on the server were louder than normal.
Are you saying the fans were running faster than normal while it was hung?
Or are they louder than usual even while its
Michael Eager wrote:
Brian Mathis wrote:
On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 12:24 PM, Michael Eager ea...@eagerm.com wrote:
Hi --
I'm running a server which is usually stable, but every
once in a while it hangs. The server is used as a file
store using NFS and to run VMware machines.
I don't see
On 3/8/2011 12:31 PM, Michael Eager wrote:
Any suggestions where I might look for a clue?
Probably something hardware related. Bad memory, overheating, power
supply, etc. I've even seen some rare cases where a bios update would
fix it although it didn't make much sense for a machine to run
On 03/08/11 7:01 AM, compdoc wrote:
Connecting any windows based computer directly to the internet is a really
really bad idea...
go away. it isn't 1998 anymore.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
On 03/08/11 7:01 AM, compdoc wrote:
Connecting any windows based computer directly to the internet is a really
really bad idea...
go away. it isn't 1998 anymore.
That may be, but the advice is still valid, windows is infinitely more
vulnerable than *NIX on a direct/open connection. Most
On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 8:59 PM, David Brian Chait dch...@invenda.com wrote:
On 03/08/11 7:01 AM, compdoc wrote:
Connecting any windows based computer directly to the internet is a really
really bad idea...
go away. it isn't 1998 anymore.
That may be, but the advice is still valid, windows
On 3/8/2011 12:53 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
On 03/08/11 7:01 AM, compdoc wrote:
Connecting any windows based computer directly to the internet is a really
really bad idea...
go away. it isn't 1998 anymore.
Still, consumer type NAT routers are really cheap, take little power,
and would
Do you have any proof of this? OR are you making assumptions of past
experiences? We have many Windows server on the net, directly with
very few hassles.
I have never had a *NIX server under my charge hacked, I have had several
Windows machines (those directly connected to the internet)
compdoc wrote:
The only indication that I had that there was a problem (other
that attached systems were not accessing files) was that the
fan(s) on the server were louder than normal.
Are you saying the fans were running faster than normal while it was hung?
Or are they louder than usual
On 03/08/11 10:59 AM, David Brian Chait wrote:
That may be, but the advice is still valid, windows is infinitely more
vulnerable than *NIX on a direct/open connection. Most corps filter traffic
to windows boxes through intermediaries to limit risk.
Corps firewall their unix servers too.
On 03/08/11 11:09 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
On 3/8/2011 12:53 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
On 03/08/11 7:01 AM, compdoc wrote:
Connecting any windows based computer directly to the internet is a really
really bad idea...
go away. it isn't 1998 anymore.
Still, consumer type NAT routers are really
On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 12:05 PM, Akemi Yagi amy...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 8:54 AM, Johnny Hughes joh...@centos.org wrote:
I would also do this:
yum reinstall \*
The reason being that sometimes the /usr/share/ items (shared between
BOTH packages) get removed when removing
m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Michael Eager wrote:
Brian Mathis wrote:
On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 12:24 PM, Michael Eager ea...@eagerm.com wrote:
Hi --
I'm running a server which is usually stable, but every
once in a while it hangs. The server is used as a file
store using NFS and to run VMware
Scott Silva wrote:
Did you try the obvious stuff for older equipment? Remove and reseat ALL cards
and memory, several times, to clean off any oxidation from contacts.
Blow out any dust and collected lint.
reseat drive cables.
Not yet, but that's always a good idea.
--
Michael Eager
Windows since XP SP2 has had a perfectly decent firewall
built in and enabled by default.
Selinux is installed by default too, and usually the first thing that's
disabled when something isn't working, just as it is with windows users.
You are right about one thing: It's not 1998. It's a lot less
Rudi Ahlers wrote:
On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 8:59 PM, David Brian Chait dch...@invenda.com
wrote:
On 03/08/11 7:01 AM, compdoc wrote:
Connecting any windows based computer directly to the internet is a
really really bad idea...
go away. it isn't 1998 anymore.
That may be, but the advice is
John R Pierce wrote:
On 03/08/11 10:59 AM, David Brian Chait wrote:
That may be, but the advice is still valid, windows is infinitely more
vulnerable than *NIX on a direct/open connection. Most corps filter
traffic to windows boxes through intermediaries to limit risk.
Corps firewall their
Michael Eager wrote:
m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Suggestion 1: -from the console-, run
setterm --powersave off
That way, even if you connect a monitor (in our, uh, computer labs, we
have a monitor-on-a-stick), you'll still see what's on the screen at the
end, not the power save blanking.
I
Michael Eager wrote:
m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Michael Eager wrote:
Brian Mathis wrote:
On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 12:24 PM, Michael Eager ea...@eagerm.com
wrote:
I'm running a server which is usually stable, but every
once in a while it hangs. The server is used as a file
store using NFS and
On 03/08/11 11:41 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
And I know of a major incident, the vector and targets being all Windows
systems. Sorry, I literally can't speak about how I know or more
details
duh. theres a lot more Windows systems out there than everything else
put together. of COURSE
compdoc wrote:
Windows since XP SP2 has had a perfectly decent firewall
built in and enabled by default.
Selinux is installed by default too, and usually the first thing that's
disabled when something isn't working, just as it is with windows users.
You are right about one thing: It's not
On 03/08/11 11:47 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Yup. Last time I saw a story about someone hanging an unprotected Windows
box on the 'Net, late last year, I think, it was down from 12 min to 5 min
before it was attacked.
and how long after you connect a 'nix box before worms start port
I'm surprised to see so many choosing HAProxy over LVS, which seems fairly
integrated into Red Hat's offerings, with full documentation and rpms in
CentOS and RHN. I've set up LVS before for an internal java application and
it seemed straightforward after understanding arptables, etc. Is HAProxy
On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 10:01 PM, John R Pierce pie...@hogranch.com wrote:
On 03/08/11 11:47 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Yup. Last time I saw a story about someone hanging an unprotected Windows
box on the 'Net, late last year, I think, it was down from 12 min to 5 min
before it was attacked.
John R Pierce wrote:
On 03/08/11 11:47 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Yup. Last time I saw a story about someone hanging an unprotected
Windows box on the 'Net, late last year, I think, it was down from 12
min to 5
min before it was attacked.
and how long after you connect a 'nix box before
m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Michael Eager wrote:
House-built, Gigabyte MB, AMD Phenom II X6, 6Gb RAM.
Any chance the problem's with the video card?
Video is on the MB. It doesn't seem likely that it's
the video, since the system doesn't respond to network
when it crashes.
It could be
On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 3:26 PM, Iain Morris iain.t.mor...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 3:44 AM, Nico Kadel-Garcia nka...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 1:36 AM, David Brian Chait dch...@invenda.com
wrote:
On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 4:40 AM, Tim Dunphy bluethu...@gmail.com
And I know of a major incident, the vector and targets being all
Windows systems. Sorry, I literally can't speak about how I know
or more details
I've been removing java from the computers I service. It's not used much if
at all, and it's a vector.
On one workstation I monitor, the java
Video is on the MB. It doesn't seem likely that it's
the video, since the system doesn't respond to network
when it crashes.
bad video hardware or drivers can easily crash the system
If its running an X windows display of any sort, I'd suggest trying it
in text-only mode. in
thanks for all the response , really gives me a good idea where to pay
attention to.
the software we're using to distribute our renders is RoyalRender, i'm not
sure if any optimization is possible, i'll check it out.
so far it seems that the option of using nfs stands or falls with he use
of
John R Pierce wrote:
Video is on the MB. It doesn't seem likely that it's
the video, since the system doesn't respond to network
when it crashes.
bad video hardware or drivers can easily crash the system
If its running an X windows display of any sort, I'd suggest trying it
in text-only
On 3/8/2011 3:14 PM, wessel van der aart wrote:
the software we're using to distribute our renders is RoyalRender, i'm not
sure if any optimization is possible, i'll check it out.
so far it seems that the option of using nfs stands or falls with he use
of sync.
does anyone here uses nfs
On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 10:46 PM, compdoc comp...@hotrodpc.com wrote:
Google Chrome , or even Firefox are the way to go for visiting those
websites that no one admits to visiting...
Are you referring to website like http://www.microsoft.com and
http://technet.microsoft.com/? ;)
--
Kind
on 09:24 Tue 08 Mar, Michael Eager (ea...@eagerm.com) wrote:
Hi --
I'm running a server which is usually stable, but every
once in a while it hangs. The server is used as a file
store using NFS and to run VMware machines.
I don't see anything in /var/log/messages or elsewhere
to
2011/3/8 John R Pierce pie...@hogranch.com:
On 03/08/11 11:47 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Yup. Last time I saw a story about someone hanging an unprotected Windows
box on the 'Net, late last year, I think, it was down from 12 min to 5 min
before it was attacked.
and how long after you
on 10:31 Tue 08 Mar, Michael Eager (ea...@eagerm.com) wrote:
Les Mikesell wrote:
On 3/8/2011 11:24 AM, Michael Eager wrote:
Hi --
I'm running a server which is usually stable, but every
once in a while it hangs. The server is used as a file
store using NFS and to run VMware machines.
When trying to do a yum update, I am told I need more space in
/boot. When I check the contents of /boot (ls -l /boot), there
are no files.
If I do a df -h, there is no available space yet it shows that it
has a lot of used space.
The fstab shows the following:
# This file is edited by
When trying to do a yum update, I am told I need more space in
/boot. When I check the contents of /boot (ls -l /boot), there
are no files.
Hm, that's not good.
If I do a df -h, there is no available space yet it shows that it
has a lot of used space.
Is /boot mounted? Please show as the
When trying to do a yum update, I am told I need more space in
/boot. When I check the contents of /boot (ls -l /boot), there
are no files.
If I do a df -h, there is no available space yet it shows that it
has a lot of used space.
The fstab shows the following:
# This file is edited by
Here is the output of mount:
/dev/mapper/VolGroup00-LogVol00 on / type ext3 (rw)
none on /proc type proc (rw)
none on /sys type sysfs (rw)
none on /dev/pts type devpts (rw,gid=5,mode=620)
usbfs on /proc/bus/usb type usbfs (rw)
/dev/hdc1 on /boot type ext3 (rw)
none on /dev/shm type tmpfs (rw)
On 03/08/11 3:17 PM, Todd Cary wrote:
Here is the output of mount:
/dev/mapper/VolGroup00-LogVol00 on / type ext3 (rw)
none on /proc type proc (rw)
none on /sys type sysfs (rw)
none on /dev/pts type devpts (rw,gid=5,mode=620)
usbfs on /proc/bus/usb type usbfs (rw)
/dev/hdc1 on /boot type
Here is the output of mount:
/dev/mapper/VolGroup00-LogVol00 on / type ext3 (rw)
none on /proc type proc (rw)
none on /sys type sysfs (rw)
none on /dev/pts type devpts (rw,gid=5,mode=620)
usbfs on /proc/bus/usb type usbfs (rw)
/dev/hdc1 on /boot type ext3 (rw)
^ It's mounted here, the
On 3/8/2011 5:17 PM, Todd Cary wrote:
Here is the output of mount:
/dev/hdc1 on /boot type ext3 (rw)
Does not appear to be mounted...correct?
Looks like /dev/hdc1 to me.
Is this a strictly-IDE system with boot disk/CD cables backwards from
normal?
--
Les Mikesell
Simon -
Did I screw up? I deleted what was in /boot!
Todd
On 3/8/2011 3:31 PM, Simon Matter wrote:
Here is the output of mount:
/dev/mapper/VolGroup00-LogVol00 on / type ext3 (rw)
none on /proc type proc (rw)
none on /sys type sysfs (rw)
none on /dev/pts type devpts (rw,gid=5,mode=620)
Simon -
Did I screw up? I deleted what was in /boot!
Yes :(
Now don't reboot!
Wait for the next mail...
Simon
Todd
On 3/8/2011 3:31 PM, Simon Matter wrote:
Here is the output of mount:
/dev/mapper/VolGroup00-LogVol00 on / type ext3 (rw)
none on /proc type proc (rw)
none on /sys
1 - 100 of 128 matches
Mail list logo
