Hola.
hazle un df -h para ver la informacion en GB
deseas reducir el LVM
solo tienes 3 LVM
/
/boot
/ora06
disculpa asumo que el ora06 es una particion de alojamiento de b/d
por si acaso detuviste el servicio de la base de datos
y desmontaste la particion /ora06 y ejecutaste el
On 08/19/11 10:51 PM, John R. Dennison wrote:
On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 04:25:28PM +0200, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
In what way did TUV break php?
The package supplies php53 and not php - while this may arguably be
correct in some situations it is not the case across the board and
causes dep
On Saturday 20 Aug 2011 03:41:12 Craig White wrote:
On Fri, 2011-08-19 at 17:46 +0100, Anne Wilson wrote:
On Friday 19 Aug 2011 17:23:34 Anne Wilson wrote:
On Friday 19 Aug 2011 15:43:23 Tony Schreiner wrote:
NFS v4 problems maybe. Try setting a value for Domain in
I haven't seen -any- updates to centos 6 since July 10th?!? is 6.1
holding this up?
From the devel mailing list:
http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/2011-August/008071.html
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
On Friday 19 Aug 2011 15:39:12 Anne Wilson wrote:
I have just upgraded my server from CentOS 5 to CentOS 6 and am having
connectivity problems. My laptop runs Fedora 14, and I have been in the
habit of mounting data partitions on my server by fstab entries. Since
the update I've not been
On Sat, 2011-08-20 at 09:38 +0100, Anne Wilson wrote:
On Saturday 20 Aug 2011 03:41:12 Craig White wrote:
On Fri, 2011-08-19 at 17:46 +0100, Anne Wilson wrote:
On Friday 19 Aug 2011 17:23:34 Anne Wilson wrote:
On Friday 19 Aug 2011 15:43:23 Tony Schreiner wrote:
NFS v4 problems
On Sat, 2011-08-20 at 11:07 +0200, Mathieu Baudier wrote:
I haven't seen -any- updates to centos 6 since July 10th?!?is 6.1
holding this up?
From the devel mailing list:
http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/2011-August/008071.html
Time for upgrading 5.6. I wonder how
On Saturday 20 Aug 2011 12:05:51 Craig White wrote:
On Sat, 2011-08-20 at 09:38 +0100, Anne Wilson wrote:
On Saturday 20 Aug 2011 03:41:12 Craig White wrote:
On Fri, 2011-08-19 at 17:46 +0100, Anne Wilson wrote:
On Friday 19 Aug 2011 17:23:34 Anne Wilson wrote:
On Friday 19 Aug 2011
At Sat, 20 Aug 2011 00:16:02 -0700 CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org
wrote:
On 08/19/11 10:51 PM, John R. Dennison wrote:
On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 04:25:28PM +0200, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
In what way did TUV break php?
The package supplies php53 and not php - while this may
On Sat, 20 Aug 2011, Anne Wilson wrote:
Every attempt to mount was simply hanging - so no help at all. However, as
you will have seen by now, the problem is solved. I was right that I had
missed some steps, and you were right that the mount points at the server end
were not correctly set
On Sat, 2011-08-20 at 07:43 -0400, Robert Heller wrote:
(I did some magic with rpm -qa php\* sed to get the proper list of
stuff to remove and then install.)
One does not require the '\'
Server 6 : rpm -qa php\*
php-pdo-5.1.6-27.el5_5.3
php-mbstring-5.1.6-27.el5_5.3
On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 01:49:12PM +0100, Always Learning wrote:
On Sat, 2011-08-20 at 07:43 -0400, Robert Heller wrote:
(I did some magic with rpm -qa php\* sed to get the proper list of
stuff to remove and then install.)
One does not require the '\'
Yes you do. Especially if there
I haven't heard anything more about the centos tee shirts KB mentioned
a few weeks ago.
Have I missed out, or am I merely being too impatient? :)
--
Fred Smith -- fre...@fcshome.stoneham.ma.us -
The Lord detests the way of the wicked
On Sat, 2011-08-20 at 09:02 -0400, Stephen Harris wrote:
On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 01:49:12PM +0100, Always Learning wrote:
On Sat, 2011-08-20 at 07:43 -0400, Robert Heller wrote:
(I did some magic with rpm -qa php\* sed to get the proper list of
stuff to remove and then install.)
On Sat, 2011-08-20 at 09:07 -0400, fred smith wrote:
I haven't heard anything more about the centos tee shirts KB mentioned
a few weeks ago.
Have I missed out, or am I merely being too impatient? :)
Me neither.
I was considering ordering a large batch from China and selling them at
a low
On Saturday 20 Aug 2011 12:45:17 John Hodrien wrote:
On Sat, 20 Aug 2011, Anne Wilson wrote:
Every attempt to mount was simply hanging - so no help at all. However,
as you will have seen by now, the problem is solved. I was right that I
had missed some steps, and you were right that the
At Sat, 20 Aug 2011 13:49:12 +0100 CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org
wrote:
On Sat, 2011-08-20 at 07:43 -0400, Robert Heller wrote:
(I did some magic with rpm -qa php\* sed to get the proper list of
stuff to remove and then install.)
One does not require the '\'
One does for
On Sat, 20 Aug 2011, Anne Wilson wrote:
Hi, John. That sounds really useful, particularly on the netbook where I have
to remember to disable the mounts before travelling. The only problem is, I
don't know how to do that. Can you either describe it to me or point me to
suitable reading?
On 08/20/11 4:43 AM, Robert Heller wrote:
Different issues. php53*replaces* php. I did this on both a A CentOS
4 and two CentOS 5 machines. Mostly painless -- just needed to
pg x.y versions prior to 9.0 replaced the PG 8.1 that came in EL5 (9.0
and later install to new directories so they
I was certain I had missed some steps in setting up the exports, but simply
could not remember them. Nor could I find the guide that got me started
before. This morning I found it. I cannot recommend this guide too highly -
so you might like to bookmark it for a reference sheet - for next
pg x.y versions prior to 9.0 replaced the PG 8.1 that came in EL5 (9.0
and later install to new directories so they can exist side by side).
further, the newer libpq isn't directly compatible with the older libpq,
so this compat-libs package provides a 'shim' library to fake the older
On 08/20/11 10:33 AM, James Hogarth wrote:
That looks like the PGDG postgres repos to me and not the distribution
postgres package, What is done there is pretty much out of scope for
that which Redhat does for their postgres/postgres84 packaging.
yes, it is, but my point was, 'we' (or rather
I have a DRBL server, basically an nfs fileserver, which I am
rebuilding. I want to put the high i/o directories on a separate raid
array for performance. Currently everything is under / in one raid
array.
How can I tell which directories, obviously other than /home, are
getting high reads and/or
On Saturday 20 Aug 2011 17:58:13 John Hodrien wrote:
On Sat, 20 Aug 2011, Anne Wilson wrote:
Hi, John. That sounds really useful, particularly on the netbook where I
have to remember to disable the mounts before travelling. The only
problem is, I don't know how to do that. Can you either
When a web site is attacked, so far by unsuccessful hackers, my error
routine adds the attackers IP address, prefixed by 'deny', to that web
site's .htaccess file. It works and the attacker, on second and
subsequent attacks, gets a 403 error response.
I want to extend the exclusion ability to
On Sun, 2011-08-21 at 00:09 +0100, Always Learning wrote:
When a web site is attacked, so far by unsuccessful hackers, my error
routine adds the attackers IP address, prefixed by 'deny', to that web
site's .htaccess file. It works and the attacker, on second and
subsequent attacks, gets a 403
On 08/21/2011 01:09 AM, Always Learning wrote:
When a web site is attacked, so far by unsuccessful hackers, my error
routine adds the attackers IP address, prefixed by 'deny', to that web
site's .htaccess file. It works and the attacker, on second and
subsequent attacks, gets a 403 error
On Sat, 2011-08-20 at 17:03 -0700, Craig White wrote:
If you are determined to do that (have user apache capable of making
changes to iptables), you can have your script do it as sudo and make an
entry in /etc/sudoers to allow user apache to execute /sbin/iptables
commands without a
On Sun, 2011-08-21 at 02:50 +0200, Patrick Lists wrote:
Maybe SELinux blocks Apache from writing to /etc/sysconfig/iptables?
Have you looked at ? These apps seem to offer a
similar solution.
I'm not using SELinux at the moment simply because I don't have the time
to understand it. I'm a
When a web site is attacked, so far by unsuccessful hackers, my error
routine adds the attackers IP address, prefixed by 'deny', to that web
site's .htaccess file. It works and the attacker, on second and
subsequent attacks, gets a 403 error response.
Have you looked at mod_evasive?
--On Sunday, August 21, 2011 2:51 AM +0100 Always Learning
cen...@u61.u22.net wrote:
I am acutely conscious of being locked-out. I can get in remotely via
the console. However the very first entries in every server's iptables
have always been to allow 3 static IPs access. 3test comes later on
31 matches
Mail list logo
