On Mon, 2011-08-08 at 19:52 -0700, Craig White wrote:
> mkdir /var/www/html/department_a
> chown root:department_a /var/www/html/department_a
> chmod g+ws /var/www/html/department_a
In which case you probably want to add apache to the department_a group.
And all users accessing that share of cours
On 09/08/11 05:33, Dave Stevens wrote:
> I have a CentOS server with postfix running. A pop user's account was
> compromised and a lot of spam started being sent. My upstream ISP's
> mail program started refusing to talk to me because of the very high
> rate of mail, error 451. I disabled the compr
Hello Les,
thanks for the reply.
I'll just go back to CentOs 5.6 then.
Any chance you could point me to a wiki or guide to get ltsp installed
on CentOs 5.6?
greetings, James
Op 08-08-11 17:52, Les Mikesell schreef:
> On 8/8/2011 8:43 AM, Johan Vermeulen wrote:
>> Dear All,
>>
>> I'm sen
Quoting "John R. Dennison" :
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> Content-Disposition: inline
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>
> On Mon, Aug 08, 2011 at 09:33:40PM -0700, Dave Stevens wrote:
>>
>> Advice? A better list for this issue perhaps?
>
> The postfix-users list see
On Mon, Aug 08, 2011 at 09:33:40PM -0700, Dave Stevens wrote:
>
> Advice? A better list for this issue perhaps?
The postfix-users list seems perfect. http://www.postfix.org has more
information.
John
--
"Which is more believable: In th
I have a CentOS server with postfix running. A pop user's account was
compromised and a lot of spam started being sent. My upstream ISP's
mail program started refusing to talk to me because of the very high
rate of mail, error 451. I disabled the compromised account. I then
changed the post
On Mon, 2011-08-08 at 21:32 -0500, Trey Dockendorf wrote:
> I'm setting up a shared web server running Apache. Each web root will
> belong to a department, which has a corresponding Active Directory
> group to give access. So far I've got samba working and such, but am
> having some trouble wrapp
I'm setting up a shared web server running Apache. Each web root will
belong to a department, which has a corresponding Active Directory group to
give access. So far I've got samba working and such, but am having some
trouble wrapping my head around the necessary permissions to make all this
work
> Whenever there's a kernel update on my system, the new kernel packages are
> installed, and the grub.conf file does not get updated. Which is THE WAY I
> want it to be. I never did like the way grub.conf got updated behind my
> back, so to speak, after a kernel update.
>
> Now I don't need to
On Aug 8, 2011, at 2:37 PM, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 08, 2011 at 07:07:57AM +0700, "LHT. Qu???c" wrote:
>> On 08/08/2011 12:01 AM, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
>>> On Fri, Aug 05, 2011 at 03:05:42PM +0700, LHT. Qu???c wrote:
Does anyone try Xen in Kernel 3.0? I use "$ git clone
gi
At 02:03 PM 8/8/2011, you wrote:
> > Folks
> >
> > My experiments with installing ZFS-FUSE in a Centos 6 system reveal
> > behavior different from that observed in Centos 5.6.
> >
> > The version of ZFS-FUSE is that provided on the EPEL repository, and
> > was installed on a 32-bit machine. I use
On Aug 8, 2011, at 12:46 PM, david wrote:
> Folks
>
> My experiments have shown that Samba behaves differently in Centos
> 5.6 and Centos 6 (updated).
>
> In Centos 5,
> service smb restart
> restarts both smb and nmb.
>
> In Centos 6, however, it restarts only smb.
>
> REMEDY:
> a) Make
> Folks
>
> My experiments with installing ZFS-FUSE in a Centos 6 system reveal
> behavior different from that observed in Centos 5.6.
>
> The version of ZFS-FUSE is that provided on the EPEL repository, and
> was installed on a 32-bit machine. I use it because of its
> deduplication facility.
>
>
Folks
My experiments with installing ZFS-FUSE in a Centos 6 system reveal
behavior different from that observed in Centos 5.6.
The version of ZFS-FUSE is that provided on the EPEL repository, and
was installed on a 32-bit machine. I use it because of its
deduplication facility.
In Centos 5.6
Folks
My experiments have shown that Samba behaves differently in Centos
5.6 and Centos 6 (updated).
In Centos 5,
service smb restart
restarts both smb and nmb.
In Centos 6, however, it restarts only smb.
REMEDY:
a) Make sure that both services running
b) Issue
chkconfig smb on
On Mon, 8 Aug 2011, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> To: CentOS mailing list
> From: m.r...@5-cent.us
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Funny Characters in Midnight Commander??
>
> Kai Schaetzl wrote:
>> I'm not seeing funny characters on that pic.
>>
> I do, or rather, I see some questionmarks just below the mi
Kai Schaetzl wrote:
> I'm not seeing funny characters on that pic.
>
I do, or rather, I see some questionmarks just below the middle of the
screen, that don't look like they belong.
mark
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.ce
I'm not seeing funny characters on that pic.
Kai
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On Mon, Aug 08, 2011 at 07:07:57AM +0700, "LHT. Qu???c" wrote:
> On 08/08/2011 12:01 AM, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 05, 2011 at 03:05:42PM +0700, LHT. Qu???c wrote:
> >> Does anyone try Xen in Kernel 3.0? I use "$ git clone
> >> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jeremy/xen.g
On 8/8/2011 8:43 AM, Johan Vermeulen wrote:
>Dear All,
>
> I'm sending this mail in relation to a post on the CentOs 6 forum :
>
>
> https://www.centos.org/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?topic_id=32545&start=0#forumpost139559
>
> CentOs 6 works great so far, and I do not want to sound impatient,
I'm on Centos 5.6 and I have a problem with the screen
showing funny characters when I run mc in a konsole
terminal window, under Xfce desktop.
Here's a link to what it looks like:
http://tinypic.com/view.php?pic=zojry1&s=7
Any ideas why mc is doing this?
Kind Regards,
Keith Roberts
---
On Mon, 8 Aug 2011, John Doe wrote:
*snip*
I do *everything* in the chrooted post, so that I can just shutdown
after install and the server is ready to be plugged.
It used to work fine with 5.x...
Everything also seems to work fine for 6.x, except for grubby.
I caught a "Grubby fatal error : un
From: Joseph L. Casale
> You don't need to do that. Add the updates repo as a 'repo' line
> in the ks, it will install anything new at once saving time and cruft.
The thing is that I setup the kickstart with the target network
configured (which will not work in our office), and then, in the post
Dear All,
I'm sending this mail in relation to a post on the CentOs 6 forum :
https://www.centos.org/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?topic_id=32545&start=0#forumpost139559
CentOs 6 works great so far, and I do not want to sound impatient, but
I'm eager to find out when Ltsp wou
>I did not move anything; it is a brand new install...
>The only thing that might be out of ordinary is that the yum update
>is made from a kickstart chrooted post script...
You don't need to do that. Add the updates repo as a 'repo' line
in the ks, it will install anything new at once saving tim
On Mon, 8 Aug 2011, John Doe wrote:
> To: CentOS mailing list
> From: John Doe
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6 kernel update and grub.conf...
>
> From: Keith Roberts
>
>>> I ran a yum update and it installed a new kernel.
>>> but it did not modify the grub.conf file.
>>> Is this the new be
From: Pete O'Connell
> hi, bash is unavailable to me on my machine unfortunately
> (it is a work machine) the command
> must be sent in a tsch shell. any way to do this in tsch?
Did you look at tcsh man page?
If you did, you must have noticed that it accepts the same '-i'
parameter as does bas
From: Keith Roberts
>> I ran a yum update and it installed a new kernel.
>> but it did not modify the grub.conf file.
>> Is this the new behavior or...?
>
> Have you moved grub.conf at all - like to a different boot
> partition, or changed any symlinks to grub.conf?
I did not move anything;
Am 08.08.11 11:12, schrieb Peter Hinse:
> Am 03.08.2011 11:23, schrieb Peter Hinse:
>
>>> we want to migrate our loadbalancers running CentOS 5.6 to new hardware
>>> and CentOS 6, however the (heartbeat-)ldirectord package seems to be
>>> hidden in the new LoadBalance repo in RHEL6. Any chance to g
Am 03.08.2011 11:23, schrieb Peter Hinse:
>> we want to migrate our loadbalancers running CentOS 5.6 to new hardware
>> and CentOS 6, however the (heartbeat-)ldirectord package seems to be
>> hidden in the new LoadBalance repo in RHEL6. Any chance to get the RHEL
>> SRPMs from this repo?
>
> just
Hi
this is my bridge structure
=
brctl show
bridge namebridge idSTP enabledinterfaces
*br0*8000.0023aea32e26no*eth0*
*tapxp*
31 matches
Mail list logo
