On 03/20/2011 10:50 PM, Ozy the barbarian guitarist wrote:
Hello,
My wiki contribution about HyperV is ready for evaluation.
http://wiki.centos.org/OzydeJong/HyperV
Cheers,
Ozy.
The article seems fine to me.
However I'd rephrase the legacy card part to something like [...]please
create a
Creo que alguno tiene un virus o un morro que se lo pisa
;-)
El 21/03/11 04:27, Freddy Zavaleta escribió:
http://www.lampugnani.com/i2332.html
___
CentOS-es mailing list
CentOS-es@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
Sí ;)
2011/3/21 Miquel Pujante miquelpma...@hotmail.com
Creo que alguno tiene un virus o un morro que se lo pisa
;-)
El 21/03/11 04:27, Freddy Zavaleta escribió:
http://www.lampugnani.com/i2332.html
___
CentOS-es mailing list
Hola,
El 21 de març de 2011 11:38, Ricardo Martinez harisel...@gmail.com ha escrit:
Sí ;)
2011/3/21 Miquel Pujante miquelpma...@hotmail.com
Creo que alguno tiene un virus o un morro que se lo pisa
;-)
¿Es el mismo que el otro día? No si al final xD
--
Oscar Osta Pueyo
Hola de nuevo, después de haber hecho ya bastantes pruebas en un máquina
virtual creo que ya he configurado el servidor para que pueda ser
reiniciado pero me quedaría más tranquilo si le echaseis un ojo a los
pasos que he seguido y la configuración que hay actualemente. Por
adelantado muchas
GRACIAS a ambos.
Este es el contenido de mi /etc/mail/access
[root@server scripts]# grep -v # /etc/mail/access
Connect:localhost.localdomain RELAY
Connect:localhost RELAY
Connect:127.0.0.1 RELAY
y por necesidad de la plataforma esta es la configuracion del servicio sendmail
Y que servicio de Correo usas ?
Puedes verlo con:
lsof -i :25
--
Ramón Macías Zamora
Tecnología, Investigación y Desarrollo
Guayaquil - Ecuador
msn:ramon_mac...@hotmail.com
skype: ramon_macias
UserLinux# 180926 (http://counter.li.org)
Cel:593-8-0192238
Tel:593 4 6044566
Hola Miguel,
Si tienes el SELinux activado yo haría un ls -lZ para comprobar que
todos los ficheros tengan el contexto bien etiquetado, no sea que al
reiniciar SELinux no te deje ejecutar algunos ficheros...
Supongo que habiendo instalado el kernel y grub desde rpm's ya debería
estar bien
Hola a todos
Alguien sabe aproximadamente cuando sale CentOS 5.6 y 6.0 ??? ... ví que
Oracle ya sacó hace unas semanas atrás sus versiones correspondientes de
Oracle Enterprise Linux 5.6 y 6.0 y también hizo lo mismo Scientific Linux
(SC Linux 5.6 y 6.0) que son los clones que conozco de Red
Hola,
2011/3/21 Javier Aquino H. jaqu...@lexuseditores.com:
Hola a todos
Alguien sabe aproximadamente cuando sale CentOS 5.6 y 6.0 ??? ... ví que
Oracle ya sacó hace unas semanas atrás sus versiones correspondientes de
Oracle Enterprise Linux 5.6 y 6.0 y también hizo lo mismo Scientific
Alguien sabe que está pasando con los desarrolladores de CentOS que al
parecer están un poco atrasados con este tema .
indican que saldrá cuando toque... es la noticia.
lo que he podido determinar es que salió rhel6 y poco después rhel5.6 y
han dejado el 6 a un lado a medio camino con el
he cometido el grave error de desinstalar la libreria libgcc-4.1.2-46
pues esta al dar yum update me daba conflicto con su version mas
actualizada la libgcc-4.1.2-48 y supuse yo que desinstalandola e
intalando su ultima version resolveria este problema pues lo que cree
fue un problema mayor.
Javier Castellanos wrote:
he cometido el grave error de desinstalar la libreria libgcc-4.1.2-46
pues esta al dar yum update me daba conflicto con su version mas
bonita la hiciste, por eso no uses nunca --nodeps a no ser que estés
extremadamente seguro.
yo viera las liberías que faltan al rpm
de verdad que si epe, si que se me fue la mano, una pregunta cuando dices
ldd /camino/al/comando/rpm
a que te refieres exactamente, podrias ser mas especificogracias por la
ayuda
El 21/03/2011 03:07 p.m., Ing. Ernesto Pérez Estévez escribió:
Javier Castellanos wrote:
he
El 21/03/11, Javier Aquino H. jaqu...@lexuseditores.com escribió:
Hola a todos
Alguien sabe aproximadamente cuando sale CentOS 5.6 y 6.0 ??? ... ví que
Oracle ya sacó hace unas semanas atrás sus versiones correspondientes de
Oracle Enterprise Linux 5.6 y 6.0 y también hizo lo mismo
gracias epe, ya he resuelto con la variante que me has dado, se supone
que sea algo pesimo hacer esto , pero ha dado resultado gracias
por la ayuda
El 21/03/2011 03:07 p.m., Ing. Ernesto Pérez Estévez escribió:
Javier Castellanos wrote:
he cometido el grave error de desinstalar
Bueno, en el foro en ingles
https://www.centos.org/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?topic_id=29147viewmode=flatorder=ASCstart=420
hay una discusion bastante agitada desde gente molesta por la falta de
comunicacion de los desarrolladores, pasando gente que los apoya y gente
cambiandose a Scientific
On Sun, 20 Mar 2011, Marko A. Jennings wrote:
On Sun, March 20, 2011 7:29 pm, William Warren wrote:
their changes are really aimed at oracle..the rest is smoke and
mirrors..:) oracle is basically(pardon me here) Centos with charges.
That's basically all oracle is going with unbreakable
From: hersh parikh hershparik...@yahoo.com
From: Nicolas Thierry-Mieg nicolas.thierry-m...@imag.fr
xfig and transfig are in centos 5, why don't you just use the regular
centos repo?
We have tried it says no packages available..if its working for you can you
please paste you .conf file here?
On Mon, March 21, 2011 5:51 am, Dag Wieers wrote:
On Sun, 20 Mar 2011, Marko A. Jennings wrote:
On Sun, March 20, 2011 7:29 pm, William Warren wrote:
their changes are really aimed at oracle..the rest is smoke and
mirrors..:) oracle is basically(pardon me here) Centos with charges.
That's
On Mon, March 21, 2011 5:51 am, Dag Wieers wrote:
On Sun, 20 Mar 2011, Marko A. Jennings wrote:
On Sun, March 20, 2011 7:29 pm, William Warren wrote:
their changes are really aimed at oracle..the rest is smoke and
mirrors..:) oracle is basically(pardon me here) Centos with charges.
That's
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 7:08 AM, John Doe jd...@yahoo.com wrote:
From: hersh parikh hershparik...@yahoo.com
From: Nicolas Thierry-Mieg nicolas.thierry-m...@imag.fr
xfig and transfig are in centos 5, why don't you just use the regular
centos repo?
We have tried it says no packages available..if
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 12:51 AM, Matthew Feinberg matt...@choopa.com wrote:
I don't see the problem here. I just tested this and it works fine. The
drupal6 package only requires php 5.2 or greater.
Right. The php53 package is in the upstream vendor's updates, all of
which are held up for
It says
[root@server]# yum list xfig
Rocks-5.4
| 1.1 kB 00:00
rpmforge
| 1.1 kB 00:00
Error: No matching Packages to list
[root@server]#
May be our repository is different then yours. Since it's working for you can
you paste baseurls in your yum repo fie?
It would be very useful.
Regards
Hersh
From: John Doe jd...@yahoo.com
To: CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org
Sent: Monday, 21 March 2011
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 8:19 AM, hersh parikh hershparik...@yahoo.com wrote:
It says
[root@server]# yum list xfig
Rocks-5.4
| 1.1 kB 00:00
rpmforge
| 1.1 kB 00:00
Error: No matching Packages to list
[root@server]#
You don't have your base CentOS repository configured. What have
Thanks for your replies. I've also seen the following in my log now:
Mar 20 05:08:55 mysite kernel: md: md1: sync done.
Mar 20 05:08:55 mysite kernel: RAID1 conf printout:
Mar 20 05:08:55 mysite kernel: --- wd:2 rd:2
Mar 20 05:08:55 mysite kernel: disk 0, wo:0, o:1, dev:sda3
Mar 20 05:08:55
Thank you for your replies.
I've ended up doing the following for my PHP and Drupal logs:
Uncommented error_log = /var/log/php/php_errors.log in /etc/php.ini
# mkdir /var/log/php
# chown -R apache.apache /var/log/php
Appended following line to /etc/syslog.conf
local6.* /var/log/php/drupal.log
You don't have your base CentOS repository configured. What have you
done to /etc/yum.repos.d/CentOS-Base.repo, or have you been doing
something strange to /etc/yum.conf? And what is this Rocks-5.4
repository?
Rocks 5.4 is a recompile of CentOS 5 oriented towards compute clusters.
--
Drew
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 8:47 AM, Drew drew@gmail.com wrote:
You don't have your base CentOS repository configured. What have you
done to /etc/yum.repos.d/CentOS-Base.repo, or have you been doing
something strange to /etc/yum.conf? And what is this Rocks-5.4
repository?
Rocks 5.4 is a
Le 21/03/2011 13:47, Drew a écrit :
You don't have your base CentOS repository configured. What have you
done to /etc/yum.repos.d/CentOS-Base.repo, or have you been doing
something strange to /etc/yum.conf? And what is this Rocks-5.4
repository?
Rocks 5.4 is a recompile of CentOS 5 oriented
hey guys,
I'm attempting to install php 5.2.7 using the webtatic repo.. but it
looks like my exclude isn't working.. I'd appreciate it if someone
could point out the mistake I'm making/flaw in my approach...
## machine info
[root@ec2-174-129-154-179 yum.repos.d]# cat /etc/redhat-release
Not just Oracle. Novell is actively pursuing Red Hat customers and
offering to support their Red Hat installations cheaper than Read Hat
does. I know a large international technology company which buys RHEL
licenses only for the first year and then switches to Novell for support
after that.
centos-boun...@centos.org wrote:
Hello,
the man syslog.conf explains how to filter syslog messages
But how could I redirect messages by a program name, like
drupal or php? I would like them to go under /var/log/drupal
This 1-liner script needs fired off at system boot.
tail --follow=name
Hello community.
We are running, Centos 4.8 on SuperMicro SYS-6026T-3RF with 2xIntel Xeon
E5630 and 8xKingston KVR1333D3D4R9S/4G
For some time we have lots of MCE in mcelog and we cant find out the reason.
Ordinary mce message looks like:
CPU 51 BANK 8 TSC 8511e3ca77dc
MISC 274d587f6141
2011/3/21 Tim Dunphy bluethu...@gmail.com:
hey guys,
I'm attempting to install php 5.2.7 using the webtatic repo.. but it
looks like my exclude isn't working.. I'd appreciate it if someone
could point out the mistake I'm making/flaw in my approach...
Maybe you should place exclude directive
Vladimir Budnev wrote:
Hello community.
We are running, Centos 4.8 on SuperMicro SYS-6026T-3RF with 2xIntel Xeon
E5630 and 8xKingston KVR1333D3D4R9S/4G
For some time we have lots of MCE in mcelog and we cant find out the
reason.
The only thing that shows there (when it shows, since
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 10:29 AM, Tim Dunphy bluethu...@gmail.com wrote:
hey guys,
I'm attempting to install php 5.2.7 using the webtatic repo.. but it
looks like my exclude isn't working.. I'd appreciate it if someone
could point out the mistake I'm making/flaw in my approach...
Why are you
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 10:56 AM, Eero Volotinen eero.voloti...@iki.fi wrote:
2011/3/21 Tim Dunphy bluethu...@gmail.com:
hey guys,
I'm attempting to install php 5.2.7 using the webtatic repo.. but it
looks like my exclude isn't working.. I'd appreciate it if someone
could point out the
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 10:34 AM, compdoc comp...@hotrodpc.com wrote:
RHEL and opensuse are different - defferent kernels, different config files
and slightly different locations for some config files.
It's not like one is a drop in replacement for the other, so it doesn't make
sense to me
On Mon, 21 Mar 2011, compdoc wrote:
Not just Oracle. Novell is actively pursuing Red Hat customers and
offering to support their Red Hat installations cheaper than Read Hat
does. I know a large international technology company which buys RHEL
licenses only for the first year and then
Is it possible or will there be any problems with using mdraid on top of mdraid?
specifically say
mdraid 1/5 on top of mdraid multipath.
e.g. 4 storage machines exporting iSCSI targets via two different
physical network switches
then use multipath to create md block devices
then use mdraid on
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 10:34 AM, compdoc comp...@hotrodpc.com wrote:
RHEL and opensuse are different - defferent kernels, different config
files
and slightly different locations for some config files.
It's not like one is a drop in replacement for the other, so it doesn't
make
sense to
Did we read the same page? When you buy Novell (SUSE) support for RedHat
EL, you will still run your original RedHat EL installation but then
update packages rebuilt by Novell. Technically that's the same like adding
the CentOS repo config to your RedHat installation and then install all
On Mon, 21 Mar 2011, Drew wrote:
Most likely because of relative cost and/or perceived value of SLES vs RHEL?
Novell is essentially offering to help you while you switch existing
kit over to SLES. If you're already paying for a RHEL subscription,
Novell's offer may have a lower cost or offer
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 12:13 PM, Drew drew@gmail.com wrote:
Did we read the same page? When you buy Novell (SUSE) support for RedHat
EL, you will still run your original RedHat EL installation but then
update packages rebuilt by Novell. Technically that's the same like adding
the CentOS
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 12:00 PM, Simon Matter simon.mat...@invoca.ch wrote:
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 10:34 AM, compdoc comp...@hotrodpc.com wrote:
RHEL and opensuse are different - defferent kernels, different config
files
and slightly different locations for some config files.
It's not
Yes Alain is absolutely right about ROCKS.
@Alain: Thanks for the information. We'll check what we have in stand alone
CentOS.BTW what do you have in yum.conf file?
Regards
Hersh
From: Alain Péan alain.p...@lpp.polytechnique.fr
To: CentOS mailing list
Is it possible or will there be any problems with using mdraid on top of mdraid?
specifically say
mdraid 1/5 on top of mdraid multipath.
e.g. 4 storage machines exporting iSCSI targets via two different
physical network switches
then use multipath to create md block devices
then use mdraid on
Hi hersh,
See my detailed answer on this subject on Rocks mailing list (October 26) :
https://lists.sdsc.edu/pipermail/npaci-rocks-discussion/2010-October/049657.html
I did nothing in yum.conf. I am using Rocks 5.3 at this moment :
# cat yum.conf
[main]
cachedir=/var/cache/yum
debuglevel=2
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 7:51 PM, Emmanuel Noobadmin
centos.ad...@gmail.com wrote:
Is it possible or will there be any problems with using mdraid on top of
mdraid?
specifically say
mdraid 1/5 on top of mdraid multipath.
e.g. 4 storage machines exporting iSCSI targets via two different
Since your exporting the storage as iSCSI, the host machine will see
it as a raw disk, irrespective of how it's setup on the exported
server. So, yes, you can do this.
Sorry for my ambiguity, I meant that mdadm would be on the host machine.
e.g. Using just a 2 node, raid 1 situation
Storage 1
Hello listmates,
xsane on Ubuntu 10 finds that Canon PIXMA via the web and seems to be able
to make use of it without a glitch. However, Centos machines sitting on the
same net fail to find it. Does anybody know why?
Thanks.
Boris.
___
CentOS mailing
I guess this is a free service so you can stop paying Red Hat as soon as
you plan to migrate to SLES. But they expect you to migrate to SLES in the
next three years.
So this is not related to OpenSUSE.
When I said opensuse, I was referring to suse. Sorry.
The problem I have is that RHEL and
Please, folks -- These are just not CentOS issues -- and the
commercial player chess-games and interplay not even vaguely
related to the subject matter which started this thread.
Please take this elsewhere
Sorry, you're right.
___
CentOS mailing
Is there something odd going on? The question about the errors in mcelog
just showed up *again*, and it's the original that I answered this
morning. The question about something - was it the md? - original seems as
though it's shown up more than twice today, with the same timestamp, I
think.
Is
Jason Pyeron wrote:
Any ideas? This one would make the 10th email received.
Hah! I literally just hit send asking pretty much the same question
before I got this.
mark
Return-Path: centos-boun...@centos.org
Received: from psmtp.com (exprod8mx192.postini.com [64.18.3.171])
On 3/21/2011 2:52 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Is there something odd going on? The question about the errors in mcelog
just showed up *again*, and it's the original that I answered this
morning. The question about something - was it the md? - original seems as
though it's shown up more than
Le 21/03/2011 22:53, Greg Bailey a écrit :
On 3/21/2011 2:52 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Is there something odd going on? The question about the errors in mcelog
just showed up *again*, and it's the original that I answered this
morning. The question about something - was it the md? - original
Hi,
due to some idiot not being able to configure his Exchange server
correctly, this list has been swamped by loads of duplicate mails.
There were still several hundreds of mails awaiting delivery to this list.
I have removed all of those from the mail queue - so if you are missing
a mail you
On Monday, March 21, 2011 05:55:48 pm Alain Péan wrote:
Le 21/03/2011 22:53, Greg Bailey a écrit :
On 3/21/2011 2:52 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Is there something odd going on? The question about the errors in mcelog
just showed up *again*, and it's the original that I answered this
Is
Am 21.03.11 22:52, schrieb m.r...@5-cent.us:
Is there something odd going on? The question about the errors in mcelog
just showed up *again*, and it's the original that I answered this
morning. The question about something - was it the md? - original seems as
though it's shown up more than
At Mon, 21 Mar 2011 17:52:15 -0400 CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org
wrote:
Is there something odd going on? The question about the errors in mcelog
just showed up *again*, and it's the original that I answered this
morning. The question about something - was it the md? - original seems
Now I have read this thread twice.
:(
--
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
- -
- Jason Pyeron PD Inc. http://www.pdinc.us -
- Principal Consultant 10 West 24th Street
On Mar 21, 2011, at 3:21 PM, Emmanuel Noobadmin centos.ad...@gmail.com wrote:
Since your exporting the storage as iSCSI, the host machine will see
it as a raw disk, irrespective of how it's setup on the exported
server. So, yes, you can do this.
Sorry for my ambiguity, I meant that mdadm
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 5:57 PM, Ralph Angenendt
ralph.angene...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
due to some idiot not being able to configure his Exchange server
correctly, this list has been swamped by loads of duplicate mails.
There were still several hundreds of mails awaiting delivery to this
Am 21.03.2011 15:34, schrieb compdoc:
Not just Oracle. Novell is actively pursuing Red Hat customers and
offering to support their Red Hat installations cheaper than Read Hat
does. I know a large international technology company which buys RHEL
licenses only for the first year and then
As I shared on this forum last week, I did a bad boo boo when I
erased my /boot/ directory without a backup - all of the things I
caution other NOT to do. Nevertheless, after trying to put
things back in order, today I decided to try a reboot and I get a
GRUB prompt.
Next I have put my
On 03/21/2011 07:43 PM, Todd Cary wrote:
As I shared on this forum last week, I did a bad boo boo when I erased
my /boot/ directory without a backup - all of the things I caution other
NOT to do. Nevertheless, after trying to put things back in order,
today I decided to try a reboot and I get
On 03/21/2011 05:57 PM, Ralph Angenendt wrote:
Apologies if this caused any inconveniences.
No apology necessary from you. Much appreciated for fixing it quickly,
Ralph.
If anyone is using Thunderbird, there's a handy add-on called Remove
Duplicate Messages on Mozilla's add-on site.
How can I determine the device on which the mbr is placed? I
tried the following:
# chroot /mnt/sysimage
# grub-install /dev/hda
However, I am not sure if hda is correct (no error messages though).
When I reboot, I get the black with the words GRUB
Todd
On 3/21/2011 4:47 PM, Digimer wrote:
On 3/21/2011 6:19 PM, Jason Pyeron wrote:
Now I have read this thread twice.
:(
--
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
- -
- Jason Pyeron PD Inc. http://www.pdinc.us -
-
On 3/21/2011 7:53 PM, Max Hetrick wrote:
On 03/21/2011 05:57 PM, Ralph Angenendt wrote:
Apologies if this caused any inconveniences.
No apology necessary from you. Much appreciated for fixing it quickly,
Ralph.
If anyone is using Thunderbird, there's a handy add-on called Remove
Duplicate
On 3/21/11 7:13 PM, Todd Cary wrote:
How can I determine the device on which the mbr is placed? I
tried the following:
# chroot /mnt/sysimage
# grub-install /dev/hda
However, I am not sure if hda is correct (no error messages though).
I'm pretty sure you said it was /dev/hdc last time
On 3/21/2011 5:37 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
On 3/21/11 7:13 PM, Todd Cary wrote:
How can I determine the device on which the mbr is placed? I
tried the following:
# chroot /mnt/sysimage
# grub-install /dev/hda
However, I am not sure if hda is correct (no error messages though).
I'm pretty
On 3/21/2011 5:37 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
On 3/21/11 7:13 PM, Todd Cary wrote:
How can I determine the device on which the mbr is placed? I
tried the following:
# chroot /mnt/sysimage
# grub-install /dev/hda
However, I am not sure if hda is correct (no error messages though).
I'm pretty
On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 4:28 AM, John Hodrien j.h.hodr...@leeds.ac.uk wrote:
An HTTP client can authenticate with any principal in the service
keytab and only one of their hostnames is going to have a PTR record.
So I'm not sure I understand your claim here.
Two A records, with PTR record
Hello,
Are there any KVM over IP switches that are not thousands of dollars?
Ideally a 3-4 port switch for a few hundred seems reasonable to me.
Mike
--
Michael B Allen
Java Active Directory Integration
http://www.ioplex.com/
___
CentOS mailing list
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 11:15 PM, Michael B Allen iop...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
Are there any KVM over IP switches that are not thousands of dollars?
Ideally a 3-4 port switch for a few hundred seems reasonable to me.
Mike
Not that I've seen in the last 10 years. They're pretty darned
On 03/21/2011 08:13 PM, Todd Cary wrote:
How can I determine the device on which the mbr is placed? I tried the
following:
# chroot /mnt/sysimage
# grub-install /dev/hda
Read further down, and read the grub man page (from a good system);
'grub-install' is not recommended. I generally go
Are there any KVM over IP switches that are not thousands of dollars?
Ideally a 3-4 port switch for a few hundred seems reasonable to me.
Try this 8-port one from LevelOne:
http://global.level1.com/Business-Products/KVM-Switches---Extenders/Rackmount-KVM-Switches/KVM-0831/421.html
It has an
On 03/21/2011 11:53 PM, Max Hetrick wrote:
On 03/21/2011 05:57 PM, Ralph Angenendt wrote:
Apologies if this caused any inconveniences.
No apology necessary from you. Much appreciated for fixing it quickly,
Ralph.
If anyone is using Thunderbird, there's a handy add-on called Remove
You'll have really poor
performance if you raid over iscsi...
I've spent more time thinking about this and reading over my
research.The crux here seems to be that while RAID does impose
additional write IOPS costs, it may be more than offset by the read
advantage. According to my own notes
On 03/21/11 9:11 PM, Emmanuel Noobadmin wrote:
You'll have really poor
performance if you raid over iscsi...
I've spent more time thinking about this and reading over my
research.The crux here seems to be that while RAID does impose
additional write IOPS costs, it may be more than offset by
Searching more on this, the consensus seems to be that RAID 1/10 on
iSCSI is quite okay and may provide read performance increase but RAID
5's iops penalty will probably be a killer.
if you can use 2 dedicated ethernet adapters to 2 iSCSI servers for
this mirror, its probably a win.
That
85 matches
Mail list logo
