CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2011:1481
Upstream details at : http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-1481.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
i386:
7932b5960c1173f1d8a3df5a756cbee8
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2011:1480
Upstream details at : http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-1480.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
i386:
7e93a0cdf0bfb9d0cadfba028ac975b8 ftp-0.17-37.el5.i386.rpm
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2011:1480
Upstream details at : http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-1480.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
x86_64:
0097ce658171d4c91b4a134e0d100212
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2011:1486
Upstream details at : http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-1486.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
i386:
793c2b5f4998f772cb890dba83b501e2 gawk-3.1.5-15.el5.i386.rpm
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2011:1486
Upstream details at : http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-1486.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
x86_64:
60e4f72f2f73381491e6bbfc6f5f7ed1
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2011:1484
Upstream details at : http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-1484.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
i386:
9c7bc4fe2d402ef82579e7959561fd30
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2011:1484
Upstream details at : http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-1484.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
x86_64:
1b76433c5d1f114c55aa4747445622d8
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2011:1490
Upstream details at : http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-1490.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
i386:
5f8c6c8842b831f47fed2ff69fbc6d78
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2011:1490
Upstream details at : http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-1490.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
x86_64:
5f8c6c8842b831f47fed2ff69fbc6d78
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2011:1492
Upstream details at : http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-1492.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
x86_64:
9979614f828ee17c098b01a714a8110b
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2011:1483
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-1483.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
x86_64:
ab306d609e179906da31f9bc3011cd0d
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2011:1483
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-1483.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
i386:
8978d824f071ae84d0c4462abd9c2e50
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2011:1491
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-1491.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
i386:
5a74f54650cd4d6014feba1a74278c6d
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2011:1491
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-1491.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
x86_64:
ac1ade89ac44a8f5438edd73e605d201
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2011:1482
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-1482.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
i386:
afb50677bbeeca7e486effd0afc9007c
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2011:1482
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-1482.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
x86_64:
afb50677bbeeca7e486effd0afc9007c
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2011:1487
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-1487.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
i386:
c3daaa20e0e4eba8f33e1ced81abfbc2
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2011:1487
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-1487.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
x86_64:
b34f9cdbf2df86eb8b4e9db2fe1a5b29
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2011:1488
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-1488.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
i386:
db3d031ab13da12298e0e4929a183f3d
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2011:1488
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-1488.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
x86_64:
31249ce37961b2a56ecfd286aa0ab0c5
Le 26/11/2011 20:01, John R Pierce a écrit :
On 11/26/11 2:42 AM, Guitart Francesc wrote:
I'm talking of one local account in the CentOS machine without
permissions to the network (this is why i'm trying to give them acces to
the NAS as your own network user account) where the users run a
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 4:22 PM, Guitart Francesc
francesc.guit...@enise.fr wrote:
if all the user processes are running as the same user ID, how do you
expect the file system to know what user is supposed to have access to
which share? what you're asking for is physically impossible. once
On 11/28/11 12:22 AM, Guitart Francesc wrote:
Sorry, maybe I haven't been clear. What I can do with Debian is to
forget the SMB password every time I get connect to NAS, in such a way
several network users can use the same local account. While, if I
understand correctly, you are talking on the
On Sat, 26 Nov 2011, Guitart Francesc wrote:
El vie, 25-11-2011 a las 11:03 +, John Hodrien escribió:
On Fri, 25 Nov 2011, Guitart Francesc wrote:
Thanks for your comment. You're right, but the problem arises with your
solution is that all users are using the CentOS machine login
You can try zabbix
www.zabbix.com
On 11/27/2011 08:01 PM, Kenneth Porter wrote:
What's available to remotely monitor services? What I'd like is something
that can run scripts for each service to connect to a port and verify that
it's up, and then send me an SMS message (phone text) to let me
Am 25.11.2011 14:43, schrieb Nicolas Thierry-Mieg:
Rainer Traut wrote:
Hi List,
I'm looking for an editor with file compare capabilities.
Gedit and kate don't seem to do this?
emacs does this
Thx guys, for all the answers, I tried the Diffuse Merge Tool and that
was well enough for my
On Sun, Nov 27, 2011 at 5:01 PM, Kenneth Porter sh...@sewingwitch.com wrote:
What's available to remotely monitor services? What I'd like is something
that can run scripts for each service to connect to a port and verify that
it's up, and then send me an SMS message (phone text) to let me know
Le 28/11/2011 09:27, Fajar Priyanto a écrit :
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 4:22 PM, Guitart Francesc
francesc.guit...@enise.fr wrote:
if all the user processes are running as the same user ID, how do you
expect the file system to know what user is supposed to have access to
which share? what
Le 28/11/2011 09:36, John R Pierce a écrit :
On 11/28/11 12:22 AM, Guitart Francesc wrote:
Sorry, maybe I haven't been clear. What I can do with Debian is to
forget the SMB password every time I get connect to NAS, in such a way
several network users can use the same local account. While, if I
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 7:40 AM, Guitart Francesc
francesc.guit...@enise.fr wrote:
1. Why use shared account?
Good question. This is a server that was already running when I started
working here. I don't know the software that has installed and prefer
not to touch a lot. That's the only
Le 28/11/2011 14:56, Les Mikesell a écrit :
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 7:40 AM, Guitart Francesc
francesc.guit...@enise.fr wrote:
1. Why use shared account?
Good question. This is a server that was already running when I started
working here. I don't know the software that has installed and
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 8:57 AM, Guitart Francesc
francesc.guit...@enise.fr wrote:
So what happened when all the users log in at once to the shared
account? I'd expect the mounted NAS to be available to everyone
regardless of who mounted it first. And if that's the case, why does
it matter
- Akemi Yagi amy...@gmail.com escreveu:
De: Akemi Yagi amy...@gmail.com
Para: CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org
Enviadas: Sexta-feira, 25 de Novembro de 2011 17:56:21 (GMT-0300)
Auto-Detected
Assunto: Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.1- RPS/RFS kernel patch
On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 11:49 AM,
On Mon, 28 Nov 2011, Les Mikesell wrote:
Logging out of the Gnome desktop should do it, but the whole concept
seems very wrong. Even if all the users are working at the same
console, they should have different logins.
+1
If you don't have separate logins, or delete and fully recreate the
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-annou...@centos.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
On Monday, November 28, 2011 11:23:57 AM Les Mikesell wrote:
Even if all the users are working at the same
console, they should have different logins.
You know, reading through this thread is frustrating.
Frustrating in that the OP's question has yet to be answered; instead, yet
again, the
Lamar Owen wrote:
On Monday, November 28, 2011 11:23:57 AM Les Mikesell wrote:
Even if all the users are working at the same
console, they should have different logins.
You know, reading through this thread is frustrating.
Yup.
Frustrating in that the OP's question has yet to be answered;
On Monday, November 28, 2011 12:40:59 PM m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
You missed one: he may not have the authority to do so.
Yep, I did. I keep forgetting that others don't have the flexibility that I
do, so thanks for that reminder.
___
CentOS mailing
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 11:50 AM, Lamar Owen lo...@pari.edu wrote:
On Monday, November 28, 2011 12:40:59 PM m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
You missed one: he may not have the authority to do so.
Yep, I did. I keep forgetting that others don't have the flexibility that I
do, so thanks for that
On Sun, 27 Nov 2011, Kenneth Porter wrote:
What's available to remotely monitor services? What I'd like is
something that can run scripts for each service to connect to a port
and verify that it's up, and then send me an SMS message (phone
text) to let me know which, if any, are down.
We
I finally decided to install the CR repo on one of my CentOS 6 machines that I
use as a host for some VMs (also running CentOS 6).
Before updating the host I updated a VM that was not critical to test the
process and was able to boot that VM, so I went ahead with updating the host
and the two
Is this available for CentOS and if so then where is this
package located? Yum cannot find it in the configured
repositories and I can seemingly only locate the
Scientific Linux version through Google.
--
*** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel ***
James B. Byrne
Les Mikesell wrote:
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 11:50 AM, Lamar Owen lo...@pari.edu wrote:
On Monday, November 28, 2011 12:40:59 PM m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
You missed one: he may not have the authority to do so.
Yep, I did. I keep forgetting that others don't have the flexibility
that I do, so
On 11/28/11 5:51 AM, Guitart Francesc wrote:
are you using smb mounts, or just smbclient with 'get/put' ftp-style
file access?
I don't know, how I can check it? What are using when you connect by
Connect to server Shared Windows ?
no idea, I hardly ever use gnome.
--
john r pierce
On Monday, November 28, 2011 01:15:30 PM Les Mikesell wrote:
None of which justifies someone else helping to continue a misguided
and insecure practice...
Not all systems are Internet connected, and not all sites need the same
security; one size does not fit all.
In the OP, we have a basic
On Wednesday, November 23, 2011 06:11:31 AM Guitart Francesc wrote:
How I can force always the request of login and password?
In System - Administration - Authentication, 'Options' tab, is 'Cache User
Information' checked?
___
CentOS mailing list
On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 4:03 AM, Lamar Owen lo...@pari.edu wrote:
On Wednesday, November 23, 2011 06:11:31 AM Guitart Francesc wrote:
How I can force always the request of login and password?
In System - Administration - Authentication, 'Options' tab, is 'Cache User
Information' checked?
I
Vreme: 11/28/2011 08:19 PM, James B. Byrne piše:
Is this available for CentOS and if so then where is this
package located? Yum cannot find it in the configured
repositories and I can seemingly only locate the
Scientific Linux version through Google.
As I can see, there is no such package
Hello,
Can someone explain why I don't get a timeout when I use the community string
public even if I don't have it
defined in my snmpd.conf file. It doesn't return data but it also doesn't
timeout. See example below.
...
rocommunity nobody 127.0.0.1
...
[root@L703108 pgsql]# snmpwalk -v 1 -c
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 11:19 AM, James B. Byrne byrn...@harte-lyne.ca wrote:
Is this available for CentOS and if so then where is this
package located? Yum cannot find it in the configured
repositories and I can seemingly only locate the
Scientific Linux version through Google.
I suggest
CentOS 5.7 x86_64. Lots of hosts NFS mounting a file system. All are
configured identically (same LDAP servers, same DNS, same autofs config,
same patches, etc). On some of them I see an NFS mount displaying a host
name:
% df -P | grep smt
hostname:/mnt/foo 1651345888 264620688 1386725200 17%
Hey guys and gals,
Anyone know of a half decent tool like DNSstuff.com only free?
I need to run some diag on a few domains but it is basically a 1 shot
deal and hard to justify buying.
thanks,
-Alan
--
“Don't eat anything you've ever seen advertised on TV”
- Michael Pollan, author of
Am 28.11.2011 22:52, schrieb Alan McKay:
Hey guys and gals,
Anyone know of a half decent tool like DNSstuff.com only free?
I need to run some diag on a few domains but it is basically a 1 shot
deal and hard to justify buying.
man dig
man nslookup
man whois
man traceroute
man dig
man nslookup
man whois
man traceroute
Clearly you've never used DNSstuff.com
Yeah, I can do all that, but the above tool does a full diagnosis for
you and makes debugging problems really quick and painless.
I could transmit this message via RFC1149, too, but it just would take
a lot
- Original Message -
Hey guys and gals,
Anyone know of a half decent tool like DNSstuff.com only free?
I need to run some diag on a few domains but it is basically a 1 shot
deal and hard to justify buying.
thanks,
-Alan
Check out:
http://www.intodns.com
--Tim
Am 28.11.2011 22:58, schrieb Alan McKay:
man dig
man nslookup
man whois
man traceroute
Clearly you've never used DNSstuff.com
yes becuase no need
Yeah, I can do all that, but the above tool does a full diagnosis for
you and makes debugging problems really quick and painless.
well
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 1:45 PM, Steve Thompson s...@vgersoft.com wrote:
CentOS 5.7 x86_64. Lots of hosts NFS mounting a file system. All are
configured identically (same LDAP servers, same DNS, same autofs config,
same patches, etc). On some of them I see an NFS mount displaying a host
name:
On 11/28/11 1:58 PM, Alan McKay wrote:
man dig
man nslookup
man whois
man traceroute
Clearly you've never used DNSstuff.com
actually, i have, and its failed to identify issues with stale and lame
NS records that I was able to easily find by hand with the 'hosts'
command which I use
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 10:38 AM, Emmett Culley emm...@webengineer.com wrote:
I finally decided to install the CR repo on one of my CentOS 6 machines that
I use as a host for some VMs (also running CentOS 6).
Before updating the host I updated a VM that was not critical to test the
process
Folks
I am trying to use the CR repo in for yum, but find that nothing is
getting updated. The repository isn't even listed in the yum run.
The file contents of /etc/yum.repo.d/CentOS-CR, after I adjusted the
priority is:
# CentOS-CR.repo
#
# The continuous release ( CR ) repository
On Mon, 28 Nov 2011 14:33:42 -0800
Akemi Yagi wrote:
Yes. The version of autofs must be different. It's a known issue and
has been resolved in later versions of autofs. Please see:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=725536
You are not authorized to access bug #725536. To see this
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 3:25 PM, Frank Cox thea...@sasktel.net wrote:
On Mon, 28 Nov 2011 14:33:42 -0800
Akemi Yagi wrote:
Yes. The version of autofs must be different. It's a known issue and
has been resolved in later versions of autofs. Please see:
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 03:25:33PM -0800, david wrote:
priority=3
Priority must be the same or lower than base/updates.
John
--
Whenever two people meet, there are really six people present. There is each
man as he sees himself, each
On Mon, 28 Nov 2011 15:31:06 -0800
Akemi Yagi wrote:
How about this one?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=735935
and
http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-1318.html
Those are public and readable.
--
MELVILLE THEATRE ~ Real D 3D Digital Cinema ~ www.melvilletheatre.com
On 11/28/2011 02:48 PM, Akemi Yagi wrote:
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 10:38 AM, Emmett Culleyemm...@webengineer.com
wrote:
I finally decided to install the CR repo on one of my CentOS 6 machines that
I use as a host for some VMs (also running CentOS 6).
Before updating the host I updated a VM
Priority
How is it ordered.
Is priority=1 more important than priority=2? If so, then I already have
at priority 1:
base, centosplus, updates, extras
at priority 2:
contrib
at priority 3
cr
at priority 10
epel
Or do I have it backwards?
At 03:34 PM 11/28/2011, you wrote:
On
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 04:07:27PM -0800, david wrote:
Please do not top-post to the centos mailing lists - thank you.
Is priority=1 more important than priority=2? If so, then I already have
Yes. highest priority is 0; lowest priority is 99.
at priority 1:
base, centosplus, updates,
At 04:32 PM 11/28/2011, you wrote:
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 04:07:27PM -0800, david wrote:
Please do not top-post to the centos mailing lists - thank you.
Is priority=1 more important than priority=2? If so, then I already have
Yes. highest priority is 0; lowest priority is 99.
at
On 11/28/2011 2:13 PM, Steve Clark wrote:
Hello,
Can someone explain why I don't get a timeout when I use the community string
public even if I don't have it
defined in my snmpd.conf file. It doesn't return data but it also doesn't
timeout. See example below.
...
rocommunity nobody
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 6:25 PM, david da...@daku.org wrote:
Folks
I am trying to use the CR repo in for yum, but find that nothing is
getting updated. The repository isn't even listed in the yum run.
The file contents of /etc/yum.repo.d/CentOS-CR
Is this a typo, or is the .repo extension
At 07:34 PM 11/28/2011, you wrote:
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 6:25 PM, david da...@daku.org wrote:
Folks
I am trying to use the CR repo in for yum, but find that nothing is
getting updated. The repository isn't even listed in the yum run.
The file contents of /etc/yum.repo.d/CentOS-CR
71 matches
Mail list logo
